研究生: |
劉佩治 Liu, Pet-Chih |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
保險業主管領導風格與管理模式之研究 The study of Leadership Style and Management Mode of Business Supervisors in Insurance Industry |
指導教授: |
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 64 |
中文關鍵詞: | 轉換型領導 、交易型領導 |
英文關鍵詞: | Transformational leadership, Transactional leadership |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202860 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:237 下載:27 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
主管的領導風格攸關團隊氣氛、獎懲辦法的訂定與運用,進而影響工作績效,對於保險公司的業務部門而言,保費收入及增員人數的成長不僅代表著團隊成員努力的成果,也代表主管的領導模式是否有效。
本研究旨在探討保險公司業務部門的各級主管在領導部屬達到目標時,依照部屬個別狀況不同施予適當的管理方式是否更能夠達到工作績效?故針對某保險公司業務部門的各級主管以半結構式訪談法收集、整理其領導及管理業務人員時的經驗陳述,將組織行為及個別人員輔導過程經過歸納、統整、分析及反思,期能夠全面檢視中高階主管在領導部屬時,如何掌握有效的激勵措施以建立有利於績效達成的核心價值與能力。
本研究觀察的主要發現如下:
一、在多變的環境下,帶領部屬達成工作績效之主管領導風格以轉換型領導為多,轉換型領導與交換型領導的運用依照部屬的個別需求不同而做調整,較可維持團隊和諧氣氛,團隊氣氛影響向心力及目標達成狀況。
二、保險業於組織運作上著重管理與輔導,轉換型領導中的四個構面(魅力領導,激勵領導,個人關懷,智力啟發)及交易型領導的三個構面(權變報酬,積極例外管理,消極例外管理),以權變報酬(Contingent Reward)為最常使用的管理模式,積極例外管理(Active
management–by–exception)最少使用。
所以在金融保險業之多變的環境以轉換型領導為主要領導型態,於日常實務運作當中以權變報酬為最常使用的管理模式。有效的領導風格及管理模式之運用可以塑造正向的組織文化,提升團隊向心力,達成目標。
The regulation and practice of the rewards and penalties system as well as the team atmosphere are related to the leadership style of the supervisors. To the sales department, the increasing of insurance premium and employee numbers not only represent the achievement of the team effort but also the effect of the leadership style.
This study is aimed to probe into the process of how to acquire better work result through proper management methods when leading the subordinates to achieve the goals. Herein this study collects the semi-structure mode interviews which acquired from supervisors of different levels in a certain insurance company, according to these experienced statements ,we generalize, conclude, analysis and reflect the process of organizational behavior and individual guidance in order to conduct a full scale survey among these middle to high level supervisors' capability indicating how to master the effective encouragements when leading their staff members to set up the company core value and competence.
The major discoveries of this study are as following:
1.In changeable environments, transformational leadership is the major leadership style when leading the subordinates to achieve the targets, it can be adjusted by the deferent needs, and prone to maintain the team atmosphere also to enhance the team centripetal furthermore.
2.Organizational function emphasizes the management and guidance, the four facets (charisma leadership, encouragement leadership, individual care, intelligent inspiration) and the three facets of transactional leadership(contingent reward, active management -by-exception, passive management-by-exception)and the contingent reward is often being used while the active management-by-exception is being taken less.
In conclusion, among this changeable environment of financial insurance trade, the transformational leadership is mainly used in practice, and this effective leadership can form a positive organization culture, enhance the team centripetal in order to reach the target.
一、中文部分:
公孫策(2012)。企業管理(二版)。臺北:志光教育文化出版社。
毛文靜(2012)。欣賞式探詢:組織發展干預新趨勢。中國人力開發,2,49-52。
王佳玉(2000)。轉換型領導與領導效能關聯之研究-以台北市政府為個案分析(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
余美玲(2009)。女性領導者人格特質、性別角色、組織變革認知與轉換型領導關聯性之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
李明席(2006)。農會員工人格特質、主管領導風格、工作壓力與工作績效之關聯研究。(未出版博士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
李建道(2011)。AI問句對團隊行為影響之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。.
李華民(1994)。激勵管理的精神與應用。勞工行政,79,29-34。
李碧娥 (2006) 。組織文化與組織氣候對組織績效之影響以某保險經紀人公司為例 ( 碩士論文 ) 。 朝陽科技大學,台中市。
林志峰(2006)。主管領導型態、人格特質、組織承諾與工作績效關聯性之研究—以國防部軍備局生產製造中心生產工廠為例 (未出版博士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
何麗勤 ( 2002 ) 。轉換型領導、交易型領導對員工效能之影響 (未出版博士論文) 。逢甲大學,台中市。
邱豔婷(2005)。人力資源高績效工作實務對員工工作績效、組織公民行為關聯性之探討(未出版博士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
徐立德(1992)。人群關係管理。台北:中華企管中心。
許士軍(1995)。管理學(第十版)。臺北:東華書局。
張立貞(2013)。柔性領導與角色績效之研究─知覺主管支持的中介效果 (未出版博士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
張建興(2011)。台籍主管領導風格對大陸員工的知識學習成效與工作績效之影響—轉換型領導 vs. 交易型領導 (未出版博士論文)。 國立成功大學,臺南市。
張潤書(2001)。行政學。臺北:三民。
戚樹誠(2014)。組織行為精華版─二版。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
彭昌盛(1993)。轉換型領導理論及其應用之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
黃家齊(2011)。組織行為學。臺北:華泰。
黃素慧(2006)。女性主管領導特質與核心能力對於員工工作投入之影響-以領導效能為中介變項 (未出版博士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
黃敬倫(2005)。領導型態、工作特性、組織承諾與離職傾向之關連性探討-以某醫學中心為例(未出版博士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
楊銘賢(1995)。管理概論。臺北:中興管理。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用. 臺北市:心理出版社。
蔡彩珠(2000)。學校應用激勵管理的可行策略。國民教育,40(4),63-64。
蔡進雄(2005)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,37-63。
鄭力倫(2008)。在不同主管領導風格下業務人員人格特質對業績績效的影響-以事務機器業為例(未出版博士論文)。國立臺北大學,新北市。.
盧建中、費吳琛、程芬蘭(2005)。轉換型領導、交易型領導、授權賦能與組織承諾關係之探討。2005年第三屆管理思維與實務學術研討會論文集。台北,銘傳大學。
盧瑞陽(1993)。組織行為:管理心理導向。臺北:華泰書局。
謝秦強(2005)。主管之領導行為與工作特性對員工工作滿意度及組織承諾影響之研究—以台南市銀行為實證 (未出版博士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
蘇國禎(2000)。我國服務業領導模式的發展及其應用之研究 (未出版博士論文)。 國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
翁宜馨 (2007) 。以系統思考探討領導者信念對組織績效之影響:以ING安泰人壽台灣子公司為例(未出版博士論文)。中山大學。高雄市。
曾美智 (2009) 。金融保險營業處文化與管理團隊領導風格對營業出發展之關係探討 ( 碩士論文) 。 成功大學,台南市。
曾崇育 (2014) 。組織變革中的轉換型領導-以某壽險個案部門為例 (碩士論文)。
國立台灣大學 , 台北市。
謝孟均 (2009) 。主管與部屬對領導風格認知差異之研究 – 以我國壽險業為例 (碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
二、英文部分:
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(2), 142-175.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
Bass, B. M. (1991). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
Bryman, A. (1993). Charismatic leadership in business organizations: Some neglected issues. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(3), 289-304.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. NY: Harper & Row
Campbell, JP (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette & LM Houghs (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd edition, pp. 687-371).
Conger, J. A. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider's perspective on these developing streams of research. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 145-179.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. Center for Creative Leadership.
Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness.Advances in experimental social psychology, 1, 149-190.
French, C., & Seward, F. (1983). Impetus for action: a cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-434.
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The leadership quarterly, 14(6), 693-727.
Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations.Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1201, 1245.
Hall, D.T., & Goodale, J.G. (1986). Human resources management: Strategy, design and implementation. Illinois: Scott, Foresman, Glenview.
Hammond, S. A., & Royal, C. (Eds.). (1998). Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry. Plano, TX: Practical Press.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behavior(p. 65). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Synderman, B. S. (1959) . The motivation to work . New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 321-339.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., & Gupta, V. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. Advances in global leadership, 1(2), 171-233.
Jacobs, T. O., & Jaques, E. (1990). Military executive leadership.
Kan, M. M., & Parry, K. W. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly,15(4), 467-491.
Kotter, J. P. (1990). A Force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press.
Locke, E. A. (1982). Relation of goal level to performance with a short work period and multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(4), 512.
Madsen, M. T. (2001). Leadership and management theories revisited. Handelshøjskolen.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achievement society. Princenton, NJ: Von Nostrand.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood.
Robbins, S. P. (1991). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications. Prentice Hall.
Robbins, and Judge (2010). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Prentice Hall Inc.
Schermerhorn, J. R., Buono, A., & Warfield, A. (1989). Management for Productivity: Advanced Instructional Modules. Aim. Wiley.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Alfred A.
Snyder, N. H., Dowd, J. J., Jr., & Houghton, D. M. (1994). Vision, values, and courage. New York: The Free Press.
Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making (Vol. 110). University of Pittsburgh Pre.
Vroom, V.R.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Walumbwa, F.O.,and C. A. Hartnell (2011), “Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links; The role of relational indentification and self-efficacy.”Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, No.1, pp.153-172.
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of management, 15(2), 251-289.
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations.
Zaleznik, A. (2003). Managers and leaders: are they different?. Clinical leadership & management review: the journal of CLMA, 18(3), 171-177.