研究生: |
林盈君 Lin, Ying-Jun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小資優學生智力、學業成就與創造力之關係研究 A Study on the Relationship between Intelligence, Academic Achievement, and Creativity in Gifted Elementary School Students |
指導教授: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong |
口試委員: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong 李乙明 Li, I-Ming 張世彗 Chang, Shih-Hui |
口試日期: | 2024/07/01 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 78 |
中文關鍵詞: | 國小資優學生 、智力 、學業成就 、創造力 |
英文關鍵詞: | elementary school gifted students, intelligence, academic achievement, creativity |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400860 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:110 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討國小資優學生的智力、學業成就及創造力之間的關係,以及不同背景變項對其表現的影響。本研究採調查研究法,研究對象為臺北市國小資優資源班的資優生,以魏氏兒童智力量表第四版及新編創造力測驗作為研究工具,所得資料以SPSS23進行分析,整理出以下研究結論:
一、資優學生的智力、學業成就及創造力表現良好,但存在個體差異,且不同性別及年級間的差異不明顯。
二、智力與學業成就呈現低度正相關。
三、智力與創造力呈部分負相關。
四、學業成就與創造力呈現低度負相關。
五、國小資優學生的智力對學業成就具有預測力。語文理解指數對國語總成績和社會總成績有顯著預測力;工作記憶指數和處理速度指數對數學總成績有顯著預測力;全量表智商、知覺推理指數和處理速度指數對自然總成績有顯著預測力。
六、國小資優學生的智力對創造力部分具有預測力。處理速度指數對流暢力有顯著預測力,工作記憶指數則對變通力有顯著預測力。
The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between intelligence, academic achievement, and creativity in elementary school gifted students, as well as the impact of different background variables on their performance. The study employed a survey research method, and the research subjects were gifted students in the gifted resource classes of elementary schools in Taipei City. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition, and a newly developed creativity test were used as research tools. Data were analyzed using SPSS23, yielding the following conclusions:
1.Gifted students demonstrate strong performance in intelligence, academic achievement, and creativity, but exhibit individual differences, with no significant differences observed based on gender or grade level.
2.There is a low positive correlation between intelligence and academic achievement.
3.Intelligence and creativity show a partial negative correlation.
4.There is a low negative correlation between academic achievement and creativity.
5.Intelligence predicts academic achievement in elementary gifted students. Specifically, verbal comprehension index significantly predicts scores in Chinese and Social Studies; working memory index and processing speed index significantly predict scores in Mathematics; overall IQ, perceptual reasoning index, and processing speed index significantly predict scores in Science.
6.Intelligence partially predicts creativity in elementary gifted students. Processing speed index significantly predicts fluency, while working memory index significantly predicts flexibility.
中文部分
丁振豐(1992)。因素分析取向與認知分析取向智力理論研究派典之比較。初等教育學報,5,253-262。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。心理。
王柏叡(2013)。國小學童學習壓力、玩興、學業成就與創造力之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
吳昆壽(2009):資優教育概論(第二版)。心理。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部。
呂宜純(2017)。國小高年級學生父母教養態度、美感素養、創造力與學業成就的關聯性探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。健行科技大學。
周宜平(2005)。智力性別出生序家庭社經地位與國一學生創造力傾向之關係〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
林珊如(1983)。國中資賦優異學生智力、認知發展、創造力與學業成就之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
特殊教育法(民國112年6月21日)修正公布。
特殊教育學生及幼兒鑑定辦法(民國113年4月29日)修正公布。
高靖岳(2011)。國中生智力因素、創意認知與科技創造力表現之關聯性研究—以創意燈具製作為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
莊力勳(2010)。創造力對學業成就研究-以苗栗縣國民小學為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。中華大學。
莊麗頤(2012)。提早入學資優生智力、學業表現及資優特質之追蹤研究—以新竹縣市為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
張世彗(2003),創造力-理論、技術/技法與培育。達雯印刷公司。
張世彗(2013)。創造力理論、技法與教學(第二版)。五南。
郭有遹(1991)。創造心理學。正中書局。
郭有遹(2001)。創造心理學(第三版)。正中書局。
郭靜姿(2004)。國小資優教育概況及其困境分析。教育資料集刊,38,1-19。
陳春方(2014)。從期望價值理論探討智力對學業成就之影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北市立大學。
張春興(2007)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華。
陳榮華、陳心怡(2007a):魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)中文版技術和解釋手冊。中國行為科學社。
陳榮華、陳心怡(2007b):魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)中文版指導手冊。中國行為科學社。
陳龍安(2002)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。心理。
蔡尚霖(2010)。國中數理資優生個人背景、智力、情緒智力及學業成就的關聯〔未出版之碩士論文〕。玄奘大學。
潘裕豐(2019)。高中美術資優班學生創造力、學業成就與藝術表現之關係研究。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),267 - 285。
盧祈銘(2015)。智力、創造力各成份與學業成績之相關探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺南大學。
謝發銓(2005)。國小學生運動技能、創造力與學業成績之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北市立體育學院。
謝宜芳(2017)。學生智力、家庭文化資本與學業成就之相關研究-以新竹市某國小為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立清華大學。
Clark, B.(2005)。啟迪資優:如何開發孩子的潛能(花敬凱譯)。心理。(原著出版於2002)
Davis, G., Rimm, S. & Siegle, D.(2012): 資優教育概論(潘裕豐、李乙明、于曉平、蔡桂芳、鄭聖敏、鄺靜辰、李俊偉、黃曉嵐、柯麗卿、桑慧芬譯)。華騰。(原著出版於2011)
Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J.(2014)。創造力:理論與當代議題面面觀(潘裕豐,Ed;張芝萱,Trans. )。華騰。(原著出版於2010)
Rober J. Sternberg, R. J. (2005)。創造力I•應用. Handbook of Creativity I• Theory.(李乙明,李淑真譯)。五南。(原著出版於1999)
Rober J. Sternberg, R. J. (2005)。創造力 II• 應用. Handbook of Creativity II• Practice.(李乙明,李淑真譯)。五南。(原著出版於1999)
英文部分
Amabile, T. M.(1983).The Social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M.(1987).The Motivation to be creative. In S. G. Isaksen(Ed.), Froniters of creativity Research.(pp.223-254). New York: Bearly Limited.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A.(2000). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students.The Templeton National Report on Acceleration, 1-92.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Going beyond the information given. WW Norton & Company.
Bruner, J. S. (1983). In search of mind: Essays in autobiography. Harper & Row.
Cunningham, G. K. (1986). Educational and Psychological Measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (2003). Handbook of gifted education. Allyn & Bacon.
Clark, B. (2007). Growing up gifted. NY:Macmillan.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B. & Siegle, D.(2011). Education of the gifted and talented (Sixth Ed.). NJ: Pearson.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gross, M. U. M. (2000). Exceptionally andprofoundly gifted students: an underserved population. Understanding ourgifted. 12(2), 3-9.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: origin and development. NY: World Books.
Haensly, P. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Creativity and intelligence: A multi-faceted relationship. Roeper Review, 12(1), 25-28.
Jung, S. S. (2002). A comparison of language learning styles among academically talented students and typical students in Korea. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 295-304.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 57-66.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20-47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004
Lovecky, D. V. (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15(4), 181-187.
Moon, S. M., & Brighton, C. M. (2008). The relationship between motivation and achievement for gifted mathematics students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 19(4), 194-208.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity:Personal and contextualfactors at work. Academy of Management Journal,39(3), 607-634.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Basic Books.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity, Phi Beta Kappen, 42, 305-310.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge University Press.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivated creativity in a culture conformity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Sternberg, R. J., O'Hara, L. A., & Lubart, T. I. (1997). Creativity as a decision process. Handbook of creativity, 189-212.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 3-15.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge University Press.
Siegler, R. S. (2005). Children's thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Swanson, H. L. (2008). What develops in working memory? A life span perspective. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 245-253.
Terman, L. M. (1926). Genetic Study of Genius (Vol. 1):Mental and physical traits of athousand gifted children. Stanford, CA:Stanford University press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt. Brace.
Williams, F.E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet (CAP): Manual. Buffalo: D.O.K. Publishers, Inc.
Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Profiles of cognitive abilities in intellectually gifted children: Implications for identification and intervention. Roeper Review, 34(1), 38-48.