YouTube作為全球最知名的線上影音平台，幾乎成為了Y世代年輕人日常娛樂與生活的一部份，平台上的創作者，YouTuber更是直接影響了觀眾的收視內容。而對YouTuber來說，如何抓住觀眾、增加曝光是他們極為重視的議題，因此越來越多瞄準社會規範邊緣或具爭議的題材相繼出現，雖然製造了話題性，但也引發了大眾兩極的評價及輿論的撻伐。因此我們以社群媒體上的錯置，來稱呼那些不適宜出現在YouTube這樣一個公眾媒體平台上的影片。
在目前的媒體環境中，觀眾對於錯置影片雖多持有負評，但我們卻發現此類影片在觀看次數與話題熱度上卻往往較其他影片高出許多，可見錯置帶給觀眾的感受不全然為負面，而是存在著正面及負面兩種不同感受的複雜關係，然而目前並無相關文獻探討此類情形，故本研究首將錯置概念應用於社群媒體領域，解釋YouTuber高流量高負評的現象，並透過結構方程式分析錯置影片對觀眾的實際影響力。
基於社會認同理論的觀點下，研究結果顯示，觀眾在面對YouTuber錯置影片時，會反對其違反社會規範的內容，並在考量到社會大眾的觀感下，產生負向認同的認知並避免做出分享、正向留言以及訂閱頻道等表達自我偏好的行為 ; 另一方面，YouTuber直率敢言的溝通方式也導致觀眾對於YouTuber本身產生認同感，希望能看到更多YouTuber替自己紓發內心情緒的影片。因此在確認錯置正負面兩種不同的效果下，YouTuber即可暸解自身影片對於觀眾的感受及影響，而對有業配需求廠商來說，也能更加掌握透過YouTuber影片的廣告成效，進而形成雙贏的局面。

As the most famous over-the-top platform in the world, YouTube has become a part of young generation’s daily life. Therefore, as the creators of the platform, YouTubers will directly affect the content which audience will see. For YouTuber, how to capture audience’s attention and increase exposure has become an important issue. More and more controversial and social norm violation topics have emerged. Although a lot of topics have been created, it has triggered the rampage and opposition of public opinion. We use anachorism to refer these videos which are not suitable for a public media platform such as YouTube.
In the current media environment, although audiences would have negative reviews on anachorism videos, we find that such videos are often much in number of views and topics than other videos, showing that anachorism to the audiences is not all negative feelings. However, there is no relevant literature to explore such situations. Therefore, this study is the first to apply anachorism to social media field explaining the phenomenon of YouTuber high traffic and high negative reviews. We use SEM (Structural equation modeling) to analyze the influence of anachorism on audiences.
Based on the social identity theory, the study pointed out that audiences would disagree the norm violation on YouTuber's anachorism videos. Having disidentification to avoid Sharing, commenting and subscribing to the YouTuber’s channel. On the other hand, YouTuber’s straightforward communication has also led audience to identify with YouTubers, hoping to see YouTubers disclosure audience’s inner hidden emotions. So the audience will want to take the initiative to watch more YouTuber videos. For the YouTubers, this paper can help them understand the actual feeling of audiences. For the Vendors to measure and manipulate their marketing strategy to fit YouTubers.

林安儒 (2019)。在現代，每個人都有聞名於世15分鐘的機會！若想提高你的知名度，可以從「這裡」下手。檢自https://reurl.cc/LEv4X (Feb. 03, 2019)
志祺七七 (2019)。「反骨男孩」教壞小孩？要求YouTuber負起社會責任，究竟合不合理。檢自https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d23uVqGgzQc&t (Apr. 26, 2019)

Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Appel, M. (2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just-world beliefs. Journal of communication, 58(1), 62-83.
Austin, E. W., Roberts, D. F., & Nass, C. I. (1990). Influences of family communication on children's television-interpretation processes. Communication research, 17(4), 545-564.
Bartsch, A. (2012). Emotional gratification in entertainment experience. Why viewers of movies and television series find it rewarding to experience emotions. Media Psychology, 15(3), 267-302.
Brauer, M., & Chekroun, P. (2005). The relationship between perceived violation of social norms and social control: Situational factors influencing the reaction to deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(7), 1519-1539.
Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., & Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 567-576.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321-347.
Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people's reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 853-867.
Cresswell, T. (2002). Cresswell, T. (2002). Introduction: theorizing place. In Mobilizing place, placing mobility (pp. 11-31). Brill Rodopi.
Cresswell, T. (2014). Place: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Cvijikj, I. P., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843-861.
Elsbach, K. D., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Defining who you are by what you're not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organization Science, 12(4), 393-413.
Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J., & Kim, J. (2005). For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22(8), 669-694.
Fred, S. (2015). Examining Endorsement and Viewership Effects on the Source Credibility of YouTubers. University of South Florida.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Goffman, E. (1959). The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry, 22(2), 123-142.
Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences' evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of communication, 53(4), 624-641.
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
Horton, D., & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 579-587.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Jerslev, A. (2016). Media Times| In The Time of the Microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10(19), 5233-5251.
Josiassen, A. (2011). Consumer disidentification and its effects on domestic product purchases: An empirical investigation in the Netherlands. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 124-140.
Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.
Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organiza- tional identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1–27.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of Personality, 22(3), 326-347.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53-81.
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(1), 80-97.
Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2008). In a working mood? The effects of mood management processes on subsequent cognitive performance. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(1), 3-14.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper and Row.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65-93.
Tarnovskaya, V. (2017). Reinventing personal branding building a personal brand through content on YouTube. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 3(1), 29-35.
Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the Doppelgã¤nger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50–64.
Wolter, J. S., Brach, S., Cronin Jr, J. J., & Bonn, M. (2016). Symbolic drivers of consumer–brand identification and disidentification. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 785-793.