研究生: |
彭芷榆 Peng, Chih-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
美國量化寬鬆對日本資產市場之外溢效果 Spillover Effects of U.S. Quantitative Easing on Japan Asset Markets |
指導教授: |
印永翔
Ying, Yung-Hsiang |
口試委員: |
何宗武
Ho, Tsung-Wu 楊淑珺 Yang, Shu-Chun S. 印永翔 Ying, Yung-Hsiang |
口試日期: | 2023/07/17 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 57 |
中文關鍵詞: | 量化寬鬆 、日本資產市場 、結構式向量自我迴歸模型 |
英文關鍵詞: | Quantitative Easing, Japan Asset Markets, Structural VAR |
研究方法: | 結構式向量自我迴歸模型 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301227 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:88 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自全球金融整合以來,主要經濟體的貨幣政策就像是強大的金融衝擊,影響著其他經濟體之資金結構與資產價格。2019年的新冠疫情,使金融市場震盪、供應鏈崩潰,美國實施了量化寬鬆,大規模的資產購買計劃替市場創造巨額的流動性。
值得注意的是,每個國家之經濟規模與性質不盡相同,本研究以美國與日本為研究對象,利用結構式向量自我迴歸模型(Structural Vector Autoregression Model)來分析美國執行量化寬鬆政策對日本資產市場的外溢效果。變數包括美國工業生產指數、美國通貨膨脹率、聯準會持有證券、日本十年期公債、日經指數以及美國兌日本匯率,實證期間自2008年1月至2022年12月,共180筆月資料。
主要的實證結果發現,美國量化寬鬆政策確實對美國與日本資產市場產生特定的顯著效果。QE使美國國內產出增加,同時帶來通貨膨漲;對於日本的股票市場,有先跌後升的影響;而匯率整體呈負向關係,即日圓相對貶值。至於日本的債券市場並沒有顯著的效果,可歸因於日本的政策利率長期處於低水準,因此對於美國政策的衝擊呈現較溫和的影響。
Since the global financial integration, the monetary policies of advanced economies have acted as powerful financial shocks, affecting the funding structure and asset prices of other economies. COVID-19 has caused turmoil in financial markets and disruption in supply chain. In response, the United States implemented quantitative easing, a large-scale asset purchase program creating substantial liquidity in the market, which also triggered memories of the financial crisis.
However, each country's economy differs in size and nature. This study applies a Structural VAR approach to analyze the spillover effects of U.S. quantitative easing on Japan asset markets. The variables include the U.S. Industrial Production Index, U.S. inflation rate, securities held outright on the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve, Japanese ten-year government bonds, Nikkei index, and the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen exchange rate. The sample period covers 180 monthly data points from January 2008 to December 2022.
The main empirical findings reveal that the U.S. quantitative easing shock indeed affects both the U.S. and Japan asset markets significantly. QE leads to an increase in the U.S. domestic output and inflation. As for Japan stock market, there is an initial decline followed by an increment. Japanese Yen has shown an overall depreciation in tandem with the QE periods. While the U.S. policy shock does not show a significant impact on the Japan bond market, which can be attributed to Japan long-term low policy interest rates, keeping the impact of the U.S. policy shock more moderate.
中文文獻
陳旭昇(2013)。時間序列分析:總體經濟與財務金融之應用。臺灣東華。
英文文獻
Bagliano, F. C., & Favero, C. A. (1998). Measuring monetary policy with VAR models: An evaluation. European Economic Review, 42(6), 1069-1112.
Bauer, M. D., & Neely, C. J. (2014). International channels of the Fed's unconventional monetary policy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 44, 24-46.
Bernanke, B. S. (1986). Alternative explanations of the money-income correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 49-99.
Bernanke, B. S. (2012). Monetary Policy since the Onset of the Crisis. Paper presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Symposium, Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
Bernanke, B. S., & Blinder, A. S. (1992). The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 901-921.
Bernanke, B. S., & Kuttner, K. N. (2005). What explains the stock market's reaction to Federal Reserve policy? The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1221-1257.
Bernanke, B. S., & Mihov, I. (1998). Measuring monetary policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 869-902.
Bhattarai, S., Chatterjee, A., & Park, W. Y. (2021). Effects of US quantitative easing on emerging market economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 122, 104031.
Bjørnland, H. C. (2008). Monetary policy and exchange rate interactions in a small open economy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(1), 197-221.
Bjørnland, H. C., & Leitemo, K. (2009). Identifying the interdependence between US monetary policy and the stock market. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 275-282.
Brischetto, A., Voss, G., Brischetto, A., & Voss, G. (1999). A structural vector autoregression model of monetary policy in Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia Sydney, NSW.
Canova, F. (2005). The Transmission of US Shocks to Latin America. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(2), 229-251.
Carrillo, J. A., Elizondo, R., & Hernández-Román, L. G. (2020). Inquiry on the transmission of US aggregate shocks to Mexico: A SVAR approach. Journal of International Money and Finance, 104, 102148.
Chen, Q., Filardo, A., He, D., & Zhu, F. (2016). Financial crisis, US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers. Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 62-81.
Cushman, D. O., & Zha, T. (1997). Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange rates. Journal of Monetary economics, 39(3), 433-448.
Dolado, J. J., Jenkinson, T., & Sosvilla‐Rivero, S. (1990). Cointegration and unit roots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4(3), 249-273.
Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
Ivanov, V., & Kilian, L. (2005). A practitioner's guide to lag order selection for VAR impulse response analysis. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 9(1).
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration--with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
Keating, J. (1992). Structural approaches to vector autoregressions. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 74(September/October 1992).
Kim, S., & Roubini, N. (2000). Exchange rate anomalies in the industrial countries: A solution with a structural VAR approach. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3), 561-586.
Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis: Springer Science & Business Media.
Neely, C. J. (2015). Unconventional monetary policy had large international effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 101-111.
Rey, H. (2015). Dilemma not trilemma: the global financial cycle and monetary policy independence: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rogers, J. H., Scotti, C., & Wright, J. H. (2014). Evaluating asset-market effects of unconventional monetary policy: a multi-country review. Economic Policy, 29(80), 749-799.
Said, E. S., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599-607.
Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
Swanson, E. T. (2021). Measuring the effects of federal reserve forward guidance and asset purchases on financial markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 118, 32-53.
Tillmann, P. (2016). Unconventional monetary policy and the spillovers to emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 66, 136-156.
Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1), 225-250.