本研究探討當前兒少保護工作中督導工作所側重的角色與功能，透過擬真情境運用，收集民間單位兒少保護督導面對不同情境時，所提供的督導功能與策略。研究結果提供督導實務面、機構面與方案政策面，於未來提升督導功能的建議。再者，針對擬真操作應用於社會工作研究中，予以後續研究者的建議。本研究以立意取樣方式，邀請7位民間單位督導進行訪談。除以擬真督導情境影片收集資料，並輔以深度訪談方式增加資料的豐富性。本研究的結論如下：
一、民間單位兒少保護督導所側重的督導角色及功能以支持為主，並透過不同的督導功能搭配，協助受督者因應不同的工作情境。
二、民間單位兒保社工督導依據擬真情境所展現的督導策略，是優先承接情緒再投入教育的功能；然後透過支持與教育的督導功能結合，讓督導功能有發揮。督導行政功能不是監控，而是加入教育功能讓行政提升效率。
三、精進民間兒少保督導功能發揮的因應，機構支持是最大的力量。提供資源讓督導接受更優質的訓練，並且以契約方案實質支持督導工作進行。另外，調整中央政策與課程訓練，修減行政表單，讓督導工作壓力減輕。
四、擬真督導情境應用於督導研究之中，可重現督導情境，使研究進行更具圖像化，並降低受訪督導的防衛，以順利訪談進行。

This research aims to explore the roles and functions of supervision by using simulation supervision for NGO’s social work supervisors of child protection services. The data collection is on how supervisors working react to different situations and the functions and strategies they offer in response. The research findings give advice on practical, organizational, and policy aspects to supervisors. The research also offers suggestion by using simulations for social work research.
The study is the purposive sampling. The researcher invites 7 supervisors from non-governmental organizations. Other than collecting information through the videos of simulation supervision, in-depth interviews are added to increase variety in the data. The research findings are as follows:
1.NGO’s child protection services mainly focus on the supporting role and function of supervision. By supplementing it with other functions, they can help those that are supervised face different scenarios at work.
2.NGO’s social work supervisors will first respond to emotions before they show their educational function in the simulations. Once emotional support and educational function
are combined, the supervisors’ true functions will reveal themselves. The administrative role of supervisors is not to monitor, but to use educational function to increase the
efficiency of administrative work.
3.The organizations themselves are the biggest support to help NGO’s social work supervisors to unleash their functions of supervisions. The organizations can do so by offering resources to let supervisors have access to the better training courses and revising the contracts to give them actual support. Also, making adjustments to government policies and training courses, as well as simplifying administrative forms can all help to decrease stress from work for the supervisors.
4.By using simulations in the study of supervisors, one can recreate supervision scenarios, help people better picture the research in their minds, and decrease defensiveness of the participants for smoother interviews.

參考書目：
中華民國國家發展委員會(2018)。兒童福利法。擷取自 經濟小辭典: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=01B17A05A9374683&sms=32ADE0CD4006BBE5&s=AC195804B87C4BC2

王文娟 (2016)。模擬案主教學方法運用於社會個案工作課程之初探:從學生自評成果來看。台灣社會工作學刊，16，87-118。

王秀燕 (2014)。兒少保護社會工作者工作安全-現況探討。社區發展季刊，147，19-34。

行政院(2018)。政策與計畫。擷取自 https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/58708ea0-f58d-48b0-9626-ae0571deee04

余漢儀 (1996)。婦運對兒童保護之影響。婦女與兩性學刊，7，115-140。

余漢儀 (2014)。台灣兒少保護的變革兼論高風險家庭服務方案的影響。台灣社會研究季刊，96，137-173。

李佳宜、侯貴圓、高啟蘭、蔡宗桓、林盈禎、游秀英、黃桂英、孫靜軒、趙慧 玲(2017)。擬真模式跨領域合作照護教育課程之成效探討。台灣擬真醫學教育期刊，4，44-48。

汪淑媛 (2008)。論台灣社工教育對社會工作職業風險之忽視。臺大社會工作學刊，17，1-42。

兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2014)。兒童少年權益網。擷取自 https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/25/107

周清玉、曾冠鈞 (2011)。保護性社工人力與工作條件之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1，47-74。

林萬億 (2019)。強化社會安全網：背景與策略。社區發展季刊，165，3-29。

林維言、陳怡如(2019)。強化社會安全網之保護服務公私部門合作策略-以家庭
暴力被害人為例。社區發展季刊，156，42-51。

施慧玲（2004）。論我國兒童人權法制之發展-兼談落實“聯合國兒童權利公 約”之社會運動。中正大學法學季刊，14，169-204。

施麗紅 (2017)。社會工作督導關係探討。社區發展季刊，159，369-384。

柯彤文、王拔群 (2015)。臨床醫療教育的新趨勢-擬真團隊訓練。台灣擬真醫學 教育期刊，2，39-41。

徐雅嵐 (2015)。兒少保護工作的挑戰與因應。鄭麗珍主編，兒童少年保護社會工作實務手冊(237-243)。高雄市：巨流。

財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2012)。兒童少年保護服務。擷取自 https://www.ccf.org.tw/?action=ourservices_domestic&class_id=4

國立臺灣師範大學研究倫理中心(2016)。何謂研究倫理。取自 http://www.acad.ntnu.edu.tw/7intro/super_pages.php?ID=7intro1

畢恆達（2010）。教授為什麼沒告訴我。（初版）。新北市：小畢空間出版社。

郭靜晃、吳幸玲（2001）。邁向廿一世紀兒童福利的願景-以兒童為中心、家庭 為本位，落實整體兒童照顧政策。華岡社科學報，15，1-13。

陳怡如 (2007)。社會服務民營化“方案委託”之初探-以嘉義家扶中心執行 監護權訪視為例。政策研究學報，7，109-137。

陳秋山(譯) (2008)。社會工作督導脈絡與概念(原作者: Tsui, M. S.)。臺北市: 心理出版社。

陳秋山、王玉馨、郭慧琳（譯）（2008）。社工質性研究（原作者：Shaw, I., & Gould, N. 2008）。台北市：都華文化。

彭淑華 (2011)。台灣兒童及少年福利政策與法令制度之發展：社會福利模式－從傳承到創新研討會。中國北京:兩岸社會福利學術研討會。

彭淑華 (2011)。由蹣跚學步到昂首前行臺灣兒童保護政策、法規與實務之發展經驗。社區發展季刊，133，273-293。

游美貴、畢國蓮、郭貴蘭 (2010)。兒少保護工作概論。於鄭麗珍主編，兒童少 年保護工作教材。臺中市：內政部兒童局委託。

游美貴、鄭麗珍 (2018)。社會工作督導概論。游美貴主編，社會工作督導：理論與實務工作手冊。臺北市：雙葉書廊。

鈕文英（2014）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。（修訂一版）。台北市：雙葉書 廊。

馮燕、李宏文、謝文元 (2011)。建國百年來兒童及少年福利的回顧與前瞻。社區發展季刊，133，309-327。

黃玉淳、許麗齡、謝素英(2011)。情境模擬溝通課程對提升新進護理人員溝通自信心之研究。護理雜誌，58，53-62。

黃彥宜 (2009)。保護性業務一線社會工作者職場暴力之初探:權力的觀點。台大 社會工作學刊，6，80-118。

黃源協 (2013)。社會工作管理。臺北市：雙葉書廊。

楊志偉(2014)。台大醫院擬真教育簡介。台灣擬真醫學教育期刊，1，48-48。

楊佩蓉 (2016)。兒少保護實務研判的挑戰與因應。社區發展季刊，156，103- 112。

葉肅科、周海娟 (2017)。兒童權利公約之後：台灣兒少福利發展。社區發展季 刊，157，54-68。

廖薰香(2017)。以擬真情境做為病人安全的診斷工具。台灣擬真醫學教育期 刊，4，33-38。

趙善如 (2009)。提昇兒童少年保護個案家庭處遇組織間合作效能之要素:從實務工作者觀點探討之。臺大社會工作學刊，20，137-177。

劉玉玲 (2015)。正向觀點的社工督導關係-以保護性業務為例。臺灣社會工作 學刊，13，101-126。

劉邦富(2011)。公部門兒童及少年福利發展。社區發展季刊，133，265-272。

潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究。臺北市:心理。

蔡淳涓(2014)。以醫學擬真評量跨團隊臨床能力。台灣擬真醫學教育期刊，1，7-13。

衛生福利部 (2018)。強化社會安全網計畫核定本。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-18-40093-1.html

衛生福利部統計處(2018)。社會工作專職人員數。取自 https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-1721-9432-113.html

鄭麗珍（2019）。社會工作研究倫理。於蔡甫昌主編，當代研究倫理總覽。台 北市：國立臺灣大學醫學院。

賴月蜜 （2003）。兒童及少年福利法合併修法之歷程與爭議-民間團體推動修法 之經驗。社區發展季刊，103，50-65。

簡春安、鄒平儀 (2016)。社會工作研究法(三版)。高雄市：巨流。

Altman, J. C., & Hohman, M. (2020). Editorial: social work’s grand challenges. British Journal of Social Work, 50(1), 1-4.
 
Barter, C. & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. London, United Kingdom: Department of sociology, University of Surrey.

Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M. S. (2016). Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568-1586.

Bland, A. J., Topping, A., & Tobbell, J (2014). Time to unravel the conceptual confusion of authenticity and fidelity and their contribution to learning within simulation-based nurse education. A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1112-1118.

British Association of Social Workers (2011). UK Supervision Policy. Birmingham, England: The British Association of Social Workers.

Collins-Camargo, C., & Royse, D., (2010). A Study of the relationships among effective supervision, organizational culture promoting evidence-based practice, and worker self-efficacy in public child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(1)1-24.

Cook, D. A., Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A.T., Erwin, P. J., & Hatala, R. (2012). Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta- analysis. Medical Teacher, 35(1), 867–898.

Cousins, C. (2004). Becoming a social work supervisor: A significant role transition. Australian Social Work, 57, 175-185. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0748.2004.00130.x

Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Evans, G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013). Cumulative risk and child development. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1342-1396. https://doi: 10.1037/a0031808.supp

Forgey, M. A., Badger, L., Gilbert, T & Hansen, J. (2013). Using standardized clients to train social workers in intimate partner violence assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 292-306.

Gibson, M. (2014). Social worker shame in child and family social work: Inadequacy, failure, and the struggle to practise humanely. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(4), 417-431. https://0doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.1080/02650533.2014.913237

Gobbi, M., Monger, E., Weal, M. J., McDonald, J. W., Michaelides, D., & De Roure, D. (2012). The challenges of developing and evaluating complex care scenarios using simulation in nursing education. Journal of Research in Nursing, 17(4), 329-345.

Hair, H. J. (2014). Power relations in supervision: Preferred practices according to social workers. Families in society, 95(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.14

Hussein, S., Manthorpe, J., Ridley, J., Austerberry, H., Farrelly, N., Larkins, C., Bilson, A. & Stanley, N. (2014). Independent children’s social work practice pilots: Evaluating practitioners’ job control and burnout. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513492859

Hussein, S., Manthorpe, J., Ridley, J., Austerberry, H., Farrelly, N., Larkins, C., Bilson, A. & Stanley, N. (2014). Independent children’s social work practice pilots: Evaluating practitioners’ job control and burnout. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513492859

Issenberg, S. B., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28.

Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Columbia University Press.
Klein, E. (2015). Supervision of social work interns as members of a multidisciplinary team. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 697-701.

Lau, C. Q., Seltzer, J. A., & Bianchi, S. M. (2016). The effects of vignette placement on attitudes toward supporting family members. Field Methods, 28(1), 79–91.

Manning, S. J., Skiff, D. M., Santiago, L. P., & Irish, A. (2016). Nursing and social work trauma simulation: Exploring an interprofessional approach. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 555-564.

McCoy, A., Rose, D., & Connolly, M. (2014). Approaches to evaluation in Australian child and family welfare organizations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 44, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.02.004.

Mcgaghie, W.C., Issenberg, B., Cohen, E.R., Barsuck, J.H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 706-711.

Motola, I., Devine, L. A., Chung, H. S., Sullivan, J. E., & Issenberg, S. B. (2013). Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher, 35(10), 1511-30. doi: https://0-doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632

Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervisor (3rd ed.). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press.

National Association of Social Workers (2013). Best practice standards in social work supervision. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.

Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309334848

O'Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. S. (2015). Social work supervision research (1970-2010): The way we were and the way ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616-633.

Petracchi, H. E., & Collins, K. S. (2006). Utilizing actors to simulate clients in social work student role plays: Does this approach have a place in social work education? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(1-2), 223-233.

Scourfield, J., Maxwell, N., Zhang, M. L., de Villiers, T., Pithouse, A., Kinnersley, P., Metcalf, E., & Tayyaba, S. (2019). Evaluation of a fast-track postgraduate social work program in England using simulated practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(4), 363-374.

Shaw, I. & Holland, S. (2014). Qualitative methods in social work-a review. London, England: SAGE Publications.

Tsui, M. (2005). Functions of social work supervision in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 48(4), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872805053471

Wilkins, D., & Jones, R. (2017). Simulating supervision: How do managers respond to a crisis? European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 454-466.

Wonnacott, J. (2012). Mastering social work supervision. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Wright, S. (2004). Child protection in the community: a community development approach. Child Abuse Review, 13, 384-398. doi:10.1002/car.875