研究生: |
彭懷萱 Peng, Huai-Xuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
一起向前行—以個別化正向行為支持增進國中普通班身心障礙學生的學校適應之研究 Let’s Go Forward Together— A Study on Improving School Adaptation of a Student with Special Educational Needs in Junior High School Through Individualized Positive Behavioral Support |
指導教授: |
胡心慈
Hu, Shin-Tzu |
口試委員: |
張正芬
Chang, Cheng-Fen 陳佩玉 Chen, Pei-Yu 胡心慈 Hu, Shin-Tzu |
口試日期: | 2024/06/25 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系碩士在職專班 Department of Special Education_Continuing Education Master's Program of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 165 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學校適應 、身心障礙學生 、個別化正向行為支持 、行為功能評量 、行為功能介入方案 |
英文關鍵詞: | school adaptation, students with special educational needs, individualized positive behavior supports, functional behavior assessment, behavioral functional intervention plan |
研究方法: | 行動研究法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401238 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:75 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以特殊教育學生的正向行為支持為架構,採協同行動研究法,學校團隊透過計劃、行動、觀察、反思、調整、再行動的動態歷程,一名國中七年級普通班情緒行為障礙學生為個案,期待改善個案在學校所面臨的適應困難,並促進個案在學習和行為有更好地表現。
首先在初級支持服務下,研究者和協同研究者共同檢視個案已經獲得到的支持,以及仍然持續存在的困難,依照學習適應、同儕互動、師生關係、常規適應、自我適應向度,彙整出個案在學校適應中需要額外協助。接著聚焦學校團隊欲改變個案的行為問題,透過行為功能評量進行分析,使用互競行為路徑圖來規劃應對策略和訂定階段性目標,並擬出行為功能介入方案。然後召集個案之班級導師、特殊教育教師,還有國文科、英文科、數學科、表演藝術科教師組成團隊,透過團隊分工和合作,提供個別化的正向行為介入,有效減少個案的問題行為,提升學生整體適應表現。
研究結果顯示,對身心障礙學生提供連續性支持服務,包括:一、檢視初級支持服務的成效和需求;二、使用行為功能評量分析行為問題;三、循序漸進執行行為功能介入方案。而普特教師確實且穩定執行介入策略,包括:一、研擬易理解和易操作的策略;二、追蹤行為數據並視情況調整;三、涵容行為的變化並持續觀察。學校以個案為中心建立跨專業團隊合作,充分地提供服務並滿足個案的需求,包括:一、定期召開團隊會議促進彼此溝通;二、設定明確合理的目標並各司其職;三、提升教師的專業知能與心理支持。
最後根據研究結論,從實務現場和未來研究提出若干建議,以作為未來推動特殊教育學生的正向行為支持之參考。
This study is based on the framework of positive behavior support for special educational needs students and adopts a collaborative action research method. The school team uses a dynamic process of planning, action, observation, reflection, adjustment, and re-action to address the case of a seventh-grade student with emotional and behavioral disorders in a regular class. The goal is to improve the case's school adaptation difficulties and promote better learning and behavior performance.
Initially, under primary support services, the researcher and co-researchers jointly examined the support the case had already received and the persistent difficulties. They identified additional assistance needed for school adaptation based on dimensions such as learning adaptation, peer interaction, teacher-student relationships, routine adaptation, and self-adaptation. The school team then focused on changing the student's behavioral problems, analyzing them through Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA), using a competing behavior pathway diagram to plan coping strategies and set phased goals, and formulating a Behavioral Functional Intervention Plan (BFIP). The team, including the student's homeroom teacher, special education teacher, and subjects teachers (Chinese, English, Math, Performing Arts), provided individualized positive behavior interventions through teamwork and collaboration, effectively reducing the case's problem behaviors and enhancing overall school adaptation performance.
The research results indicate that providing continuous support services for students with special educational needs includes: (1) reviewing the effectiveness and needs of primary support services; (2) using FBA to analyze behavior problems; (3) gradually implementing the BFIP. Regular and special education teachers need to consistently and steadily implement intervention strategies, which include: (1) developing strategies that are easy to understand and implement; (2) tracking behavior data and adjusting according to student’s performance; (3) accommodating behavior changes and continuing observation. The school establishes a student-centered interdisciplinary team collaboration, fully providing services and meeting the case's needs, which includes: (1) holding regular team meetings to promote communication; (2) setting clear and reasonable goals with everyone fulfilling their responsibilities; (3) enhancing teachers' professional knowledge and psychological support.
Finally, based on the research conclusions, several suggestions are made from practical and future research perspectives to serve as a reference for promoting positive behavior support for special needs students.
Dettmer, P.(2014):專業合作與溝通:合作、諮詢與團隊運作支持特殊需求學生(韓福榮、林珮如、王雅瑜、蘇芳柳、佘永吉,譯)。華騰文化出版社。(原著出版於 2013)。
Kearney, A. J.(2018):應用行為分析入門手冊(孟瑛如、簡吟文、吳侑達,譯)。心理出版社。(原著出版於 2015)。
十二年國民基本教育課程綱要(2023):十二年國民基本教育特殊教育課程實施規範。教育部國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺 https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Facet/Home/index.aspx?HtmlName=Home
王文伶、丁政本、鄧若瑩(2016)。輕度障礙、資優以及一般國中學生因應普通班學習活動的適應現況與其影響因素。特殊教育學報,44,1-35。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000182-201612-201702200005-201702200005-1-35
王振德(2000)。教育大辭書。https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/
王櫻芬(2020)。依附、憂鬱和積極因應對青少年學校生活困擾之影響性研究。教育心理學報,52(1),191-217。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202009_52(1).0008
立法院(2022年8月22日)。特教生情緒行為問題處理法制研析。立法院全球資訊網之法制局之研究成果之議題研析 https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=220835
曲邦婷、李庭瑜、曾聖潔(2014)。幼教師於融合教育中之專業覺知與需求。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,103,311-324。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000110-201411-201501210011-201501210011-311-324
朱尹安(2011)。臺北市特殊教育相關專業人員服務模式初探。特殊教育季刊,(120),45-52。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.201109_(120).0006
吳怡靜、黃雅蘭、楊雅婷(2011)。正向行為支持計畫對國中資源班自閉症學生尖叫哭鬧行為處理之成效研究。特教園丁,26(4),1-12
吳武典(2013)。臺灣特殊教育綜論(一):發展脈絡與特色。特殊教育季刊,(129),11-18。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.2013.129.11-18
吳雅萍(2019)。從特殊教育教師與普通教育教師的合作觀點探討普通教育課程調整的實務運作。雲嘉特教期刊,(30),21-28。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18166938-201911-202006030008-202006030008-21-28
呂依蓉(2016)。《薩拉曼卡宣言與特殊需求教育行動綱領》翻譯:融合教育檢視與反思(一)。特殊教育季刊,(138),21-28。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.2016.139.35-41
宋宥賢(2020)。臺灣學校輔導系統之發展:邁向系統觀點與專業資源整合。新社會政策,(68),50-59。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20150427001-202006-202007070022-202007070022-50-59
孟瑛如(2019)。資源教室方案:班級經營與補救教學(第 4 版)。臺北市:五南。
林坤燦、鄭浩宇、林育辰、郭又方(2023)。普通學校融合教育思維與現場行動方案具體實踐。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,111,63-80。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000110-N202302240010-00003
林翠英(2010)。情緒行為障礙學生之個別化教育計畫的內涵。國小特殊教育,(50),44-51。https://doi.org/10.7034/SEES.201012.0044
洪儷瑜、曹祐榮、何佩容(2023)。臺灣融合教育發展之跨國比較研究:以輸入-歷程-成果指標模型為例。特殊教育研究學刊,48(2),1-35。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.202307_48(2).0001
洪儷瑜、陳佩玉(2018)。從兩個三角形談臺灣推動正向行為支持的發展。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,107,121-139。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000110-201812-201812110010-201812110010-121-139
洪儷瑜、鳳華、 何美慧、張蓓莉、翁素珍(2018):特殊教育學生的正向行為支持。心理出版社。
夏菁穗(2018)。正向行為支持方案對國中學習障礙學生行為問題改善之行動研究。身心障礙研究季刊,16(3&4),178-200。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17292832-201812-201901160029-201901160029-178-200
孫淑柔、黃澤洋(2018)。普通班身心障礙學生學校支持服務模式之建構。當代教育研究季刊,26(1),77-113。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201803_26(1).0003
特殊教育法施行細則(2023)。中華民國一百十二年十二月二十日教育部臺教學(四)字第 1122806628A 號令修正發布全文 19 條。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080032
張世彗(2021):行為改變技術(8版)。五南出版社。
張正芬(2001)。自閉症兒童不服從行為之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,21,165-187。
張正芬(2018)。身心障礙學生的情緒行為輔導:行為功能介入方案的實施。學生事務與輔導,57(3),54-59。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.201812_57(3).0006
張美華、簡瑞良(2011)。新全方位課程設計理念在特殊教育的運用。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,100,71-104。https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201112.0071
張蓓莉(2009)。臺灣的融合教育。中等教育,60(4),8-18。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10180230-200912-201001190065-201001190065-8-18
教育部(2022):分散式資源班間接服務參考手冊。教育部國民及學前教育署優質特教發展網絡系統暨教學支援平台 https://sencir.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/GoWeb/include/index.php?Page=5-F
教育部(2023):中華民國教育統計。教育部全球資訊網 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=829446EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B203&s=B19AF3B0B4D7BFAC
曹祐榮、洪儷瑜(2020)。從國際發展趨勢談臺灣推動融合教育之實踐。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,109,69-102。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000110-202011-202012030010-202012030010-69-102
陳介宇、蔡昆瀛(2009)。“幼兒情緒與行爲問題檢核表”編製之研究。測驗學刊,56(2),235-268。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200906.0235
陳玉娟(2014)。正向行為支持對改善學習障礙學生課堂干擾行為之成效〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學
陳佩玉、蔡欣玶、林沛霖(2015)。身心障礙學生功能本位行為介入方案成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊,40(1),1-30。
陳佩玉、蔡淑妃(2017):正向行為支持發展的趨勢:2008-2017。中華民國特殊教育年刊,1-21。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201503.4001001
陳幸榆、吳訓生(2015)。大專校院智能障礙學生學校適應之調查研究。障礙者理解半年刊,14(2),67-90。https://doi.org/10.6513/TJUID.2015.14(2).4
陳祥瑀(2017)。正向行為支持對改善國中智能障礙學生課堂行為問題之成效〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學
陳嫺霓、楊康臨(2013)。亞斯柏格兒童家庭面對學校適應的壓力經驗。國小特殊教育,(56),71-90。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000543-201312-201501280019-201501280019-71-90
陶蕃瀛(2004)。行動研究:一種增強權能的助人工作方法。應用心理研究,(23),33-48。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15609251-200409-x-23-33-48-a
曾思瑜(2003)。從“無障礙設計”到“通用設計”-美日兩國無障礙環境理念變遷與發展過程。設計學報,8(2),57-76。https://doi.org/10.6381/JD.200309.0057
鈕文英(2010)。特殊教育證據本位實務之建立、鑑識與運用。南屏特殊教育,(1),1-24。
鈕文英(2016):身心障礙者的正向行為支持(第二版)。心理出版社。
鈕文英(2020):質性研究方法與論文寫作三版。雙葉書廊。
黃柏華(2006)。身心障礙學生國小升國中轉銜方案之實施原則與實例。國小特殊教育,42(2),54-62。
葉靖雲(2011)。學習不利學生的科學教育困境與需求~以學習障礙生為例。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,261-281。https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201112.0261
臺北市東區特教資源中心(2023):巡迴專區之情緒行為專業支援。臺北市東區特教資源中心網站 https://www.terc.tp.edu.tw/information.php?p_id=85
臺北市政府教育局統計室(2023):111學年度臺北市高級中等以下學校概況表。臺北市政府教育局網站 https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=596E0D35F1581985&sms=69B4E6B26379EE4E&s=FB890C92546FF822
鳳華、鍾儀潔、蔡馨惠、羅雅瑜、王慧婷、洪雅惠、吳雅萍、吳佩芳、羅雅芬、陳佩玉、田凱倩(2021):應用行為分析導論(第二版)。心理出版社。
劉宗幸(2021)。實施社會情緒學習課程提升青少年自我調節能力。台灣教育,(731),83-90。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18166482-202110-202110200008-202110200008-83-90
蔡昆瀛、張芳慈(2010)。由特殊教育法之修訂論特教相關專業團隊服務。國小特殊教育,(50),11-20。https://doi.org/10.7034/SEES.201012.0011
蔡明富(2014)。高中職學生社會行為評量系統之問題行為量表編製研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,(37),1-26。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20120111002-201412-201503090016-201503090016-1-26
蔡淑妃、翁素珍(2018)。淺談執行行為功能評量之困難。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,141-157。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000110-201812-201812110010-201812110010-141-157
鄭津妃(2012)。臺灣普教與特教的現況與未來-繼續統合或行動融合?。特殊教育季刊,(124),21-28。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.201209_(124).0003
鄭津妃、張正芬(2014)。融合教育的績效:SNELS資料庫國中障礙學生的學校適應與滿意。特殊教育研究學刊,39(3),81-109。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201411.3903004
戴官宇、李永昌(2007)。行為支持計畫對國中視多重障礙學生不專注行為之處理成效。特殊教育學報,(25),135-159。https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.200706.0135
顏瑞隆、張正芬(2012)。從生態系統理論談自閉症學生的學校適應。特殊教育季刊,(124),11-19。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.201209_(124).0002
Ala’i-Rosales, S., Cihon, J. H., Currier, T. D., Ferguson, J. L., Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., ... & Weinkauf, S. M. (2019). The big four: Functional assessment research informs preventative behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00291-9
Bates, S. M., Mellin, E., Paluta, L. M., Anderson-Butcher, D., Vogeler, M., & Sterling, K. (2019). Examining the influence of interprofessional team collaboration on student-level outcomes through school–community partnerships. Children & Schools, 41(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.n11
Bradbury, H., Mirvis, P., Neilsen, E., & Pasmore, W. (2008). Action research at work: Creating the future following the path from Lewin. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2, 77-92.
Brosnan, J., & Healy, O. (2011). A review of behavioral interventions for the treatment of aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.023
Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., . . . Fox, L. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070200400102
Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2015). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. Guilford Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070000200302
Dawes, M. (2017). Early adolescents’ social goals and school adjustment. Social Psychology of Education, 20(2), 299-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9380-3
Diamantopoulou, S., Verhulst, F. C., & Van Der Ende, J. (2011). Gender differences in the development and adult outcome of co-occurring depression and delinquency in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 644. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023669
Dunlap, G., Sailor, W., Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2009). Overview and history of positive behavior support. In Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 3-16). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_1
Fallon, L. M., O’Keeffe, B. V., & Sugai, G. (2012). Consideration of culture and context in school-wide positive behavior support: A review of current literature. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711426334
Friman, P. C. (2010). Cooper, Heron, and Heward's Applied Behavior Analysis: Checkered flag for students and professors, yellow flag for the field. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-161
Gerard, J. M., & Booth, M. Z. (2015). Family and school influences on adolescents' adjustment: The moderating role of youth hopefulness and aspirations for the future. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.06.003
Harvey, S. T., Boer, D., Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (2009). Updating a meta-analysis of intervention research with challenging behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250802690922
Hurl, K., Wightman, J., Haynes, S. N., & Virues-Ortega, J. (2016). Does a pre-intervention functional assessment increase intervention effectiveness? A meta-analysis of within-subject interrupted time-series studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.003
Mitchell, B. S., Bruhn, A. L., & Lewis, T. J. (2015). Essential features of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral supports. In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (p. 539-562). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_31
O'Neill, R. E., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (2015). Functional Assessment and Program Development for Problem Behavior: A Practical Handbook (3rd eds.). Stamgord, CT: Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1030011200024611
Reschly, D. J. (2002). Change dynamics in special education assessment: Historical and contemporary patterns. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_9
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0007
Sosa, L. V., & McGrath, B. (2013). Collaboration from the ground up: Creating effective teams. School Social Work Journal, 38(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60935-6
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1-2), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_03
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2008). What we know and need to know about preventing problem behavior in schools. Exceptionality, 16(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830801981138
Vergunst, F., Commisso, M., Geoffroy, M. C., Temcheff, C., Poirier, M., Park, J., ... & Orri, M. (2023). Association of childhood externalizing, internalizing, and comorbid symptoms with long-term economic and social outcomes. JAMA Network Open, 6(1), e2249568-e2249568. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1102
Weiss, M. J., DelPizzo-Cheng, E., LaRue, R. H., & Sloman, K. (2010). ABA and PBS: The dangers in creating artificial dichotomies in behavioral intervention. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10(3-4), 428. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100681
Wentzel, K. R. (2003). School adjustment. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology, Vol. 7, (p. 235–258). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207010