簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林雅芬
Lin, Ya-Fen
論文名稱: 國小高年級學童恆毅力量表的編製及其與創造力之相關研究
The Development of “Traditonal Chinese version of the Grit Scale’’(GS-TC) and a Research on the Relationship of GS-TC and Creativity
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 創造力發展碩士在職專班
Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 62
中文關鍵詞: 恆毅力努力持續性創造力興趣穩定性學業成就
英文關鍵詞: academic achievement, consistency of interests, creativity, grit, perseverance of effort
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.MPCD.005.2019.F02
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:408下載:50
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 恆毅力(Grit)這一概念最早由美國心理學家Angela L. Duckworth等人在2007年提出,所謂恆毅力指的是對長期目標的毅力與熱情。過去研究多以國中以上學生、成人為研究對象,少有研究者針對國小學童進行量表編製。據此,本研究即欲發展一套適合國內國小學童使用的恆毅力量表:正體中文版「恆毅力量表」(GS-TC)。本量表翻譯自Duckworth et al.(2007)所編製的「恆毅力量表」,在中文化修訂上分為三個部分,首先以225位國小高年級學童進行預試分析,並針對預試結果進行題意修訂。根據項目分析及探索性因素分析結果,GS-TC各題項間具有良好的鑑別度,且具有穩定的二因素結構,量表總題數也經刪題從原來12題變為11題。第二部分對407位國小高年級學童進行信度分析、效標關聯效度(五大人格特質-嚴謹性/自我控制/努力自我調節)的檢定及驗證性因素分析。結果顯示,GS-TC具有穩定的二因素結構,兩分量表之內部一致性穩定(興趣穩定性分量表α = .70,努力持續性分量表α = .78),且與各效標間的關係也符合預期,二因素結構大致符合適配度指標的標準門檻。最後再額外抽取53位國小高年級學童間隔三週後施測,結果顯示,GS-TC具有良好的再測信度(r = .52 ~ .64)。綜合上述,透過三群不同的樣本比較來看,GS-TC具有穩定的信、效度,且適合國小高年級學童使用。此外,研究者進一步以GS-TC探究國小高年級學童的恆毅力對學業成就、創造力的相關情形,結果顯示GS-TC與國小高年級學童學業成就及創造力有低度正相關。最後本研究針對GS-TC之後續研究與應用進行延伸討論。整體而言,GS-TC能有效測量國小高年級學童之恆毅力,亦能延伸探討其學業成就與創造力之相關,對教育、社會與人格心理學等領域具有實際應用的價值。

    The concept of Grit was first proposed by American psychologists Angela Duckworth et al. in 2007 and is defined as perseverance and passion for long-term goals. However, most researchers focused on junior high school students and adults instead of children in the past. This study is trying to develop a scale called Traditonal Chinese version of the Grit Scale(GS-TC) that is applicable to elementary school students. The GS-TC was translated from the English version of the Gtit Scale mentioned by Duckworth et al.(2007) and can be divided into three parts.
    First, starting a pilot study of the GS-TC with 225 Taiwanese 5-6 grade students then revised the questions according to the analysis of the results. It showed not only good discrimination but also stable two-factor structure. The total amount of questions were adjusted from 12 to 11. Second, reliability analysis of results from a formal test with 407 Taiwanese 5-6 grade students suggested that GS-TC demonstrated high internal consistency for each factor (Consistency of Interests, α = .70; Perseverance of Effort, α =.78). Moreover, criterion-related validity analysis results suggested that the relationships between the subscales and criterions and roughly in line with expectations. These results demonstrated the whole construct effectiveness of GS-TC. The goodness-of-fit indices and confirmatory factor analysis of results provided evidence for the composite reliability of the scale. Third, good test-retest reliabilities from .52 to .64 were supported by results from 53 Taiwanese high grade elementary school students after an interval of three weeks. These findings suggest that the GS-TC could aim to high grade elementary school students to measure with good reliability and validity. In addition, GS-TC has a lower posititvely correlated relationship with academic achievement and creativity of high grade elementary school students. Finally, potential theoretical and practical applications of the measure were discussed. In conclusion, GS-TC could effectively measure the grit of high grade elementary school students, and further discuss the reationship with academic achievement and creativity. For educational, social, and personality psychological domains, it was practical applied valuable.

    謝誌 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 iv 表次 vi 圖次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4 第三節 名詞解釋 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 恆毅力的歷史演進與定義 6 第二節 恆毅力的相關研究 8 第三節 恆毅力的相關概念 14 第四節 恆毅力的相關變項 17 第五節 正體中文版恆毅力量表編製 22 第三章 正體中文版恆毅力量表之預試分析 24 第一節 題目翻譯 24 第二節 題目預試 26 第三節 預試結果 26 第四節 討論 30 第四章 正體中文版恆毅力量表之正式施測 33 第一節 信、效度檢驗 33 第二節 恆毅力對國小高年級學童學業成就與創造力之相關情形 39 第三節 討論 41 第五章 結論 43 第一節 結論 43 第二節 研究限制與建議 45 參考文獻 47 一、中文部分 47 二、英文部分 49 附錄 56 附錄一:Duckworth et al.(2007)所編製的原始英文版恆毅力量表 56 附錄二:正體中文版「恆毅力量表」(預試) 58 附錄三:正體中文版「恆毅力量表」(正式) 59 附錄四:五因素人格特質量表 60 附錄五:自我控制量表 61 附錄六:努力自我調節量表 62

    一、中文部分
    毛連塭(1994)。創造力的涵意及其概念的闡析。國小特殊教育,17,1-7。
    毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力的研究。臺北市:心理。
    石培欣(2000)。國民中學學生家庭環境、同儕關係與學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    李德高(1991)。創造心理學。臺北市: 五南。
    吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部。
    吳靜吉、丁興祥、邱皓政主編(2002)。創造力的發展與實踐。臺北市: 五南。
    吳明隆(2012)。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市:五南。
    林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市: 心理。
    邱皓政、丁興祥、林耀南、陳育瑜、林碧芳、王詩婷、賴靜儀、柯怡安、陳佳筠、何潤娥(譯)(2009)。創造力:當代理論與議題。(原作者:Mark A Runco)。臺北市: 心理。
    邱發忠、姚妃宴(2010)。調整焦點、目標時間距離對創造力表現的影響。教育心理學報,41,497-520。
    邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(2008)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊,50,125-145。
    洪慧芳(譯)(2017)。恆毅力。(原作者:Angela Duckworth)。臺北市:天下雜誌。
    唐銘、劉儒德、高欽、莊鴻娟、魏軍、邸妙詞(2016)。調節聚焦對高中生恆毅力水平的影響:學業情緒的中介作用。心理與行為研究,14(4),479-485。
    陳昭儀(1992)。創造力的定義及研究。資優教育季刊,44,12-17。
    陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北市:五南。
    陳李綢(2008)。中學生個人特質測量與適應性指標研究。教育心理學報,40(2),323-340。
    陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報:教育類,39,127-149。
    彭震球(1991)。創造性教學之實踐。臺北市:五南。
    張春興(2002)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華。
    張世彗(2007)。創造力理論、技法與教學。臺北市: 五南。
    張世彗(2011)。創造力教學、學習與評量之探究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,1-12。
    張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君(2010)。教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響。復興崗學報,99,151-172。
    張旭中、邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君(2011)。調節焦點動機、成功預期對創造力與批判性思考的影響。教育心理學報,43(2),499-520。
    賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。臺北市:開明。
    楊坤原(2001)。創造力的意義及其影響因素簡介。科學教育月刊,239,3-12。
    葉明正(2002)。創造力的意涵-四P概述。生活科技教育,35,9,7-14。
    盧雪梅(1990)。創造性的人格特質。創造思考教育,2,19-39。
    饒見維(2005)。創造力思考訓練:創造思考的心理策略與技巧。臺北市:五南。
    蕭佳純(2014)。延岩交叉相關與潛完成長模式在創造力傾向與科技創造力關係問之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,39 (2),87-107。

    二、英文部分
    Amabile, T. M.(1983). The social psychology of creativity : Acomponential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
    Amabile, T. M.(1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    Barrick M. R., & Mount M. K.(1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of applied Psychology,75(1),111.
    Baumeister R. F., Bratslavs E., Muraven M., & Tice D. M.(1998).Ego depletion:Is the active self a limited resource.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,5,1251-265.
    Chang, W.(2014). Grit and academic performance: Is being grittier better?(Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article_2319&context_oa_dissertations
    Chen, C.S.,(2002).Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course. Information Tecnology,Learning and Performance Journal.20(1):11-25
    Cox C. M.(1926). Genetic studies of genius:The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses(Vol. 2, pp.216-217). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Cross, T. M.(2014). The gritty: Grit and non-traditional doctoral student success. The Journal of Educators Online, 11. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1033306.pdf
    De Dreu C. K. W., & Nijstad B. A.(2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648-661.
    Dholakia U.M., Gopinath M., Bagozzi R.P., & Nataraajan R.(2006).The role of regulatory focus in the experience and self-control of desire for temptations.Journal of Consumer Psychology,16(2),163-175.
    Doljonac,R.F.,(1994).Using Motivational Factors and Learning Strategies to Predict Academic Success. Dissertation abstracts International.56(01).142A
    Dornbusch, S.M., Ritter, P.L., Leiderman, P.H., Roberts, D.F., & Fraleigh, M.J.(1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58, 1244-1257.
    Duckworth A. L., Peterson C., Matthews M. D., & Kelly D. R.(2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.
    Duckworth A. L., & Quinn P. D.(2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale(Grit-S).Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166-174.
    Duckworth A. L.(2011).The significance of self-control. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences.108(7).2639-2640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019725108
    Duckworth A.L., Teri A. Kirby, Eli Tsukayama, Heather Berstein, & K.Anders Ericsson.(2011).Deliberate Practice Spells Success:Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550610385872
    Duckworth A.L., & Gross, J. J.(2014). Self-control and grit related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319–325. doi:10.1177/0963721414541462
    Duckworth A. L., & David Scott Yeager.(2015) Measurement Matters:Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes. Educational Researcher, 4.
    Ericsson K. A., & Charness N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
    Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S. A., & Duckworth, A. L.(2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace,school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036
    Förster J., Higgins E. T., & Idson L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the ‘‘goal looms larger’’ effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115-1131.
    Förster, J., & Higgins E. T. (2005). How global vs. local processing fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636.
    Friedman R. S., & Förster J.(2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492.
    Friedman R. S., & Förster J.(2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
    Guilford, J. P.(1988). Some changes in the structure of intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-4.
    Gottfredson L.S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life .Intelligence, 24,79–132.
    Henry, J. (2009). Enhancing creativity with M. U. S. I. C. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55, 2.
    Higgins E. T.(1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
    Hirt E. R., Devers E. E., & McCrea S. M.(2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230.
    Hochanadel Aaron, & Finamore Dora.(2015). Fixed and Growth Mindset in Education and How Grit Helps Students Persist in the Face of Adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 1.
    Hough L. M., & Ones D. S.(2002). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. Personnel Psychology,233–277. doi:10.4135/9781848608320.n13
    Isen A.M.(1985). The asymmetry of happiness and sadness in effects on memory in normal college students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 388-391.
    In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, M. Csikszentmihalyi(Eds.). Creativity and development(pp. 15-29). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, INC.
    Joanne P. Rojas. (2015).The relationships among creativity, grit, academic motivation, and academic success in college students. Theses and Dissertations--Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology. 39. Retrieved from https://ukno-wledge.uky.edu/edp_etds/39/
    Katherine Meunks, Allan Wigfield, Ji Seung Yang, & Colleen R. O’Neal.(2017).How True Is Grit? Assessing Its Relations to High School and College Students’ Personality Characteristics, Self-Regulation, Engagement, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology.109(5),599-620.
    Katherine R. Von Culin, Eli Tsukayama, & Angela L. Duckworth. Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals.(2014). The Journal of Positive Psychology:Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, Vol.9. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.898320
    Li, Caihong.(2015).The short grit scale : a dimensionality analysis. Theses and Dissertations--Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology. 33. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_etds/33
    McCrae R. R., & John O. P.(1992). An introduction to the five - factor model and its applications. Journal of personality,60(2), 175-215.
    Neisser U., Boodoo G., Bouchard T. J. J., Boykin A. W., Brody N,, & Ceci S J.(1996).Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
    O'Brien .T B., & DeLongis A.(1996). The Interactional Context of Problem ,Emo-tion,and Relationship-Focused Coping: The Role of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of personality ,64,775-813.
    Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T. and McKeachie, W.J.,(1991).Self-regulated Learning Strategies. Retrieved from http://www.jan.ucc.nau.edu.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J.(1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning; Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
    Roberts B. W., & Mroczek D.(2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science,1(1), 31-35.
    Robertson-Kraft Claire, & Duckworth Angela L.(2014).True Grit: Trait-level Perseverance and Passion for Long-term Goals Predicts Effectiveness and Retention among Novice Teachers.Teach Coll Rec,116(3).
    Rojas, J. P., & Usher, E. L.(2013). Exploring correlations among creativity, grit, and mathematics achievement in socioeconomically diverse schools. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky. Retrieved from http:// sites.education.uky.ed-u/motivation/files/2013/08/RojasUsher.pdf
    Roy F., Baumeister Kathleen. D., & Vohs Dianne M.(2007).The Strength Model of Self-Control.Curren Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 351-355.
    Runco, M.(2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academy Press.
    Rusu A., Hojbota A.M., & Constantin,T.(2013).Beyond the asymmetries between pleasure and pain.An exploratory study of the links between regulatory focus,trait affectivity and motivational persi.Annals of the AI.i.Cuza.University Psyc-hology,22(1),89-102.
    Schwarz N.(2000). Emotion, cognition and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 433-440.
    Se lfhout M., Burk W., Branje S., Denissen Van Aken M., & Meeus W.(2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of personality,782,509-538.
    Seibt B., & Förster J.(2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38-56.
    Sinclair R. C., & Mark M. M.(1992). The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser(Eds.), The construction of social judgments(pp. 165- 193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.(1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
    Sternberg, R. J.(2003). The development of creativity as a decision-making process. Creativity and Development(pp.91-138). doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.003.0004
    Strayhorn, T. L.(2014). What role does grit play in the academic success of Black male collegians at predominantly White institutions? Journal of African American Studies, 18, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12111-012-9243-0
    Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L.(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
    Terman L. M., & Oden M. H.(1947).The gifted child grows up:Twenty-five years’ follow-up of a superior group. Oxford, England:Stanford University Press, 137(2), 189-190.
    Unger, A., Bi, C., Xiao, Y. Y., & Ybarra, O.(2016). The revising of the Tangney Self‐control Scale for Chinese students. PsyCh journal, 5(2), 101-116.
    Webb E. (1915).Character and intelligence. British Journal of Psychology ,1(3), 99.
    West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R., Duckworth, A. L.,Gabrieli, C. F., & Gabrieli, J. D.(2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 148–170. doi:10.3102/0162373715597298

    下載圖示
    QR CODE