行動載具與無線網路科技的快速崛起使得實境學習成為新興學習策略。有著行動載具的協助，與當地特色景物結合的實境學習能夠加深學習者在真實情境之下與學習資源連動，達成有意義的學習方式。目前許多情境感知之實境學習多以遊戲式學習為主，並且融入合作、競爭等小組成員互動方式。許多文獻針對實境遊戲學習討論，並且著重平台設計、教學策略設計等主題，但卻鮮少研究探討分組模式所造成的影響。以往研究已證實，在教室的教學環境下，同質能力分組與異質能力分組對不同先備能力學習者之學習成效形成差異。當合作方式由傳統教室走向真實情境是否仍會形成相同的影響是本篇研究關注的焦點。本篇研究使用實驗法，受試者為58位，依照其審美知能高低將其分派至同質能力小組或異質能力小組，並接受一實境遊戲學習，主題為信義區公共藝術教學，並觀察依變項之變化：學習成就與小組學習興趣。研究統計方式採取成對樣本T檢定與共變數分析，並配合半結構式訪談進行質化資料收集。量化研究結果顯示，接受實境遊戲教學以後，全體學習者之學習成效均有顯著改善。然而，不同分組類型並不存在顯著差異，且不同能力者在分組類型亦無發生交互作用。搭配質化資料分析結果，顯示不同能力者在不同分組皆能在實境遊戲學習中獲得良好的學習經驗。本研究延伸以往能力分組討論，並且對未來的教學設計者或是教師給予實境遊戲融入教學現場的實質建議。

Context-aware learning is an innovative strategy that enables learners to interact with people in a real learning context and receive purposive learning materials that are embedded in the context. The schemes are usually game-based and are performed with group cooperations and competitions, because active interactions between group members are required throughout the game-based learning process. However, recent studies put very limited amount of efforts on the investigation of the grouping effects. Studies have proven that in traditional classrooms, learners with different prior content-specific abilities are in favor of different types of grouping methods (heterogeneous and homogeneous). This paper addresses the grouping effects on context-aware game-based learning. 58 subjects were assigned to one of the two groups, in which either a heterogeneous or a homogeneous method was employed. Parallel form of achievement tests were given as the pretest and posttest to evaluate learner’s achievement, and a group learning interest questionnaire was given to explore learner’s group-learning interest on different grouping methods. Interviews were performed to gather qualitative information. The results of the study show that the learners have great improvement after receiving context-aware game-based learning and there is no significance between learners with different prior abilities in different grouping method. The assumption is made that context-aware game-based learning increase the learning efficiency of all learners. The results also make suggestions to instructional designers for better grouping learners into a context-aware game-based learning scenario.

壹、中文文獻
王如哲（2010）。解析「學生學習成效」，評鑑雙月刊，27，62。Retrieved from http://www.ntcu.edu.tw/oaa/Schoolweb/Files/05_03/%E8%A7%A3%E6%9E%90%E3%80%8C%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E6%88%90%E6%95%88%E3%80%8D.pdf
王金國 (2000 )。簡介小組討論教學法，教育研究，8，137-147。取自http://class.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/669/1669/img/1381/780643923.pdf
吳統雄（1984）。電話調查：理論與方法。台北市：聯經。
林大正, & 陳宗禧. (2008). The study of instructional design in context-aware mobile learning environments. Journal of Information Technology and Applications, 2(4), 221-226. Retrieved from http://jita.csi.chu.edu.tw/
張秀梅（2003）。不同能力分組方式在合作學習應用中對學習態度和學習成就的影響（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號091TKU00154011）
張春興（2007）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
教育部（2008）。數位學習白皮書。台北市：教育部。
許世宏（2011）。探索式導覽系統應用於隨境遊戲之教學成效研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號 099NTNT5395029）
陳瓊花（2004）。臺灣民眾美感素養發展與藝術教育改進之研究報告。國立臺灣藝術教育館委託之專題研究成果報告（編號：930302）。取自http://ed.arte.gov.tw/ch/trust/content.aspx?AE_SNID=124
傅斌暉（2004）。審美知能測驗研究－以九十二學年度台北縣國民中學美術班聯合招生甄試審美知能科為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號 092NTNU0233013）
蘇錦麗（2009）。「大學院校學生學習成果評估」相關內涵分析，評鑑雙月刊，21。Retrieved from http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2009/09/01/1794.aspx

貳、西文文獻
Abowd, G., Dey, A., Brown, P., Davies, N., Smith, M., & Steggles, P. (1999). Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In H.-W. Gellersen (Ed.), Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing (Vol. 1707, pp. 304-307): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/3-540-48157-5_29
Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students' perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 7-20. doi:10.1177/001698620404800102
Allan, S. D. (1991). Ability grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping and the gifted. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60-65. Retrieved from EBSCO database.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37-40. doi:10.3102/0013189X025008037
Boticki, I., Looi, C. K., & Wong, L. H. (2011). Supporting mobile collaborative activities through scaffolded flexible grouping. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 190-202. Retrieved from JSTOR database.
Bressler, D., M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517. doi:10.1111/jcal.12008
Chang, W.-C., Wang, T.-H., Lin, F. H., & Yang, H.-C. (2009). Game-based learning with ubiquitous technologies. IEEE Internet Computing, 13(4), 26-33. doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.81
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003) A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
Cheng, W. Y., Lam, S. F., & Chan, C. Y. (2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 205-221. doi:10.1348/000709907X218160
Cheung, C. K., & Rudowicz, E. (2003). Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 241-254. doi:10.1080/00220670309598813
Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: An investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96. doi:10.1111/jcal.12036
Cohen, E. G. (1986). Designing groupwork : strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM. doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.1.10.pdf
Dodeen, H. (2015). The effects of positively and negatively worded items on the factor structure of the UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(3), 259-267. doi:10.1177/0734282914548325
Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 482-493. doi:10.2307/328891
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54(3), 151-162. doi:10.2307/2112327
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999
Edwards, R. (2001, October 14). GNS and other matters of role-playing theory. The Forge, [Online forum]. Retrieved from http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/1/
Esposito, D. (1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: Principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments. Review of Educational Research, (43)2, 163-179. doi:10.3102/00346543043002163
Fiedler, E. D., Lange, R. E., & Winebrenner, S. (2002). In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24(3), 108-111. doi:10.1080/02783190209554142
Findley, W. G., & Bryan, M. (1971). Ability grouping: 1970 status, impact, and alternatives. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Center for Educational Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED060595)
Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 58-89. doi:10.1177/0272431695015001005
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20-20. doi:10.1145/950566.950595
Gentes, A., Guyot-Mbodji, A., & Demeure, I. (2010). Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design. Multimedia Systems, 16(1), 43-55. doi: 10.1007/s00530-009-0172-2
Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18(8), 519-521. doi:10.1037/h0049294
Good, T., & Marshall, S. (1984). Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous group? In P. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, and M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group process (pp. 15-38). New York, NY: Academic Press. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED268075)
Groh, F. (2012). Gamification: State of the art definition and utilization. In Proceedings of the 4th Seminar on Research Trends in Media Informatics (pp.39-46). Ulm, Germany. Retrieved from http://d-nb.info/1020022604/34/#page=39
Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2010). University students' attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 9-20. doi: 10.1177/1469787409355867
Hollifield, J. (1987). Ability grouping in elementary schools. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED290542)
Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2011). A systematic approach for learner group composition utilizing u-learning portfolio. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (3), 102-117. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/14_3/9.pdf
Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & Dam, G. T. (2009). Mobile game‐based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 332-344. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00316.x
Hung, P.-H., Lin, Y.-F., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33-42. Retrieved from JSTOR database.
Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
International Telecommunication Union. (2014). The world in 2014: ICT facts and figures. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2014/ITU_
Key_2005-2014_ICT_data.xls
Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for improving group work. Oxford, England: Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2006). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 785-811. Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/edtech/30.pdf
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Roseth, C., & Shin, T. S. (2014). The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(9), 622-633. doi:10.1111/jasp.12280
Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Hagen, Germany: FernUniversitat, Instution for Research into Distance Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED472435)
Klopfer, E., & Sheldon, J. (2010). Augmenting your won reality: Student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Directions for Youth Development, 2010(128), 85-94. doi:10.1002/yd.378
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C-L. C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence in Education, 23(1-2), 22-30. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1066568870230105
Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007). Standardized tests predict graduate students' success. Science, 315, 1080-1081. doi:10.1126/science.1136618
Laine, T. H., Sedano, C. A. I., Joy, M., & Sutinen, E. (2010). Critical factors for technology integration in game-based pervasive learning spaces. Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(4), 294-306. doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.16
Laine, T., & Joy, M. (2009). Survey on context-aware pervasive learning environments. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 3(1), 70-76. doi:10.3991/ijim.v3i1.680
Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e‐learning: towards context‐aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E1-E9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458. doi:10.3102/00346543066004423
Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9-30. doi:10.1177/1469787407074008
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3, 223-253. Retrieved from http://ocw.metu.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=1311
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public, (6)2, 31-55. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
McManus, M. S., & Gettinger G. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 13-22. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9944439
Melero, J., Hernández-Leo, D., Sun, J., Santos, P., & Blat, J. (2015). How was the activity? A visualization support for a case of location-based learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 317-329. doi:10.1111/bjet.12238
Ｍoran, T. P., & Dourish, P. (2001). Introduction to this special issue on context-aware computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4), 87-95. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI16234_01
Naismith, L., Sharples, M., Vavoula G., & Lonsdale P. (2004). Literature review in mobile technologies and learning (A NESTA Futurelab Series - Report 11). Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/190143/filename/Naismith_2004.pdf
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2011). Student learning, student achievement: How do teachers measure up? Executive summary. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED517573)
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, 1-18. doi:10.5334/2004-8-oblinger
Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 27-34). IEEE. doi:10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281330
Pandey, K. (2009). Advantages and disadvantages of RFID technology. Retrieved from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-rfid-technology.html
Peng, H., Su Y.-J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: mobile learning re‐defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 171-183. doi:10.1080/14703290902843828
Ploetzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Preier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 103-121). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Pergamon Press. Retrieved from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.1.12.pdf
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1-4. doi:10.1145/950566.950596
Saha, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2003). Pervasive computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. Computer, 36(3), 25-31. doi:10.1109/MC.2003.1185214
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 33(2), 105-119. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-6405-z
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning, and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 314-331. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.001
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2011). When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979266
Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and psychological measurement, 41(4), 1101-1114. doi:10.1177/001316448104100420
Schwabe, G., & Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: Design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204-216. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00128.x
Shaffer, D. W., Halverson, R., Squire, K. R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. (WCER Working Paper No. 2005-4). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED497016)
Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2005). Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 1001-1023. doi: 10.1080/00420980500106963
Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile age. Paper presented at Conference on Seeing, Understanding, Learning in the Mobile Age, Budapest, Hungary. Retrieved from http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/papers/theory
%20of%20learning%20budapest.pdf
Shih, J. L., & Chen, C. P. (2012). Approaching M-learning with the application of instructional pervasive game. In Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on (pp. 254-258). IEEE. doi:10.1109/WMUTE.2012.62
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342. doi:10.3102/00346543050002315
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 347-350. doi:10.3102/00346543057003293
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471-499. doi:10.3102/00346543060003471
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 268-286. doi:10.1111/jcal.12088
Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 259-274. doi:10.3102/00028312019002259
Syvanen, A., Beale, R., Sharples, M., Ahonen, M., & Lonsdale, P. (2005). Supporting pervasive learning environments: adaptability and context awareness in mobile learning. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2005. WMTE 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 3-5). IEEE. doi:10.1109/WMTE.2005.62
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ... . International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, (8)2. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/346/875
UNESCO. (2000). Education for all status and trends 2000: Assessing learning achievement. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001198/119823e.pdf
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It's not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 17-30. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/digital-game-based-learning-its-not-just-digital-natives-who-are-restless
Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 642-655. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642
Whitton, N. (2013). Encouraging engagement in game-based learning. In P. Felicia (Ed), Developments in current game-based learning design and deployment (pp. 17-26). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1864-0.ch002
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024