簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 呂志峰
Chih-Feng Lu
論文名稱: 中學生月相盈虧相關迷思概念類型與概念改變過程之探討
指導教授: 許瑛玿
Hsu, Ying-Shao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 地球科學系
Department of Earth Sciences
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: 迷思概念月相概念改變中學生
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:150下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 學生在進行學習之前,具有的前備知識(prior knowledge),因受限於本身經驗與個別推論,有別於專家所持有的科學概念 (Osborne & Gilbert, 1980)。學生所發展出來的概念是不完整,甚至是不正確的,此稱為迷思概念(Driver & Easley, 1978; Clark & Peterson, 1986)。這些概念很難藉由學習加以改變,往往形成學習的絆腳石,阻礙學習的進行(Vosniadou &Brewer, 1992)。
    為了有效改變學生所具有的迷思概念,許多的教學策略被提出來以促進學生進行概念改變(何玉婷, 2005)。諸多促進概念改變的教學策略裡,常見的認知衝突策略是使用異例(anomaly)、類比(Duit, 1991; Gentner, 1998)、電腦模擬教學以及TEL model課程設計模式(Hsu, Ying-Shao, Wu, Hsin-Kai & Hwang, Fu-Kwun, 2008)。本研究以彰化縣某國中二年級兩個常態班級的學生為研究對象,試圖探討國中二年級學生在進行「月相盈虧成因課程」前後概念改變情形,並了解不同空間能力的學生概念改變的差異情形。
    首先,研究者以「月相盈虧成因診斷測驗」分析國中二年級學生在進行課程前所具有的月相盈虧成因迷思概念,並在課程後測探討「月相盈虧成因課程」對學生學習月相盈虧成因概念改變的情形。
    研究獲得以下結果:
    1. 學習前學生的概念模式有七種。科學模式解釋月相盈虧成因的學習者有5位;在迷思概念類型中有9位以月食的模式來解釋月相盈虧成因,而有10位同學以位置模式解釋月相盈虧成因,最後有4位以混合模式解釋月相盈虧成因。
    2. 學生在教學後較多人呈現出部份或完整的科學概念。
    3. 學生在經過課程之後仍持有迷思概念,其中月食模式的學生最多(3位)。
    4. 高、低空間能力學生在經過月相盈虧課程之後概念有顯著改變,顯示課程教材對高、低空間能力學生獲得較顯著的成效。

    謝誌 II 摘要 III 目次 IV 附錄目次 V 表次 VI 圖次 VIII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與背景……………………………………………………..1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………..3 第三節 研究問題……………………………………………………………..3 第四節 研究的重要性………………………………………………………..4 第五節 名詞釋義……………………………………………………………..4 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 迷思概念……………………………………………………………..6 第二節 概念改變與教學策略……………………………………………….16 第三節 空間能力的研究……………………………………………………..27 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究對象……………………………………………………………..28 第二節 研究設計與流程……………………………………………………..29 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………………..32 第四節 資料分析……………………………………………………………..42 第五節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………..49 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 學生學習前的月相盈虧成因概念類型……………………………..50 第二節 學生學習前後概念類型轉變………………………………………..59 第三節 學生概念改變分析與個案探討………………………………….….62 第四節 空間能力對學生概念學習的影響…………………………………..72 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 綜合討論……………………………………………….……………75 第二節 建議與未來研究方向……………………………………………….79 附錄一 月相盈虧成因診斷測驗…………………………………………………99 附錄二 月相盈虧成因課程動畫、模擬實驗之內容與引導問題……………105 附錄三 情境問題………………………………………………………………111 附錄四 晤談問題………………………………………………………………113 表次 表 2.1.1 Piaget的認知發展時期……………………………………………7 表 2.1.2 九年一貫課程綱要月相相關能力指標……………………………11 表 2.1.3 月相相關研究與重要發現…………………………………………12 表 2.1.4 月相盈虧相關迷思概念內容………………………………………13 表 2.1.5 月相盈虧成因心智模式……………………………………………14 表 2.1.6 月相盈虧成因概念解釋模式………………………………………15 表 2.2.1 概念改變四條件與對應策略………………………………………16 表 2.2.2 Thagard(1992)的概念改變階層理論…………………………19 表 2.2.3 概念改變理論整理…………………………………………………23 表 2.2.4 TEL 模式內容對應表……………………………………………26 表 3.1.1 研究對象一覽表……………………………………………………28 表 3.3.1 九年一貫課程綱要月相相關概念…………………………………32 表 3.3.2 教科書月相相關概念分析表………………………………………35 表 3.3.3 課程內容設計與TEL教學模式對應表……………………………36 表 3.3.4 模擬實驗動畫………………………………………………………38 表 3.3.5 月相盈虧成因課程教學流程………………………………………38 表 3.3.6 月相盈虧診斷測驗雙向明細表……………………………………40 表 3.3.7 學生前後測概念類型與特性………………………………………41 表 3.4.1 資料分析方法………………………………………………………42 表 4.1.1 前測診斷測驗概念類型人次表……………………………………51 表 4.1.2 學生前測概念類型與人次表………………………………………58 表 4.2.1 學生前後測概念類型與人次表……………………………………59 表 4.2.2 學生前後測概念類型分類表………………………………………61 表 4.3.1 前後測概念類型改變人次表………………………………………64 表 4.4.1 空間能力分組表……………………………………………………72 表 4.4.2 高度空間能力分組前後測概念類型分類表………………………72 表 4.4.3 中度空間能力分組前後測概念類型分類表………………………73 表 4.4.4 低空間能力分組前後測概念類型分類表…………………………74 圖次 圖 2.2.1 本體樹的組織架構…………………………………………………20 圖 2.2.2 本體內與跨本體類別的概念改變示意圖…………………………21 圖 2.2.3 Vosniadou(1994)的認知架構理論……………………………22 圖 2.2.4 類比橋實例設計……………………………………………………25 圖 3.2.1 研究流程圖...……………………………………………………30 圖 3.3.1 南一版 月相示意圖………………………………………………33 圖 3.3.2 康軒版 月相示意圖………………………………………………34 圖 3.3.3 光復版 月相示意圖………………………………………………34 圖 4.1.1 月形變化正確圖示…………………………………………………52 圖 4-1.2 編號20205的學生第二題回答內容………………………………53 圖 4-1.3 編號20205的學生第八題回答內容………………………………53 圖 4.1.4 編號20203的學生第二題回答內容………………………………53 圖 4.1.5 編號20233的學生第二題回答內容………………………………54 圖 4.1.6 編號20211的學生第二題回答內容………………………………55 圖 4-1.7 編號20211的學生第八題回答內容………………………………55 圖 4.1.8 編號20208的學生第八題回答內容………………………………56 圖 4.1.9 編號20505的學生第二題回答內容………………………………57 圖 4.1.10 編號20505的學生第二題回答內容………………………………57 圖 4.2.1 學生教學前後概念改變累積人次圖………………………………60 圖 4.3.1 學生前後測概念改變變化圖………………………………………63 圖 4.3.2 編號202029的學生前測答案……………………………………65 圖 4.3.3 編號202029的學生後測答案……………………………………65 圖 4.3.4 編號202028學生的前測答案……………………………………66 圖 4.3.5 編號202028學生的後測答案……………………………………66 圖 4.3.6 編號202004學生的前測答案……………………………………67 圖 4.3.7 編號202004學生的後測答案……………………………………67 圖 4.3.8 編號205008學生的前測答案……………………………………68 圖 4.3.9 編號205008學生的後測答案……………………………………68 圖 4.3.10 編號 202020的前測答案…………………………………………69 圖 4.3.11 編號 202020的後測答案…………………………………………69 圖 4.3.12 編號 202026的前測答案…………………………………………70 圖 4.3.13 編號 202026的後測答案…………………………………………70 圖 4.3.14 編號 202016學生的前測答案……………………………………71 圖 4.3.15 編號 202016學生的後測答案……………………………………71

    一、中文部分
    丁凡(譯)(1998)。因才施教:開啟多元智慧,破除學習困難的迷思。臺北市:遠流。(Thomas Armstrong, 1987)
    王克先(1987)。學習心理學。台北市:五南圖書。
    王美芬(1991)。自然科錯誤之研究。台北市立師範學院學報, 22, 367-400。
    王美芬(1992):我國五、六年級學生有關月亮錯誤概念的診斷及補救教學策略的應用。台北市立師範學院學報,23,357-380。
    王保進(1999)。視窗版SPSS 與行為科學研究。台北市:心理出版社。
    王晉基、郭重吉(1992) 利用選擇題的方式來探求國中學生對光的迷思概念,科學教育,3:73-92。
    朱錦鳳(1997)。教學電腦模擬的必備要件及注意事項。教學科技與媒體, 31,49-53。
    李曉雯(2001)。國小四年級學生「月相」迷思概念之研究。臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    邱美虹(2000)。概念改變的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊, 8(1), 1-34。
    邱美虹和陳英嫻(1995):月相盈虧之概念改變。師大學報, 40, 509-548。
    邱月玲(2002)。不同的科學圖文配置對學生閱讀學習的影響-以『月相概念』為例。臺中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文。
    余芳如(2003)。不同教學策略對國小高年級學生學習「月相盈虧」概念的影響。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    何玉婷(2005)。探討不同教學方式對高中生學習四季概念的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所,台北市。
    吳百薰(1998)。國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所,台中。
    吳武典、蔡崇建(1986)。國中資優學生的認知方式與學習方式之探討。特殊教育研究學刊, 2, 219-230。
    林永菁(2000)。不同教學方式及心智能力與兒童地科概念認知層次的關係研究。未出版碩士論文,國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。
    林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華書局。
    洪瑞英(1998)。高中生的化學平衡概念之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所,高雄市。
    姜滿(1993)。國小學童地球科學概念之理解。台南師院學報, 26, 193-219。
    郭生玉(1985)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局。
    郭生玉(1999)。心理與教育研究法。台北縣:精華書局。
    郭重吉(1987a)。英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究。資優教育季刊, 22, 2-8。
    郭重吉(1987b)。評介學習風格之有關研究。資優教育季刊, 23, 7-16。101
    郭重吉(1988)。從認知觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報, 13, 351-371。
    郭重吉(1991)。國中學生熱與溫度概念的另有架構。彰師大學報, 2, 435-463。
    郭重吉(2001)。漫談建構主義在數理教學上的應用。建構與教學,16。
    翁雪琴(1994)。探討國三學生對於「畫夜及四季」成因之心智模式及其概念改變歷程。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所,台北市。
    翁金鶯(2002)。國小學童地球運動之另有概念與空間概念關係之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所,屏東縣。
    陳玉玲(2000)。概念改變教學策略對地球運動概念之教學效果-以國小六年級學生為例。未出版博士論文,國立政治大學教育學系,台北市。
    陳李綢(1992)。認知發展與輔導。台北市:心理出版社。
    陳英嫻(1995)。月相盈虧之概念改變。師大學報, 1995, 40, 509-548。
    陳淑筠(2002)。國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台東師範學院教育研究所,台東。
    陳珊珊(1993)。我國國三學生酸鹼概念之研究。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    陳政瑜(1994)。由球體透視概念探討學生學習月相成因之困難。國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。
    陳盈吉(2004):探究動態類比對於科學概念學習與概念改變歷程之研究--以國二學生學習氣體粒子概念為例。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    梁勇能(2000)。動態幾何環境下,國二學生空間能力學習之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學數學研究所,台北市。
    教育部(1999)。國民教育九年一貫課程綱要。「自然與科技」課程綱要研修小組。
    許瑛玿(1999)。網路科技支援之電腦教學軟體對學生學習科學概念的影響。師大學報, 44(1,2), 1-16。
    許瑛玿和吳慧珍(2002)。網路合作學習與科學過程技能的學習。科學教育月刊, 254, 16-27。
    許嘉玲(1997)。浮力學習之概念改變。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所,台北市。
    張川木(1996)。促進概念改變教學方式(2)。科學教育月刊, 186, 10-18。
    張春興(1997)。教育心理學。台北:五南圖書。
    張春興、林清山(1991)。教育心理學。東華書局。
    張美玉、吳玉明(1999)。不同學習型態學生學習表現的探討-解釋推理及問題解決能力。科學教育學刊, 7(3), 255-280。
    張國恩(1999)。資訊科技融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育雙月刊, 72,2-9。
    黃福坤(1999)。資訊素養與教學-以物理教學示範實驗教室輔助教學網站為例。圖書館與資訊科學, 25(2), 53-62。
    曾永祥(2003)。線上課程對高二學生四季成因概念學習的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所,台北市。
    裘維鈺(1995)。國小學童植物概念及其相關迷思概念之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺中師範學院初等教育學系,台中。
    楊坤原(2000)。教學主義與建構主義對電腦輔助教學設計的意含。視聽教育雙月刊, 42(3), 14-27。
    楊坤原、張賴妙理(2004)。發展和應用二段式診斷工具來偵測國中一年級學生之遺傳學另有概念。科學教育學刊, 12(1), 107-131。
    鄭湧涇(1998)。概念學習研究對科學教學與師資培育的啟示。國民中學學生概念學習學術研討會論文集,18-32。
    蔣家唐(1995)。視覺空間認知能力向度分析既數理-語文資優生視覺空間認知能力差異研究。未出版碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系,彰化縣。
    蔡翠華(1996)。國小數學學習障礙學生的學習型態與學習策略之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所,台北市。
    樊雪春(1999)。學生科學迷思概念的法則分析與建構取向教學法之實驗效果研究。未出版博士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,台北市。
    劉嘉茹(2000)。以研究綱領與本體分類論探究概念改變機制之研究。未出版博士論文,國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所,台北市。
    劉俊庚(2002)。概念改變與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析-以概念圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    劉伍貞(1996)。國小學生月相概念學習之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文。
    賴瑞芳(2002)。小學生月亮迷思概念之研究。國立台中教育大學科學教育所碩士論文。
    蕭建華(2005)。初探不同學習環境對高一學生地球科學學習成效的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所,台北市。
    蘇育任(1993)。「兒童的科學」研究之沿革與其對國小自然科教學之啟示。台中師範學院初等教育研究集刊,1, 91-104。
    蘇育任(1999)。職前及在職國民小學教師的天氣概念及其相關迷思概念之探究。科學教育學刊,7(2), 157-176。

    二、英文部分
    Abimbola, I. O. (1988). The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science. Science Education, 72, 175-184.
    Ahrens, C. D. (1992). Meteorology Today (5th ed.). New York: West Publish Company.
    Anderson, B. (1986). Pupils Explanations of some Aspects of Chemical Reaction. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
    Atwood, R. K., & Atwood V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ conception of the cause of season. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 553-563.
    Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Education psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of childrens' view about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157-174.
    Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382.
    Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201-206.
    Baxter, J. (1989). Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11(special issue), 503-513.
    Bishop, J. E. (1978). Developing students’ spatial ability. The Science Teacher, 20-23.
    Bliss, J., Ogborn, J., & Whitelock, D. (1989). Secondary school pupils’ commonsense theories of motion. International Journal of Science Education, 11(3), 261-272.
    Bonham, L.A. (1988). Learning style use: In need of perspective. Lifelong learning: an omnibus of practice and research, 11(5), 14-19.
    Boujaoude, S. B. (1989). A study of conceptual change in junior high school science students during instruction about the concept of burning. UMI Document NO 8903612.
    Brown. D. E. & Clement. J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18, 237-261.
    Brumby, M. N. (1982). Students’ perceptions of the concept of life. Science Education, 66(4), 613-622.
    Canas, A. J., Ford, K. M., Novak, J. D., Hayes, P., Reichherzer, T. R., & Suri, N. (2001). Online concept maps: enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. The science teacher, 68(4), 2001.
    Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Implications for learning and discovery in sciences. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 129-186.
    Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to process: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concept. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
    Chinn , C.A., & Brewer ,W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of educational research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 63(1), 1-49.
    Chinn , C.A., & Brewer ,W.F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.
    Chou, H.W., & Wang, Y.F. (1999). Effects of learning style and training method on computer attitude and performance in world wide web page design training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(3), 323-342.
    Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257.
    Clement, J., Brown., D., Zietsman., A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding “anchoring conceptions” for grounding instruction on students’ intuition. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 554-565.
    Crews, W. E. (1990). Development of a paper-and-pencil instrument to elicit student concepts concerning the earth as a planet. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED324 191)
    Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. Science Education, 79(3), 295-312.
    Davidson, G.V., Savenye, W.C., & Orr, K.B. (1992). How do learning styles relate to performance in a computer applications course? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 348-358.
    Driver, R. (1981). Pupil’s alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of science Education, 3, 93-101.
    Driver, R.(1985). Beyond appearances:the conservation of matter under physical and chemical transformation. In R. Driver(Ed.), Children’s Ideas in Science. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
    Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conception and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.
    Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Education, 5, 61-84.
    Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
    Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds) (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulation of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
    Duchastel, P. (1991). Instructional strategies for simulation-based learning. Journal of Educational Technology System, 19(3), 265-276.
    Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles in service system. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Dunn, R.,& Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individualized learning styles. Reston, VA: Reston Pub-lishing Co.
    Duit, R.(1991). On the role of analogies and metaphor in learning science. Science Education. 75(6), 649-672.
    Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Students’ conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
    Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students' misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001-1015.
    Faryniarz, J. V., & Lockwood, L. G.. (1992). Effectiveness of microcomputer simulation in stimulating environmental problem solving by community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 453-470.
    Garnett, P. J, Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, D. (1995). Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
    Gentner, D. (1998). Analogy. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, (pp. 107-113). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Gilbert, J. K.,Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
    Gilbert, J. K., & Swift, D. J. (1985). Towards a Lakatosian analysis of the Piagetian and alternative conception research programs. Science Education, 69, 681-696.
    Gorsky, P. and Finegold, M. (1992) Using computer simulations to restructure students’ conception of force. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 11,163–178.
    Hameed, H., Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1993). Facilitating conceptual change in chemical equilibrium using a CAI strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 221-230.
    Hashweh, M. (1986). Toward and explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 229-249.
    Harlen(2001). Taking childrens’ idea seriously- influence and trends. Primary Science review,67,14-17.
    Hart, R. A., and Moore, G. T., 1973. The development of spatial cognition: A Review. In Downs, R. M., and Stea, D., editors, Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company, pp. 246-295.
    Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.
    Head, J. (1986). Research into ‘alternative framework’: Promise and problems. Research in Science & Technological Education, 4(2), 203-211.
    Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383-396.
    Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Education, 20(8), 731-743.
    Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541-553.
    Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussion: Speakeasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839-857.
    Hsu, Ying-Shao (in press). Learning about seasons in a technologically enhanced environment: The impact of teacher-guided and student-centered instructional approaches on the process of students' conceptual change. Science Education.
    Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, J. Y., Phares, V. L., & Suttles, C. W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 933-946.
    Jones, M. F., Carter, G., & Rua, M. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convection and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 139-159.
    Karplus, R., & Thier, H. (1967). A New Look at Elementary School Science, New Trends in Curriculum and Instruction Series. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
    Kelly, P. R. (1998). Transfer of learning from a computer simulation as compared to a laboratory activity. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 26(4), 345-351.
    Klausmeier (1974), H. J.,Ghatala, E. S.,& Frayer, D. A. Conceptual learning and development. New York:Academic Press.
    Kuhn, T.S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
    Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave( Eds.), Criticism and the growth and the knowledge( pp. 91-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657~677.
    Linn, M. C., & Swiney, K. (1981). Individual differences in formal thought: Role of expectations and aptitudes. Journal of Education Psychology, 73, 274-286.
    Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visual-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
    Macnab, W., & Johnstone, A. H. (1990). Spatial skills which contribute to competence in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 24(1), 37-41.
    Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
    Martini, M. (1986). An analysis of the relationships between and among computer-assisted instruction, learning style, perceptual preferences, attitudes, and the science achievement of 7th grade students in a suburban N.Y. school district. (Doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 877-03A.
    McDermott L. C. (1990). Research and computer-based instruction: Opportunity for interaction. American Journal of Physics, 58(5), 452–462.
    McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental ,genetic hormonal ,and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918.
    Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 1, 587-596.
    Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing science understanding:: A human constructivist view. San Diego, London: Academic press.
    Novak, J. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101.
    Novak, J. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
    Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nurrenbern, S., & Pickering, M.(1987). Concept Learning vs. Problem Solving: Is There a Difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-510.
    Nussbaum, J. (1979). Children’s conceptions of the earth as a cosmic body: A cross age study. Science Education, 63(1), 83-93.
    Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. (1976). An assessment of children’s concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60, 535-550.
    Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61.
    Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., & Kali, Y. (1994). Relationship between earth science education and spatial visualization. Paper presented at NARST conference, Anaheim.
    Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about ideas about electric current. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(1), 73-82.
    Osborne, R.J. & Cosgrove, M.M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of states of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-835.
    Osborne, R., &Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s Science. Auckland: Heinemann.
    Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 311-321.
    Pallrand, G. J., & Seeber, F. (1984). Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 507-516.
    Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade-11 and -12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 301-314.
    Philips, W. C. (1991). Earth science misconceptions. Science Teacher, 58, 21-23. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
    Piaget, J.(1970).Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University press.
    Rastovac, J., & Slavsky, D. B. (1986). The Use of paradoxes as an instructional strategy. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16(2), 113-118.
    Renzulli, J., & Smith, L. H. (1979). Developing individual educational programs(IEPs) for the gifted. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
    Rivers, R. H., & Vockell, E. (1987). Computer simulation to stimulate scientific problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 403-415.
    Ross, B., & Munby, H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: A study of high-school students' understanding of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11-23.
    Sanger, M. J. (2000). Using particulate drawing to determine and improve students’ conceptions of pure substances and mixture. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(6), 762-766.
    Schneps, M. J. (1987). The Private Universe. Wolbacti Image Processing Laboratory, by Harvard University and Smithsonian Institution, MCML XXXIX: President and Fellows of Havard College.
    Sharp, J. G. (1996). Children’s astronomical beliefs: A preliminary study of year 6 children in south-west England. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 685-712.
    Siemankowski, F., & MacKnight, F. (1971). Spatial cognition: Success Prognosticator in college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1, 56-59.
    Stavridou, H., & Solomonidou, C. (1998). Conceptual reorganization and the construction of the chemical reaction concept. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 205-221.
    Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301.
    Tao, P-K., & Gunstone, R. (1999a). Conceptual change in science through collaborative learning at the computer. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 39-57.
    Tao, P-K., & Gunstone, R. (1999b). The process on conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859-882.
    Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Tomas, R. A., & Hooper , E. (1991). Simulation: An opportunity we are missing . Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 497-513.
    Treagust, D. F., & Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. A paper presented at the 59th annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching , San Francisco , California.
    Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1031-1055.
    Wallace, J. D., & Mintzes J. J. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1033-1052.
    Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternatives conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
    West, L. H. T.& Pines, A. L. (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.
    White, B.Y. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition and instruction , 1(1), 69-108.
    White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-117.
    Vosniadou, S. (1989). Knowledge acquisition in observational astronomy. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the American Association, Washington, DC,.
    Vosniadou, S. (1991). Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring: Lesson for the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. Journal of Curriculum Studies , 23(3), 219-237.
    Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
    Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Education Research, 57(1), 51-67.
    Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F.(1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535-585.
    Webb, N. M. (1985). Verbal interaction and learning in peer-directed groups. Theory into Practice, 24 (1), 32-39.
    White, B., & Horwitz, P. (1988). Computer microworlds and conceptual change: A new approach to science education. In P. Ramsden, (Ed.), Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 69-80). London: Kogan Page.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE