本研究是以教育行動研究的方法，利用生活上的主題作觀察與探討的教材，儘量由學生所引發的問題去作學習與探討的活動，將學生分成幾個小組，先由小組負責完成主題中的各個小活動，再進行全班性的分享學習；此教學模式的主要特徵在於教師只是扮演提供諮商跟鼓勵的引導角色，而學生能自由、自主、自動的以小組共同負責的方式來進行學習活動，藉由「合作學習」的模式完成學習的目的。
本研究的目的在於探討「合作學習」教學模式中學生的合作行為對學習氣氛、學習態度、知識體認、情感、品行培養及能力訓練方面的影響，整個研究透過兩個教學活動，歷經9個多月完成；利用教學中的觀察、學生感想的問卷調查和訪談得知：處在講述式教學模式下的學生，普遍對於他們的學習情境感到乏味、無趣，學習只是為了成績及前途，缺乏對知識的真實體認及繼續學習的意願；而處於「合作學習」教學模式下的學生，普遍覺得在合作學習的教學情境下可以很活潑、愉快的學習，他們也喜歡經由彼此的討論而更深入的了解資料、體驗事物的運作原理。

This research is conducted by the method of educational action research, which chooses daily life topics as observation and investigation subjects and uses questions brought up by students as learning and studying materials as much as possible. First of all, split the students into numerous groups, and ask each group to do the necessary exercises and activities for each topic separately. Finally the whole class could share the experience of each group’s respective topic. The characteristic of such teaching mode is that teachers are only playing the assistant role of consultation and encouragement, while students carry out learning activities through “cooperative learning” way freely, independently and automatically. Through such a “cooperative learning” mode achieves the purpose of learning.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the effects on the students’ cooperative behavior under the “cooperative learning” teaching method on learning atmosphere,learning attitude, acknowledgement of knowledge, feelings, moral cultivation, and ability training. The whole study includes two teaching activities that lasted 9 months. The relative data is from observations during teaching and surveying the students’ feelings by questionnaires and interviews. The result shows that pupils under one-side narration teaching circumstances generally feel bored and tedious; learning is solely for grades and future prospects, and students lack the intention of learning real knowledge and the desire to continue learning. Meanwhile students under the teaching method of “cooperative learning” commonly feel that they can learn happily and energetically. They also like to further enhance their understanding of materials and comprehend the operating principle of all matter through group discussion.

一.中文部分
1. 于富雲（2001）：從理論基礎探究合作學習的教學效益。教育資料與研究,38,22-28。
1. 王千倖（1997）：合作學習。師友,民86（10）,34-39。
2. 王千倖（1999）：「合作學習」與「問題導向學習」－－培養教師及學生的科學創造力。教育資料與研究,28（5）,31-40。
3. 吳幸宜（1994）：學習理論與教學應用。台北市：心理出版社。
4. 李郁文（1998）：團體動力學。台北市：桂冠圖書。
5. 林生傳（1997）：新教學理論與策略。台北市：五南出版社。
6. 林坤燦（1996）：合作學習方案的認識與實施。國教園地,55‧56,17-21。
7. 林清山、林天祐（2002）：合作學習。http://www.nmh.gov.tw/edu/basis3/13/gm8.htm
8. 陳文典（1998）：STS理念下之教育。台灣教育,575 ,10-19。
9. 陳文典（1998）：實作評量在學力測驗之應用。測驗與輔導,150,3108-3111。
10. 陳文典（1999）：STS科學教育研討會（Ⅱ）。國立台灣師範大學編印。
11. 陳文典（2001）：「生活化課程」的特質、功能與設計。自然與生活科技學習領域,康軒文教事業印製。
12. 陳昱宏（2000）：從社會建構主義的觀點看一個高中生物教室中的合作學習。科學與教育學報,2000,4,21-60。
13. 陳惠邦（1998）：教育行動研究。台北市：師大書苑。
14. 陳龍安（1997）：創造思考教學的理論與實施。創思與合作的教學法,師大書院發行。
15. 陳瓊森（2001）：教學典範與合作學習。http://p1.ncue.edu.tw/cn/c1/bk2/ch11.htm
16. 黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）：合作學習。台北市：五南出版社。
17. 黃政傑（1997）：合作學習教學法。台北市：師大書苑。
18. 楊巧玲（2000）：問題導向教學與合作學習教學策略之理論與實際。課程與教學季刊,2000,3（3）,121-136。
19. 蔡清田（2000）：教育行動研究。台北市：五南出版社。
20. 盧富美（1992）：談合作學習及其教學流程。教師之友,33（4）,3-8。
21. 鍾國俊（2001）：由維持體溫談起。http：//www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/
二.英文部分
1. Achilles,C.M.,＆Hoover,S.P.（1996）.Transforming administrative praxis:The potential of problem-based learning（PBL）as a school-improvement vehicle for middle and high schools.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 397 471）
2.Bandura,A.（1986）.Social cognitive theory.New York:Holt, Rinehart＆Winston.
3.Brown,J.S.,Collins,A.,＆Duguid,P.（1989）. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research,18（2）,32-42.
4.Callagher,S.A.,Sher,B.T.,Stepien,W.J.＆Workman,D.（1995）.Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics,95（3）,136-146.
5.Cordeiro,P.,＆Campbell,B.（1995）.Problem-based learning as cognitive apprenticeship in educational administration.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 386 800）
6.Deci,E.L.,Vallerand,R.J.,Pelletier,L.G.,＆Ryan,R.M.（1991）.Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist,26（3/4）,325-346.
7.Flavell,J.H.（1963）.The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget.Princeton,N.J.:Van Nortrand.
8.Gordon,J.R.（1989）.Diagnosing motivational problems and the reward system. In A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behavior.Boston Allyn＆Bacon.
9.Johnson,D.W.＆Johnson,R.T.（1987）. Learning Together and Alone:Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning（2nd ed.）.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
10.Lave,J.,＆Wenger,E.（1991）. Situated learning:Legitimated peripheral participation. Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press.
11.Malone,T.W.,＆Lepper,M.R.（1987）.Making learning fun:A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning.In Snow,R.E.＆Farr,M.J.（Eds.）,Aptitude,learning,and instruction（Vol.3）.Congnitive and afdective process analyses.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.
12.McLellan,H.（1993）. Situated learning in focus:Instruction to special issue. Educational Technology,33（3）,5-9.
13.Parker,R.E.（1985）.Smallgroup cooperative learning improving academic ,social gains in the classroom.NASS Bulletin,69（479）,PP.48-57.
14.Piaget,J.（1926）.The language and thought of the child. New York:Harcourt Brace.
15.Reigeluth,C.M.（1983）.Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.Rottier,J. and Ogan,B.J.（2001）. http://p1.ncue.edu.tw/cn/c1/bk2/ch1.htm
17.Slavin,R.E.（1985）.An instruction to cooperative learning research.In Slavin,R.,et al.（Eds） Learning to cooperate,cooperating to learn,PP.5-16.
18.Vygotsky,L.S.（1978）.In M., Cole,V.John-Steiner,S.Scribner ＆ E.Souberman（Eds.）,Mind in society:the Development of Higher Psychological Processes,Cambridge. MA:Harvard University Press.
19.West,D.J.,＆Watson,D.E.（1996）.Using problem-based learningand educational reengineering to improve outcomes.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 400 242）
20.Wittrock,M.C.（1978）. The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Psychology,13,15-29.
21.Yager.R.（1990）.The Constructivist Learning Model. The Science Teacher 1990.Jult.
22.Young,M,F.,＆Kulikowich,J.M.（1992）. Anchored instruction an anchored assessment:An ecological approach to measuring situated learning.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 354 269）
23.Young,M,F.（1993）. Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development,41（1）,43-58.