簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林宜葶
Lin, Yi-Ting
論文名稱: 兒童在同儕互動中的對立語言
Strategies of Opposition in Children's Interaction
指導教授: 蘇席瑤
Su, Hsi-Yao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 157
中文關鍵詞: 對立兒童語言語用策略文字遊戲同儕互動
英文關鍵詞: opposition, child language, pragmatic strategies, language play, peer interaction
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204395
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:165下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本篇論文旨在研究臺灣兒童於同儕互動間產生對立時的語言表達策略,及其與成人間的差異。文中語料來源為台北市某小學三十二位低年級學生,於課間活動的對話。參與觀察的兒童共使用四大類不同的語言策略以表達自身的反對立場,包括挑戰(Challenge)、言語攻擊(Verbal abuse)、拒絕(Refusal)及異議語(Disagreement),這四大類語言策略可以更進一步細分為二十四種策略。兒童透過比較、挑戰、與批評以強調自身的優越;使用語言遊戲、禁忌語達成語言攻擊目的;拒絕和異議語則以不同的語用策略呈現。在質化與量化的比較下,語料分析結果顯示此年齡層的兒童跟成人同樣偏好使用強異議語,但相較於成人的表現,兒童表達不同意見的方式更為直接,不使用減弱詞來淡化其反對語言對與話者產生的面子威脅。從語言社會化的觀點來看,低年級的兒童在語言層面的使用上已有相當成熟的能力,能善用語言表達反對意見,但就其語用層面來看,仍無法充分使用符合華人社會所冀求的委婉、保全雙方顏面的表達方式。

    Opposition is prominent in children’s interaction, but a systematic analysis among Mandarin-Chinese speaking children in Taiwan is still lacking. This thesis aims to investigate children’s oppositional strategies in peer interaction and to compare children’s strategies with adults’. The analysis is based on the twenty-five hours of audio-and videotaped interactions in a public elementary school in Taipei. A total of 32 children in lower-grades (i.e., aged around 7 to 8) participated in the study. This study examines the data both quantitatively and qualitatively. On the basis of the spontaneous data, children’s opposition falls into four main types, including challenge, verbal abuse, refusal, and disagreement. Each type can be subdivided into various categories. Children may compare themselves with others, purposely challenge others’ courage, and criticize others’ performance and behavior in an attempt to show their superiority. Language play and taboo words/expressions are exploited as linguistic resources for verbal abuse. Refusal and disagreement are expressed by pragmatic strategies, including 10 refusal strategies (3 strong and 7 weak forms) and 9 disagreement strategies (5 strong and 4 weak forms). This study and previous research on adults’ opposition (Liao, 1994; Lin, 1999) suggests that both children and adults prefer aggressive strategies to passive ones. Nevertheless, children oppose more directly than adults with a great deal of minimal disagreement tokens. They seldom avoid confrontations. Different from adults, children rarely use downtoners, such as modals, contrast markers, and qualifiers. From the perspective of language socialization, it is suggested that lower-graders are linguistically competent but still learning to oppose in culturally appropriate ways since ‘saving face’ is highly valued in Chinese community.

    Table of Contents Chinese Abstract i English Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapter One Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Overview of the study 2 1.3 Organization of the thesis 4 Chapter Two Literature Review 5 2.1 Children’s language practices in peer interaction 6 2.2 Children’s conflict talk 10 2.3 Major elements in opposition: refusal and disagreement 16 2.3.1 Refusal 16 2.3.2 Disagreement 20 2.4 Language play 28 2.5 Linguistic and pragmatic strategies in joking 32 2.5.1 Linguistic triggers 33 2.5.2 Pragmatic strategies 35 Chapter Three Methodology 41 3.1 Data collection 41 3.2 Data analysis 44 3.2.1 Data transcription 44 3.2.2 Unit for analysis 44 3.3 Classification scheme 46 3.3.1 Challenge 48 3.3.2 Verbal abuse 49 3.3.3 Refusal 51 3.3.4 Disagreement 55 3.3.5 Interim summary 57 Chapter Four Results and Discussions 60 4.1 Overall distribution of strategies 60 4.2 Challenge 64 4.2.1 Comparing 65 4.2.2 Daring 68 4.2.3 Criticism 70 4.3 Verbal abuse 71 4.3.1 Teasing 73 4.3.2 Insulting 85 4.3.3 Teasing vs. Insulting 92 4.4 Refusal 95 4.4.1 Simple negation 97 4.4.2 Account 97 4.4.3 Suggestion 98 4.4.4 Evasion 99 4.4.5 Threat 100 4.4.6 Refutation 102 4.4.7 Counterclaim 103 4.4.8 Negated ability 104 4.4.9 Conditional acceptance 105 4.4.10 Dissuasion 106 4.5 Disagreement 107 4.5.1 Simple negation 108 4.5.2 Account 109 4.5.3 Suggestion 110 4.5.4 Evasion 110 4.5.5 Threat 111 4.5.6 Refutation 112 4.5.7 Correction 116 4.5.8 Clarification 117 4.5.9 Minimal disagreement token (MDT) 118 4.6 Comparison of children’s and adults’ oppositions 121 4.6.1 Refusal in children and adults 122 4.6.2 Disagreement in children and adults 124 4.7 Linguistic and pragmatic competence in children 140 Chapter Five Conclusion 145 5.1 Summary of the findings 145 5.2 Implications and limitations 148 Appendix 1. Consent form 150 Appendix 2. Transcription conventions 151 References 152

    References
    Ardington, Angela M. (2006). Playfully negotiated activity in girls’ talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 73–95.
    Beebe, L. M., & Takahashi, T. (1989). Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: Chastisement and disagreement. In M. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation (pp. 199–218). New York: Plenum Press.
    Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. Anderson, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the Development of Communicative Competence in a Second Language (pp. 55–73). New York: Newbury House.
    Benoit, P. J. (1983). The use of threats in children’s discourse. Language and Speech, 26, 305–329.
    Boggs, S. T. (1978). The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, 7, 325–344.
    Brenneis, D., & Lein, L. (1977). “You fruithead”: A sociolinguistic approach to children’s dispute settlement. In Ervin-Tripp. S. and Mitchell-Kernan. C. (Ed.), Child Discourse (pp. 49–65). New York: Academic Press.
    Cashman, H. R. (2006). Impoliteness in children’s interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(2), 217–246.
    Chen, X., Ye, L., & Zhang, Y. (1995). Refusing in Chinese. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language (pp. 119–163). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
    Chen, Yu-Cheng. (2012). A Study of Mandarin Refusal Strategies by Undergraduate Students in Taiwan with a Focus on Gender, Power Relation and Social Distance. MA thesis. Taichung: Providence University.
    Chen, Ting-Yi. (2016). Mandarin Speaking Children’s Expression of Negation in Mother-child Conversation. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: Some evidence from what children say and do. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The Child’s Conception of Language (pp. 17–43). New York: Springerverlag.
    Cook, G. (2000). Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Corsaro, W. A., & Rizzo, T. (1990). Disputes and conflict resolution among nursery school children in the US and Italy. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations (pp. 21–66). Cambridge University Press.
    Crystal, D. (1996). Language play and linguistic intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 12(3), 328–344.
    Crystal, D. (1998). Language Play. University of Chicago Press.
    Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367.
    Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: “The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research Language Behavior Culture, 1(1), 35–72.
    Culpeper, J. (2010). Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3232–3245.
    Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.
    Culpeper, J. (2015). Impoliteness strategies. In A. Capone & J. L. Mey. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society (pp. 421–445). Springer.
    Deneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 8(3), 285–298.
    Dienhart, J. M. (1999). A linguistic look at riddles. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 95–125.
    Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, P. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In A. E. Jane. & Martin D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 45–89).
    Dunn, J. (1988). The Beginnings of Social Understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Eder, D. (1988). American Sociological Association, 51(3), 225–235.
    Eder, D. (1990). Serious and playful disputes: variation in conflict talk among female adolescents. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations (pp. 67–84). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Eder, D. (1998). Developing adolescent peer culture through collaborative narration. In S. M. Hoyle & C. T. Adger (Eds.), Kids Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood (pp. 82–94). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Eisenberg, A. R. (1987). Learning to argue with parents and peers. Argumentation, 1, 113–125.
    Eisenberg, A. R., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149–170.
    Ely, R., & McCabe, A. (1994). The language play of kindergarten children. First Language, 14, 19–35.
    Farris, C. S. (1991). The gender of child discourse: Same-sex peer socialization through language use in a Taiwanese preschool. Journal of Linguistic Anthropolopy, 1(2), 198–224.
    Farris, C. S. (2000). Cross-sex peer conflict and the discursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(5), 539–568.
    Forman, R. (2011). Humorous language play in a Thai EFL classroom. Applied Linguistics, 32(5), 541–565. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr022
    Garvey, C., & Shantz, C. U. (1992). Conflict talk: Approaches to adversative discourse. In C. G. and C. U. Shantz (Ed.), Conflict in Child and Adolescent Development (pp. 93–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Goodwin, H. M. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 657–677.
    Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Formal cultural procedures for the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American Ethnologist, 7(4), 674–695.
    Goodwin, M. H. (1997). Children’s linguistic and social worlds. Anthropology Newsletter, 38, 3–4.
    Goodwin, M. H. (2001). Organizing participation in cross-sex jump rope: Situating gender differences within longitudinal studies of activities. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(1), 75–106.
    Goodwin, M. H. (2002). Exclusion in girls’ peer groups: Ethnographic analysis of language practices on the playground. Human Development, 45, 392–415.
    Goodwin, M. H. (2005). Interaction, language practice, and the construction of the social universe. Calidoscopio, 3(3), 184–195.
    Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. Philips, S. Susan, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective (pp. 200–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Goodwin, M. H., & Kyratzis, A. (2011). Peer language socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 365–390). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
    Grimshaw, A. D. (1990). Research on conflict talk: antecedents, resources, findings, directions. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations (pp. 281–324). New York: Allen D. Grimshaw.
    Guo, Yu-Feng. (2001). A Case Study on South-Min Pragmatic Characteristics and Development of a 2-year-old Child. MA thesis. Hsinchu: National Hsin-Chu Teachers College.
    Hadley, K. G. (2003). Children’s word play: Resisting and accommodating Confucian values in a Taiwanese kindergarten classroom. Sociology of Education, 76(3), 193–208.
    Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Play with language: Overextensions as analogies. Journal of Child Language, 11(1984), 337–346.
    Jong, Yih-ru. (2012). Children’s Refusal Strategy in Peer Talk. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychologlical Bulletin, 127(2), 229–248.
    Kotthoff, H. (1996). Impoliteness and conversation joking on relational politics. Folia Linguistica, 30(3-4), 299–326.
    Kuczaj, S. A. (1982). Language play and language acquisition. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 197–232). New York: Academic Press.
    Kuo, M. (2011). Children in arguments with peers: Young children’s strategies as opposer and opposee. In Z. Jing-Schmidt (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (pp. 123–132). University of Oregon, Eugene.
    Kuo, S. H. (1992). Formulaic opposition markers in Chinese conflict Talk. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics (pp. 388–402).
    Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 625–649.
    Kyratzis, A., & Guo, J. (2001). Preschool girls’ and boys’ verbal conflicts strategies in the United States and China. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(1), 45–74.
    Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insults. In Language in the Inner City (pp. 297–353). Urbana, IL: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
    Li, Guo-Zhen. (2012). A Study of Gender Differences in Refusal. MA thesis. Taichung: Providence University.
    Liao, Chao-chin. (1994). A Study on the Strategies, Maxims, and Development of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Crane.
    Lin, Zhi-yi. (1999). Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese Conversation. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Liu, Jung-yu. (2009). Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese: A Sociopragmatic Analysis. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Liu, Wenting. (2016). An analysis of doctor-patient conflict talks in Grey’s anatomy. Studies in Literature and Language, 12(1), 42–45.
    Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–486.
    Maynard, D. W. (1985a). How children start arguments. Language in Society, 14, 1–30.
    Maynard, D. W. (1985b). On the functions of social conflict among children. American Sociological Review, 50(2), 207–223.
    Milner, G. B. (1972). Homo ridens: Towards a semiotic theory of humor and laughter. Semiotica, 5(1), 1–30.
    Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(2), 225–256.
    Niemi, K. (2014). “I will send badass viruses.” Peer threats and the interplay of pretend frames in a classroom dispute. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 106–121.
    Pepicello, W. J., & Weisberg, R. W. (1983). Linguistic and humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Humor Research (pp. 59–83). New York: Springer.
    Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Redidel.
    Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163–191.
    Su, H.Y. (2009). Reconstructing Taiwanese and Taiwan Guoyu on the Taiwan-based Internet. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(2), 313–335.
    Su, H.Y. (2003). The multilingual and multi-orthographic Taiwan-based Internet: Creative uses of writing systems on college-affiliated BBSs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1).
    Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 807–837.
    Tu, Yi-Jun. (2014). Disagreements on Facebook Wall. MA thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Wang, Hui-wen. (2007). Dispreferred Responses in Mandarin Child Language. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Wang, Yu-fang. (1997). Dispreferred responses in Mandarin Chinese conversation. In The First Symposium on Discourse and Syntax in Chinese and Formosan Languages (pp. 103–134). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
    Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–63). New York: John Benjamins.
    Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Wu, Fei-Rong. (2010). Children’s Refusal Strategy in Mandarin Discourse: A Case Study. MA thesis. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
    Yang, Li-Chin. (2003). A Study of Young Children’s Production and Perception of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis. Taichung: Providence University.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE