簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳宗學
Wu, Zong-Syue
論文名稱: 教師身分與回饋模式對教師校園創新推廣策略數位模擬學習之影響
Effects of Teacher’s Identity and Type of Feedback on Teachers’ Learning of Innovation Diffusion Strategies from Computer Simulation
指導教授: 陳明溥
Chen, Ming-Puu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 模擬式學習創新推廣回饋策略教師身分學習成效
英文關鍵詞: simulation learning, teachers’ identities, diffusion of innovation, feedback strategies, learning performance
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204921
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:185下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探究不同的回饋策略(資訊回饋、績效回饋)與不同的教師身分(職前教師、在職教師)對教師透過數位模擬學習校園創新推廣策略的學習成效影響。參與本研究之在職教師樣本來自於桃園、台北、新北市的國小、國中、高中;而職前教師之樣本來自於師範院校在學之實習教師,樣本總數共121人。研究設計採因子設計,自變項包括回饋策略與教師身分,「回饋策略」依據學習者所選用之創新推廣策略後由系統給予的回饋形式分為資訊回饋與績效回饋;「教師身分」則依據學習者為在職教師與否分為在職教師與職前教師;依變項為校園創新推廣策略之學習成效。

    研究結果顯示:(1)就在職教師而言,在數位模擬學習活動時使用資訊回饋,其校園創新推廣策略的學習成效優於使用績效回饋;相對地,(2)就職前教師而言,在數位模擬學習活動時使用績效回饋,其校園創新推廣策略的學習成效優於使用資訊回饋。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of teacher’s identity and type of feedback on teacher’s learning of innovation diffusion strategies. There were 61 in-service teachers from Taoyuan, New Taipei City and Taipei City and 60 pre-service teachers from a teachers’ university participated in this study. The independent variables were types of feedback and teachers’ identities. The types of feedback strategies included performance feedback and information feedback. Teacher’s identities were categorized as in-service teachers and pre-service teachers. The dependent variable was learning performance of innovation diffusion strategies.

    The results revealed that (a) for in-service teachers, when learning innovation diffusion strategies from computer simulation, using information feedback strategy resulted in better learning performance than using performance feedback strategy, and (b) oppositely, for pre-teachers, when learning innovation diffusion strategies from computer simulation, using performance strategy revealed better learning performance than using information feedback.

    附表目錄 vi 附圖目錄 vii 第一章緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 6 第三節 研究範圍與限制 7 第四節 重要名詞釋義 9 第二章 文獻探討 12 第一節 資訊科技融入教學 12 第二節 創新推廣 18 第三節 數位模擬 26 第四節 回饋策略 30 第三章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究對象 33 第二節 研究設計 34 第三節 校園創新推廣模擬 37 第四節 研究工具 49 第五節 資料分析 50 第四章 結果與討論 52 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 結論 57 第二節 建議 59 參考文獻 62 附錄一 校園創新推廣策略成就測驗 68 附錄二 創新接受度量表 72 附錄三 校園創新推廣模擬-以建立願景事件為例 73

    中文部分
    黃嘉勝 (1994)。創新觀念接受度量表在教學科技研究上的運用。教學科技與媒體,15,31-36。
    邱志忠 (2002)。國小教師運用資訊科技融入學科教學之教學策略研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    張國恩 (1999)。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育,72,2-9。
    張雅芳 (2001)。資訊科技融入教學之雙重障礙及其克服之道。資訊科技融入中小學課程教學工作坊手冊,77-79。
    張雅芳 (2003)。教師運用科技之相關因素探討。教育研究月刊,116,41-49。
    顏龍源 (2000)。主題化的電腦融入教學概念。資訊與教育,80,32-40。
    徐新逸、吳佩瑾 (2000)。資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體,59,63-73。
    沈敏慧 (2007)。國小教師資訊融入教學之教師自我效能感、學校行政支援與創
    新接受度相關研究。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺東縣。
    陳新烈 (2013)。我國中小學重要資訊教育政策分析(1997-2012)。佛光大學學習與數位科技學系碩士班,未出版,宜蘭縣。
    陳彥輔 (2009)。資訊融入教學的新觀點─問題解決情境中的資訊科技融入學習。國教之友,60(2),58-66。
    陳嘉彌 (1996)。中等學校教師接受創新程度之分析。教育研究資訊,4(3),86-103。
    王全世 (2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育,80,23-31。
    王全世 (2001)。資訊科技融入教學之實施與評鑑研究。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    王堯興 (2005)。國小資訊種子教師運用自由軟體融入教學關注階層、溝通媒介類型與教學創新接受度之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
    王英州 (2002)。高雄縣國中教師教學媒體使用現況之調查研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學習碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    何榮桂 (2002)。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展─兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育,87,22-48。
    李曉伶 (2003)。澎湖縣國小資訊科技融入教學實施現況與教師使用意願、困難之研究。臺南師院課程與教學碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
    唐介華 (2004)。國小教師之教學效能及電腦焦慮與其實師資訊如教學關係之研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東縣。
    林煌凱 (2002)。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    林秀美 (1996)。電腦模擬:一個具有潛力的學習環境。視聽教育雙月刊,38(3),16-25。

    英文部分
    Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (1991). Computer-based instruction: method and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
    Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Ambrose, D. (1987). Managing complex change. Pittsburgh, PA: Enterprise Group.
    Anderson, R. E. & Plomp, T. (2008). National contexts. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer, 37-66.
    Baek, Y. K. (2008). What hinders teachers in using computer and video games in the classroom? Exploring factors inhibiting the uptake of computer and video games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 665-671.
    Barnett, M. (2008). Using authentic cases through the use of a web-based professional development system to support student teachers in examining classroom practice. Action in Teacher Education, 29(4), 3-14.
    Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1988). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principle, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
    Chamber, J. A. & Sprecher, J. W. (1983). Computer-assisted instruction: Its use in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Christopher, S., Charles, H., Michael, M., Paulius, M., & Marty, A. (2002). Applying Mixed Reality to Entertainment. IEEE Computer, 35(12), 122-124.
    De Grove, F., Bourgonjon, J., & Van Looy, J. (2012). Digital games in the classroom? A contextual approach to teachers’adoption intention of digital games in formal education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2023-2033.
    Dennis, J. R. & Kansky, R. J. (1984). Instructional computing: An action guide for educator. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
    Dempsey, J.V. & Wager, S.U. (1988). A taxonomy for the timing of feedback in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, 28(10), 20-25.
    Doyle, D. & Brown, F. M. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills – The benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 330-336.
    Gorozidis, G. & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teacher’s motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1-11.
    Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
    Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
    Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Hermens, A. (2009). Integrating blended teaching and learning to enhance graduate attributes. Education & Training, 51(5/6), 476-490.
    Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52.
    Huppert, J., Yaakobi, J., & Lazarovvitz, R. (1998). Learning microbiology with computer simulations: Students’ academic achievement by method and gender. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 231-245.
    Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scale for the measurement of innovationess. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
    Kenny, R. F. & McDaniel, R. (2011). The role teachers’ expectations and value assessments of video games play in their adopting and integrating them into their classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 197-213.
    Lara, M., Enfield, J., Myers, R., & Frick, T. (2010). Assessing learning in online simulations: a case study of the diffusion simulation game. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications Technology, Anaheim, CA.
    Lee, J. (1999). Effectiveness of computer-based instructional simulation: A meta analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 71-85.
    Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
    Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free press of Glencoe.
    Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovation. New York: The Free press.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free press.
    Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
    Roper, W. J. (1977). Feedback in computer assisted instruction. Programed Learning and Educational Technology, 14, 43-49.
    Sahin, S. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives of the diffusion of information and communications technologies (ICTs) and the effect of case-based discussions (CBDs). Computers & Education, 59, 1089-1098.
    Sears, S. J. & Hersh, S. B. (1998). Contextual teaching and learning: An overview of the project. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond. Information series no. 376 (1–16).
    Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research,78(1), 153-189.
    Tharp, R. G. & Gallimore, R. (1991). The Instructional Conversation: Teaching and Learning in Social Activity. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, 13(1), 1-11.
    Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413-424.
    Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 11(4). 342–365.
    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE