目的: 探討臺灣青少年男子網球選手與挑戰賽網球選手比賽中主要表現及其對比賽之影響。方法:本研究拍攝2014年三太子盃挑戰賽會內賽三十二強起至冠亞軍決賽（31場）和O.P.I.美傑仕盃全國A級青少年排名賽之16歲組八強起至冠亞軍決賽（7場）兩個不同層級賽事，共計38場比賽40名男子選手的比賽對戰實況為研究對象，並以混合設計二因子變異數分析對比賽進行統計分析。結果:一、不同層級選手在發球局三階段得分表現（直接得分，接拍得分與對峙得分）有交互作用存在(F = 69.326，p <.05)，在直接得分、接拍得分方面，挑戰賽選手＞青少年選手，在對峙得分方面，則為青少年＞挑戰賽選手；二、在接發球局之接發回擊情況（被發球得分，攻擊性回擊與防守性回擊）有交互作用存在(F = 74.520，p <.05)，在被發球得分方面，挑戰賽選手＞青少年選手，而在攻擊性回擊與防守性回擊，則為青少年＞挑戰賽選手；三、不同層級選手在保發率也有所不同（挑戰賽:80%；青少年:52%），在發球局時保發及破發球局之主要得分表現有交互作用存在(F = 508.646，p <.05)，不同層級選手在發球優勢與對峙得分方面，保發球局＞破發球局；四、挑戰賽冠軍選手與非冠軍選手在主要得分表現有交互作用存在(F = 8.614，p <.05)，在發球優勢上，冠軍選手＞非冠軍選手，在對峙得分與所有失分，非冠軍選手＞冠軍選手。結論:一、在發球局得分表現挑戰賽選手是以直接得分，而青少年選手則是以對峙得分為主要得分表現；二、在接發球局不同層級選手皆是以防守性回擊作為主要回擊表現；三、發球優勢（直接得分、接拍得分）是挑戰賽選手成功保發的原因；四、發球優勢與接拍成功率是挑戰賽冠軍選手贏球的關鍵。

Purpose: This research investigates the major game performance of Taiwan junior tennis players and Challenger tennis players and its impact on the match. Methods: For the purpose of this research, the research uses 2014 San Tai Zhi cup (Challenger level) 31 matches, and O.P.I Level A Taiwan National Junior Championship 16/U 7 matches from quarter finals to collect data to conduct this research. Data collection for this research was analyzed by two-way ANOVA mixed design. Results: 1.) The game performance of players of different levels during service games (service winner, one-two punch, rally winners) exists an interaction effect (F = 69.326，p <.05). Challenger players have more service winner and one two-punch than junior players. Junior players have more rally winners than Challenger players. 2.) During return game’s return situation (service winner from the opponent, aggressive returns, passive returns) exists an interaction effect. (F = 74.520，p <.05). Service winners from the opponent for Challenger players is more than those of junior players’. Junior player has more aggressive and passive return than those of Challenger players’. 3.) Players of different levels have a different percentage of service games hold. (Challenger players: 80%; Junior players: 52%) (F = 74.624，p <.05). Players of different levels during service games that were held have more serving advantage and rally winners than during service games that were broken. 4.) The major game performance of non-champion challenger players and challenger champion exists an interaction effect (F = 8.614，p <.05). Challenger champion has more serving advantage than challenger players. Challenger champion has more rally winners and totally point loss combined than those of challenger players’ Conclusions: 1.) Challenger players win primarily from service winners, while junior players win primarily from rally winners. 2.) During return games, players of different levels all use passive return as their main return performance. 3.) Serving winner (service winners, one-two punch) is the reason for challenger player’s high percentage for service games held. 4.) Serving advantage and one-two punch are the key to winning for challenger champion player.

中文部分：
王鶴森、林偉毅、趙曉涵（2005）。網球發球落點與技術相關表現之研究：以2004 年美國網球公開賽男子單打賽為例。體育學報，384，109-120。

王鶴森（2006）。預測發球局贏率在網球發球策略之應用。大專體育，84，158-162。

李建平（2003）。網球技術型態與比賽策略之探討。中華體育季刊，17(2)，50-56。

李建平（2004）。國內優秀男子網球選手單打發球對比賽勝負關係之研究。體育學報，36，227-237。

李鑑芸（2009）。網球接發球技術應用分析。台大體育學報，104，95。

連玉輝（2004）。現代男子強勢網球(Power Tennis)之研究：深度訪談的質化探討。體育學報，37，113-131。

林瞭祿（1999）。網球單打技術型態研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

林永安（1994）。網球發球不同慣用手選手之球路與落點之比較與探討。臺灣體育，
73，39-47。

張文件（2004）。網球的發球技術及發展趨勢。安慶師範學院學報，5，100-102。

張凱隆（2008）。頂尖職業選手發球優勢探討-以2007 年四大公開賽男女單打比賽為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

張碧峰、陳志榮（2009）。職業網球選手比賽中發球與接發球比賽勝負影響之研究。運動教練科學，16，67-76。

張志堅（2006）。網球發球技術分析與接發球戰術運用。雲科大體育，9，119-124。

黃僅喻（2012）。職業網球選手 Djolovic 與 Federer 對戰各階段得分之比較研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
廖上瑋（2013）。職業網球選手 Djolovic 與 Nadal 對戰比較研究-以紅土球場為例 （未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

劉錦璋、張凱隆（2012）網球發球優勢的意義與應用。屏師體育學刊，15，221-229頁。

劉中興、李彩滿（1997）。華裔網球名將張德培發球與接發球表現之探討。大專體育，36，113-118。

謝侑達（2011）。從納達爾與費德勒對戰比賽中探討頂尖網球選手的得分優勢。（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

英文部分：
Barnett, T. J., & Clarke, S. R. (2002). Using Microsoft Excel to model a tennis match. In 6th Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport (pp. 63-68). Bond University, Queensland, Australia.

Barnett, T., & Clarke, S. R. (2005). Combining player statistics to predict outcomes of tennis matches. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 16(2), 113-120.

Barnett, T., Meyer, D., & Pollard, G. (2008). Applying match statistics to increase serving performance. J Med Science Tennis, 13(2), 24-27.

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Bmj, 310(6973), 170.

Cabill, D. Tactics of the baseline player, coaching& sport science review. 10th year issue27, 2002.

French, K. E., Nevett, M. E., Spurgeon, J. H., Graham, K. C., Rink, J. E., & McPherson, S. L. (1996). Knowledge representation and problem solution in expert and novice youth baseball players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(4), 386-395.

Furlong, J. D. G. (1995). 43 The service in lawn tennis: how important is it?. Science and racket sports, 266.

Hizan, H., Whipp, P., & Reid, M. (2011). Comparison of serve and serve return statistics of high performance male and female tennis players from different age-groups. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(2), 365-375.

King, H. A., & Baker, J. A. (1979). Statistical analysis of service and match-play strategies in tennis. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences.

Klaassen, F. J., & Magnus, J. R. (2003). Forecasting the winner of a tennis match. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(2), 257-267.

McCraw, P. D. (2011). Making the Top 100: ITF Top 10 junior transition to Top 100 ATP tour (1996–2005). COACHING & SPORT SCIENCE REVIEW.

McMahon, G. and de Mestre, N. (2002). Tennis serving strategies. In G. Cohen andT. Langry (Eds.), Sixth Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport. University of Technology, Sydney.

McPherson, S. L. (1999). Expert-novice differences in performance skills and problem representations of youth and adults during tennis competition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 233-251.

Newton, P. K., & Keller, J. B. (2005). Probability of winning at tennis I. Theory and data. Studies in applied Mathematics, 114(3), 241-269.

Pestre, B. (1998). Improving the game in fast courts through tactical situations. ITF CSSR, 14, 13-15.

Pollard, G. N. (2008). What is the best serving strategy. J Med Sci Tennis, 13(2), 34-38.

Pollard, G. N., Pollard, G. H., Barnett, T., & Zeleznikow, J. (2009). Applying tennis match statistics to increase serving performance during a match in progress. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 14(3), 16-19.

Pollard, G. N., & Pollard, G. H. (2007). Optimal risk taking on first and second serves. Proceedings of Tennis Science & Technology, 3, 273-280.