簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝宛靜
Hsieh, Wan Ching
論文名稱: 國中資優生校園霸凌經驗之調查研究
A Survey on the Bullying Prevalence of Gifted Students in Junior High Schools
指導教授: 杞昭安
Chi, Chao-An
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 102
中文關鍵詞: 國中資優生校園霸凌
英文關鍵詞: gifted students in the junior high school, school bullying
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:197下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國中資優生校園霸凌之現況及其在性別、年級上的差異情形。本研究以臺北市246名國中資優資源班學生為研究對象,並以自編的「國中資優生校園欺凌經驗調查問卷」為研究工具,蒐集之資料以描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、相依樣本變異數分析進行統計分析。茲將研究發現歸納如下:
    (1)國中資優生從幼稚園到八年級期間,曾遭到同儕霸凌者約占四成六。其中曾遭同儕霸凌的女生約占四成八,男生約佔四成五。
    (2)國中資優生所經驗的十五種霸凌行為中百分比最高的前五項依次是:遭同學惡意取笑、同學用髒話辱罵、同學取不喜歡的綽號、被其他同學排擠孤立、故意推撞。
    (3)國中資優生校園霸凌經驗大致呈現隨著年級漸增,次數亦逐步提高的趨勢;高峰則出現在七年級,八年級次之,六年級又次之。
    (4)國中資優生在不同霸凌行為方式所知覺之困擾程度,從高到低前五項依次是:遭同學惡意取笑、遭同學取不喜歡的綽號、遭同學孤立排擠、遭同學用髒話辱罵、遭徒手毆打。
    (5)不同霸凌類型感受困擾程度的平均數差異達顯著水準,由高至低依次是:關係霸凌、言語霸凌、肢體霸凌、性霸凌、涉及犯罪之霸凌。事後比較,除「關係霸凌」與「言語霸凌」之間無顯著差異外,其餘霸凌類型之間均達顯著差異。
    (6)比較國中資優生在五種霸凌類別所知覺的困擾程度,判斷屬於校園霸凌者均顯著高於判斷非屬於校園霸凌者。
    (7)國中資優生判斷不算是校園霸凌的理由大致有:屬於開玩笑性質、屬於偶發事件、傷害程度尚可接受、行為人無傷害意圖、當事人仍能自我防衛或反擊、視為常態性發展或人性的一部分。
    (8)國中資優生判斷可界定為校園霸凌的理由大致有:被害人感覺苦惱或不舒服、該行為針對同一對象且重複發生、程度超越人我互動的界線、行為者的傷害意圖或實際造成的傷害效應。

    The purpose of this survey was to investigate the bullying prevalence of the gifted students in junior high schools. Gifted eighth graders (N=246) in Taipei city participated in this retrospective study, which explored the prevalence of being bullied and being a bully during nine school years. Data were collected by a self-developed questionnaire and were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0, applying descriptive statistics analysis, independent sample t-test, One-Way ANOVA. The findings were as the following:
    1.Prevalence of being bullied at some time dring nine school years (K-8) was 46.7%, among which 48.7% was female, and 45.0% was male.
    2.The top five most prevalent kind of bullying were as the following in descending order: (1) being made fun of, (2) being called names, (3) being called unacceptable nicknames, (4) being socially excluded, (5) being pushed or shoved around.
    3.28.1% seventh graders had experienced at least one kind of bullyinig with the frequency higher than once a week,which was the most prevalent grade, following by 24.4% eighth graders and 22.4% sixth graders. There were significant differences among the prevalence of five types of bullying in different grades. The prevalence ascended as the grade added on, and usually peaks at six to eight grades.
    4.The top five worst impact of being bullied were as the following in descending order: (1) being made fun of, (2) being called unacceptable nicknames, (3) being socially excluded, (4) being called names, (5) being hit.
    5.There were significant differences among the psychological impact of being bullying. Among the five type of bullying, Relational Bullying bothered the gifted students most, followed by Verbal Bullying, Physical Bullying, Sexual Bullying, and Criminal Bullying.
    6.There were significant differences between the impact of those incidencs being categorized as school bullying and those not being defined as though.
    7.While the incidence not being defined as school bullying, the rationales utilized by the gifted junior high school students were as the following: (1) They were just kidding. (2) It was accidental, not intentional. (3) The harm was minimal and acceptable. (4) The perpetrator didn’t mean it. (5) The victim still can fight back or defend him/herself. (6) Bullying was developmentally normal or part of human nature.
    8.While the incidence being categorized as school bullying, the rationales applied by the gifted junior high school students were one of the following: (1) The victim was harmed or upset. (2) It targeted repeatedly at the same person. (3) It transgress normal human interaction or boundaries. (4) The perpertrator meant it or caused substancial harm.

    第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題………………………………………4 第三節 名詞釋義……………………………………………………6 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………8 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………9 第一節 校園霸凌的定義、類型與測量……………………………9 第二節 校園霸凌盛行率及其在性別與年齡上的差異情形………20 第三節 資優生校園霸凌經驗及其對社會心理發展之影響………24 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………37 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………37 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………39 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………41 第四節 研究步驟……………………………………………………44 第五節 資料處理……………………………………………………46 第四章 結果與討論………………………………………………47 第一節 不同性別與資優類別之國中資優生校園霸凌經驗現 況分析…………………………………………………………47 第二節 國中資優生校園霸凌行為類別及其在性別、年級之 差異分析.………………………………………………………………50 第三節 國中資優生知覺困擾程度與霸凌行為類別之關係…………60 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………69 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………69 第二節 建議…………………………………………………………72 參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 75 中文部分…………………………………………………………………75 英文部分…………………………………………………………………76 附錄…………………………………………………………………85 附錄一 國中資優生校園欺凌經驗調查問卷…………………………85 附錄二 開放性問題整理.……………………………………………96

    中文部分
    吳雅真(2009):校園霸凌現況調查與介入措施之個案研究。東海大學公 共事務研究所碩士論文。
    李惠怡(2004):防治國小學童校園欺凌行為教學計畫及其成效之研究。 臺北市立教育大學社會學習領域教學碩士論文。
    沈邑蓎(2009):「酷凌行動」計畫在國中表演藝術課程的實踐-以校園衝 突、霸凌為主軸。國立臺南大學戲劇創作與應用學系碩士論文。
    周秀玲(2008):高中職生受凌因素之研究—以嘉義市為例。國立中正大 學犯罪防治所碩士論文。
    林采霖(2011):受傷者的話療─聆聽校園霸凌受害者的生命故事。國立 臺灣大學新聞所碩士論文。
    林苡彤(2008):國中生關係攻擊角色與規範信念、同理心、人際衝突因 應策略之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導所碩士論文。
    邱珍琬(2001):國小校園欺凌行為與教師對應策略。屏東師院學報,15, 41-80。
    柯宜呈(2007):國中女生受欺凌經驗之探究。國立高雄師範大學性別教 育研究所碩士論文。
    高禎禧(2008):國小學童情緒智力與校園欺凌態度之相關研究。國立新 竹教育大學人資處輔導教學碩士論文。
    張秀如(2006):國中生欺凌受害經驗之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔 導與諮商系教學碩士論文。
    莊季靜(2006):國中學生同儕攻擊者之社會訊息處理歷程研究。國立臺 灣師範大學教育心理與輔導所碩士論文。
    陳秋琪(2009):彰化縣某國中學生受霸凌類型及其相關因素研究。國 立臺灣師範大學衛生促進與衛生教育系碩士論文。
    彭彥凌(2008):反校園霸凌之生活技能教學介入成效探討。 國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系碩士論文。
    黃志弘(2009):高雄地區國小高年級學童生命態度與校園霸凌行為關係 之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育系碩士論文。
    黃貴貞(2010):大學生回溯被霸凌經驗之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育 心理與諮商所碩士論文。
    楊雅鈴(2009):父母教養方式與校園暴力行為關係之研究。國立高雄師 範大學教育系碩士論文。
    鄔佩麗(1997):校園暴力行為之預防及處理策略模式研究。教育心理學 報,27,137-176。
    鄔佩麗、洪儷瑜(1997):校園暴力行為之診斷與處理策略研究。教育心 理學報, 29,177-214。
    劉炘衢(2009):國小校園霸凌現況與防治教育需求調查研究-以雲林縣為 例。國立中正大學犯罪防治所碩士論文。
    劉哲宇(2009):台北市國小高年級學生校園霸凌行為之研究。臺北市立 教育大學社會學習領域教學碩士論文。
    蔡嘉玲(2009):台南縣完全中學學生受霸凌經驗與恐懼感氣氛相關之研 究-以霸凌態度為中介變項。南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發 展所碩士論文。
    鄭雅尹(2009):國小霸凌防治課程設計之研究。臺北市立教育大學心理 與諮商教學所碩士論文。
    顏正芳(2010):兒童青少年校園霸凌經驗和心理健康之關聯性。台灣精 神醫學, 24,1,3-14。
    魏麗敏、黃德祥(2009):臺灣校園欺凌行為受害學生特質之分析研究。 臺中教育大學學報,23,1,175-196。

    英文部分
    Aluede, O., Adeleke, F., Omoike, D., & Afen-Akpaida, J. (2008). A review of the extent, nature, characteristics and effects of bullying behaviour in schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 151-158.
    Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118(1), 130-138.
    Austin, S., & Joseph, S. (1996). Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year‐olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 447-456.
    Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117-127.
    Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3), 177-188.
    Bond, L., Wolfe, S., Tollit, M., Butler, H., & Patton, G. (2007). A comparison of the gatehouse bullying scale and the peer relations questionnaire for students in secondary school. Journal of School Health, 77(2), 75-79.
    Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(1), 73-87.
    Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(02), 203-214.
    Campbell, A. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(3), 237-264.
    Chan, J. H. F. (2006). Systemic patterns in bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 27(3), 352-369.
    Clarke, A. T. (2006). Coping with interpersonal stress and psychosocial health among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 10-23.
    Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., & Kim, T. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization. In S.R. Jimerson, S.M. Swearer, & D.L. Espelage (Eds), Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective, (pp.347-362). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22-36.
    Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
    Duncan, N. (1998). Sexual bullying in secondary schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 16(2), 27-31.
    Duncan, N. (1999). Sexual bullying : Gender conflict pupil culture in secondary schools. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2-3), 123-142.
    Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? The School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-384.
    Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571-579.
    Furlong, M. J., Sharkey, J. D., Felix, E. D., Tanigawa, D., & Green, J. G. (2010). Bully Assessment: A call for increased precision of self-reporting procedures. In S.R. Jimerson, S.M. Swearer, & D.L. Espelage (Eds), Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective , 329-345. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Glew, G. M., Fan, M., Katon, W., Rivara, F. P., & Kernic, M. A. (2005). Bullying, psychosocial adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine, 159(11), 1026-1031.
    Grant, K. E. (2006). Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: Evidence of moderating and mediating effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(3), 257-283.
    Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(04), 441-455.
    Hoover, J. H., Oliver, R., & Hazler, R. J.(1992). Bullying: Perceptions of adolescent victims in the midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 13(1), 5-16.
    Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children's coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 267-278.
    Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., & Henttonen, I. (1999). Children involved in bullying: Psychological disturbance and the persistence of the involvement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(12), 1253-1262.
    Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., Henttonen, I., Almqvist, F., Kresanov, K., Linna, S. L., . . . Tamminen, T. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(7), 705-717.
    Mishna, F. (2009). Bullying of lesbian and gay youth: A qualitative investigation. British Journal of Social Work, 39(8), 1598-1614.
    Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
    Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., & Ruan, W. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 730-736.
    Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.
    Neary, A., & Joseph, S. (1994). Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 183-186.
    Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Oxford: Hemisphere.
    Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin J. B. Asendorpf (Ed.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 315-341). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Olweus, D. (1996). Bullying at school: Knowledge base and an effective intervention programa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 794(1), 265-276.
    Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying. In S.R. Jimerson, S.M. Swearer, & D.L. Espelage (Eds), Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective (pp.9-33). NY, New York: Routledge.
    Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259-280.
    Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 216-224.
    Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Connolly, J. A., Yuile, A., McMaster, L., & Jiang, D. (2006). A developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 376-384.
    Peterson, J. S.(2002). A longitudinal study of post-high-school development in gifted individuals at risk for poor educational outcomes. Journal of Secondary Gifted Eduation, 14, 6-18.
    Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006a). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148-168.
    Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006b). Bullying among the gifted: The subjective experience. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 252-269.
    Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 80-88.
    Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry / La Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 48(9), 583-590.
    Rigby, K. (2007). Bullying in schools: and what to do about it . Sydney: Acer Press.
    Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among australian children and implications for psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 33-42.
    Robinson, N.M.(2002). Introduction. In M. Neihart, S.M. Reis, N.M. Robinson, & S.M. Moon (Eds.) The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What do we Know, (pp.31–37).Washington: Prufrock press.
    Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukialnen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
    Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 30-44.
    Savickas, M. L. (1999). The transition from school to work: A developmental perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 47(4), 326-336.
    Shute, R. (2008). Everyday victimization of adolescent girls by boys: Sexual harassment, bullying or aggression? Sex Roles, 58(7-8), 477-489.
    Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education,72(3-4) , 36-58.
    Silverman, L., Neilhart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S.M. Reis, N.M. Robinson, & S.M. Moon (Eds.) The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What do we Know,( pp. 31–37).Washington: Prufrock press.
    Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26(1), 1-9.
    Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., & Liefooghe, A. P. D. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a Fourteen–Country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119-1133.
    Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101-110.
    Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the olweus Bully/Victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239-268.
    Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 441-464.
    Sowa, C. J., McIntire, J., May, K. M., & Bland, L. (1994). Social and emotional adjustment themes across gifted children. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 17(2), 95-98.
    Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 435-450.
    Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ?theory of mind?: A critique of the ?social skills deficit? view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117-127.
    Swearer, S. M., Grills, A. E., Haye, K. M., & Cary, P. T. (2004). Internalizing problems in students involved in bullying and victimization: Implications for intervention. Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention, , 63–83.
    Swearer, S. M., Turner, R. K., Givens, J. E., & Pollack, W. S. (2008). ``You're so gay!'': Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males? School Psychology Review, 37(2), 160-173.
    Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Underwood, M. K., Galenand, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why Can’t we all just get along? Social Development, 10(2), 248-266.
    Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3-25.
    Whitted, K. S., & Dupper, D. R. (2005). Best practices for preventing or reducing bullying in schools. Children & Schools, 27(3), 167-175.
    Wortman, C. B. (1983). Coping with victimization: Conclusions and implications for future research. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 195-221.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE