研究生: |
陳玠云 Chen, Jie-Yun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
小黃公車及計程車共乘對遊客運具選擇行為的影響-以宜蘭地區為例 The Effects of Taxi-Bus and Taxi-pool on the Tourist’s Mode Choice Behavior— A Case Study of Yilan area |
指導教授: |
陳敦基
Chen, Dun-Ji |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 106 |
中文關鍵詞: | 運具選擇 、多項式羅吉特 、小黃公車 、敘述性偏好 、個體選擇模式 |
英文關鍵詞: | Choice Behavior, Multinomial Logit Model, Stated Preference, Taxi-Bus, Disaggregate Choice Model |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001159 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:186 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
每逢假日會有許多搭乘大眾運輸的遊客規劃到宜蘭旅遊,然而搭乘宜蘭當地的大眾運輸很容易遇到不同運具在時間及金錢上的不確定性問題,為提升大眾運輸的服務品質及當地大眾運輸的使用率,本研究模擬在宜蘭熱門景點設定新型的運具服務-小黃公車、計程車共乘,藉此探討遊客在面對新運具及原有運具方案時的選擇行為及偏好,同時亦探討新運具加入優惠時,遊客對於運具選擇的行為。本研究採用敘述性偏好模擬羅東、宜蘭、礁溪轉運站分別到傳藝、金車酒廠、蘭陽博物館之間設計三個情境: (1) 原始票價、(2) 小黃公車提供來回20元等值現金點數以及計程車共乘提供8折優惠、(3)小黃公車提供來回20元等值現金點數以及計程車共乘提供65折優惠;同時,並提供小黃公車以及計程車共乘、市區公車三種運輸工具方案給遊客選擇,藉由三個情境來了解宜蘭總體遊客對於運具選擇的行為。本研究以網路問卷發放的方式並回收412份問卷,接著使用羅吉特模型來了解遊客對於每個方案選擇的機率,藉此了解運具的選擇偏好。
研究結果顯示:(1) 當小黃公車有提供7折優惠及計程車提供8折優惠時,多數受訪者會從市區公車方案轉移到小黃公車及計程車共乘方案;(2) 當共乘擴大優惠時,受訪者多數會選擇搭乘計程車共乘,其增加幅度亦最大的;(3)在總體成本彈性,共乘成本彈性較大,公車成本彈性較小,小黃公車成本彈性則是介於兩者之間;在時間彈性方面,計程車共乘彈性最小,公車彈性最大,小黃公車是介於兩者之間,(4) 在敏感度分析中,各運具都會隨著時間成本的正向變動,選擇機率的變動幅度會呈現負向的變動,當成本及時間負向變動時,則反之,其中計程車共乘在旅行成本變動最大,市區公車最小;在時間敏感方面,市區公車變動最大,小黃公車最小。最後,根據分析及結果提供相關建議可做為未來宜蘭規劃地區推動小黃公車以及計程車共乘的參考依據。
In every holiday, many tourists who take public transportation plan to visit Yilan area. However, taking local public transportation in Yilan is prone to time and money problems. In order to improve the service quality of public transportation and the usage rate of local public transportation, This research simulates two new types of transportation service-Taxi-bus and taxi sharing in popular attractions of Yilan area, in order to explore the tourist’s choices and preferences in the face of new transportation equipment and original transportation solutions. This study uses stated preferences to simulate the transfer stations of Luodong, Yilan, and Jiaoxi to Transart, Jinche Winery, and Lanyang Museum, respectively, and designs three scenarios. : (1) The original fare, (2) The Taxi-Bus provides round-trip cash equivalents of 20 yuan and a 20% discount for taxi sharing, (3) the Taxi-Bus provides round-trip cash equivalents of 20 yuan and provides a 35%discount for taxi pool. In the meantime,there are three n mode alternatives, including Taxi-bus, taxi-pool, and local bus, for the tourist to choose. Three scenarios are used to understand the Yilan tourists’s overall behavior regarding transportation mode choice. The study collected 412 questionnaires from network, then used the Logit model to estimate the tourist’s probability ofchoice in each situation, so as to understand the choice of transportation preferences.
The results showed that: (1) When taxi-bus offers a 30% discount and taxis-pool offers a 20% discount, most respondents will switch from the bus to the taxi-bus and taxi pool, (2) When expanding the discount, most respondents will choose to take taxi-pool, and the increase rate is also the largest. (3) In terms of the overall cost elasticity (CE), the CE of bus is the smallest, the CE of taxi-pool is the largest and the CE of taxi-bus is between both of then. In terms of time elesticity(TE), the taxi-pool has the smallest elasticity bus have the greatest one, and the TE of taxibus is between both of ttheml (4) In the sensitivity analysis, the probability of three mode alternatives will change in a positive direction with the reduction of time and cost. Taxi-pool has the largest change in cost, taxi-bus has the smallest change in time, and the bus has the largest change in times and the smallest change in cost. Finally, the of analysis, results,and suggestions in the study which will be referred for the future promotion of taxibus and taxipool in Yilan.
中文文獻
1. 鄭永祥(1994),機車使用者轉乘大眾捷運系統個體選擇行為之研究,交通大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
2. 龍天立(1976),戶到戶公共運輸系統在臺北市可行性之初步研究,運輸計劃季刊,5(1), 29-63。
3. 凌瑞賢(2001),運輸規劃原理與實務,鼎漢國際工程顧問股份有限公司,台北市。
4. 張顥鐘(2002),以敘述性偏好法探討迄點屬性對城際旅運者運具選擇行為之影響,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
5. 邱靜淑(2004),都市通勤者運具選擇行為之研究,國立暨南大學碩士論文。
6. 賴文泰 & 呂錦隆 (2008),應用涉入理論於運具選擇行為之研究,運輸計劃季刊, 37(2),237-262。
7. 許寶仁(2007),政府委外經營政策形成與執行作為之研究-以高速公路ETC案為例,國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
8. 李綠芬(2009),託運人對定期貨櫃航商電子交易服務系統之選擇行為研究,交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班運輸物流組學位論文。
9. 魏家儀(2010),偏遠地區居民運具選擇行為之影響因素分析,交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。
10. 周文生(2010),計程車共乘管理制度之探討。都市交通半年刊,1,18-34。
11. 張學孔、王穆衡等人(2010),需求反應式公共運輸服務整合型研究(2/3),交通部運輸研究所與中華智慧型運輸系統協會合作研究報告。
12. 邱榮和 & 陳柏熏(2011),兩岸直航旅客海空運運具選擇探討-以基隆至廈門間航線為例,航運季刊,20(3),1-17。
13. 林韋丞(2012),觀光地區遊客運具之選擇偏好-以台灣好 行日月潭線為例,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
14. 夏晧清(2013),以活動觀點研究法探討平日、週末假日活動時間價值之研究,國立成功大學都市計劃學系博士班。
15. 謝承憲、馮正民、林韋丞(2014)。觀光地區遊客運具之選擇偏好-以臺灣好行日月潭線為例。運輸學刊,26(1),35-62。
16. 李芊(2014),需求反應式運輸接駁服務乘客使用意願之研究,臺灣大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
17. 武伯原(2015),高速公路興建對遊憩及旅運行為之影響分析-以國道五號為例,交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。
18. 李映廷(2018),來臺觀光旅客之都市公共運具選擇,交通大學運輸與物流管理學系學位論文
19. 交通部統計處計程車營運狀況調查報告(2018)。
20. 交通部運輸研究所(2019),需求反應公共運輸服務(DRTS)執行成果之檢討,交通部運輸研究所。
21. 嚴國基(2019),道路旅次預約政策基礎分析模型之研究。運輸計劃季刊,48(1),29-62。
22. 洪宗賢(2019),電商社群平台會員制活化之研究─ 以丹爸社群電商團購平台為例,國立高雄大學國際高階經營管理碩士在職專班。
23. 王珮鈴(2019),探討高雄公車式小黃服務品質對使用行為之影響,成功大學碩士論文。
24. 黃佳寗(2019),歐洲推行 MaaS 經驗對我國發展智慧交通的啟示,經濟前瞻,186,87-90。
25. 自由時報(2009),觀光計程車 有專用標章。自由時報,取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/356941
26. 宜蘭觀光計程車(2010),宜蘭縣觀光計程車‧宜蘭縣汽車駕駛員職業工會‧宜蘭縣計程車客運商業同業公會‧宜蘭縣政府工商旅遊處觀光行銷科科長李岳儒:來宜蘭趴趴走計程車尚界讚~『宜蘭縣觀光計程車』親善大使專用標章有保障。隨意窩日誌。取自https://m.xuite.net/blog/newtaiwannet/662/40095539
27. 宜蘭縣政府(2015),宜蘭縣政府2015-06-15 1530紅配綠,悠遊宜蘭勁有趣!。取自:http://e-landbus.tw/eLandBus/HotNewsShow2.aspx?idx=45
28. 安哥宜蘭旅遊(2016),取自https://blog.xuite.net/angle625/twblog/143546135
29. 台灣車聯網頁協會(2017)。ETC訊息分享_下載遠通電收ETC APP,eTag用戶享好康!取自http://www.ttia-tw.org/news.php?wshop=ttia&Opt=detailed&tp=News&lang=zh-tw&news_id=22346
30. 台中市政府(2017),台中首條「小黃公車」路線 4月起免費預約搭乘。取自:https://www.taichung.gov.tw/993700/post
31. 胡照鑫(2018),交通部與中華電信合作開發UMAJI APP 推出十大亮點服務,匯流新聞網,取自https://cnews.com.tw/124181016a05/
32. 中華電信(2018),UMAJI 遊.買.集」APP 正式上市 行動支付獨享85折 掃碼驗票快速通行,中華電信,取自https://www.cht.com.tw/zh-tw/home/cht/messages/2018/msg-181016-164000
33. 遠通新聞(2018),下載正版ETC APP 夏日優惠齊發三大超商送抗暑好康 每月再抽萬元禮券20名。取自
34. 遠通電收。來自https://www.fetc.net.tw/UX/?GnOunE=k7iPUEZsuInhk3d74nK1PyAd8VcL6FoLArl7aaEEIUKx5jyybvs2_ZrTTG_vTJN5gYxujCtIJ0YcYDQTMGLqS6W3XFh6_u7SArBR06V3dVnQ.69vssTOTLY_K9Y2rXoPJlem4nlPQFlvdjqm
35. https://www.fetc.net.tw/UX/UX0901SharePoint/UX090104CompanyEventContent?EventsType=CompanyNews&EventID=285&EventTitle=下載正版ETC%20APP%20夏日優惠齊發%20三大超商送抗暑好康%20每月再抽萬元禮券20名&EventDate=06%2F01%2F2018%2000%3A00%3A00&zf0StZ=kOzTcqcGKSYboz7monlnGMxYwjaGAvomJcIDn69cD
36. 台中市政府(2018),市議員讚「小黃公車」成效好 交通局擴大規劃10條路線服務偏鄉。取自https://www.taichung.gov.tw/1081385/post
37. 李克聰(2018),連假塞車善用差別費率來解。財團法人國家政策研究基金會。取自https://www.npf.org.tw/1/19118
38. Jobus(2018)。宜蘭公車指南!搭公車暢遊宜蘭各大熱點全攻略!。取自https://jobus.tw/宜蘭/
39. 金門縣政府(2018),服務偏鄉 小黃公車試跑金沙地區。金門新聞。取自:https://www.kinmen.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=98E3CA7358C89100&sms=BF7D6D478B935644&s=45AA173ED857E1C4&Create=1
40. 李逸涵(2019),UMAJI下一步 師大教授陳敦基列三方向,智慧應用網,取自https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/package_show.asp?cat=158&id=0000554652_UEO5JLHV6YNQ681MM6B9C&packageid=13281
41. 侯俐安(2019),UMAJI結合線上支付和旅運規畫吸引日本取經,聯合新聞網,取自https://udn.com/news/story/7270/3987826
42. 李逸涵(2019),打造個人化旅運規劃 強化用戶黏著度是關鍵,智慧應用網,取自https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/package_show.asp?cat=158&id=0000554739_2fs6wrcc4j24ab8992kx6&packageid=13281
43. 台南市政府(2019),小黃公車再獲中央補助服務範圍再擴大更貼心。市府新聞。取自https://www.tainan.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=13370&s=4285303
44. 台南市政府(2019),小黃公車正式啟用多贏政策持續推動。新聞及國際關係處新聞傳播科。取自https://www.tainan.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=13370&s=3737775
45. 皇冠大車隊,高雄公車式小黃。取自https://www.crowntaxi.com.tw/wp/drts
46. 台東縣政府。臺東縣首辦需求反應式運輸服務 小黃公車【紅葉-鹿野】線29日通車典禮。取自http://www.taitung.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=E4FA0485B2A5071E&s=F13212EEC1039CAC
47. 台灣車聯產業協會(2019),基隆市「DRTS營運改善計畫」 山區公共運輸智能又潔能,取自:http://www.ttia-tw.org/news.php?wshop=ttia&Opt=detailed&tp=News&lang=zh-tw&news_id=22601
48. 台中市政府(2019),中市小黃公車明年再增5路線 前進太平霧峰。取自https://www.taichung.gov.tw/1363060/post
49. 芋傳媒(2019),貼心服務銀髮族 屏東小黃公車再升級。芋生活。取自:https://living.taronews.tw/2019/08/28/448616/
50. 低碳永續家園資訊網(2020)。推動公共運輸使用率提升計畫(縣市層級)。取自:https://lcss.epa.gov.tw/LcssViewPage/Responsive/AreaDoc.aspx?CityID=64000&ActDocId=5bb11f8d-22f5-4daf-a844-cd0159bd43b1
英文文獻
1. Antikainen, M. & Ahonen, M. (2007). How to attract customers to innovate in an online community maintained by a company. University of Tampere.
2. Bernstein, D. A. (2011). Essentials of psychology. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
3. Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V. & Ben-Akiva, M. (2012). Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transport Policy, 19(1), 93-104.
4. Bamberg, S. (2006). Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environment and behavior, 38(6), 820-840.
5. Ben-Elia, E. & Ettema, D. (2011). Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters’ travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(7), 567-582.
6. Ben-Elia, E. & Ettema, D. (2009). Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour—a study of willingness to participate. Transport policy, 16(2), 68-76.
7. Becker, J. U., Clement, M. & Schaedel, U. (2010). The impact of network size and financial incentives on adoption and participation in new online communities. Journal of Media Economics, 23(3), 165-179.
8. Edu, B.A. (2015) “Non-State Market Instruments for Responsible Oil and Gas Production: A Historical Study of Equitable Origin EO100TM Certification Scheme” JWHSD, 1(4), 8-23.
9. Chang, S. J., Chen, H. Y. & Chen, H. C. (2019). Mobility as a service policy planning, deployments and trials in Taiwan. IATSS Research, 43(4), 210-218。
10. Diana, M. (2010), “From Mode Choice to Modal Diversion: A New Behavioural Paradigm and an Application to The Study of The Demand for Innovative Transport Services,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 429-441.
11. Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C. & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a social media perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
12. Gärling, T. & Fujii, S. (2009). Travel behavior modification: Theories, methods, and programs. The expanding sphere of travel behaviour research, 97-128.
13. Hu, X., Chiu, Y. C. & Zhu, L. (2015). Behavior insights for an incentive-based active demand management platform. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 4(2), 119-133.
14. Hockenbury, D. H. & Hockenbury, S. E. (2003). Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
15. Hossain, M. (2012, May). Users' motivation to participate in online crowdsourcing platforms. In 2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research. 310-315.
16. Hoh, B., Yan, T., Ganesan, D., Tracton, K., Iwuchukwu, T. & Lee, J. S. (2012). TruCentive: A game-theoretic incentive platform for trustworthy mobile crowdsourcing parking services. In 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 160-166.
17. Jin, L. & Huang, Y. (2014). When giving money does not work: The differential effects of monetary versus in-kind rewards in referral reward programs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(1), 107-116.
18. Killeen, Peter(1982). Incentive theory. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 29. 169-216.
19. Litman, T. (2011). Transportation elasticities. How prices and other factors affect travel behavior, 24.
20. Maki, A., Burns, R. J., Ha, L. & Rothman, A. J. (2016). Paying people to protect the environment: A meta-analysis of financial incentive interventions to promote proenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 242-255.
21. Meloy, M. G., Russo, J. E. & Miller, E. G. (2006). Monetary incentives and mood. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 267-275.
22. O'Fallon, C,. Sullivan, C., and Hensher, D. A., (2004) “ Constraints Affecting Mode Choices by Morning Car Commuters", Transport Policy, 11, 17-29.
23. Praveen S.(2017). "Incentive Theory of Motivation," in Psychestudy. Retrieved from https://www.psychestudy.com/general/motivation-emotion/incentive-theory-motivation.
24. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Briere, N. M. & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35-53.
25. Paulini, M., Maher, M. L.& Murty, P. (2014). Motivating participation in online innovation communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10(1), 94-114.
26. Riggs, W. (2017). Painting the fence: Social norms as economic incentives to non-automotive travel behavior. Travel Behaviour and Society, 7, 26-33.
27. Sumner, R. L. (1993). U.S. Patent No. 5,182,555. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
28. Sinha, Somesh & Verma, Priyanka. (2018). Consumer’s Response towards Non-Monetary and Monetary Sales Promotion: A Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11. 500-507.
29. Sarah M.S. (2012). Incentive Theory of Motivation. Retrieved from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/incentive-theory-of-motivation
30. Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. Elsevier.
31. Tshube, T., Akpata, D. & Irwin, B. (2012). The use of nonmonetary incentives as a motivational tool in sports. Psychology Research, 2(11), 662.
32. Yanez, M. F., Raveau, S., and Ortuzr, J. de D.,(2010).“Inclusion of Latent Variables in Mixed Logit Models: Modelling and Forecasting", Transportation Research Part A, 44, 744-753.