研究生: |
李家嫚 Lee, Chia-Man |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
戶外冒險教育課程對國中生生活適應能力影響之研究–以新北市某中學為例 The Study of the Effects of Outdoor Adventure Education on the Life Adjustment Ability of Junior High School Students in New Taipei City |
指導教授: |
蔡居澤
Tsai, Ju-Tse |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 182 |
中文關鍵詞: | 冒險教育課程 、單車課程 、生活適應能力 |
英文關鍵詞: | Outdoor Adventure Education, Cycling Curriculum, Life Adaption |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100148 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:151 下載:22 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的是為探討戶外冒險課程如何影響國中生生活適應能力,以新北市某國中共11位七年級學生為研究對象,設計五天四夜花蓮台東單車課程,利用心理出版社所出版「中學生生活適應量表」作為調查工具,輔以參與式觀察、訪談、日誌,以及錄音資料,依照中學生生活適應量表中的四大面向:個人適應、家庭適應、人際與社會適應、學習與工作適應進行研究分析。研究結果發現,戶外冒險教育課程對中學生生活適應能力產生下列影響:
1. 課程後學生生活適應能力在每個項目皆高於平均水準50的常模標準,其中以人際關係(74.82)最高,五個月整體平均進步12.55分、一年後各細項下降,比對一年後個人進步分數仍為正值。顯示戶外冒險教育課程對學生生活適應上有顯著正向的影響,一年後的延宕影響不顯著。
2. 生活適應能力各個面向影響以「自我勝任」(ES=0.80)呈高度改變。其他依序為自我定向(ES=0.56)、自我意識(ES=0.54)成中度改變。除家庭適應和社會適應外,其餘皆達輕度改變。分項目在斯皮爾曼相關係數統計顯著,以全量表和學習適應0.934**與工作適應相關係數0.959**最高。
3. 戶外單車課程經驗對生活適應能力正向影響,與學生在學校生活中的具體經驗連結。蒐集整理質性訪談、日記與生活札記,歸納分類為下列五個面向:「更認識自己的過程」、「人際互動的技巧」、「團隊支持與同儕影響」、「反思與分享所帶來的意義」和「面對挫折的心境」。
The purpose of this research is to explore how outdoor adventure courses affect the life adaptability of junior high school students. According to the life adaptability curriculum goals, the researcher designed a five-day overnight cycling course from Hualien to Taitung. The research objects are 11 seventh graders from New Taipei City.
The research tools include the "Life Adaptation Scale for Middle School Students" (Chen&Tsia,2009) published by Psychological Publishing Company as a survey tool, which is supplemented by participatory observations, interviews, questionnaires, diaries, and recording data. The research discussion was divided into four major aspects of the Middle School Students’ Life Adaptation Scale: personal adaptation, family adaptation, interpersonal relationship and social adaptation, learning and work adaptation. The results of the study found that outdoor adventure education courses have the following effects on the adaptability of junior high school students:
1.After the course, students’ adaptability to life in each index was higher than the average standard (PR50), among which interpersonal relationship (PR74.82) is the highest. It showed that outdoor adventure education courses had a significant positive impact on students’ adaptation to life.
2. The main result of different dimension of Life Adaptation was the self-competence (ES=0.80) which was the highest in the group. Others were self-orientation (ES = 0.56), and self-awareness (ES = 0.54), which changed moderately. All indices except for family adaptation and social adaptation, showed at least a mild change. The sub-items were significantly related in Spearman's rank correlation, among them the highest scores were the learning adaptation (0.934 **) and the work adaptation (0.959 **) with the full scale.
3. The experience of the outdoor cycling course had a positive impact on life adaptability and was connected with specific experiences in school life. By collecting qualitative interviews and diaries, the researcher summarized and classified them into the following five aspects: "The process of self-understanding ", "Interpersonal interaction skills", "Team support and Peer influence", "The meaning from reflection and sharing, and" The mental state of facing frustration."
ㄧ、中文文獻
王伯宇(2015)。冒險教育課程對小型企業員工教育訓練之長期成效研究。臺灣運動教育學報,10(1),31-50。
吳崇旗。(2006)。建構戶外冒險教育效益機轉之模式-以繩索挑戰課程為例 (博士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。
吳崇旗、巫昌陽(2008)。定向運動課程對生活效能與團隊凝聚力之影響研究。運動休閒管理學報,5(2),19-31。
吳崇旗、謝智謀(2008)。冒險教育生活效能量表之發展。體驗教育學報,2,42-58。
吳崇旗、謝智謀(2010)。繩索挑戰課程對大學生冒險教育生活效能與團隊凝聚力之影響。人文社會科學研究,4(1),74-91。
吳新華(1993)。適應的概念分析。台南師院初等教育學報,6-169。
周鳳琪(2000)。國中適應不良學生參與探索諮商團體之效益研究。臺灣師範大學公民訓育學系學位論文,1-224,立昌。
林秀卿、吳崇旗、王國安(2013)。冒險教育課程對國中體育班學生團隊凝聚力之成效。臺灣運動教育學報,8(1),45-65。
林孟欣(2019)。冒險教育對弱勢家庭學生挫折容忍力影響之研究-以桃園某團體自行車環島活動為例。臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系學位論文,1-113。
竺定宇(2004)。探索教育對企業團隊效能之影響。國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
邱圓惠(2007)。自我探索課程對國中生自我效能及生活適應影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
郎亞琴、范月華(2009)。國小高年級學童挫折容忍力與生活適應之研究。教育科學期刊,8(2),1-20。
涂柏原(1997)。國三學生生活壓力,自我強度與學業成就之因果模式(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所,臺北市。
張昀、謝智謀。(2009)。「探險,最能建立性格的力量」-戶外冒險教育與復原力。體驗教育學報,(3),1-12。
張智勝(2006)。戶外冒險教育課程效益之影響因素探究。臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系學位論文,臺北市。
張殿玉(2001)。試論自我意識與成就動機的激勵. 鄭州大學學報 (哲學社會科學版), 34(6), 23-25.
許思涵(2019)。單車環島探索教育課程對高關懷國中生自我效能,情緒智能及心理健康之研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文,1-156。
郭妙雪、郭玲芳(2008)。單親家庭高中(職)學生父母管教方式、自我概念與生活適應之相關研究:以臺北縣市為例。華岡農科學報,22,37-56。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導:理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
陳明斌、卓國雄、洪彰岑(2014)。臺南地區單車運動參與者基本心理需求與自我決定動機之相關研究。長榮運動休閒學刊,(8),64-73。
陳皆榮(1997a)。冒險性露營活動對於青少年自我實現之影響。中華民國體育學會體育學報,22,71-82。
陳皆榮(1997b)。冒險性活動對於青少年團隊氣氛影響之研究。中華民國體育學會體育學報,22,133-144。
陳皆榮(1997c)。青少年冒險性挑戰活動實驗之研究-自我概念與焦慮。臺北,立昌。
陳皆榮(2000)。冒險性挑戰活動對青少年自我概念與自我實現的影響之研究,臺北。
陳啟榮(2011)。淺談怪獸家長。中等教育。
陳惠雯、林世華、吳麗娟(2001)。婚姻衝突、家庭界限與青少年子女適應之相關研究。教育心理學報。
冠宇(2009)。單車樂活最夯的生活方式。取自行政院體育委員會網址http://www.sac.gov.tw/resource/annualreport/sport6/p28.asp
曾瓊瑩(2015)。戶外教育活動對學童生活適應之促進-以手拉手營隊為例。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系學位論文,1-169。
黃佳雯(2014)。大台北地區國中生人際衝突因應策略,學習態度與學校生活適應之相關研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文,臺北市。
黃茂在、曾鈺琪(2015)。臺灣戶外教育內涵與課程優質化初探。教育脈動,(4),25-43。
廖鴻霖(2010)。以手段目的鏈探討自行車運動休閒價值。亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理學系碩士班學位論文,1-118。
劉傳將(2009)。單車環島自助旅行者夢想與成長的起點中。代步與休閒產業雙月刊,41,24-34。
蕭金土、陳瑋婷(2014)。臺灣學生依附關係,自我概念與生活適應之關係研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,28(2),23-48。
謝智謀、王俊杰、廖坤保(2014)。以體驗為本的冒險教育對高風險家庭青少年自我效能影響之研究。體驗教育學報,(8),165-186。
謝毓雯(1998)。青少年挫折經驗與挫折容忍度之關係研究建設性思考與社會支 持的角色,國立政治大學,未出版,台北市。
二、英文文獻
Adler, A., Ansbacher, H. L., & Ansbacher, R. R. (1964). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler (Vol. 1154). New York: Harper & Row.
Allan, J. F., McKenna, J., & Hind, K. (2012). Brain resilience: Shedding light into the black box of adventure procesess. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 16(1), 3-14.
Bandura (1995),社會學習理論(周曉虹譯),台北:桂冠,(原文於2000年出版)
Berman, D. S., & Davis-Berman, J. (2005). Positive psychology and outdoor education. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 17-24.
Bond, D. L. (1990). Loneliness and solitude: Some influences of object relations on the experiences of being alone. Unpublished master’s thesis, Boston University.
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
Bowlby, J. (1969), Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, 1, 1973.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard university press.
Brown, M. (2010). Transfer: Outdoor adventure education’s Achilles heel? Changing participation as a viable option. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 14(1), 13-22.
Chickering, A. W. (1969). Education and identity. Jossey-Bass.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. Peer rejection in childhood, 17-59.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and education. NAMTA journal, 22(2), 2-35.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge university press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (1990). Flow.
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 118(1), 108-132.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford university press.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford university press.
Fletcher, T. B., & Hinkle, J. S. (2002). Adventure based counseling: An innovation in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(3), 277-285.
Gass, M. A. (1985). Programming the transfer of learning in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 8(3), 18-24.
Gass, M. (1991). The longitudinal effects of an adventure orientation program. Journal of Experiential Education, 14(1), 47-48.
Greenway, R. (1995). The wilderness effect and ecopsychology. Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind, 122-135.
Gerstein, J. S. (1990). North Illinois University corporate adventure handbook. DeKalb,IL: North Illinois University College of Continuing Education.
Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family Therapy-An Overview (4th Edn), Pacific Grove, Brooks.
Golins, W. (1976). The exploration of the Outward Bound process model. Denber, CO: Colorado Outward Bound School.
Hattie, J., Marsh, H. W., Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of educational research, 67(1), 43-87.
Horwood, B. (1999). Educational adventure and schooling. Adventure programming, 9-12.
Howell, J. N. (1992). Adventure Boosts Empowerment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 1(3), 14-16.
Kimball, R. O. (1980). Wilderness/Adventure Programs for Juvenile Offenders.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. (2004). A prescription for leading in cynical times. Ivey Business Journal, 20(11), 1-7.
Kraft, R. J., & Sakofs, M. (1985). The Theory of Experiential Education.
Lazarus, R. S. (1976). Patterns of adjustment (3-rd ed.).
Luckner, J. L., & Nadler, R. S. (1997). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning. Dubuque, IA: Kendall. Hunt.
Mahoney, M. J. (1988). Constructive metatheory: 1. Basic features and historical foundations. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 1(1), 1-35.
Meier, J. F. (1978). Is the risk worth taking? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 49(4),31-33.
Micucci, J. A. (1998). The adolescent in family therapy: Breaking the cycle of conflict and control. Guilford Press.
Miles, J. C., & Priest, S. (1999). Adventure Programming. Venture Publishing, Inc., 1999 Cato Avenue, State College, PA 16801.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morrison, J. (1986). The wilderness solo solitude and re-creation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Moreno, J. L. (1941). Foundations of sociometry: An introduction. Sociometry, 15-35.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. Handbook of positive psychology, 195-206.
Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722-737.
Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1998). Does outdoor education really work? A summary of recent meta-analyses. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 3(1), 2-9.
Peterson, C. A. (1978). The right to risk. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 49(4), 47-48.
Priest, S. (1999). The Semantics of adventure programming, In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure Programming (pp. 111). State College.
Prouty, D., Panicucci, J., & Collinson, R. (2007). Adventure education: theory and applications. Human kinetics.
Raiola, E., & O’Keefe, M. (1999). Philosophy of practice: A history of adventure programming. In Miles, J. C. & Priest, S. (Ed.),
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Straume, L. V. (2008). Flow as a resource: A contribution to organizational psychology. Tapir Academic Press.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
UNESCO, T. D. (1978). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. Final Report. Paris.