研究生: |
黃信瑋 Huang, Sin-Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
人工智慧面試之有形性對應徵者印象管理之影響 The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Interview Interface of Tangibility on Applicants' Impression Management Behaviors |
指導教授: |
孫弘岳
Suen, Hung-Yue |
口試委員: |
陳怡靜
Chen, Yi-Ching 陳建丞 Chen, Chien-Cheng 孫弘岳 Suen, Hung-Yue |
口試日期: | 2022/06/30 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 72 |
中文關鍵詞: | 印象管理 、人工智慧 、非同步錄影面試 、社會介面理論 |
英文關鍵詞: | Impression Management, Artificial Intelligence, Asynchronous Video Interview, Social Interface Theory |
研究方法: | 實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200970 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:206 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
越來越多企業在甄選過程中使用搭載人工智慧(Artificial Intelligence, AI)的非同步錄影面試(Asynchronous Video Interview, AVI)。過去研究探討了AI面試如何影響技術、偏見和經濟後果。然而,當應徵者使用AVI加AI的平台進行錄影面試時,介面缺乏有形性一直是個問題,且過去未有研究探討應徵者在面對不同介面的AI面試時所產生的不同反應。
在求職面試中,應徵者會透過印象管理(Impression Management, IM)來展現最好的一面,包括誠實性和欺騙性印象管理。誠實的印象管理可能會增強甄選效度,而欺騙性印象管理則會損害甄選效度。過去的研究表明,即使是經驗豐富的面試官也無法正確識別候選人的印象管理行為。因此,求職面試中的印象管理問題已成為學術界和實務界的研究熱點,且由於錄影面試搭載AI的甄選方式在疫情催化下變得更加普及,本研究旨在探討AI面試的有形性對於應徵者印象管理的影響。
本研究運用兩種不同的AI面試介面,進行了 2 組(是否具備有形性)的實驗設計。研究中的有形性透過虛擬AI面試官來體現,一共有 70名正在尋找全職/兼職工作及培訓計畫的應徵者(N=67)參與本研究。研究結果表明,參與者在具備有形性的AI面試介面下會展現更多的自我行銷,而自我辯護、誇大不實、避重就輕等則沒有統計上的顯著差異,不過參與者的錄影面試經驗與勤勉審慎性對於其誠實性或欺騙性印象管理皆具有重要影響。
Nowadays, more and more companies are using Asynchronous Video interviews (AVI) equipped with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the personnel selection process. However, lack of tangibility is always a concern when job applicants are required to interact with a void interface using AVI plus AI platform, and there is no academic study investigating how the job applicants respond to different behavior toward different interfaces of AI interviews with or without tangibility.
This study developed different AVI-AI interview interfaces and conducted a quasi-experimental design of 2 groups (interface with or without tangibility) groups. There are 67 participants (N = 67) who are looking for full-time/part-time jobs were solicited to participate in this experiment.
The results show that participants will show more self-promotion under the tangible AI interview interface, and there is no difference in honest defensive, image creation, and image protection. However, the participants' video interview experience and conscientiousness are important for both honesty and deceptive impression management.
陳建丞, & 蔡維奇. (2005). 面談前印象對面試官評量效應之探討: 以面談結構性爲干擾變數.臺大管理論叢, 16(1), 155-170.
邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 (附光碟). 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
陳怡靜, & 錢國倫. (2015). 從功能與象徵性架構探討雇主形象對組織人才吸引力的影響. 中山管理評論, 23(4), 1125-1154.
戴元利(民109年9月14日)偵測微表情、預測性格AI人工智慧變身面試官。TVBS新聞網。取自https://news.tvbs.com.tw/
Abbas, A., Zhou, Y., Deng, S., & Zhang, P. (2018). Text Analytics to Support Sense-Making in Social Media: A Language-Action Perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 42(2), 427-464. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/13239
Ahsen, M. E., Ayvaci, M. U. S., & Raghunathan, S. (2019). When Algorithmic Predictions Use Human-Generated Data: A Bias-Aware Classification Algorithm for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0789
Amaral, A. A., Powell, D. M., & Ho, J. L. (2019). Why does impression management positively influence interview ratings? The mediating role of competence and warmth. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12260
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111.
Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016532
Basch, J. M., Melchers, K. G., Kurz, A., Krieger, M., & Miller, L. (2020). It Takes More Than a Good Camera: Which Factors Contribute to Differences Between Face-to-Face Interviews and Videoconference Interviews Regarding Performance Ratings and Interviewee Perceptions? Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09714-3
Blair, D. K., & Coyle, C. (2005). An examination of multicultural competencies of entry level certified therapeutic recreation specialists. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 39(2), 139. https://doi.org/https://0-www.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/scholarly-journals/examination-multicultural-competencies-entry/docview/218629611/se-2?accountid=14228
Bourdage, J. S., Roulin, N., & Tarraf, R. (2018). “I (might be) just that good”: Honest and deceptive impression management in employment interviews. Personnel Psychology, 71(4), 597-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12285
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2019). Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform. Management Science, 65(12), 5449-5460. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388
Buehl, A.-K., & Melchers, K. G. (2018). Do attractiveness and competition influence faking intentions in selection interviews? Journal of Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000208
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1165-1188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503
Comrey, A., & Lee, H. (1992). Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis, 2, 1992.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of personality, 55(2), 299-316.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
de Winter*, J. C., Dodou*, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate behavioral research, 44(2), 147-181.
Dhar, V., Geva, T., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Sundararajan, A. (2014). Prediction in economic networks. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 264-284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0510
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2018). Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them. Management Science, 64(3), 1155-1170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643
Ellis, A. P., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: a function of question type? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200
Gerich, J. (2012). Video-enhanced self-administered computer interviews. In Online research methods in urban and planning studies: Design and outcomes (pp. 99-119). IGI Global.
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research [Academy of Management Annals]. 14(2), 627-660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life (Vol. 21). Harmondsworth London.
Gorman, C. A., Robinson, J., & Gamble, J. S. (2018). An investigation into the validity of asynchronous web-based video employment-interview ratings. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000102
Guenole, N., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2005). The Suitability of Goldberg's Big Five IPIP Personality Markers in New Zealand: A Dimensionality, Bias, and Criterion Validity Evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(2).
Gupta, P., Fernandes, S. F., & Jain, M. (2018). Automation in recruitment: a new frontier. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 8(2), 118-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
Haan, M., Ongena, Y. P., Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T., & De Glopper, K. (2017). Response behavior in a video-web survey: A mode comparison study. Journal of Survey Statistics Methodology, 5(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw023
Hartwell, C. J., Johnson, C. D., & Posthuma, R. A. (2019). Are we asking the right questions? Predictive validity comparison of four structured interview question types. Journal of Business Research, 100, 122-129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.026
Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.181
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
Huang, C. y., Liao, H. y., & Chang, S. H. (1998). Social desirability and the Clinical Self‐Report Inventory: methodological reconsideration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199806)54:4<517::AID-JCLP13>3.0.CO;2-I
Jatobá, M., Santos, J., Gutierriz, I., Moscon, D., Fernandes, P. O., & Teixeira, J. P. (2019). Evolution of artificial intelligence research in human resources. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 137-142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.165
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and psychological measurement, 34(1), 111-117.
King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0
Kreps, G. L., & Neuhauser, L. (2013). Artificial intelligence and immediacy: designing health communication to personally engage consumers and providers. Patient Education and Counseling, 92(2), 205-210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.014
Kristof-Brown, A., Barrick, M. R., & Franke, M. (2002). Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. Journal of Management, 28(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800103
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Science, 65(7), 2966-2981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Krause, K. (2017). Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 371-382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12191
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Hemsing, V. (2020). Is anybody listening? The impact of automatically evaluated job interviews on impression management and applicant reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(4), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-03-2019-0156
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Papathanasiou, M. (2019). Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 217-234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12246
Law, S. J., Bourdage, J., & O’Neill, T. A. (2016). To fake or not to fake: Antecedents to interview faking, warning instructions, and its impact on applicant reactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1771. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01771
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18(2), 179-197.
Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2006). A model of faking likelihood in the employment interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 299-316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00353.x
Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1638–1656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638
Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self‐deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), 131-141.
Liem, C. C., Langer, M., Demetriou, A., Hiemstra, A. M., Wicaksana, A. S., Born, M. P., & König, C. J. (2018). Psychology meets machine learning: Interdisciplinary perspectives on algorithmic job candidate screening. In Explainable and interpretable models in computer vision and machine learning (pp. 197-253). Springer.
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. 67(2), 111.
Liu, X., & London, K. (2016, June). Tai: a tangible AI interface to enhance human-artificial intelligence (AI) communication beyond the screen. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 281-285). https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901896
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: actor perspectives. Routledge.
Marcus, B. (2009). ‘Faking’from the applicant's perspective: A theory of self‐presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 417-430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00483.x
McCarthy, J., & Goffin, R. (2004). Measuring job interview anxiety: Beyond weak knees and sweaty palms. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 607-637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00002.x
McCarthy, J., Hrabluik, C., & Jelley, R. B. (2009). Progression through the ranks: Assessing employee reactions to high‐stakes employment testing [Personnel Psychology]. Personnel Psychology, 62(4), 793-832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01158.x
McFarland, L. A., Ryan, A. M., & Kriska, S. D. (2003). Impression management use and effectiveness across assessment methods. Journal of Management, 29(5), 641-661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00030-8
Mejia, C., & Torres, E. N. (2018). Implementation and normalization process of asynchronous video interviewing practices in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(2), 685-701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0402
Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy, 7, 33-35.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, 97-146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric theory.
Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2018). The importance of procedural justice in human–machine interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 27-39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.022
Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. (1998). Uses and abuses of the analysis of covariance. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(6), 557-562.
Roulin, N., Bangerter, A., & Levashina, J. (2014). Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0295
Roulin, N., Bangerter, A., & Levashina, J. (2015). Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations? Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 395-444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12079
Roulin, N., & Bourdage, J. S. (2017). Once an impression manager, always an impression manager? Antecedents of honest and deceptive impression management use and variability across multiple job interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 29.
Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.587
Suen, H.-Y., Chen, M. Y.-C., & Lu, S.-H. (2019). Does the use of synchrony and artificial intelligence in video interviews affect interview ratings and applicant attitudes? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.012
Suen, H.-Y., Hung, K.-E., & Lin, C.-L. (2019). TensorFlow-based automatic personality recognition used in asynchronous video interviews. IEEE Access, 7, 61018-61023.
Swider, B. W., Barrick, M. R., & Harris, T. B. (2016). Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000077
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson Boston, MA.
Van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019). Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 215-222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009
Weiss, B., & Feldman, R. S. (2006). Looking good and lying to do it: Deception as an impression management strategy in job interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 1070-1086. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00055.x
Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020). Personnel selection in the digital age: A review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. European Journal of Work Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1681401