研究生: |
張馥讌 Chang, Fu-Yen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
無聲「勝」有聲!聽子女與聾父母代間關係之探索 Family Resilience: the intergenerational Relationship between Hear Adult Children and Deaf Parents |
指導教授: |
林如萍
Lin, Ju-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人類發展與家庭學系 Department of Human Development and Family Studies |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 112 |
中文關鍵詞: | 聾父母與聽子女 、代間關係 、三次訪談系列方法 、聾人文化 |
英文關鍵詞: | deaf parents and hearing children, intergenerational relationship, the three interview series, deaf culture |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201901 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:211 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
聾父母與聽子女的家庭組成普遍存在於聾人社會,但國內目前針對聽子女與聾父母家庭關係的研究相對匱乏,因此本研究期望透過解析聽子女在聾家庭成長的生命經驗與感受,及其代間關係樣貌之描繪,提出對聽子女聾父母組成家庭之實務建議,並開拓相關學術研究領域之視野。
本研究以三次訪談系列方法,訪談四名成年聽子女,探索他們成長於聾家庭的主觀感受、親子互動經驗、家庭成員之間的關係狀態、以及對於幼時親子互動經驗與成年後對代間關係之詮釋。本研究主要發現如下:
一、聽子女幼時雖然因手語能力尚不足以與父母無障礙的溝通,較易感到孤單,但受到聾父母及聽人長輩(尤以聽祖父母為甚)較多的關注與疼愛,加諸社會資源的挹注,通常能減緩與一般家庭的落差。
二、聽祖父母與聾父母間缺乏共同語言,就如同聾父母與聽子女間溝通時有困難,教養風格有著代間傳遞的影子,發展出較無拘束與規範的「放任型」,亦或是因語言隔閡而產生的「一知半解型」以及「身教型」教養模式。
三、成年聽子女與父母代間關係可分為三種型態:因情感累積、手語能力提升而發展出的「親密」情感;因傳統性別角色框架下,始終說不出口的「內斂」情感;源自於童年期與父母互動經驗缺乏,呈現若即若離的「矛盾」情感。但無論何種型態,皆可見聽子女在勞務與經濟層面給予聾父母支持及回饋。
四、成年聽子女自發性精進手語能力、接納聾人文化、以及成熟健全的心理,乃是聽子女親子互動經驗擴展至代間關係時的重要關鍵元素,從抗拒排斥到接受,乃至於帶著聾家庭的身分走向婚姻。
根據探討之結果,本研究提出針對家庭生活教育專業及社會政策實務服務之建議,並闡述本領域未來學術研究之展望。
In the context of the deaf people society, it is common to see a household with members including hearing children and deaf parents; however, there is little empirical research involving the hearing children of deaf parents. The focus of this study is on the analysis of the growing experience and feeling of the hear children with deaf parents and their intergenerational relationship. As the result, we expect to provide more practical advice to this certain type of family organization and widen the vision of relative researches in the future.
The three interview series method was conducted in this study. Four hear adult children were interviewed to explore their feelings, parent-child interaction experience, relationship with family members, and the impact on their intergenerational relationship with deaf parents as a grown-up based on their childhood interaction experience. The key findings of this study are listed as -
(1) Although the hear young children did show signs of feeling lonelier due to not completely proficient in sign language to communicate with their deaf parents, this emotional gap could still be brought together by getting more attention and care from the deaf parents and other hearing elders (usually the grandparents)in the family and with better access to the social resources.
(2) Lacking of common language that leads to the communication difficulty also existed between hearing grandparents and their offspring (aka the deaf parents).The intergenerational parenting style carrying through the family tended to be more loose and ignorant. Due to the linguistic barrier, deaf parents sometimes didn’t educate their hear children with precepts but through actual actions. The incomplete comprehensive communications between the deaf parents and hear children were also observed.
(3) Three types of intergenerational relationship were identified between hear adult children and the deaf parents: “Intimate” - due to the emotional attachment and proficient in sign language developed over years; “Introverted”- emotions had been consistently repressed due to the traditional stereotype of gender; “Ambiguous”- due to the lack of interactions during the childhood. No matter which type was observed, the deaf parents all received housework and financial assistance from the hear adult children.
(4) The hear adult children expanded their interaction with deaf parents to the intergenerational relationship through proactively improving sign language skills, acknowledging the deaf culture, and advancing mental development. These key elements would help them to accept their deaf family background and perhaps carry it to their own marriage.
In conclusion, this study provides the suggestions on professional family education and social service and elaborates the prospect of this field.
中文
王秋霜、許維素(2008)。已婚聽障者婚前擇偶經驗之探討。教育心理學報,40(1),127-152。
利翠珊(2002)。婆媳與母女:不同世代女性家庭經驗的觀點差異。女學學誌-婦女與性別研究,13(1),179-218。
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯(2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(原作者:Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin)。嘉義市:濤石文化。
吳嘉瑜(2004)。子代夫妻對偶代間關係經驗:「他」的矛盾?「她」的矛盾?。中華輔導學報,15,123-149。
宋曉真、邢敏華(2006)。聾父母與聽小孩家庭的溝通和教養問題。國立臺南大學特殊教育與復健學報,15,105-126。
李青松(2000)。家庭親子間關係的變遷:社會創新與子女發展階段對代間關係的交換影響。應用心理研究,5,43-45。
李美枝(1998)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能: 以大學生為例。本土心理學研究,9, 3-52。
沈香君(2008)。聽於無形•覺於有情~~三名有聾父母之聽子女的經驗敘說(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
邢敏華、顧玉山(2002,11月)。我的父母是聾人:聾父母/聽子女的親子溝通與教養問題研究。載於國立台南師範學院特殊教育中心舉辦之「聽障者心理衛生與教育溝通」學術研討會會議手冊暨論文集(頁115-138),台南市。
邢敏華(譯)(2005)。動作中的語言:探究手語的本質(原作者:J.D. Schein & D.A. Stewart)。台北市:心理。
周玉慧、吳齊殷(2001)。教養方式、親子互動與青少年行為:親子知覺的相對重要性。人文及社會科學集刊,13(4),439-476。
林如萍(1998)農家代間情感之研究──老年父母與其最親密的成年子女,中華家政學刊,27,68~83。
林如萍(2012)。台灣家庭的代間關係與代間互動類型之變遷趨勢。載於伊慶春、章英華編,台灣的社會變遷1985~2005:家庭與婚姻(76-124)。台北市:中研院社會所。
林如萍、蘇美鳳(2004)。青少年的祖孫關係與其對老人態度之研究。中華家政學刊,35,75-90。
林伶旭(2003)。無聲的吶喊-台灣聾人文化的形構與危機(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,台北市。
林妙娟、高淑貴(1990年3月)。鄉村家庭親職角色與親子關係之研究。花蓮區研究彙報,6。取自http://goo.gl/lKd6s。
林萬億(2013)。當代社會工作─理論與方法。台北:五南。
姚美華、胡幼慧(2008)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析?。載於胡幼慧編,質性研究:理論、方法、及本土女性研究實例(141-158)。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧(2008)。質性研究:理論、方法、及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
徐玉恩(2010)。聾父母之聽子女與聽父母之聽子女其自我概念與親子溝通之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
高欣卉(2012)。聽障父母對學齡兒童親職教育主觀經驗之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,台北市。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課-首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文文化。
張思嘉(2001)。婚姻早期的調適過程:新婚夫妻之質性研究。載於李瑞玲(主編),婆媳之間:自己人乎?外人乎?(91-133)。台北:台灣大學心理學系本土心理學研究室。
畢恆達(2008)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧編,性研究:理論、方法、及本土女性研究實例(27-45)。台北:巨流。
許維素、王秋霜(2009)。聽障者婚姻適應之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,26,163-202。
陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
陳信木(2004)。生育率與死亡率變遷對於世代重疊共存時間的影響:生命歷程的模擬分析。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC91-2412-H-004-009-),未出版。
黃溱筠(2012)。從無聲走向有聲-聾父母與獨生聽子女的經驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
葉光輝(2009)。臺灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究,31,97-141。
葉怡伶、王鍾和(2012)。國中生父母管教方式,親子衝突議題及其因應策略之研究。家庭教育雙月刊,38,6-27。
廖姿婷(2005)。成年子女孝道信念與母親代間情感之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
趙庭正(2008)。你聽得見我媽?我看見了你—一個諮商新手進入聾人世界的經驗述說(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北教育大學,台北市。
劉秀丹(2004)。啟聰學校學生文法手語、自然手語及書面語故事理解能力之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
鄭佩玉(2007)。以家庭系統觀點探究婚姻衝突家庭子女之知覺與因應的轉變歷程(未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
謝素分(2005)。台北地區聽障/聾父母對聽人子女的教養態度、困難與需求(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
謝維玲(譯)(2011)。父親的手(原作者:Myron Uhlberg)。新北市:大家。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2003)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。
蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、林惠雅、幸曼玲、陳李綢…陳淑美(1998)。發展心理學。台北市:心理。
英文
Allsop, L. & Kyle, J. (1997). Deaf parents and their hearing children. Unpublished report. Bristol, UK: The Deaf Studies Trust.
Barbara, R. (1987). Deaf Parents of hearing children. IN Eugene, D. M. & McCay, V. (Eds.), They grow in silence understanding deaf children and adult (pp.103-110). Boston: College-Hill Press.
Bengtson, V. L. & Schrader, S. S. (1982). Parent-child relations. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology (Vol. 2): Social roles and social participation. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Buchino, M. A. (1993). Perceptions of the oldest hearing child of deaf parents : on interpreting, communication, feeling, and role reversal. American Annals of the Deaf,138, 40-44.
Burke, T. G. (1994). Understanding and Assisting Hearing Children of Deaf. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://goo.gl/820xx.
Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. NY: Springer.
Clark, K. (2003). Children of Deaf adults: Communication and parenting issues in families with deaf parents and hearing children. Retrieved November 17, 2012, from http://goo.gl/jQ0nj.
Cooney, T. M. (2000). Parent–child relations across adulthood. In R. M. Milardo & S. Duck (Eds.), Families as relationships (pp. 39-58). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Filer, R. D. & Filer, P. A. (2000). Practical considerations for counselors working with hearing children of deaf parents. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(1), 38-43.
Hadjikakou, K., Christodoulou, D., Hadjidemetri, E., Konidari, M. & Nicolaou, N. (2009).The Experiences of Cypriot Hearing Adults with Deaf Parents in Family, School, and Society. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(4), 486-502.
Kaufman, G. & Uhlenberg, P. (1998). Effects of Life Course Transitions on the Quality of Relationships between Adult Children and Their Parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60,924-938.
Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (1996). A journey into the Deaf-World. San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.
Peluso, P. R., Peluso ,J. P., White, J. F., & Kern, R. M.(2004). A comparison of attachment theory and individual psychology: a review of the literature. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(2), 139-145.
Peluso, P. R., Peluso ,J. P., Buckner J. P., Kern, R. M & Curlette,W. (2009). Measuring lifestyle and attachment: an empirical investigation linking individual psychology and attachment theory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(4), 394-403.
Preston, M. P. (1994). Mother father deaf: living between sound and silence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schein, J. D. & Delk Jr, M. T. (1974). The Deaf Population of the United States. VA: National Association of the Deaf.
Schein, J. D. (1989). Deaf Community. Western Canadian Centre of Studies in Deafness, University of Alberta.
Singleton, J. L. & Tittle, M. D. (2000). Deaf parents and their hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 221-236.
Wintre, M. G., Yoffe, M., & Crowley, J. (1995). Perception of parental reciprocity scale (POPRS): Development and validation with adolescents and young adults. Social Development, 4(2),129-148.