國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文全文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳其玲 Chi-ling Chen
論文名稱：	高中學生和教師對於<普通高級中學英文科課程綱要>能力指標的看法 Teachers’ and Student’s Perceptions of the Competence Indicators in National Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English
指導教授：	程玉秀 Cheng, Yuh-Show
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	英語學系 Department of English
論文出版年：	2012
畢業學年度：	100
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	142
中文關鍵詞：	高中英文、課程綱要、能力指標
英文關鍵詞：	high school english, Curriculum guidelines, competence indicator
論文種類：	學術論文
相關次數：	點閱：165 下載：15
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

九九高中英文課程綱要已頒布施行。為了要增進課程實施的效益，有必要研究利害關係人的對於課程改革的感知和接受度。其中，老師和學生對於課程目標的看法尤其重要，因為其看法會決定他們是否會完成目標能力的教學與學習。本研究目標就在於了解老師和學生對於課程綱要中，將課程目標概念化的分項能力指標的看法。
來自台灣各區域的1,422位學生和110位老師參與了這次的問卷調查研究。老師和學生填寫兩種不同版本的問卷。在問卷中，他們在五點量表中填入他們認知裡每個分項能力指標的重要性，並且選擇是否會將該分項能力指標作為課程的教學或學習目標。研究者使用了描述性數據、t檢定，以及卡方檢定來分析參與教師與學生的問卷填答。
本研究發現老師和學生認為各分項能力指標相當重要，且大部分填答者願意將分項能力指標當作是教學或學習的目標；但參與本研究之師生對思考能力指標的重視程度較低。老師和學生對於閱讀、寫作、學習策略，以及學習興趣與態度的分項能力指標看法不一。根據研究結果，有關當局應更加強宣傳九九高中英文課程綱要的特色─思考能力，同時也應設法縮短老師和學生對能力指標認知上的差異。

The 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English have been put into practice. In order to enhance the effectiveness of the curriculum implementation, it is necessary to investigate the stakeholders’ perceptions and acceptance of the mandated curriculum. Teachers’ and students’ perceptions and acceptance of the course objectives are especially important because they may determine whether teachers and students would take action to achieve the mandated goals. The present study thus aims to understand how teachers and students perceive the competence indicators in the Curriculum Guidelines, which conceptualize the course objectives.
In total, 1,422 students and 110 teachers from senior high school in different parts of Taiwan were recruited to participate in the survey study. Teachers and students filled in two different versions of questionnaires. They were required to assign a perceived importance value to each competence indicator on a five-point Likert scale and choose whether they would take the indicator as teaching or learning goal. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and Chi-square analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results of the study show that both teachers and students recognized the competence indicators as important, and most participants would take the indicators as their learning goals. However, less emphasis was put on the indicators for thinking skills, one of the curricular innovations in the 2010 Curriculum Guidelines. Most importantly, teachers and students differed in their views about competence indicators for reading, writing, learning strategy, and learning attitude. It is suggested that authorities concerned should put more emphasis on promoting the new feature of 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English, i.e. thinking skills. It is also necessary to bridge the gap between teachers’ and students perceived importance of abilities to be developed in the English course.

CHAPTER ONE    INTRODUCTION ………………………………………..    1
Research Background ……………………………………............................    1
Significance of Study ……………………………………………………….    5
Research Questions …………………………………………………………    7
Organization of the Study …………………………………………………..    7

CHAPTER TWO    LITERATURE REVIEW …………………………………    8
2010 National Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School ……………    8
2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English     10
Factors Related to Curriculum Implementation ……………........................    14
The Influence of Stakeholders’ views on Curriculum Implementation ........    16
The Role of Teachers’ Perceptions in Curriculum Implementation ..…..    18
The Role of Students’ Perceptions in Curriculum Implementation ..........    23

CHAPTER THREE   METHOD ……………………………………………..    26
Participants ……………………………………………………………….    26
Background Information of Student Participants …………………….    26
Background Information of Teacher Participants …………………….    29
Instruments ……………………………………………………………….    33


Data Collection Procedures..……...………………...……………….….......    34
Data Analysis Procedures ..…………………………………….……….......    34

CHAPTER FOUR    RESULTS ……………………………………………….    36
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Listening …………........    36
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Speaking  ……………..    41
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Reading ………………..    46
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Writing…………….......    52
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Four-Skill Integration..……..    58
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Thinking Skills ………..    63
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Learning Strategies     67
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Learning Attitudes and Motivation……………………………………………………………….    73
Participants’ Views of Competence Indicators for Cultural Understanding and Global view ………………………………………………………    79
Summary …………………………………………………………………..    84

CHAPTER FIVE    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION …………………….    91
Discussion of Major Findings ………………………………………………    92
Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators ………………………………………………………….    92


Competence Indicators as Teachers’ and Students’ Teaching or Learning Objectives …………………………………………….    96
Implications of the Study ……………….…………………………………..    99
Limitations of the Study ….………………..………………………………..    101
Future Research Directions …………………………………………………    101

References …………………………………………………………………………    103
Appendixes …………………………………………………………………………
Appendix A  Chinese and English versions of Competence Indicators in 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English     114
Appendix B  Questionnaire for Students …………………………………..    125
Appendix C  Questionnaire for Teachers …………………………………..    134


LIST of TABLES

    page
Table 1.    Number and Percentage of Student Participants by Areas and Schools.     27
Table 2.    Number and Percentage of Student Participants by Grade Level …….    28
Table 3.    Distribution of Student Participants by Start Learning Time ……..…..    28
Table 4    Distribution of Student Participants by Cram School Experience ……    29
Table 5.    Distribution of Student Participants by Proficiency Test experience. ..     29
Table 6.    Distribution of Teacher Participants by Area.  ………………………    30
Table 7.    Distribution of Teachers by Age.  ….…………………………………    30
Table 8.    Distribution of Teachers by Teaching Experience. ……………………    31
Table 9.    Distribution of Teachers by English Teaching Experience.  …………    31
Table 10.    Distribution of Teachers by Perception of Students’ Academic Performance. ………………………………………………………….    32
Table 11.    Distribution of Teachers by Perception of Students’ English Proficiency.  ………………………………………………………….    32
Table 12.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Listening.  …………………………………………….    37
Table 13.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Listening as Teaching or Learning Goal  …………………………….    39
Table 14.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Speaking  ……………………………..………………    42
Table 15.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Speaking as Teaching or Learning Goal. ……………………………..    44


Table 16.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Reading  ………………………………………………    46
Table 17.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Reading as Teaching or Learning Goal  …………………………….    50
Table 18.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Writing.  ………………………………………………    52
Table 19.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Writing as Teaching or Learning Goal ………………………………..    56
Table 20.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Four-skill Integration  ……………………………….    58
Table 21.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Four-skill Integration as Teaching or Learning Goal ….…………..….    61
Table 22.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Thinking Skills ………………..……………………….    63
Table 23.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Thinking Skills as Teaching or Learning Goal ………………………..    66
Table 24.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Learning Strategies  ……………………………….    68
Table 25.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Learning Strategies as Learning or Teaching Goal  ………………..    71
Table 26.    Teachers’ and Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Learning Attitude and Motivation  ……………….…    73
Table 27.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Learning Attitude and Motivation as Teaching or Learning Goal     77


Table 28.    Students’ Perceived Importance of Competence Indicators for Cultural Understanding and Global View  ……………….……….    79
Table 29.    Percentage of Participants Taking Each Competence Indicator for Cultural Understanding and Global View as Teaching or Learning Goal………………………………………………………………..    82
Table 30.    Competence Indicators Assigned Higher Importance Values by Teachers     86

                                

REFERENCES

Chinese References
Chang, W. C. (張武昌) (2006)。台灣的英語教育：現況與省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊，69，139-144。臺北市：教育資源及出版中心。
Li, K. C. (李坤崇) (2007)。高中新課程綱要總綱修訂的理念與特色。教育研究月刊，159，106-120。臺北市：國立教育資料館。
Yeh, H. N. (葉錫南) (2008)。高中英文科新課程綱要之修訂理念與特色。教育研究月刊，166，25-32。臺北市：國立教育資料館。
Cheng, Y. S. (程玉秀), Yeh, H. N. (葉錫南), & Su, S. F. (蘇順發) (2011)。九十九年「普通高級中學英文科課程綱要」之規劃、實施與預期效果：教師觀點。英語教學，35，91-137。臺北市；英語教學雜誌社。
Yeh. Y. C. (葉玉珠) (1999)。代理(課)教師批判思考教學專業知識、個人教學效能及教學行為之現況及關係之研究。國立政治大學學報，78，55-84。臺北市：國立政治大學。
Chian, M. F. et. al. (簡茂發, 洪冬桂, 區雅倫, 夏蕙蘭, 劉澄桂, 舒琮慧, 管美蓉, 潘莉瑩, 姚霞玲) (2007)。大學入學考試中心命題研究與測驗發展。教育研究與發展期刊，3 ，1-28。臺北縣三峽鎮：國立教育研究院籌備處。
MOE. (教育部) (2008a)。普通高級中學必修科目「英文」課程綱要。取自：http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0035/%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87-%E5%BF%85%E4%BF%AE.pdf。
MOE. (教育部) (2008b)。普通高級中學必修科目英文科課程綱要修訂重點與特色。取自： ftp://140.111.102.129/course/overview/feature/03.pdf。
MOE. (教育部) (2008c)。普通高級中學必修科目英文科課程綱要補充說明。取自： http://140.116.223.225/98course/10/10-03-english.pdf。

English References
Amuzie, G. L., & Winke, P. (2009). Changes in language learning beliefs as a result of study abroad. System, 37, 366-379.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Balint, M. (2007). Analyzing and using Japanese EFL learner beliefs. In Proceedings of JALT Conference 2007: Challenging Assumptions—Looking in, Looking out, 134-145.
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40.
Bernat, E., & Lloyd, R. (2007). Exploring the gender effect on EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 79-91.
Bernat, E., & Gvozdenko. (2005). Beliefs about language learning: Current knowledge, pedagogical implications, and new research directions. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Electronic Journal, 9, 1-21.
Bernat, E. (2006). Assessing EAP learners’ beliefs about language learning in the Australian context. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8, 202-227.
Bernat, E. (2008). Beyond beliefs: Psycho-cognitive, socio-cultural and emergent ecological approaches to learner perceptions in foreign language acquisition. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 7-22.
Borg, M. (2005). A case study of the development in pedagogic thinking of a pre-service teacher. Retrieved from: http://tesl-ej.org/ej34/a5.pdf
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
Bray, L., & Swan, A. (2008). Voices in curriculum development: Researchers, designers and teachers. Language Teaching, 41, 299-309.
Brown, B. W. (1990). The place of beliefs and of concept formation in a language teacher training theory. System, 18, 86-96.
Carless, D. R. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System 31, 485-500.
Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 505-518.
Chang, X. Y. (2010). Learning beliefs of distance foreign language learners in China: A survey study. System, 38, 30-40.
Chang, H. R. (2004). A study of junior high school teachers’ beliefs and practices on listening instruction in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Chang Hua Normal University.
Chen, I. C. (2004). Taiwan college English majors’ beliefs about EFL learning. Unpublished master thesis, Southern Taiwan University.
Cheng, P. P. (2005). A study of aboriginal junior high school students’ views on communicative language teaching at particularly remote area in southern Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, Leader University.
Chung, I.F., & Huang, Y. C. (2009). The implementation of communicative language teaching: An investigation of students’ viewpoints. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 18, 67-78.
Cohen, A. D., & Fass, L. (2001). Oral language instruction: Teacher and learner beliefs and the reality in EFL classes at a Colombian University. Retrieved from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPaper
Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27, 493-513.
Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for Autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23, 105-205.
Deng, D. F. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 1, 1-23.
Duff, P. A., & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers’ socio-cultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 451-486.
El-Okda, M. (2005). A proposed model for EFL teacher involvement in on-going curriculum development. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 7, 33-49
Fang, Z. H. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, 47-65.
Feng, Z. W. (2007). The perceptions of Chinese junior high and senior high students regarding the teaching and learning of English listening and speaking skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
Finch, A. (2008). An attitudinal profile of EFL learners in Korea. Electrical Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 206-219.
Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom's taxonomy: Original and revised. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved January 2009, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt
Gabillon, Z. (2005). L2 learner’s belief: An overview. Journal of Language and Learning, 3, 233-260.
Gardner, D. (2007) Understanding autonomous learning. In Proceedings of the Independent Learning Association 2007 Japan Conference: Exploring theory, enhancing practice, Autonomy across the disciplines (pp.1-9). Karda University of International Studies, China, Japan.
Gorsuch, G. (2000). EFL Educational policies and educational cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 675-710.
Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41, 147-181.
Hawkey, R. (2006). Teacher and learner perceptions of language activity. ELT Journal, 10, 242-252.
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influence on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557-576.
Horwitz, E. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333–340.
Hsu, C. L., Wang, H. S., & Chen, Y. J. (2005). Evaluating effects of a systems thinking model on curriculum and instruction reform in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2005/proceed/papers/
HSU417.pdf
Hsu, J. H. (2002). Impacts of English teachers’ perceptions of communicative language teaching on classroom practice in senior high schools in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University..
Hsu, J. Y. (2005). A study of senior high school English teachers’ practice and beliefs about writing instruction. Unpublished master thesis, National Sun Yat-San University.
Hsu, L. S. (2003). A study of the relationship between senior high school students’ English achievement and learner autonomy. Unpublished master thesis, National Chang Hua Normal University.
Huang, S. H. (1992). Senior high students’ EFL learning beliefs: A site study. In The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.477-485). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
Iemjinda, M. (2007). Curriculum innovation and English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher development. Educational Journal of Thailand, 1, 9-20.
Karim, K. M. R. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and expectations about communicative language teaching (CLT) in post-secondary education in Bangladesh. Unpublished master thesis, University of Victoria.
Kennedy, C., & Kennedy, J. (1996). Teacher attitudes and change implementation. System, 24, 351-360.
Kern, R. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71– 92.
Kikuchi, K., & Browne, C. (2009). English educational policy for high schools in Japan: Ideals and reality. RELC Journal, 40, 172-191.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). Curriculum innovation in Turkish primary education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 309-322.
Kojima, H. (2003). The changing EFL education system in Japan. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, 90, 139-151.
Kuo, S. C. (2008). Exploring an English teacher’s beliefs and classroom practice: A case study in an EFL context. Unpublished master thesis, National Chung Cheng University.
Lai, H. H. (2001). Student perceptions regarding needs for communication-based English instruction in a selected university in southern Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of South Dakota.
Lamb, M. (2003). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32, 3-19.
Leger, D. D. S., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37, 269-285.
Li, D. (1998). It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-703.
Li, H. (2008). Assessing EFL teachers’ reflective thinking: A case study of two in-service secondary teachers. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 3, 36-44.
Li, J., & Wang, J. (2004). Developing a systematic needs analysis pattern in EFL curriculum. In Proceedings of CLaSIC (pp. 456-464). Singapore: De Gruyter Mouton.
Liao, W. W. (2002). Senior high school English teacher’ beliefs toward communicative language teaching and their classroom practice. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Liao, P. S., & Chian, M. Y. (2003). The study of students’ and their teachers’ beliefs about English learning. In Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on English teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp.65-76). Taipei.
Liddicoat, A. (2004). Language policy and methodology. IJES, 4, 153-171.
Lin, T. C. (2006). EFL technological university students' use of language learning strategies and beliefs about language learning. Unpublished master thesis, Southern Taiwan University.
Ming, T. S. (2009). Investigating autonomy of Malaysian ESL learners: A comparison between public and private universities. The southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 15, 97-124.
Moroz, R., & Waugh, R. F. (2000). Teacher receptivity to system-wide educational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 159-178
Muir, P. (2007). Toward culture: Some basic elements of culture-based instruction in China’s high schools. Sino-US English Teaching, 4, 38-43
Mulat, L. (2003). Teachers’ attitudes towards communicative language teaching and practical problems in its implementation. Unpublished master thesis, Addis Ababa University.
Nazari, A. (2007). EFL teachers’ perception of the concept of communicative competence. EFL Journal, 61, 202-210.
Nishino, T. (2008). Japanese secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practice regarding communicative language teaching: An exploratory survey. JALT Journal, 30, 27-50.
Nkosana, L. (2008). Attitudinal obstacles to curriculum and assessment reform. Language Teaching Research, 12, 278-312.
Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243-253.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ belief and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 2, 307-332.
Peacock, M. (1999). Beliefs about language learning and their relationship to proficiency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 247-265.
Peacock, M. (1998). Exploring the gap between teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about useful activities for EFL. International journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 233-250.
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380-390.
Riley, P. A. (2006). The beliefs of first year Japanese university students towards the learning of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
Ramanathan, V., & Morgan, B. (2007). TESOL and policy enhancements: Perspective from practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41. 447-463.
Richards, J. C., Gallo, P. B., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Exploring teachers’ beliefs and the process of change. The PAC Journal, 1, 41-62.
Sakui, K. & Gaies, S. (1999). Investigating Japanese learners’ beliefs about language learning. System, 27, 473–492.
Savignon, S. & Wang, C. (2003). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. IRAL, 41, 223-249.
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
Schwarts, A. (2002). National standard and diffusion of innovation: Language teaching in the United States. In S. J. Savigon (ed.), Communicative language teaching in translation: Contexts and concerns in teacher education (pp. 112-130). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shawer, S. F., Gilmore, D., & Banks-Joseph, R. B. (2008). Student cognitive and affective development in the context of classroom-level curriculum development. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1-28.
Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173-184.
Silva, M. (2005). Constructing the teaching process from inside out: How pre-service teachers make sense of their perceptions of the teaching of the four skills. Retrieved from: http://tesl-ej.org/ej34/a10.pdf.
Silver, R. E., & Skuja-steele, R. (2005). Priorities in English language education policy and classroom implementation. Language Policy, 4, 107-128.
Su, Y. C. (2006). EFL teachers persecutions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32, 265-283.
Tan, M. (2005). CLT-Beliefs and practices. Journal of Language and Learning, 3, 104-115.
Tsai, T. H., & Lee, F. M. (2007). A case study: Communicative language teaching in Taiwan. Journal of Far East University, 24, 15-38.
Tsui, L. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40, 185-200.
Wan, W. L. (2008). Investigation of beliefs about English learning for sixth graders in Taichung County. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Wang, C. C. (2002). Innovative teaching in foreign language contexts: The case of Taiwan. In S. J. Savigon (ed.), Communicative language teaching in translation: Contexts and concerns in teacher education (131-153). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum policies in the Chinese tertiary context. Unpublished master thesis, Queen’s University.
Wang, H. (2008a). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 20, 1-38.
Wang, H. (2008b). The impact of curriculum innovation on the culture of teaching. Chinese EFL Journal, 1, 5-30.
Wang, R. J. (2008). The theoretical and practical study of communicative approach in southern Taiwan junior high schools: Based on professors’, teachers’, and students’ perspectives. Unpublished master thesis, National Pingtung Institute of Commerce.
Wang, W. F., & Lam, A. S. L. (2009). The English language curriculum for senior secondary school in China: Its evolution from 1949. RELC, 40, 65-82.
Watanabe, Y. (2006). A needs analysis for a Japanese high school EFL general education curriculum. Second Language Studies, 25, 83-163.
Wedell, M. (2003). Giving TESOL change a chance: Supporting key players in the curriculum change process. System, 31, 439-456.
Widdows, S., & Voller, P. (1991). PANSI: A survey of the ESL needs of Japanese university students. Cross Cultures, 18, 127-139.
Wong, L. Y. M. (2009). Perspectives on the English language education of Hong Kong’s New Senior Secondary (NSS) Curriculum. Asian EFL Journal, 35, 1-27.
Wu, C. W. (2006). A research on investigating English learning beliefs of junior high school students in Tainan district. Unpublished master thesis, Li De College of Management.
Wu, X. Q. (2006). Communicative and traditional teaching in Taiwan: Students’ views and factors influencing them. Unpublished master thesis, National Ching Hua University.
Yang, M. N. (2006). Taiwanese Five-year junior college EFL students’ beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Cheng Chi University.
Yang, S. C., & Lin, W. C. (2004). The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 33-45.
Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1085-1103.
Yang, Y. C. (2008). A study of elementary school English teachers’ belief and practice in communicative language teaching. Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua Normal University.
Yashima, T., & Nishide, Z. L. (2008). The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. System, 36, 566-585.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文