研究生: |
趙秀玲 Hsiu-ling Chao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
書寫「異托邦」:瑪格麗特‧愛特伍《盲眼刺客》之空間與休閒 Writing 'Heterotopias': Space and Leisure in Margaret Atwood's The Blind Assassin |
指導教授: |
史文生
Frank Stevenson |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 75 |
中文關鍵詞: | 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍 、盲眼刺客 、異托邦 、空間 、休閒 、箱 |
英文關鍵詞: | Margaret Atwood, The Blind Assassin, heterotopias, space, leisure, container |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:216 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文闡述瑪格麗特‧愛特伍《盲眼刺客》中女性空間及休閒經驗的困境。將休閒視為私人空間的論述前提下,試圖窺探女性透過空間的挪用以書寫顛覆權力結構。文中援引性別空間及休閒等理論,探究女性在空間的訴求上所面臨的兩難,女性休閒經驗遭受的貶抑以及休閒空間作為一個反抗壓迫的場域。全文共分成五個部分。引言簡述在性別領域中的地理政治議題以及休閒理論的演進。第一章闡釋《盲眼刺客》中女性空間經驗的匱乏。無論是在公領域或私領域女性都很難享有私人空間。私領域,如家庭空間意味著家事及性愛的勞動。能動性的限制使得女性在公領域,如城市空間裡閒逛是不合宜的。第二章剖析女性休閒經驗的限制,指出女性受制於「非休閒」的窘境,被迫培養及從事非自願的休閒活動。第三章提出休閒空間化的概念,將休閒視為異質空間,亦即傅科所謂的「異托邦」。主角透過書寫獲得一個發聲的空間,「異托邦」不僅有助於主體的重塑,並進而提供了反抗壓迫者的場域。結論重申空間及休閒對於主體發展的重要性以及「異托邦」作為一個純我空間提供重新書寫自我的潛力。
This thesis expounds the predicament of women’s spatial and leisure experience in Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin. Considering leisure as personal spaces, this thesis intends to investigate the appropriation of space by women through the analysis of narrative as subversion to power relations. By referring to theories of space and gender, as well as concepts of leisure theories, this thesis attempts to scrutinize the dilemmatic situation of women’s access to space, the disempowerment of self by the devaluation of leisure experience, and leisure space as a means of resistance to external dominance. Except for the purpose of feminist leisure research, this study hopes to contribute to the agenda of ensuring personal space for women by revealing how fictional world may parallel and reflect the real society.
This thesis includes five parts. The Introduction briefly addresses issues like geographic politics in the sphere of gender and the shift of leisure theories. Chapter One explicates the spatial entrapment of women in the novel, indicating a sense of misplacement both in the private and the public spheres. Chapter Two analyzes the jeopardy of women’s leisure from anti-leisure perspective, discussing the non-voluntary leisure activities imposed upon women. Chapter Three addresses the conceptualization of leisure as other spaces or, in Foucault’s terms,‘heterotopias’, ‘spaces’ of autonomous choice, which allow for the possibilities of resistance to male dominance. Finally, the Conclusion reiterates the importance of space and leisure and the potential of ‘heterotopias’ as leisure space to rewrite the script of the self.
Atwood, Margaret. The Blind Assassin. New York: Random, 2000.
---. Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
Bemrose, John. “Margaret’s Museum.” Maclean’s 113.37 (2000): 54-56.
Bowlby, Sophie, Susan Gregory, and Linda McKie. “‘Doing Home’: Patriarchy, Caring, and Space.” Spec. issue of Women’s Studies International Forum 20.3 (1997): 343-50.
Bouson, Brooks J. “‘A Commemoration of Wounds Endured and Resented’: Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin as Feminist Memoir.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 44.3 (2003): 251-69.
Boys, Jos. “Women and Public Space.” Making Space: Women and the Man-Made Environment. London: Pluto, 1984. 37-54.
Cunningham, Michael. The Hours. London: Fourth Estate, 1999.
Daniels, Margaret J., and Heather E. Bowen. “Feminist Implications of Anti-leisure in Dystopian Fiction.” Journal of Leisure Research 33.4 (2003): 423-40.
Dove, Rita. “Daystar.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Jerome J. Paul and Beaty Hunter. 7th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998. 665.
Foucault, Michel. “Space, Knowledge, and Power.” The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rainbow. New York: The New P, 2000. 349-64.
---. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16.1 (1986): 22-7.
Gussow, Mel. “An Inner Eye That Sheds Light on Life’s Mysteries: Margaret Atwood on Vision, Sacrifice and Lyrical Complexities.” New York Times 10 Oct. 2000: B1, B7.
Hareven, Tamara K. “The Home and the Family in Historical Perspective.” Social Research 58.1 (1991): 19 pp. 15 Dec 2003 <http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=9707221705&db=aph>.
Henderson, Karla A., M. D. Bialeschki, and S. Shaw. A Leisure of One’s Own: A Feminist Perspective on Women’s Leisure. PA: Venture, 1989.
Hite, Molly. “Tongueless in Toronto.” Women’s Review of Books 18.6 (2001): 1+
Howells, Coral A. Margaret Atwood. New York: St. Martin’s, 1995.
---. “Lest We Forget.” Canadian Literature 173 (2002): 114-16.
Ingersoll, Earl. “Waiting for the End: Closure in Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin.” Studies in the Novel 35.4 (2003): 543-58.
Kelly, John R. Leisure Identities and Interactions. London: Allen & Unwin, 1983.
Lessing, Doris. “To Room Nineteen.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M. H. Abrams, et al. 6th ed. Vol. 2. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1993. 2301-23.
Mitchell, Don. “Feminism ad Cultural Change: Geographies of Gender.” Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. 199-229.
Ovid. “Metamorphoses.” The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed. Maynard Mack, et al. 6th ed. Vol. 1. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1992. 917-946.
Parkin-Gounelas, Ruth. “‘What Isn’t There’ in Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin: The Psychoanalysis of Duplicity.” Modern Fiction Studies 50.3 (2004): 681-700.
Rendell, Jane. “Introduction: ‘Gender, space.’” Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Ed. Jane Rendell, Barbara Penner, and Iain Borden. New York: Routledge, 2000. 101-11.
Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Rayna Reiter. New York: Monthly Review P, 1975. 157-210.
Sexton, Anne. “Self in 1958.” The Complete Poems: Anne Sexton. New York: Mariner Books, 1999. 155.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Harold Jenkins. New York: Methuen & Co., 1982.
Staels, Hilde. “Atwood’s Specular Narrative: The Blind Assassin.” English Studies 2 (2004): 147-60.
Stein, Karen F. “A Left-Handed Story: The Blind Assassin.” Margaret Atwood’s Textual Assassinations: Recent Poetry and Fiction. Ed. Sharon R. Wilson. Columbus: Ohio State University P, 2003. 135-53.
Tavris, Carol and Carole Offir. The Longest War. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.
Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class. London: Unwin Books, 1970.
Walter, Benjamin. Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. Trans. Harry Zohn. London : Verso, 1983
Wearing, Betsy. Leisure and Feminist Theory. London: Sage P, 1998.
Weisman, Leslie K. “The Home as Metaphor for Society.” Discrimination by Design: A Feminist Critique of the Man-Made Environment. Urbana and Chicago: U of Illinois P, 1992. 86-123.
Wilson, Elizabeth. “Into the Labyrinth.” The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of Disorder, and Women. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991. 1-11
---. “The Invisible Flâneur.” The Contradictions of Culture: Cities, Culture, Woman. London: Sage, 2001. 72-89.
Wilson, Sharon R. “Margaret Atwood and Popular Culture: The Blind Assassin and Other Novels.” Journal of American & Comparative Cultures 25.3-4 (2002): 270-75.
Wolff, Janet. Feminine Sentences: Essays on Women and Culture. Cambridge: Polity P, 1990.
Woolf, Virginia. “A Room of One’s Own.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M. H. Abrams, et al. 6th ed. Vol. 2. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1993. 1926-85.