研究生: |
楊評如 Yang, Ping-Ju |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
體育師資生在體育教材教法課之體育課學習概念探討 A Study of Pre-service Physical Education Teachers’Conception of Learning Physical Education Class in Physical Education Teaching Method Course |
指導教授: |
掌慶維
Chang, Ching-Wei |
口試委員: |
掌慶維
CHANG, Ching-Wei 林靜萍 Ling, Ching-Ping 羅凱暘 Lo, Kai-yang |
口試日期: | 2022/06/15 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育與運動科學系 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 59 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學習概念 、職前體育師資培育 、素養導向 |
英文關鍵詞: | Conception of learning, Pre-service physical education teacher training, Competency-based education |
研究方法: | 半結構式訪談法 、 焦點團體法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401737 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:86 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
體育師資培育是體育教師養成的關鍵基礎,而體育師資生對體育課學習時所抱持的概念,對師資生在構思與實踐體育教學的表現具有重要的影響。在面對素養導向課程改革之際,體育師資生對體育學習所抱持的概念,對於落實新課綱而言,具有重要的意義。因此,本研究旨在探討體育師資生關於體育課的學習概念。研究方法採立意取方式,以北部某師資培育機構的師資生有修習體育教材教法之學生,運用焦點團體進行訪談,所蒐集資料以內容分析法進行分析。結果:一、體育師資生主要依過去體育課經驗對體育學習所抱持的概念,在意義上放鬆、輕鬆、時間自主;在經驗上包括運動專長訓練、自由活動;在特徵上以新技能的學習、動作反覆練習為進行體育學習的主要特質。二、體育師資生在參與師資培育課程期間,對體育學習概念在意義上朝向教育與終身學習的發展;在方式上認為需要同理心、團隊合作;在特徵上需運用身體活動進行互動。本研究最後針對職前體育師資培育課程的啟示進行討論,最後提出結論。
The cultivation of pre-service physical education teachers is the fundamental basis for their development, and the concepts held by pre-service PE teachers during learning how to teach significantly impact their conceptualizing and teaching practices of PE class. During the competency-based curriculum reform, the concepts that pre-service PE teachers hold towards PE learning are crucial for interpreting and implementing the new curriculum guidelines. Therefore, the study investigates the conceptions of learning in physical education class among pre-service physical education (PE) teachers. The research methodology of this study were as follows: The purposive sampling method was adopted, pre-service PE students were recruited from a teacher training institution in northern Taiwan. Data were collected through focus group interviews and analyzed by content analysis. The results showed that, based on pre-service teachers’ past PE class experiences, the concepts of PE learning that emphasizing relaxation, ease, and self-directed time management. These experiences include specialized sports training and free activities, with the main characteristics of ongoing PE learning being the acquisition of new skills and repetitive practice of motor skills. During the period of teacher training courses, pre-service PE teachers’ concepts of PE learning developed towards education and lifelong learning in terms of significance. They believed that empathy and teamwork are necessary in terms of teaching approach, and the use of physical activities for interaction is required in terms of characteristics. The study concludes with insights relevant to the pre-service PE teacher training programs.
一、中文部分
吳清山 (2017)。素養導向教師教育: 理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政雙月刊,112,14-27。
吳琦翎 (2014)。台灣大學生網路學習概念、網路學習方法與網路學習自我效能之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳璧純、詹志禹 (2018)。從能力本位到素養導向教育的演進、發展及反思。教育研究與發展期刊,14(2),35-64。
沈冠名、吳琦翎、李旻憲 (2017)。臺灣大學生網路學習概念之研究。數位科技學習期刊,9(3),1-22。
林采青 (2014)。台灣高中生公民與社會科學習概念、學習方法、學習態度及學習成就之探究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林清山 (2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),1-32。
林鼎鈞 (2019)。高中體育素養導向體育教學概念之探討。國立台灣師範大學體育學系碩士論文。
教育部 (2014 年 11 月 28 日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。取自http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/at tach/87/pta_5320_2729842_56626.pdf
教育部 (2021)。中華民國教師專業素養指引-師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育 課 程 基 準。教 育 部 主 管 法 規 查 詢 系 統。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002069&KeyWord=課程基準
符碧真 (2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式-素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),59-87。
陳美玉 (1999)。教師專業學習與發展。台北:師大書苑。
喻鴻鈞(2015)。從現象分析學取向探討學生科學學習概念之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所博士論文。
掌慶維(2018)。素養導向體育教學之理論基礎。學校體育,168,38-48。
掌慶維(2021)。素養導向職前體育師資培育課程與教學-理念與實務,台北市。
曾莉雯(2018)。科學模擬融入探究過程對學生科學學習概念與科學學習方法之影響-以浮力單元為例。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文。
游自達(2019)。素養導向教學的實踐:深化學習的開展。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),6-12。
程峻(2019)。解析核心素養―談素養導向體育教學轉化。學校體育,6,103-119。
黃琇屏(2017)。淺談核心素養與評鑑概念。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),91-94。
二、英文部分
Aleksander S. & Tadeusz L. J. (2018). Conceptions of learning chosen by pedagogy and physical education students. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health.5(2), 276-280.
Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, D, MacDonald, & M. O’ Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 347-365). SAGE.
Anto ́nio M. D. (2007). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students.Higher Education,54, 781-794.
Buehl, M.M., Alexander, P.A. and Murphy, P.K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfree (Eds.). Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673– 708). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-centry teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
Duell, O.K. & Schommer, M. (2001). Measures of people’s beliefs about knowledge and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 419–449.
Durand,D. (2011). La systemique. Presses Universitaires de France.
Green, A., & Leask, M. (2016). What do teachers do? In S. Capel, M. Leask, & S. Younie, (Eds.), Learning to teach in secondary school. A companion to school experience (7th ed., pp. 1.1). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Hofer, B.K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.
Jaeger, R. & Tittle, C. (1980). Minimum competency testing: Motives, models, measures and consequences. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Kember, D., & Kwan, K.-P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469-490.
Korthagen, F. (2011). Making teacher education relevant for practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Orbis Scholae, 5(2), 31-50.
Kukari, A. (2004). Cultural and religious experiences: Do they define teaching and learning for pre-service teachers prior to teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 95–110.
M. Rönnqvist, H. Larsson, G. Nyberg & D. Barker (2019). Understanding learners’ sense making of movement learning in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(2), 172-186.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.
Michelle, F., Fiona, D., & Dominic, C.(2018). The Role of PETE in Developing and Sustaining Physical Literacy Informed Practitioners. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37, 299-307
Morton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
Nola P. & John. (2002). Assessing Studentsí Conceptions of Learning. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 2, 17-32.
Säljö, R. (1979).Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443-451.
Suzan F A. (2004). High School Students' Physical Education Conceptual Knowledge. The American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 75(3), 272–287.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275-284.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70.
Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733-1750.
Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning:The differences revealed by college students. Computer & Education, 53, 1092-1103.
Tsai, C.-C., & Kuo, P. C.(2008).Cram school student’s conceptions of learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 351-373.
Wondifraw D. (2020). Conceptions of teaching & learning and teaching approach preference: Their change through preservice teacher education program. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-18.