研究生: |
張鑫安 Hsin-An Chang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以題型模版為基礎之網路多媒體測驗編輯系統 The development of a template-based online multimedia assessment authoring system |
指導教授: |
游光昭
Yu, Kuang-Chao |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 226 |
中文關鍵詞: | 網路多媒體測驗 、題型 、模版 、教學系統開發與評鑑 |
英文關鍵詞: | Web-based multimedia assessment, Question type, Template, Instructional system development and evaluation |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:177 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
目前利用網路進行測驗的情況雖然普及,卻僅限於少數題型與文字、圖片的搭配組合,無法充分展現多媒體在網路上的應用能力。因此,本研究嘗試建置一個以題型模版為基礎的網路多媒體測驗編輯系統,內含多種測驗題型,並支援多種媒體格式,形成不同的試題編輯模版,以方便從事多媒體測驗的出題工作。教師能夠在網際網路的環境下,依題型和媒體元素選擇不同的編輯模版,進行編輯、上傳各種媒體元素,形成網路多媒體測驗試題,讓學生能直接在網路上進行練習。
本研究除了以文獻探討作為系統需求分析依據,並以系統發展生命週期進行系統開發,成功的建立一個提供多樣化題型、兼容多種媒體格式之「網路多媒體測驗編輯系統」,並導入串流技術,嘗試解決網路多媒體影音傳輸的限制,最後以專家評估、教師試用及學生測驗等方式完成系統之內、外部評鑑。本研究發現,專家對於本系統內部結構及行為大多持正面的看法,教師對系統的試用經驗調查亦屬正面的評價。而在學生使用本系統進行多媒體測驗方面,經由準實驗設計、共變數分析的結果顯示:藉由本系統進行多媒體測驗的實驗組學生,其調整後的平均成績高於一般傳統紙筆測驗的控制組學生,且達到統計上的顯著差異。此外,關於測驗數據的分析與判讀,研究者也詳細陳述於後,同時根據研究結果提出相關建議,期望能提昇網路多媒體測驗在教學評量上的運用與導引進一步的相關研究。
Common educational web-based assessment systems are facing two challenges in development: insufficient variety of question types and integration of media formats, as past literature stated. This study tried to design and build up a web-based multimedia assessment authoring system featuring customization and ease of use templates – containing several question types and supporting a variety of media – to simplify and streamline the creation process. Therefore, instructors are able to create and manage a web-based assessment with pre-customized templates and media formats after lecturing; students are able to take the exam for self-evaluation and practices whenever learning activities are finished. This system was innovated and implemented through System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), and a Template-based Multimedia Assessment Authoring system was therefore formed, highlighting the multiple module function as well as the integration of various media types, and introducing streaming technology to solve the bandwidth problem for media transmission caused by audio and video. Internal and external evaluations were conducted later on via experts’ comments. Survey results indicated that most of the experts were unanimously holding a positive attitude toward the system, and so were the instructors who actually implemented it into lecturing. With respect to students’ learning results, statistical data gained from quasi-experimental design and covariance analysis showed the experimental group with the designed system’s support was more likely to achieve higher scores than the one without it and meanwhile a statistical significances was exerted, too. Finally, the author proposed further research implications and directions on this emerging topic.
一、中文部分
尹玫君(1995)。遠距教學系統於國民小學之應用研究─子計畫二教學策略學習行為之研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
王子華、黃世傑(2002)。網際網路評量與試後分析系統(WATA)之設計。資訊與教育,2001年資訊教育特刊,276-286。
何榮桂(1997)。從「測驗電腦化與電腦化測驗」再看網路化測驗。測驗與輔導,144,2972-2974。
何榮桂(2000)。網路環境題庫與測驗之整合系統。科學發展月刊,28(7),534-540。
余民寧(1997)。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量。台北:心理出版社。
吳仁和、林信惠(2003)。系統分析與設計理論與實務應用。台北:智勝文化。
李連順(2000)。國中生活科技線上測驗系統發展研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
周倩(2000)。台灣網路學習的研究:個人的經驗與觀察。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學主辦之第十六屆科學教育學術研討會,台北。
周朝宜(1999)。線上即時學習評量系統設計介紹。資訊與教育,71,59-61。
林敏慧、陳慶帆、謝崇琪、張佑瑋、廖崇閔、蔡景堯及吳允中(2003)。建構於Internet之安全的元件式多媒體線上測驗系統,論文發表於國立台灣師範大學資訊教育學系主辦之第十一屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會,台北。
林裕集(2001)。適用於電腦教室之網路測驗系統:以國小英語科為例。國立台中師範學院教育測驗與統計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
林璟豐(2001)。全球資訊網測驗題型之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林耀福(1993)。簡明英漢字典。台北:文橋。
邱龍斌(2002)。線上體育多媒體評量系統之研究與開發-以國中課程基本排球動作為例。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
施玉惠、周中天、陳淑嬌、朱慧美、陳純音、葉錫南(1999)。國民中小學英語教學及評量模式研究。台北:教育部。.
徐昊杲、邱佳樁(2002)。技職教育研究教戰手冊-SPSS基礎篇。台北:師大書苑。
翁正雄(2003)。多媒體線上測驗系統之建置及其相關研究。國立台中師範學院教育測驗與統計研究所教學碩士論文,未出版,台中。
翁全志(2003)。九年一貫自然與生活科技能力指標之網路多媒體教材與測驗評量研究。國立交通大學網路學習學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
區國良、陳國棟、劉寶均(1997)。建立於全球資訊網上之群體學習系統,論文發表於銘傳管理學院主辦之第六屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會,台北。
張智星(2000)。JavaScript 程式設計與應用:用戶端。Roger Jang's Home Page。2004年5月24日,取自http://neural.cs.nthu.edu.tw/jang/books/javascript/
張鑫安、游光昭(2004)。運用多媒體線上評量學生的自然與生活科技能力。中等教育,55(1),134-147。
張鑫安、蘇照雅(2004)。ITS三維度評鑑分類法則之初探,論文發表於國立成功大學主辦之2004數位生活與網際網路科技研討會,台南。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。
郭生玉(1990)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。
郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華。
陳正昌(2002)。行為科學及社會科學統計學:統計軟體運用。台北:巨流。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1982)。測驗的編製與應用。台北:偉文。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1996)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文。
陳新豐(1999)。多媒體線上適性測驗系統之探討-教育測驗的新趨勢。教育資料文摘,252,106-113。
陳新豐(1999)。多媒體線上適性測驗系統發展之探討。臺灣教育,577,45-48。
葉連祺(2000)。教師自編紙筆式測驗試題類型之探討。研習資訊,17,42-53。
劉亞平(1998)。教育改革的關心程度問卷與線上測驗之研究。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。
蔡福興(1999)。國中生活科技教學活動網路資源系統發展研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
簡瑞華(2002)。線上題庫與評量系統之開發。國立台中師範學院教育測驗與統計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
羅綸新(2002)。多媒體與網路基礎教學理論、實務與研究。台北:博碩文化。
二、外文部分
Aoyama, M. (1993). Concurrent-Development Process Model. IEEE Software,10(4), 46-55.
Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning About Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Directions. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Bally, L., Brittan, J., & Wagner, K. H. (1977). A Prototype approach to Information System Design and Development. Information and Management, 1(1), 21-26.
Benington, H. D. (1987). Production of Large Computer Programs. Monterey, CA: Computer Society Press.
Bennett, R. E. (2002). Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(1), Available from http://www.jtla.org.
Bennett, R.E., Goodman, M., & Hessinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Using multimedia in large-scale computer-based testing programs. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3), 283-294.
Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of software Development and Enhance. IEEE Computer, 21(5), 61-72.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1979). Educational research(3rd ed.). New York: Longmans.
Bugbee, A. C. (1996). The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 282-299.
Charman, D. & Elmes, A. (1998). Formative assessment in a basic geographical statistics module. In D. Charman & A. Elmes (Eds.), Computer Based Assessment (Volume 2): Case studies in Science and Computing (pp. 17-20). Plymouth: SEED Publications, University of Plymouth.
Clariana, R. B., & Wallace, P. E. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602.
Davies, P. (1999). Learning through assessment: OLAL .. On-line Assessment and Learning. In M. Danson & R. Sherratt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Annual CAA Conference (pp. 75-88). Loughborough, UK.
Felton, H., & McConachy, D. (1980). Giving an account. PartⅢ. Description and review of a school-based evaluation project undertaken with the help of an “outside” facilitator. Teachers as evaluators project.(ERIC Document Production Service NO. ED201601)
Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Iqbal, A., Oppermann, R., Patel, A., & Kinshuk (1999). A Classification of Evaluation Methods for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In U. Arend, E. Eberleh & K. Pitschke (Eds.), Software Ergonomie '99 - Design von Informationswelten (pp. 169-181). Leipzig: BG Teubner Stuttgart.
Kendle, A., & Northcote, M. (2001). Online Assessment Criteria in Action: Task Design in Contrasting Tertiary Education Contexts. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2001(1), 920-924, Available from: http://dl.aace.org/8625.
Lewy, A. (1985). The autonomous unit of evaluation: Combining the strengths of in-house and external evaluations. In P. Tamir (Ed.), The role of evaluators in curriculum development (pp. 184-206). Sydney: Croom Helm.
Littman, D., & Soloway, E. (1988). Evaluating ITSs: The cognitive science perspective. In M. C. Polson & J. J. Richardson (Eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liu, M., Papathanasiou, E., & Hao, Y. (2001). Exploring the use of multimedia examination formats in undergraduate teaching: results from the field-testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(3), 225-248.
McCormack, D., & Jones, D. (1997). Building a Web-Based Education System. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
McFarlane, A. (2001). Perspectives on the relationships between ICT and assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3), 227-235.
Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). Montgomery, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Mills, H. (1971). Top-down programming in Large Systems. In
R. Ruskin (Ed.), Debugging Techniques in Large Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mills, H., Linger, R., & Hevner, A. (Eds.). (1986). Principles of Information Systems Analysis and Design. New York: Academic Press.
Northcote, M., & Kendle, A. (2000, March). Online assessment techniques for Indigenous learners. Paper presented at the Australian Indigenous Education Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.
Royce, W. W. (1987). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wescon. New York: IEEE Press.
Scott, W. B., Robert, J. B., Aaron, T., & Larry, M. (2000). Education Research Using Web-Based Assessment System. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 28-43.
Siemer, J., & Angelides, M.C. (1998). A Comprehensive Method for the Evaluation of Complete Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 85-102.
Sly, L., & Rennie, L. J. (1999). Computer managed learning as an aid to formativeassessment in higher education. In S. Brown, P. Race, & J. Bull (Eds.), Computer Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
Tamir, P. (Ed.).(1985). The role of evaluators in curriculum development. Sydney: Croom Helm.
Valette, R. M. (1994). Classroom techniques: Foreign languages and English as a second language (Reissue Ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Zakrzewski, S., & Bull, J. (1998). The Mass Implementation and Evaluation of Computer-based Assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 141-152.