研究生: |
郁嘉傑 Yu, Chia-Chieh |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
共享租賃車結合智慧停車系統使用意圖之研究—應用科技接受模式 A Study of Intention on The Use of Shared Rental Car with Smart Parking System-Application of Technology Acceptance Model |
指導教授: |
陳敦基
Chen, Dun-Ji |
口試委員: |
邱皓政
Chiou, Haw-Jeng 王中允 Wang, Chung-Yung |
口試日期: | 2021/07/21 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 132 |
中文關鍵詞: | 共享租賃車 、智慧停車系統 、科技接受模型 、使用意圖 、使用模式 |
英文關鍵詞: | Shared rental car, Smart parking service, Technology acceptance model, Use intention, Usage pattern |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100917 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:118 下載:14 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,共享租賃車在許多國家拓展服務據點,也在臺灣快速發展,然而,回顧我國目前共享租賃車發展,還在剛起步的階段,距離國外共享租賃車能做到的甲租乙還功能,還有很大的進步空間,且服務系統經常發生技術性問題,尚缺乏便利性和穩定性。因此,本研究回顧國外業者的解決方案,發現國外業者與智慧停車服務的供應商合作,藉由智慧停車系統提供的車輛定位、停車場管理、客戶數據蒐集等功能,來提升甲租乙還模式的服務品質,也能同步提升共享租賃車整體營運的效能,因此本研究計畫將共享租賃車加入智慧停車系統作為研究。
本研究探討結合智慧停車系統的新型態共享租賃車服務,是否為消費者帶來便利性和使用意圖?研究受訪者在城市內部使用模式及城際之間使用模式兩種不同模式有哪些差異性?以及研究不同背景變項的受訪者在使用意圖和其他構面上是否產生差異性?提供共享租賃車業者作為提升服務品質和創新的方向和建議。本研究以科技接受模型結合感知風險構面作為研究架構,分別創建城市內部與城際之間兩種模型,利用結構方程模型(SEM)建立各構面間的影響關係,並透過問卷調查取得研究資料,有效樣本數為405份。最後,利用IBM SPSS與IBM SPSS AMOS進行資料計算及分析。
研究結果發現「感知有用性」為影響使用意圖的關鍵因素,意即提升共享租賃車結合智慧停車系統的使用績效,能最有效提升受訪者的使用意圖;在使用模式的差異性上,受訪者對城際模式具有較高的偏好,但考量消費者的使用需求,兩種使用模式可以獨立並行發展;而在不同背景變項受訪者的差異性上,低、中年齡層的受訪者與已具有共享租賃車使用經驗的受訪者,推銷其功能性、方便性、實用性等具有最大的效果。
In recent years, shared rental cars have expanded service divisions in many countries and are also developing rapidly in Taiwan. However, reviewing the current development of shared rental cars in Taiwan.Compared with foreign shared rental cars that can pick up in A and return in B,we still have a long way to go. In addition, technical problems often occur in the service system, and the service lacks convenience and stability. Therefore, this research reviews the solutions of foreign companies. Foreign companies find smart parking system service providers.With the functions of vehicle positioning, parking lot management, customer data collection and other functions provided by the smart parking system, the service quality of the “pick up in A and return in B model” can be improved, and the overall operation efficiency of shared rental cars can also be improved simultaneously.
This research explores whether a new type of shared rental car service combined with smart parking service will bring convenience and use intentions to consumers? What are the differences between the two different modes of the intra-city and the inter-city? Are there differences in the various constructs of respondents with different background variables? The results will be provided to the shared rental car industry as suggestions for improving service quality and innovation. Finally, use software “IBM SPSS and IBM SPSS AMOS” for data calculation and analysis.
This study uses the technology acceptance model combined with the perceived risk construct as the research framework to create two models of intra-city and inter-city respectively. The structural equation model (SEM) is used to establish the influence relationship between the various constructs. The research data was obtained through questionnaire surveys, and the number of valid samples was 405.
The results of the study found that "perceived usefulness" is a key factor influencing use intention, which means that improving the use performance of shared rental cars combined with smart parking services can most effectively enhance the respondents' use intentions. In terms of the differences in usage patterns, the interviewees have a higher preference for the inter-city model.However, considering the needs of consumers, the two can be developed independently and in parallel. Respondents with different backgrounds, low- and middle-age respondents, and respondents with experience in using shared rental cars have the greatest effect in promoting its functionality, convenience, and practicality.
英文文獻
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior Action control (pp. 11-39): Springer.
Al-Turjman, F., & Malekloo, A. (2019). Smart parking in IoT-enabled cities: A survey. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101608.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960.
Bollen, K. A. (2005). Structural equation models. Encyclopedia of biostatistics, 7.
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models (Vol. 154): Sage.
Caulfield, B., & Kehoe, J. (2021). Usage patterns and preference for car sharing: A case study of Dublin. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 253-259.
Cheron, E. J., & Ritchie, J. B. (1982). Leisure activities and perceived risk. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(2), 139-154.
Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
DeMaio, P. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of public transportation, 12(4), 3.
Efthymiou, D., Antoniou, C., & Waddell, P. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transport policy, 29, 64-73.
Faqih, K. M. (2013). Exploring the influence of perceived risk and internet self-efficacy on consumer online shopping intentions: Perspective of technology acceptance model. International Management Review, 9(1), 67-77.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales.
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y., Wong, W.-M., & Tam, K.-Y. (2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of management information systems, 18(3), 97-124.
Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. ACR special volumes.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2), JCMC526.
Joo, J.-H. (2017). Motives for participating in sharing economy: Intentions to use car sharing services. The Journal of Distribution Science, 15(2), 21-26.
Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in human behavior, 26(3), 310-322.
Loose, W., Mohr, M., & Nobis, C. (2006). Assessment of the future development of car sharing in Germany and related opportunities. Transport Reviews, 26(3), 365-382.
Murray, K. B., & Schlacter, J. L. (1990). The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 18(1), 51-65.
Orssatto, R. J., & Clegg, S. R. (1999). The political ecology of organizations: Toward a framework for analyzing business-environment relationships. Organization & Environment, 12(3), 263-279.
Shoup, D. C. (2006). Cruising for parking. Transport policy, 13(6), 479-486.
Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of marketing, 27(3), 39-50.
中文文獻
吳淑慧(2020)。電子支付使用者使用關鍵因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,東吳大學會計學系,台北市。
吳琬盈(2017)。感知易用性、感知有用性、知覺利益、知覺風險與共享消費態度關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所(含碩專班),臺北市。
李長緯(2018)。感知易用性、感知有用性、使用態度與行為意圖之研究-以街口支付為例。未出版之碩士論文,實踐大學企業管理學系碩士班,台北市。
李政忠(2004)。網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議。資訊社會研究, 6,頁 1-24。
周令珩(2018)。以科技接受模型探討金融市場導入機器人理財之可行性。未出版之碩士論文,大同大學資訊經營學系(所),台北市。
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法 (二): 統計原理與分析技術)。
邵宜謙(2017)。人格特質、知覺風險與知覺價值對使用意願之影響-以Airbnb為例。未出版之碩士論文,東吳大學企業管理學系,台北市。
張皓筑(2017)。應用科技接受模式及聯合分析法初探「交通行動服務(MaaS)」之使用意圖與服務屬性偏好特性。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學運輸管理學系碩士班,新北市。
張錦特, 蘇姵芹, 何蕙萍, & 蘇百勝(2009)。以修正科技接受模式探討語音留言板互動功能之使用意願。電子商務學報, 11(3),頁 469-487。
郭裕元(2013)。以科技接受模式探討影響消費者使用智慧電動車意圖之要素。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學工學院工程管理碩士在職專班,台南市。
陳寬裕 & 王正華(2010)。結構方程模型分析實務: AMOS 的運用):五南。
曾春瑜(2013)。以延伸式科技接受模型探討行動支付帳單之使用意願。未出版之碩士論文,東吳大學資訊管理學系,台北市。
黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式-理論與應用):台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
劉潔蓉(2004)。消費者對網路銀行的信任、認知與使用意願之研究。未出版之碩士論文,崑山科技大學企業管理研究所,台南市。
賴彥廷(2016)。網路購物知覺價值、知覺風險、知覺易用與使用態度對使用意願影響之研究-以第三方支付服務為例。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學企業管理學系管理科學碩博士班,嘉義縣。
蕭文龍 & 陳世智(2018)。AMOS 結構方程模式最佳入門實用書。台北市:碁峰資訊。
網路引用
鷹式家族,汽車購車成本與租賃成本比較(2020),檢自:https://projecteaglet.com/irent-ir1316187/。
臺北市政府民政局,2021年1月臺北市人口統計(2021),檢自:https://ca.gov.taipei/News.aspx?n=8693DC9620A1AABF&sms=D19E9582624D83CB。
臺北市政府交通局,2020年臺北市停車位數(2020),檢自:https://www.dot.gov.taipei/News.aspx?n=EB7F7FF4E1CD8C7F&sms=A35DB7434E5F6C4E。
U指數(U-car),國內共享租賃車服務調查(2020),檢自:https://feature.u-car.com.tw/feature/article/62207。
iRent共享汽機車,iRent共享租賃車服務資訊(2021),檢自:https://www.easyrent.com.tw/irent/web/。
Zipcar共享汽車服務,Zipcar共享租賃車服務資訊(2020),檢自:https://zipcar.com.tw/。
Smart2go格上車共享,Smart2go共享租賃車服務資訊(2020),檢自:https://www.car-plus.com.tw/smart2go。
遠通電收,國內智慧停車服務資訊(2019),檢自:https://parking.fetc.net.tw/。
BABLE,歐洲智慧停車服務資訊(2020),檢自:https://www.bable-smartcities.eu/explore/solutions/solution/solution/smart-parking.html。
EVCARD,中國智慧停車服務資訊(2018),檢自:https://www.evcard.com/。
中租租車,2015年消費者年齡層統計資料(2015),檢自:https://www.rentalcar.com.tw/。
財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心,2020臺灣網路報告(2020),檢自:https://report.twnic.tw/2020/index.html