研究生: |
林純雯 Chun-Wen Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國民中學校長道德領導之研究 The study of principals' moral leadership in junior high schools |
指導教授: |
謝文全
Hsieh, Wen-Chyuan 張明輝 Chang, Ming-Huei |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育學系 Department of Education |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 320 |
中文關鍵詞: | 道德領導 、倫理領導 、校長領導 、學校行政 、行政倫理 、學校行政領導 |
英文關鍵詞: | Moral leadership, Ethical leadership, Principal leadership, School administration, Administrative ethics, School administrative leadership |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:268 下載:248 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本研究之主要目的,在於探討道德領導的基本概念與實施歷程,並透過調查研究,瞭解國民中學校長實施道德領導的現況,最後根據研究結論,提出實施或改善校長道德領導的建議。
為達致上述目的,本研究兼採文獻分析與問卷調查方法:首先,透過文獻分析,探討道德領導的基本概念與實施歷程,以瞭解道德領導的意義、性質、必要性、功能、相關理論與研究、實施原則與作法、可能面臨的問題及其解決之道;其次,根據文獻探討之結果,編製「國民中學校長道德領導調查問卷」,進行調查研究,藉以瞭解國民中學校長實施道德領導的必要性、可行性、功能、原則、作法、面臨的問題及其解決之道;最後,根據研究結論,提出具體建議。
本研究之調查對象計有三類:一為國中教育人員;二為教育行政機關人員;三為學者專家。共發出問卷1058份,實得有效問卷805份,問卷資料處理採SPSS for Windows 10.07統計套裝軟體進行統計分析。
綜合文獻分析之結果與調查研究之發現,獲得以下結論:
一、 道德領導重視高層次的領導信念,要以道德權威引發成員的義務
感,使其自然而然達成自我實現,完成組織目標。
二、 國中校長實施道德領導有其必要性存在,乃因學校教育包含道德教
育、道德領導可使人心悅誠服,及道德領導可重建校園與社會倫
理。
三、 國中校長實施道德領導有其可行性。
四、 國中校長實施道德領導可發揮獲得支持與認同、增進成員責任感、
導引成員互相信任,及促進和諧氣氛等多重功能。
五、 國中校長實施道德領導必須掌握以身作則、尊重人權、視成員為生
命共同體及堅持道德理想等原則,但目前的校長僅大致如此。
六、 國中校長實施道德領導,得採取考慮整體利益、勇於反省批判、考
量成員才德、拒絕不當招待,及堅持教育理想等作法,但目前大部
分的校長只是大致做到。
七、 國中校長實施道德領導時,可能遭遇抗拒壓力、法令僵化、處理兩
難困境、修養道德,及擬定準則等問題,且目前的情況亦偶爾面
臨。
八、 國中校長實施道德領導遭遇問題時,應可運用修正規範、建構校園
倫理、鼓勵具備雅量、凝聚向心力,以及理性分析與批判等策略解
決問題,只是目前的校長尚未能有效採用。
九、 國中教育人員、教育行政機關人員,及學者專家均支持校長實施道
德領導,且對實際情況的覺知大同小異,唯其間主要差異在於校長
的認知高於其他職務者、男高於女、資深者高於資淺者。
十、 校長實施道德領導須輔以合宜的禮法、完善的制度等相關配套措
施。
根據文獻探討內容、調查研究發現,以及研究者意見,提出實施與改善校長道德領導之建議:
一、教育行政機關與師資培育機構應採取推動校長道德領導的配合措施。
二、教育行政機關與學校宜加強宣導道德領導理念及實施成效。
三、教育行政機關與學校當合作排除外在壓力的不當干預。
四、校長須加強建構學校的倫理環境。
五、學校應當採取具體措施以落實校長的道德領導。
六、學校宜充分運用外在資源配合實施道德領導。
七、校長對於學校中的每一份子均應發揮道德關懷。
八、教師必須支持校長實施道德領導。
九、校長實施道德領導時須擴及對社區的關心與責任。
十、道德領導的進一步研究,可拓展研究主題、充實研究內容、輔以質
性方法,並增加研究對象。
Abstract
The purposes of the study are: (1) to explore the primary concepts of moral leadership and its practice, (2) to investigate the current situation of moral leadership in junior high schools, (3) to conclude the results and offer some suggestions for practicing or improving principals’ moral leadership.
In order to accomplish the purposes, the research adopts documentary research and questionnaire survey. First, through documentary analysis, the study explores the primary concepts of moral leadership and its practice to understand the meanings, essence, necessity, function, relational theories and researches, principles, problems, and the solution of the problems of moral leadership. Second, according to the results drawn from the literatures, the researcher develops “ the questionnaire of principals’ moral leadership in junior high schools ” used for investigation survey to understand the necessity, validity, function, principles, methods, problems, and the solution of the problems of moral leadership. Finally, according to the results, the research provides some substantial suggestions.
The subjects of this study with sample size of 1058 subjects and the effective number of 805 subjects are randomly selected from junior high schools’ staffs, educational administration staffs, and experts/scholars. The data of questionnaire is processed for statistical analysis under the “ SPSS for Windows 10.07 “ statistics package software.
From the findings of document analysis and investigation survey, the conclusions are drawn as follows:
1. Moral leadership puts emphasis on the higher level of
leading beliefs, and it aims at evoking members’ sense of
obligation by moral authority to reach self-actualization
and accomplish the organizational goals.
2. It is necessary for junior high schools’ principals to
practice moral leadership because school education includes
moral education, and moral leadership lets members follow
the leader naturally and reconstruct schools/society ethics.
3. It is possible for junior high schools’ principals to
practice moral leadership.
4. Moral leadership has several functions, such as obtaining
members’ recognition, improving their sense of
responsibility, and so on.
5. As junior high schools’ principals practice moral
leadership, they must keep some rules, such as respecting
human rights, insisting moral ideals, etc., but a few
principals do not reach the goal.
6. As junior high schools’ principals practice moral
leadership, they must adopt some methods, such as
considering the benefit of the whole members, considering
members’ abilities and character, etc., but a few
principals do not reach the goal.
7. As junior high schools’ principals practice moral
leadership, they may encounter some problems, such as
pressure, ossified laws, and so on.
8. As junior high schools’ principals practice moral
leadership, they can use some strategies, such as modifying
norms, encouraging rational analysis and critic, etc., but a
few principals have not adopted them.
9. Moral leadership is supported by teachers in junior high
schools, educational administration staffs, and
scholars/experts.
10. As junior high schools’ principals practice moral
leadership, they must adopt some relational measures.
Based on the conclusions, the researcher proposes some concrete suggestions to practice and improve moral leadership in the following:
1. Educational administration and teacher training institution
should adopt some relational measures.
2. Educational administration and schools may promote moral
leadership.
3. Educational administration and schools should exclude the
illegal interference.
4. Principals have to reconstruct schools’ ethical environment.
5. Schools should adopt concrete measures to practice moral
leadership.
6. Schools may fully use resources to practice moral leadership.
7. Principals should morally consider each person in schools.
8. Moral leader had better be supported by teachers.
9. Moral leadership must expand into consideration and
responsibility of community.
10. The further research may expand the theme, plenitude the
content, and use the qualitative research, and so forth.
王如哲(1998)。教育行政學。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
王雅玄(1996)。從領導特質論分析組織溝通類型之取向。載於國教月
刊,第43卷,3.4期,頁23-33。
王健聖(1991)。體罰學生,老師判處拘役緩刑兩年。載於中國時報,80
年9月11日,第3版。
方志華(2000)。諾丁關懷倫理學之理論發展與教育實踐。國立台灣師範
大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
石元康(1995)。當代自由主義理論。台北市:聯經出版社。
朱康有(2000)。老子。香港九龍:中華書局。
李春旺(2000)。企業倫理。台北市:正中書局。
李玉惠(1999)。二十一世紀的學校行政管理。載於教育行政論壇第五次
研討會會議手冊,頁187-205。
李威熊(1985)。中國文化的精神探索。台北市:黎明出版公司。
余英時(1982)。歷史與思想。台北市:聯經出版事業公司。
余朝權譯,Yukl, G. A.原著(1986)。領導學。台北:五南。
吳宗立(1999)。從民族性格論中國式行政領導行為。輯於教育資料與研
究,第29期,頁40-45。
吳清山(2001)。教育發展研究。台北市:元照出版社。
沈清松(1985)。現代哲學論衡。台北市:黎明圖書事業出版公司。
林火旺(1999)。倫理學。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。載於國
家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10卷2期,頁232-254。
林明地(1999)。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。載於教育政策論壇,第2
卷,第2期,1999年8月,頁129-156。國立暨南大學教育政策與行政
研究所主編。
林秀珍(1994)。羅爾斯正義原則及其教育涵義研究。國立台灣師範大學
教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
林振春(1992)。人文領導理論研究。台北市:師大書苑。
林新發(1999)。教育與學校行政研究:原理和應用。台北市:師大書
苑。
林新發、李宜玫(1997)。校園倫理的動力與變數。載於國教之友,第48
卷,第4期,頁21-24。
秦夢群(1999)。教育行政—理論部份。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
高強華譯,Trachtenberg, S. T.著(1992)。論大學校長的道德角色。
載於教育研究雙月刊,第26期,頁40-43。
徐曉慧譯,Badaracco, J. L.原著(1999)。對與對的抉擇。台北市:臉
譜文化。
徐五郎(1994)。國立新竹實驗中學,校長提前退休引人關注,因涉及違
法對教師考績考核對簿公堂,引起教權會質疑。載於台灣立報,83年
12月18日,第21版。
張文軍(1998)。後現代教育。台北市:揚智文化。
張明輝(1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北市:師大書苑。
張明輝譯,Henderson, J. G. & Hawthorne, R. D.原著(2000)。革新
課程領導者的育成。輯於單文經總校閱,高新建、蔡清田、游家政、
張明輝、王麗雲譯(2000)。革新的課程領導,頁227-249。台北
市:學富文化。
張翠菱(1994)。公共服務倫理研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論
文,未出版。
張潤書(1988)。組織行為與管理。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
陳奎熹(2000)。教育社會學--微觀分析。輯於陳奎熹、高強華、張鐸嚴
編著(2000),教育社會學,頁17-62。台北縣:國立空中大學印
行。
陳奎熹(1997)。教育社會學研究。台北市:師大書苑。
陳文團(1998)。政治與道德。台北市:台灣書店。
陳美岑譯,Tjosvold, D. & Tjoscold, M. M.原著(2000)。領導心理
學。台北市:商周出版。
陳亞蘭(1996)。連日來的校園事件,不是單純的個案問題。載於自立早
報,85年1月16日,第14版。
陳憶雯(1995)。教育部今年度主題輔導工作坊研習,校園暴力問題受矚
目--編印手冊提供教師化解師生衝突之道。載於更生日報,84年5月
26日,第3版。
陳慶瑞(1995)。費德勒權變領導理論研究。台北市:師大書苑。
陳碧華(1991)。校風好壞校長是關鍵--中小學校校長拿紅包索回扣,毛
高文要辦人。載於聯合報,80年6月20日,第3版。
陳碧華(1989)。延長12年國教明星高中仍會存在,越區就讀現象恐將更
嚴重,相對分數「優秀」假象,越區登記催化因素。載於聯合報,78
年11月27日,第6版。
教育部(2000)。台閩地區國民中小學校概況統計--八十八學年度。台北
市:教育部統計處。
曾仕強、劉君政(1995)。中國的經權管理。台北市:國家出版社。
曾寶瑩(1989)。私校不合格專任教師仍有百餘位,教局作業有誤,疑涉
官商勾結情事。載於中央日報,78年5月6日,第5版。
黃乃熒(2000)。後現代教育行政哲學。台北市:師大書苑。
黃乃熒(2001)。教育決策權力的正當性:決策倫理及其典範的討論。載
於師大學報教育類,第46卷,第1期,頁1-19。
黃乃熒(1997)。學校行政領導之道的詮釋與實踐。載於興大人文社會學
報,第6期,頁153-184。
黃乃熒(1995)。脈絡領導與學校行政創意及倫理的探討。載於中學教育
學報,第2期,頁1-39。
黃昆輝(1991)。教育行政學。台北市:東華書局。
黃錦樟(2000)。傳統文化與道德領導:傳統道德領導能否取代西方理論
成為東亞地區學校領導的範式?新世紀教育發展與規劃學術研討會論
文。國立台灣師範大學教育學系主辦,未出版。
黃藿(1999)。德行倫理學的復興與當代道德教育。載於中大社會文化學
報,第9期,頁1-18。
范熾文(2000)。學校行政決定的革新趨向:倫理決定。載於學校行政雙
月刊,第8期,頁55-67。中華民國學校行政研究學會主編。
范熾文(1998)。道德領導--進入學校改革之核心。載於國教世紀,第
183期,頁45-46。
傅大為(1996)。懷念孔恩(Thomas Kuhn)。載於中國時報,85年7月1
日,第20版。
溫明麗(1986)。哈伯瑪斯溝通行動理論及其德育涵義。國立台灣師範大
學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
廖春文(1994)。二十一世紀教育行政領導理念。台北市:師大書苑。
葉匡時(2000)。迷人又迷惑的領導。輯於鄭懷超譯,Mintzberg原著。
領導:哈佛商業評論,3-12頁。台北市:天下文化書坊。
葉保強、陳志輝(1999)。商亦有道--商業倫理學與個案分析。香港九
龍:中華書局。
樊和平(1995)。中國人文管理。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
歐陽教(1992)。德育原理。台北市:文景書局。
歐陽教(1974)。道德判斷與道德教學。台北市:文景出版社。
潘國正(1990)。促銷國中教科書,搶六千餘萬元市場,燃起回扣戰--書
商向校長塞紅包。載於中國時報,79年3月8日,第16版。
謝文全(1998)。道德領導--學校行政領導的另一扇窗。輯於林玉体主編
(1998),跨世紀的教育演變,頁237-253。台北市:文景書局。
謝文全(1995)。教育行政—理論與實務。台北市:文景書局。
鍾金龍(1997)。傳聞校長介入,教評會委員資格受質疑,教師會盼教育
部重新擬定產生辦法,維護教師權益。載於台灣新聞報,86年4月22
日,第18版。
戴楊健(1996)。行政倫理守則之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士
論文,未出版。
簡成熙(1997)。關懷倫理學與教育--姬莉根與諾丁思想初探。輯於簡成
熙主編(1997),哲學和教育--20世紀末的教育哲學,頁197-232。
高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
薛迪安譯(1997)。面對管理時代的大師。台北市:新雨出版社。
羅虞村(1987)。領導理論研究。台北市:文景出版社。
鄭伯壎(1991)。家族主義與領導行為。輯於楊中芳、高尚仁主編
(1991),中國人中國心—人格與社會篇,頁365-408。台北市:遠
流出版社。
蕭武桐(1996)。行政組織的倫理決策之研究--台北市政府公務人員倫理
決策之實證分析。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文,未出版。
蕭武桐(1991)。公務倫理的理論與應用。台北市:時英出版社。
顧慕晴(1999)。強化縣市行政人員行政倫理之研究。人事管理,第
3604、3605期,頁4-16,23-33。
Bates, R. (1988). Is there a new paradigm in educational
administration? In New Orleans. Pp. 20-21.
Beck, L. G. (1994). Reclaiming educational administration as a
caring profession. New York: Teachers college, Columbia
university.
Beck, L. G. & Murphy, J. (1994). Ethics in educational
leadership programs: An expanding role. California: Corwin
Press, INC.
Begley, P. T. & Leonard, P. E. (1999). The values of
educational administration. New York: Taylor & Francis
Group.
Benne, K. D. (1949). Leadership theory and administrative
behavior: The problem of authority. In Administrative
science quarterly, 4(2). Pp.259-301.
Blount, J. M. (1996). Caring and the open moment in educational
leadership: A history perspective. In RICH, D. E. & Galen,
J. V. (eds). (1996). Caring in an unjust world: negotiating
borders and barriers in schools. Pp.13-30. Albany: State
University of New York.
Bottery, M. (1993). The ethics of educational management:
Personal, social and political perspective on school
organization. New York: Gassell.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Clark, D. L. & Meloy, J. M. (1989). Renouncing bureaucracy: A
domocratic structure for leadership in schools. In
Sergiovanni, T. J. & Moore, J. H. (1989). Schooling for
tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count. Needham
Heights, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
Cooper, T. L. (1994). Handbook of administrative ethics. Marcel
Dekker, Inc.
Coppola, D. L. (1998). Moral leadership: A proposed theory
illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals.
〔WWW page〕. URL
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9839504
(visited 2000/09/01).
Crawford, G. & Nicklaus, J. (2000). Philisophical & cultural
Values: Applying ethics in schools. New York: Eye On
Education.
Crowson, R. (1989). Managerial ethics in educational
administration: The rational choice approach. Urban
Education, 23(4), Pp.412-435.
Cunningham, W. G. & Cordeiro, P. A. (2000). Educational
administration: A problem-based approach. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Curry, B. (1994). Reconceptualizing higher education
organuzations. In Maxcy, S. J., ed. (1994). Postmodern
school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational
administration. Pp.141-152. London: Praeger.
Donaldson, G. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools:
Connecting people, purpose, and practice. New York: Teacher
College, Columbia University.
Dwivedi, O. P. (1978). Public service ethics. Belgium:
International Institute of Administrative Science.
Evans, R. (2000). The authentic leader. In Fullan, M. (2000).
The Jossey-bass reader on educational leadership. Pp. 287-
308. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Greenfield, W. D. (1993). Articulating values and ethics in
administrator preparation. In Colleen, A. C. (ed). (1993).
Educational administration in a pluralistic society. Pp.267-
287. Albany, New York: SUNY.
Greenfield, T. B. (1986). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and
nonnatural order in organization. In Sergiovanni, T. J. &
Corbally, J. E. (eds). (1986). Leadership and
organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative
theory and practice. Pp.142-169. University of Illionis
Press.
Greenfield, T. B. (1975). Theory about organization: A new
perspective for schools. In Hughes, M. G. (ed). (1975).
Administering education: International challenge. Pp.71-99.
London: Athone Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist
Press.
Gregor, M. (1996). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Gulley, F. S. (1999). Academic president as moral leader: James
T. Laney at Emory University, 1977-1993. 〔WWW page〕. URL
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview/9926043
(visited 2000/09/01).
Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the
design of work: A test of a theory. In Organizational
behavior and human performance, 16(2). Pp.250-279.
Harold, F. G. & Jeremy, F. P. (1990). Ethics and public
personnel administration. In Steven, W. H. & Richard, C. K.
(1990). Public personnel administration, p.249. Englewood
Cliffs: N. J. Prentice Hall.
Henderson, J. E. (1998). The key to leadership effectiveness:
Leader authenticity. Present at the 7th annual national
conference on creating the quality school. Arlington, VA.
27 March 1998. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED
419 292 ).
Hill, P. T., Foster, G. E. & Gendler, T. (1990). High schools
with character. Santa Monica, Calif: The RAND Corporation.
Hodgkinson, C. (1996). Administrative philosophy: Values and
motivations in administrative life. New York: Pergamon.
Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art.
New York: State university of New York press.
Hudson, J. (1997). Ethical leadership: The soul of policy
making. In Journal of school leadership. 7(5), Pp.506-520.
Jenkins, H. O. (1991). Getting it right: A handbook for
successful school leadership. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in
our schools. New York: Basic Book.
Johnston, B. J. (1994). Educational administration in the
postmodern age. In Maxcy, S. J., ed. (1994). Postmodern
school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational
administration. Pp.115-132. London: Praeger.
Jun, J. S. (1986). Public administration: Design and problem
solving. New York: Macmillan.
Lashway, L. (1996). Ethical leadership. ERIC Digest 107--June
1996. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 463).
Lindle, J. C. (1999). What can the study of micropolitics
contribute to the practice of leadership in reforming
schools? In School Leadership & Management, 19(2), Pp.171-
178.
Louis, F. M. & Richard, J. E. (1994). Moral leadership in a
poststructural era. In Maxcy, S. J. (1994). Postmodern
school leadership: Meeting the crisis ineducational
administration. Pp.133-140. London: Praeger.
Lucas, N. J. (1999). Lives of integrity: Factors that influence
moral transforming leaders. 〔WWW page〕. URL
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9839504
(visited 2000/09/01).
Lunenburg, F. C. & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational
administration. New York: Wadsworth publishing company.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue.Indiana: University of Notre
Dame Press.
Morgan, D. F. (1994). The public interest. In Cooper, T. L.
(1994). Handbook of administrative ethics. Pp.125-146. New
York: M. Dekker.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York:
Harper.
Maxcy, S. J. (1994). Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the
crisis in educational administration. London: Praeger.
Maxcy, S. J. (1991). Educaational leadership: A critical
pragmatic perspective. Toronto: OISE Press
Miron, L. F. & Elliott, R. J. (1994). Moral leadership in a
poststructural era. In Maxcy, S. J., ed. (1994). Postmodern
school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational
administration. Pp. 133-140. London: Praeger.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organuzation. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten new directions
transforming our lives. New York: Warner Book, Inc.
Noddings, N. (1995). Care and moral education. In Kohli, W.
(ed). (1995). Critical conversations in philosophy of
education. p.139. New York: Routledge.
Noddings, N. (1994). Foreword. In Starratt, R. J. (1994).
Building an ethical school: A practical response to the
moral crisis in schools. Pp.ix-x London: The Falmer Press.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and
moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Paton, H. J. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals.
New York: Harper and Row.
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of
excellence: Lessons from American best-run companiex. New
York: Harper Collins.
Peterson, K. D. (1977-1978). The principal's tasks. In
Administrator's Notebook, 26(8), Pp.2-5.
Pojman, L. P. (1999). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong.
Belmont CA: Wadsworth publishing company.
Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. In
Journal of philosophy, 77, Pp.515-572.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Razik, T. A. & Swanson, A. D. (2001). Fundamental concepts of
educational leadership. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Robinson, C. & Bruce, R. (1997). Cultivating identity and moral
leadership in mediating relationships: Critical hermeneutic
analysis of African self-determination, economic
development, and management education in the second
economies of Congo-Zaire, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. 〔WWW
page〕. URL
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9806262
(visited 2000/09/01).
Rorty, R. (1989). Contigency, irony, and solidarity. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Ross, S. D. (1972). Moral decision: An introduction to ethics.
San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Company.
Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the twenty-first century.
Westport, CF: Praeger.
Ruggiero, V. R. (1988). The art of thinking. (2nd ed). New
York: Harper Collins.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective
practice perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San
Franciso: Jessey-Bass Publishers.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the
heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Sergiovanni, Burlingame, Coombs & Thurston (1992). Educational
governance and administration (third edition). Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get
extraordinary performance in schools. San Diego: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich.
Strike, K. A., Haller, E. J. & Soltis, J. F. (1998). The ethics
of school administration. New York: Teachers college press.
Starratt, R. J. (1995). Leaders with vision: The quest for
school renewal. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Starratt, R. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical
response to the moral crisis in schools. London: The Falmer
Press.
Starratt, R. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory
for practice in educational leadership. In Educational
administration quarterly, 27(2), Pp. 185-202.
Sullivan, R. J. (1994). An introduction to Kant's ethics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terry, T. L. (1994). Administrative ethics in a Chinese
society: The case of Hong Kong. In Cooper, T. L. (1994).
Handbook of administrative ethics. Pp.487-503. New York: M.
Dekker.
Vaill, P. (1984). The purposing of high performing systems. In
Sergiovanni, T. J. & Corbally, J. E. (eds). (1984).
Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on
administrative theory and practice. Pp. 85-104. University
of Illionis Press.
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organization. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.