研究生: |
張志豪 Chi-hao Chuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成效之影響 The Influence of Creative Thinking Teaching on the Learning Effectiveness of the Technology Curriculum Student at Senior High School |
指導教授: |
吳明雄
Wu, Ming-Hsiung |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2000 |
畢業學年度: | 88 |
語文別: | 中文 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創造思考教學 、學習成效 、創造性問題解決能力 、創造思考能力 、科技教育 |
英文關鍵詞: | creative think teaching, learning effect, creative problem-solving, creativity, technology education |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:712 下載:68 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中 文 摘 要
本研究之具體目的有五:一、探討高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生創造思考能力之影響。二、探討高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生創造性問題解決能力之影響。三、探討高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對不同學業成就學生創造思考能力之影響。四、探討高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對不同學業成就學生創造性問題解決能力之影響。五、探討高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成果之影響。
本研究採「不相等前後測控制組準實驗設計」,以國立屏東高中高一普通班兩班學生為研究對象,一班為實驗組,另一班為控制組,實施為期十週的實驗教學。研究工具計有:吳靜吉新編創造思考測驗、創造性問題解決能力問卷、學生作品檢核表、學習反應調查問卷。使用二因子共變數分析、t考驗等統計方法。研究結果發現:
一、 接受高中生活科技課程創造思考教學的實驗組學生,在創造思考能力方面,圖形流暢力、變通力、精進力及語文流暢力、變通力、獨創力分數顯著優於控制組學生。
二、 接受高中生活科技課程創造思考教學的實驗組學生,在創造性問題解決能力方面,問題覺察、提出想法及尋求最佳方案等分數,顯著優於控制組學生。
三、 接受高中生活科技課程創造思考教學的實驗組學生,在學習成果檢核表之概念、圖像、標題、文稿、焦點、及總分等評量分數上,均顯著優於控制組學生。
四、 教學方法與學業成就並無顯著之交互作用,且實驗組之高學業成就組學生,其創造思考測驗、創造性問題解決能力問卷之得分並未顯著優於低學業成就組學生。
五、 學生對於生活科技課程創造思考教學之學習反應呈現正向的反應,在學生晤談、課堂觀察、意見調查所呈現的資料上,發現課程活動中呈現的和諧、輕鬆、開放、包容的氣氛,為學生所喜愛。
Abstract
This study is designed for the following five objectives : 1.to explore the effect of the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course on the student’s creative thinking ability ; 2.to explore the effect of the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course on the student’s ability for creative problem-solving ; 3. to explore the effect of the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course on the creative thinking ability of students with different academic achievements ; 4. to explore the effect of the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course on the ability in creative problem-solving for those students with different academic achievements ; 5.to explore the effect of the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course on the student’s learning results.
This study adopts the quasi-experiment plan of the control section with unequal prior & post test. Its objects are students from two freshman classes of the ordinary program at National Pingtung Senior High School. One class is the experiment section, while the other the control section. The experimental teaching is conducted for ten weeks. The study instruments include : the creative thinking test, questionnaire of ability for creative problem-solving, student’s work evaluation list and survey questionnaire on the learning reactions, newly compiled by Mr. Wu, Ching-Chi. Such statistic methods are used as two-way analysis of covariance ( ANCOVA ) and t test, etc. It is found from the study results that :
1. The experimental group students who receive the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course made significantly greater gains in fluency, flexibility, elaboration of figural creative thinking abilities, and in fluency, flexibility, originality of verbal creative thinking abilities than the control group students.
2. The experimental group students who receive the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course made significantly greater gains in discovering problems, addressing ideas and seeking the best projects of creative problem-solving than the control group students.
3. The experimental group students who receive the creative thinking teaching of the senior high school’s life technology course made significantly greater gains in concept, image, headline, manuscript, focus and total grades of learning achievement than the control students.
4. There were no significant interaction between the teaching method and the academic achievements. The students with high academic achievements in the experimental group did not make significantly greater gains of scores of the creative thinking test and the questionnaire of creative problem-solving than the control students.
5. The learning reactions which the students make against the creative thinking teaching of the life technology course assume positive. Based on the data presented from the student’s interview, class observations and opinion survey, it is found that the harmonious, relaxing, open and comprehensive atmosphere associated with the curricular activities are favored by students.
參考書目
壹、 中文部分:
方炳林(民63):作業的評鑑,中國教育學會主編:教學研究。台北:商務印書館。
方崇雄(民84):國民中學生活科技教育問題解決模式課程設計與實驗研究。中華民國工藝教育學會。
王文科(民78):教育心理學。台北:心理出版社。
王文科(民81):資優課程設計--有效的資優課程規畫方案。台北市:心理出版社。
王安祥、陳明德、林東正、黃宜純(民89):工專學生人因工程創作力課程規劃—以醫療器材開發為例。載自科技創作力培育理論與實務研討會,國立臺灣師範大學。
毛連塭(民76):資優教育教學模式。台北:心理。
毛連塭(民78):實施創造思考教育的參考架構。創造思考教育,創刊號,pp2~9。
比嘉佑典 (民85): 以教師的指導訓練促進創造性發展。中日技術人力創意發展研習會報告資料,國立台灣師範大學。
李大偉(民79):中學工藝課教學策略之探討。載於沈六編:教學法研究。台北:五南。
李錫津(民75):創造思考教學對高職學生創造力發展之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
李錫津(民76):創造思考教學研究。台北:台灣書店。
李隆盛(民84):國中工藝╱生活科技教學策略之研究。行政院國家科學委員會。
李隆盛(民85):科技與職業教育的課題。台北:師大書苑。
李仁芳(民88):不同凡想,專文推薦---睥睨。台北:遠流出版社。
杜明城譯(民88):創造力。台北:時報出版。
林幸台、王榮木(民83):威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。台北:心理。
林幸台(民63):創造性教學對才賦優異者創造力發展的影響。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林建平(民73):作文和繪畫創造性教學方案對國小四年級學生創造力之影響。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳明雄(民77):國中工藝科創造思考實驗課程對學生創造思考能力影響之研究。中學工藝教育。12,18-23。
吳明雄(民77):創造思考與發明實驗課程對高工學生創造發明能力之影響。國科會計畫NSC77-0111-S003-24。
吳明雄(民83):工業職要教育的創造思考教學。技職教育雙月刊,24,pp 14~17。
吳明雄(民86):創造思考教學成效追綜評鑑。國科會研究計畫:NSC86-2516-S-003-009-TG。
吳靜吉(民78):適當的創造動機。創造思考教育,創刊號,頁13-14。
吳靜吉(民87):「新編創造思考測驗研究第二年期末報告」。教育部訓育委員會。
洪久賢(民84):批判思考教學在家政教育之應用研究。國科會研究計畫NSC 84-2413-H-003-015。
洪榮昭(民86):問題解決的思考模式。技術問題解決能力發展研究研習會報告資料。台北:臺灣師範大學。
郭生玉(民76):心理與教育研究法。台北:精華書局。P83。
郭生玉(民86):心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局。
郭允文等(民86):「科學及創造力培養」計畫。科學發展月刊,第26卷8期,pp 942~947。
郭秀枝(民83):視覺障礙學生創造傾向、認知風格、創造動機、創造表現及其關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
郭有遹(民83):創造性問題解決方法。台北:心理。
陳榮華(民74):國小資優班學生創造思考訓練成效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳龍安(民73):「問、想、做、評」創造思考教學模式的建立與驗證。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳龍安(民75):陶倫思圖形創造思考測驗(乙式)指導手冊。臺北市立師範學院。
陳龍安(民77):創造思考教學之研究。臺灣區省立師範學院七十六年度教學研究學術研討會論文集,103~212頁。
陳龍安(民78):點石成金---談創造思考教學的要領。創造思考教育,創刊號,pp 29-33。
陳龍安(民79):創造思考與問題解決。台北:創造思考教育,1,pp7-18。
陳龍安(民80):創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理出版社。
陳龍安(民84):創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理出版社。
陳龍安(民87):創造思考教學的理論與實際(5版)。台北:心理出版社。
陳昭雄(民74):工業職業技術教育。台北:三民。
陳淑惠(民85):臺灣地區學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究─年級、性別、教師教學創新行為、父母管教態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳淑(民80):創造性問題解決訓練課程對高中學生創造能力、科學能力及科學相關態度的影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳耀華(民81):文化、科學與科技。載於香港中文大學校外進修部(編)科技與人生,pp 1~8,台北:臺灣商務印書館。
陳昭儀、陳琦、張素華(民84):瞭解創意人。台北:心理。
陳昭儀(民85):二十位傑出發明家的生涯路。台北:心理。
陳美岑(民88):高職實用技能班美髮技術科創造思考教學方案之實施成效。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
張玉成(民77):開發腦中金礦的教學策略。台北:心理。
張世慧(民77):創造性問題解決方案對國小資優班與普通班學生創造性問題解決能力、創造力和問題解決能力的影響。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
張世慧(民78):創造性問題解決的兒童觀。創造思考教育,1,pp 34~41。
張春興(民82):心理學。台北:東華書局。
張春興(民83):教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
孫仲山(民80):工藝教育的文化功能。中學工藝教育月刊,24卷11期,pp 2~9。
孫仲山(民86):科技素養教育的本質。中學工藝教育月刊,30卷4期,pp 2~8。
許智偉譯(民67):科技與教育,臺灣教育,335,pp 55~59。
鄭麗玉(民82):認知心理學------理論與應用。台北:五南。
黃達三(民81):科學技學社會(STS)和小學科學教育。國教月刊,38(1,2),pp 30~39。
黃金俊(民88):高職印刷科攝影課程創造思考教學模式之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
楊朝祥(民73):技術職業教育辭典。台北:三民。
盧雪梅(民79):創造性的人格特質。創造思考教育,2,頁44-47。
詹秀美(民78):國小學生創造力與問題解決能力的相關變項研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
詹秀美、吳武典(民80):問題解決測驗指導手冊。台北:心理出版社。
教育部(民85):高級中學課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(民88):教育基本法。台北:教育部。
廖季清(民73):教師發問技巧對學生創造思考能力之研究。台北:教育部。
湯誌龍(民88):高工機械科學生專業創造力及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
賈馥茗(民61):發展創造才能的教學。載於中國教育學會主編:教學研究。台北:商務印書館。
賈馥茗(民65):英才教育。台北:開明書店。
賈馥茗(民68):英才教育(2版)。台北:開明書店。
董 奇(民84):兒童創造力發展心理。台北:五南。
蔡錫濤(民84):國中生活科技課程內涵及教學策略探討。中學工藝教育月刊,28卷1期,pp 13~15。
蔡錫濤(民86):高中生活科技課程架構及實施策略。中學工藝教育月刊,30卷1期,pp 25~29。
蔡伸章譯(民81):未來的衝擊。台北:志文出版社。
羅大涵(民74):工藝教育的迷失。中學工藝教育月刊,18卷8期。
歐陽鐘仁譯(民73):教師啟發學童創造能力的方法。台北:幼獅文化。
鍾聖校(民79):對創造思考教學的省思。資優教育季刊,34,pp 21-27。
鍾一先 (民86):問題解決教學策略應用於國民中學生活科技之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
鍾協衡(民88):創造思考教學對高職機械修護科實用技能班學生學習成效影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
俞國良(1996):創造力心理學。浙江:浙江人民出版社。
簡真真(民70):國小資優實驗班學生創造力與問題解決能力之發展之研究。國立高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
簡真真(民71):國小資優實驗班學生創造力與問題解決能力之發展之研究。國立高雄師範學院教育學刊,4期,pp 173~224。
劉焜煇、余阿輝譯(民59):水平思考五日訓練法。台北:仙人掌出版社。
劉誌文(民83):國民小學自然科創造性問題解決教學效果之研究。國立臺南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
貳、英文部分:
Amabile, T.M.(1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Blanchard, K. & Lorber, R. (1984). Putting the One Minute Manager to Work, Willow Books, New York.
Boden, M.(1992).The creative Mind: Myths and mechanisms. New York : Basic Books.
Cohen,G.(1991). Memory in the real world. Lea, London.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1988).Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In Sternberg, R.J.(Ed.), The Nature of Creativity(pp325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, G.A.(1986). Creativity is forever. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
DeVore, P. W. (1980).Technology:An introduction. Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.
Daiber, R.(1988).Discovery, inquiry, and experimentation. In W. Kemp & A. Schwaller (eds.). Instructional strategies fot technology. The 37th yearbook of Council on Technology Teacher Education. Mission Hill, CA : Glencoe.
Deluca, V.W. (1992). Survery of Technology Education Problem-Solving Activities. The Technology Techer, 51(5), 26-30.
Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Lodon : Allym and Bacon.
Dyrenfurth, M. J. & Mihalevich, J. R.(1987).Technological literacy:More than computer literacy. Paper presented at the National School Boards Association Conference,Dallas,TX,USA.
Dyrenfurth , M. J. & Kozak, M. R.(Eds.)(1991). Technological literacy : 40th yeatbook of the Council on Technology Teacher Education . Peodia, IL: Glencoe Civision, MacMillan/McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
Eberle, B. & Stanish, B. (1996). CPS for Kids : A Resources Book for Teaching Creative Problem-Solving to Children. Prufrock. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED406 291)
Ebel, R. L. (1979).Essentials of educational measurement (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
Evans, J.R.(1991).Creative Thinking in the decision and management science. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.
Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The Measurement of Creativity. In A. B. Margret (Ed), Dimension of Creativity, (pp. 199-242). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Creativity as a product of intelligence and personality. In C. D. Saklofske, & M. Zeidner (Ed), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence, (pp. 231-247). New York: Plenum Press.
Feldhusen, J. F., Houtz,J.C., Ringenbach,S. & Lash, A.(1971). Review of problem solving measurement tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.,Sep,1971.
Feldhusen, J. F. & Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking And program solving in gifted education, Texas: Kendall Hunt Publishing company.
Francis, D.(1990).Effective Problem Solving. London : Routledge.
Gagne, R. M.(1970). The conditions of learning(2th ed.). New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gagne, R. M.(1985).The conditions of learning(4th ed.). New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gallucci, A. K. (1991).The relationship among the academic achievement, learning style preferences, and creativity of gifted and normal intermediate students in suburban new york school district.Ann Arbor, Mich.:UMI.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26.
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, pp.444-454.
Goor, A.(1974). Problem solving of creative and noncreative students. Dissertation Abstracts, 35, 3517A.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M. & Russell, J.(1985). Instructional media and the technologies of instruction (2nd ed.). New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Helgeson, S.L.(1992). Problem solving research in middle/junior high school science education. Columbus, OH : ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Howe(1997):Creative Problem Solving Approaches Processes for Teaching and Doing Creative Activity。創造性思考教學研討會研習手冊。台北市:台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
Johnson, I.H.(1988).Game and simulation. In Kemp, W. & Schwaller, A.E.(Eds.). Instructional Strategies for Technology Education. 37th Yearbook, Council on Technology Education.
Johnson, J.R. (1992). An Imperative. The Technology Teacher,52(2),p4.
Jonassen, D. H.(1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1),45-94.
Keefe, J. & Walberg, H.J. (1992).Teaching for thinking. Virgina : National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kemp, W. & Schwaller, A.(1988). Introducation to instructional strategies. In W. Kemp & A. Schwaller (eds.). Instructional strategies for technology. The 37th yearbook of Council on Technology Teacher Education. Mission Hill, CA : Glencoe.
Maier , N. & Janzen, J.C. (1969). Are good problem-solvers also creative? Psychological Reports, 24, 139-146.
Manfield, R.S.,Busse,T.V. & Krepelka,E.J.(1978). The Effectiveness of Creativity Training. Review of Educational Research, 48 (4),517-536.
Mayer, E. R. (1989). Human nonadversary problem solving. In K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.),Human and Machine Problem Solving. New York: Plenum Press.
Mayer, R.E.(1992).Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition. New York : W.H.Freeman and Company.
McAlpine, J. etc.(1989). Creative Problem Solving:Faces of Man (The Arts). Educational Impressions. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED405 278)
Micklethwait & Wooldridge (1997) . The Witch Doctors : Making Sence of the Management Gurus. London : Aitkeny Stone. Ltd.
Morgan, L. (1894). An Introduction to Comparative Psychology, Scott, London.
Moss,J.,Je.(1987).Technology education : Subject or student centered? Journal of Epsilon PiTau, 13(1),40~43.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Noll,V.H., Scannell,D.P. & Craig,R.C.(1976).Introduction to educational measurement(4th ed.).Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
North Dakota State Board for Vocational-Technical Education (1996). Technology education: A North Dakota Curricular Framework. North Dakta, USA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 419)
Olson, D. W. (1963). Industrial arts and technology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. :Prentice-Hall.
Osborn, A.F.(1953).Applied imagination. New York: Charles Scribiner’s Sons.
Parnes, S.J.(1977). CPSI: The general system. The Journal of Creative Behavior,11 (1),1-11.
Preitz,C.(1992):Career and Technology students.:A curriculum model . Paper presented at the International Technological Literacy Symposium , Anchorage , Alaska , USA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 339)
Rhodes, M.(1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Robinson, P. & Johnstone, I.(1997).Expanding the Creative Role of Technical Workers. Proceeding of the International Conference on Creativity Development in Technical Education and Training. Taipei.97.9-25.
Roy, R.(1986).Technology education:Subject or student centered? Journal of Epsilon PiTau,13(1),40~43。
Savage, E. & Sterry, L.(1990). A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. Roston. VA : International Technology Education Association.
Simonton, D.K.(1990). Motivation and personal histories. In Runco,M.A.,& Albert,R.S.(Eds.), Theories of creativity. California :Sage.
Snyder, J. & Hales, J.(eds.).(1981).Jackson’s mill industrial arts curriculum theory. Charleston, WV:West Virginia Department of Education.
Stashak,G.(1981).Technological literacy: The publishers role. Paper presented at the Technology Education Symposium II,Menomonie,WI,USA.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of Creativity.In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. (PP 125-147). Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J.(1998). The Theory of Successful Intelligence.臺灣師大創造力、智力與思考研習會研習手冊。
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T.I (1991). An Investment theory of Creativity and indevelopment. Human Development, 34,1-31.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T.I(1995). Defying the Crowd : Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc. New York.
Taylor, C.W. & Ellison, R.L.(1964). Prediction of creativity with the biographical inventory. In P.E.Vernon (Ed.), (1970). Creativity (pp. 327-338). Middlesex, England : Penguin.
Torrance, E.P.(1965) .Rewarding Creative Behavior. New York: Prentice- Hall.
Torrance,E. P. (1967). Scientific view of creativity and factors affecting its growth , In kagan , J. (Ed.): Creativity and Learning , Houghton-Mittlin.
Torrance, E. P. & Myers, R.E.(1970).Creative Learning and Teaching. New York, Dodd, Mead and Company.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can We Teach Children to Think Creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1973).Dyadic interaction in creative thinking and problem solving. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
Torrance,E.P.(1974).Torrance test of creative thinking : Norms-technical manual,princeton.New York: Personnel Press,Inc.
Treffinger, D. J. & Isaksen, S.G. (1992). Creative problem solving –An Introduction. Center of creative learning. Inc.
Treffinger, D.J., Isaksen, S.G., & Dorval, K.B.(1992): Creative Problem Solving: An introduction. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.
Treffinger, D.J., Isaksen, S.G., & Dorval, K.B.(1994): Creative Problem Solving: An Overview. In Runco. ED. Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Treffinger, D.J. & Firestein, R.L.(1989). Creative Problem Solving (Second of Three Parts). Gifted Child Today. September/October, 40~47.
Vernon, P. E.(1989) . The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning,& C.R.Reynolds (Eds.),Handbook of creativity ,93-110. NY: Plenum Press.
Wallas, G.(1926). Stage in the creative process. In Rothenberg, A. & Hansman, C.R.(Eds.), The creativity question. Duke University Press.
Wakefield, J.F.(1992).Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the arts orientation.p.13.NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Wiles, J. & Bondi, J.(1981). Skills Clusters for Creative Thinking Activity Book. Wiles,Bondi & Associates.
Wright, J.R.(1993).The Lexicon of technological literacy . Technology Teacher,52(8),3~8.
Zachman, L. et al. (1984). Examiner’s manual of 〝Test of Problem Solving〞.Moline, ILL: Lingui Systems.