本研究旨在發展薩提爾冰山理論及創造思考技法融入國中寫作課程，比較兩者對於國中學生同理心、情緒複雜度、創造思考及寫作表現之提升效果。本研究採用準實驗設計的不等組前後控制設計，研究參與者為臺灣中部地區某國中八年級學生114人（58男、56女）；參與者依據班級區分為4組，分別為2個實驗組、1個控制組及一組無介入組，前三者以三種不同的寫作課程進行實驗教學。實驗組1一班30人（16男14女），接受為期8週的「薩提爾冰山理論融入寫作教學」；實驗組2一班30人（14男、16女），接受為期8週的「創造思考融入寫作教學」；控制組一班26人（14男、12女），則接受為期8週的「一般寫作教學」；無介入組一班28人（14男、14女）。實驗教學期程包含前測、後測共計10週，無介入組僅參與「新編創造思考測驗」、「正負向情緒量表」、「BES同理心量表」的前測與後測。研究工具使用「新編創造思考測驗」、「正負向情緒量表」、「BES同理心量表」、「會考寫作測驗評分規準」及「自編情意寫作評分量表」進行實驗教學效果測量。本研究結果顯示，經過八週的實驗課程，四組學生於同理心無顯著差異；情緒複雜度為無介入組有所提升；創造思考中的流暢力、獨創力無顯著差異，變通力則是對照組高於兩組實驗組。情意寫作以實驗組1提升效果最好。最終，本研究依據研究結果針對後續研究與實務提出建議。

The purpose of this study is to develop and integrate Sattir iceberg theory and creative thinking techniques into junior high school writing curriculum, comparing their effects on empathy, emotional complexity, creative thinking, and writing performance among junior high school students. The research adopts a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group, involving 114 8th-grade students (58 males, 56 females) from a junior high school in central Taiwan. Participants are divided into four groups: 2 experimental groups, 1 control group, and 1 no-intervention group. The first experimental group (30 students, 16 males, 14 females) undergoes an 8-week "Sattir iceberg theory integrated writing instruction," the second experimental group (30 students, 14 males, 16 females) undergoes an 8-week "creative thinking integrated writing instruction," while the control group (26 students, 14 males, 12 females) receives an 8-week "regular writing instruction." The no-intervention group consists of 28 students (14 males, 14 females). The experimental teaching period includes pre-tests, post-tests, and spans 10 weeks. The no-intervention group only participates in pre-tests and post-tests for the "New Creative Thinking Test," "Positive-Negative Emotion Scale," and "BES Empathy Scale." Research tools include the "New Creative Thinking Test," "Positive-Negative Emotion Scale," "BES Empathy Scale," "Comprehensive Writing Test Scoring Criteria," and "Self-developed Affective Writing Scoring Scale" for measuring experimental teaching effects. The results of this study indicate that after eight weeks of experimental courses, there is no significant difference among the four groups in terms of empathy. Emotional complexity shows improvement in the no-intervention group. There is no significant difference in fluency and originality in creative thinking, but flexibility is higher in the control group compared to both experimental groups. In affective writing, experimental group 1 shows the best improvement. Finally, based on the research findings, recommendations are made for future research and practical applications.

一、中文資料
Maria&Eleanor（2009）。心靈的淬煉——薩提爾家庭重塑的藝術。張老師文化，台北。
Robert J. Sternberg（2005）。創造力Ｉ理論。五南出版，台北。
日本能率協會（1993）。KJ法應用實務。清華管理科學圖書中心，台北。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（2000）。創造力研究。心理出版社。
王琪、楊帆（2008）。薩提爾家庭治療模式評析。醫學與哲學（人文社會醫學版）， 8。
王德蕙、李奕璇、曾芬蘭、宋曜廷（2013）：「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」信度與效度分析研究，測驗學刊，60(1)，156。
余季容（2014）。應用正向心理特質情意教學方案對國小資優學生正向意義學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
吳潤宗（2022）。 文本情意教學的提問設計研究──以汐止區某高中為例。國立台灣師範大學，台北。
吳靜吉（2020）。創造力的激發。遠流出版，台北。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。台北：教育部。
宋佳霖（2020）。知識創新活動融入繪本教學對國中生同理心發展之影響。國立政治大學，台北。
李崇建（2021）。薩提爾的對話練習。親子天下，台北。
周欣宜（2020）。運用日記書寫進行情意學習之行動敘說。國立臺北教育大學，台北。
林清山（2009）。心理與教育統計學。東華出版社。
林菀萍（2015）。故事討論對國小低年級同理心發展之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學，台北。
林嘉琪（2008）。「創造思考教學法」對國中生創造力、寫作能力及寫作興趣之影響。國立台灣師範大學，台北。
洪幼玲（2014）。薩提爾模式應用於作文教學之歷程研究。靜宜大學，台中。
洪翊珺（2016）。烏龜與烏鴉—以「同理心」為主題之繪本創作研究。國立台中教育大學，台中。
范麗超（2012）。運用繪本教學增進國小低年級學生同理心之行動研究。國立台南大學，台南。
唐淑華（2004）。情意教學—故事討論取向。心理出版社，台北。
徐曉放（2014）。情感教育融入抒情散文寫作教學之研究。國立臺中教育大學，台中。
涂馨尹（2016）。國中教育會考寫作測驗試題與精熟樣卷分析。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
國中教育會考推動工作委員會（民112年）：寫作測驗評分規準。取自：https://cap.rcpet.edu.tw/exam3-1.html
康宜淳（2017）。同理心教育之繪本創作。國立臺灣科技大學，台北。
張慧如（2017）。運用繪本教學提升幼兒同理心行為之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學，台北。
教育部（2003）。創造力教育白皮書。臺北：教育部。
教育部（2021），十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。臺北：教育部。
陳瑋瑄（2017）。會考寫作測驗精熟樣卷研究—對應108新課綱國語文領域核心素養。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。
曾致仁（2019）。薩提爾成長模式應用於臺中市國民中小學師生互動之研究。國立中興大學，台中。
曾莉芳（2012）。情意教學課程方案對學生挫折容忍力之影響-以國小三年級學生為例。東海大學，台中。
曾晴（2020）。運用創作性戲劇提升國小二年級學童同理心之個案研究。國立臺灣藝術大學，新北。
程美芳（2018）。「六頂思考帽創意思考策略」融入英語多元文化教學對國中生創造性潛能、創造性傾向及情緒複雜度的提升效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。
程景琳、廖小雯（2013）。「同理反應情境式量表」之編製與信效度檢驗。健康促進與衛生教育學報，(40)，69-95.
黃玉美（2011）。繪本運用於國小階段學童情意教學之研究。南華大學，嘉義。
黃詩婷（2017）。故事的共鳴：運用一人一故事劇場於國中生同理心與故事分享。國立台南大學，台南。
黃聲儀（2009）。以靜思語輔助國語科情意教學之研究。國立臺中教育大學，台中。
黃齡儀（2013）。運用繪本教學增進國小四年級學童同理心發展與人際關係之研究。樹德科技大學，高雄。
楊士朋（2019）。高中生創造力、寫作自我效能與情意寫作表現的相關性。國立台灣師範大學，台北。
楊婷雅（2015）。同理心融入創造思考教學與傳統教學法對提升同理心之效果比較。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。
葉杏芳（2020）。教育戲劇教學對發展國小六年級學生同理心之行動研究。國立台中教育大學，台中。
蔡佩錦（2012）。以情意教學增進國小高年級學生人際互動關係之行動研究~綜合活動學習領域為場域。台北市立教育大學，台北。
蔡孟容（2017）。國中七年級學生同理心培育課程之成效研究。國立臺北教育大學，台北。
蔡念筑（2021）。運用故事討論教學進行國小三年級學童同理心學習成效與影響之行動研究。國立政治大學，台北。
賴均雅（2021）。影像融入國中國文教學之研究―以情意教學為例。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
謝庭蓁（2018）。「創造思考與情意教學」運用於高中歷史教學-以「羅馬共和政治」單元為例。國立台灣師範大學，台北。
鍾宇瑄（2021）。覺察自身，發展素養力——以薩提爾模式探究一位國小媒體素養教育教師為例。臺北市立大學，台北。
鍾佳穎（2014）。五月天歌曲應用於國中國文教學之研究－－以寫作教學和情意教學為例。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
鍾聖校（2000）。情意溝通教學理論：從建構到實踐。五南出版，台北。
簡千容（2013）。國小教師運用薩提爾模式之敘說研究。國立嘉義大學，嘉義。

二、外文資料
A.C. Bohart, D.J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior implications for family, school and society, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA (2001), pp. 61-86
Abdolrezapour, P. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and EFL learners’ writing performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 331-339.
Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Journal of adolescence, 32(2), 393-408.
Albin, M. L., Benton, S. L., & Khramtsova, I. (1996). Individual differences in interest and narrative writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 305-324.
Alloway, T. P., Copello, E., Loesch, M., Soares, C., Watkins, J., Miller, D., ... & Ray, S. (2016). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Emotional Empathy Scale. Measurement, 90, 438-442.
Anastácio, S., Vagos, P., Nobre-Lima, L., Rijo, D., & Jolliffe, D. (2016). The Portuguese version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES): Dimensionality and measurement invariance in a community adolescent sample. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(5), 614-623.
Andreoni, J., & Rao, J. M. (2011). The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 513-520.
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of psychosomatic research, 38(1), 23-32.
Banmen, J. (2002). The Satir model: Yesterday and today. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), 7-22.
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.
Beck, M., & Libert, B. (2017). The rise of AI makes emotional intelligence more important. Harvard Business Review, 15, 1-5.
Berrios, R. (2019). What is complex/emotional about emotional complexity?. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1606.
Brooke, R. (1988). Modeling a writer's identity: Reading and imitation in the writing classroom. College composition and communication, 39(1), 23-41.
Brubacher, L. (2006). Integrating emotion‐focused therapy with the Satir model. Journal of marital and family therapy, 32(2), 141-153.
Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2004). The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal of research in personality, 38(2), 150-163.
Cabedo-Peris, J., Martí-Vilar, M., Merino-Soto, C., & Ortiz-Morán, M. (2021, December). Basic Empathy Scale: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 29). MDPI.
Cohen, D., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth. Developmental psychology, 32(6), 988.
Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion review, 8(2), 144-153.
D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160-165.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
Decety, J., & Michalska, K. J. (2010). Neurodevelopmental changes in the circuits underlying empathy and sympathy from childhood to adulthood. Developmental Science, 13(6), 886–899.
Eberle, R. F. (1972). Developing imagination through scamper. Journal of Creative Behavior.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology Vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 646–718).
Eragamreddy, N. (2013). Teaching creative thinking skills. International Journal of english language & translation studies, 1(2), 124-145.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(4), 967.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 43(4), 522.
Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Ruiz, D. (2008). Emotional intelligence in education.
Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S. (2009). Empathy and education. The social neuroscience of empathy, 85(98).
Geer, J. H., Estupinan, L. A., & Manguno-Mire, G. M. (2000). Empathy, social skills, and other relevant cognitive processes in rapists and child molesters. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 99–126.
Geher, G., Betancourt, K., & Jewell, O. (2017). The link between emotional intelligence and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(1), 5-22.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267.
Hamann, S., & Canli, T. (2004). Individual differences in emotion processing. Current opinion in neurobiology, 14(2), 233-238.
Haselden, P. G. (2003). Use of affinity diagrams as instructional tools in inclusive classrooms. Preventing School Failure, 47(4), 187-189.
Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 33(3), 307.
Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352-358.
Idek, M. (2016). Measuring the application of SCAMPER technique in facilitating creative and critical thinking in composing short stories and poems. Malaysian Journal of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Education, 2, 30-53.
IEA's Progress in International Reading Literacy Study - PIRLS 2021
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of adolescence, 29(4), 589-611.
Kang, S. M., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Individual differences in emotional complexity: Their psychological implications. Journal of personality, 72(4), 687-726.
Kang, S. M., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Individual differences in emotional complexity: Their psychological implications. Journal of personality, 72(4), 687-726.
Lam, T. C. M., Kolomitro, K., & Alamparambil, F. C. (2011). Empathy training: Methods, evaluation practices, and validity. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 7(16), 162-200.
Leake, E. (2016). Writing Pedagogies of Empathy: As Rhetoric and Disposition. In Composition Forum (Vol. 34). Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition.
Lim, S. J., & Park, E. Y. (2013). Changes in communication and relationship pattern for undergraduate nursing students after'Satir communication education'. The Journal of Korean academic society of nursing education, 19(2), 151-162.
Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Emotional complexity.
Majid, D. A., Tan, A. G., & Soh, K. C. (2003). Enhancing children's creativity: An exploratory study on using the Internet and SCAMPER as creative writing tools. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 13(2), 67-82.
Malatesta, C. Z., Izard, C. E., Culver, C., & Nicolich, M. (1987). Emotion communication skills in young, middle-aged, and older women. Psychology and Aging, 2(2), 193.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & emotion, 25(5), 818-833.
Marcos, R. I. S., Fernández, V. L., González, M. T. D., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52(5), 509.
McCurrie, M. (2020). Taking Another Look at Empathy: Teaching Writing Now. Journal of Teaching Writing, 35(2), 1-24.
Olderbak, S., & Wilhelm, O. (2017). Emotion perception and empathy: An individual differences test of relations. Emotion, 17(7), 1092.
Ong, A. D., Zautra, A. J., & Finan, P. H. (2017). Inter-and intra-individual variation in emotional complexity: Methodological considerations and theoretical implications. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 15, 22-26.
Quoidbach, J., Gruber, J., Mikolajczak, M., Kogan, A., Kotsou, I., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Emodiversity and the emotional ecosystem. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 143(6), 2057.
Richburg, M., & Fletcher, T. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Directing a child's emotional education. Child Study Journal, 32(1), 31-38.
Ritchie, S. J., Luciano, M., Hansell, N. K., Wright, M. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). The relationship of reading ability to creativity: Positive, not negative associations. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 171-176.
Shapiro, L. E. (1998). How to raise a child with a high EQ: A parent's guide to emotional intelligence, New York: Harper Collins.
Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity research journal, 18(1), 87.
Stetson, E. A., Hurley, A. M., & Miller, G. E. (2003). Can universal affective education programs be used to promote empathy in elementary aged children? A review of five curricula. Journal of Character Education, 1(2), 129.
Taylor, G. J. (1984). Alexithymia: concept, measurement, and implications for treatment. The American journal of psychiatry.
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 38(2), 227-242.
Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to reading and writing. Thinking skills and creativity, 7(1), 38-47.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality.
Wing, J. F., Schutte, N. S., & Byrne, B. (2006). The effect of positive writing on emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1291-1302.
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European journal of personality, 15(4), 297-310.
Zedelius, C. M., Mills, C., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). Beyond subjective judgments: Predicting evaluations of creative writing from computational linguistic features. Behavior research methods, 51, 879-894.