研究生: |
李昀佳 Li, Yun-Jia |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探究智慧型個人助理對第二語言學習之影響以及學習者的看法 Exploring the Effects of Intelligent Personal Assistants on L2 Learning and Learners' Perceptions |
指導教授: |
陳浩然
Chen, Hao-Jan |
口試委員: |
徐筱玲
Hsu, Hsiao-Ling 王宏均 Wang, Hung-Chun 陳浩然 Chen, Hao-Jan |
口試日期: | 2021/06/09 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 92 |
中文關鍵詞: | 互動假說 、電腦輔助語言教學 、智慧型個人助理 |
英文關鍵詞: | Interaction Hypothesis, Computer-assisted Language Learning, Intelligent Personal Assistants |
研究方法: | 實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101568 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:180 下載:55 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
一直以來,學習者之間的互動被認為是第二語言習得的關鍵要素之一。學習者與他人溝通、協商的過程有助於學習第二語言。智慧型個人助理 (IPAs) 已經被用於語言習得多時,因它們提供了學習者大量的與電腦互動、溝通的機會。相關研究側重於探討第二語言學習者對智慧型個人助理的看法,以及智慧型個人助理是否有能力聽懂學習者所說的話。然而,較少有研究深入分析第二語言學習者能否透過與智慧型個人助理互動,增進其第二語言聽力。本研究旨在調查智慧型個人助理對第二語言學習者之聽力影響,以及學習者對使用智慧型個人助理學習第二語言的看法。台北市某國中的兩班七年級學生參與此研究。一班為實驗組 (N = 28),另一班則為對照組 (N = 28)。兩組學生一週皆有四節英語課,接受相同的教材及教法,並進行聽力理解之前測。實驗組則在每週的其中一節英語課,與智慧型個人助理Alexa進行互動,並完成多項口說任務及聽力練習。五週過後,兩組受試者皆進行聽力理解之後測,而實驗組需另外完成學習動機量表、問卷及參與半結構化訪談,以了解他們對於使用智慧型個人助理學習第二語言的看法。根據成對樣本t檢定的結果指出,實驗組的聽力前測與後測分數有顯著差異,顯示第二語言學習者在與智慧型個人助理 Alexa 互動五週後(共六節課,總計300分鐘),聽力技能有顯著之進步。此外,學習者大多對與智慧型個人助理互動的經驗持正向看法,喜歡完成實驗中那些與他們的興趣或校園生活較有關聯的活動,並且有意願在未來繼續使用智慧型個人助理於學習目的。問卷及訪談的結果則顯示,部份學習者有時因自身字彙量不足,較難理解Alexa所表達的意思。另外,學習者亦提供可行之建議,以供日後有意將智慧型個人助理融入外語教學之教師及學習者參考。
Grounded on the Interaction Hypothesis, it has been believed that interaction among learners plays a significant role in second language learning. Intelligent personal assistants (IPAs) have been used to achieve language learning purposes since they were found to offer learners chances of human-computer communication and interaction. Previous studies focused on examining L2 learners’ perceptions toward using IPAs and IPAs’ abilities to understand learners’ accented speech. Nevertheless, few studies explored L2 learners’ possible language skills improvement that might be achieved through interacting with IPAs. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of IPAs on improving L2 learners’ listening skills as well as learners’ perceptions toward using IPAs for L2 learning. 56 seventh-grade students from two classes in a junior high school in Taipei City participated in this study as two intact sampling groups. One class was the experimental group (N = 28) and the other one was the control group (N = 28). The two groups received similar instructions in regular English classes. The experimental group interacted with the IPA, Amazon Alexa, in one of the four regular English class periods each week (50minutes), and they were assigned to complete speaking tasks and listening exercises. A listening comprehension pretest and posttest were adopted to the two groups to evaluate the effects of interacting with Alexa on improving L2 listening skills. The experimental group was invited to complete a learning motivation scale, a perception questionnaire, and join a semi-structured interview to share their perceptions toward using Alexa. The result of the paired sample t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the listening pretest and the posttest within the experimental group, revealing that learners’ L2 listening skills improved significantly after interacting with Alexa for 6 classes (300 minutes). As for L2 learners’ perceptions toward Alexa, they mostly enjoyed interacting with Alexa, especially completing the tasks that were relevant to their interests or school life. Further, learners held positive views about using Alexa for learning purposes in the future. The findings of the questionnaire and interview indicated that sometimes learners had difficulty understanding Alexa because of their limited vocabulary. Suggestions on using Alexa in classes were also pointed out by learners. Lastly, pedagogical implications were provided for those who are considering involving IPAs in learning contexts.
Bateson, G., & Daniels, P. (2012). Diversity in technologies. In G. Stockwell (Ed.),
Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 127-146). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060981
Bibauw, S., Francois, T., & Desmet, P. (2015). Dialogue-based CALL: an overview of
existing research. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Critical
CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy. http://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000310
Bibauw, S., Francois, T., & Desmet, P. (2019). Discussing with a computer to practice a foreign language: Research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535508
Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish
interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 120-136. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25089
Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681
Chapelle, C. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (1st ed., pp. 53-64). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613578
Chapelle, C. (2007). Technology and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070050
Chen, H. J., Yang, T. Y., & Lai, K. W. (2020). Investigating college EFL learners’
perceptions toward the use of Google Assistant for foreign language learning.
Interactive Learning Environments,116.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.183303
Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769401400414
Dalby, J., & Kewley-Port, D. (1999). Explicit pronunciation training using automatic speech recognition technology. CALICO Journal, 16(3), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v16i3.425-445
Dizon, G. (2017). Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of Alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
Dizon, G. (2020). Evaluating intelligent personal assistants for L2 listening and speaking development. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/1 0125/44705
Dunn J. (2016a) It’s been a good year for the Amazon Echo. Business Insider India. https://www.businessinsider.in/its-been-a-good-year-for-the-amazon-echo/articleshow/56227876.cms
Dunn, J. (2016b) We put Siri, Alexa, Google Assistant, and Cortana through a marathon of tests to see who’s winning the virtual assistant race – here’s what we found. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/siri-vs-google-assistant-cortana-alexa-2016-11
Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J. & Guetl, C. (2010). Adding semantic web knowledge to intelligent personal assistant agents. International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, China. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5218
Goksel-Canbek, N., & Mutlu, M. E. (2016). On the track of artificial intelligence: Learning with intelligent personal assistants. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 592-601. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3549
Graus, D., Bennett, P.N. & White, R.W. (2016) Analyzing and predicting task reminders. In J. Vassileva & J. Blustein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930239
Hauswald, J., Laurenzano, M. A., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Rovinski, A., Khurana, A.,
Dreslinski, R. G., Mudge, T., Petrucci, V., Tang, L. & Mars, J. (2015). Sirius: An open end-to-end voice and vision personal assistant and its implications for future warehouse-scale computers. In O. Ozturk & K. Ebcioglu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Istanbul, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.1145/2694344.2694347
Hawking, S., Russell, S., Tegmark, M., & Wilczek, F. (2014). Stephen Hawking:
Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence-but are we taking AI seriously enough? The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-transcendence-looks-implications-artificial-intelligence-are-we-taking-ai-seriously-enough-9313474.html
Hearst, M. (2011, November). ’Natural’ search user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 54(11), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018396.2018414
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
Levy M. (1997) Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2015). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
Lopatovska, I., Rink, K., Knight, I., Raines, K., Cosenza, K., William, H., Sorscher, P., Hirsch, D., Li, Q., & Martinez, A. (2018). Talk to me: exploring interactions with the Amazon Alexa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(4), 984-997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618759414
Markowitz, J. A. (2013). Beyond SIRI: Exploring Spoken Language in Warehouse Operations, Offender Monitoring and Robotics. In A. Neustein & J. A. Markowitz (Eds.), Mobile Speech and Advanced Natural Language Solutions (pp. 3-21). New York. Springer New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6018-3_1
Marty, F (1981). Reflections on the use of computers in second language acquisition. System. 9 (2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(81)90023-3
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126
Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2016). Are commercial ‘personal robots’ ready for language learning? Focus on second language speech. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture-short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 325–329). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.583
Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2019). Intelligent personal assistants: Can they understand and be understood by accented L2 learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1595664
Murph, D. (2011). iPhone 4S hands-on. Engadget. https://www.engadget.com/2011-10-04-iphone-4s-hands-on.html
Nagata, N. (1995). An effective application of natural language processing in second language instruction. CALICO Journal, 13(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.V13I1.47-67
Nielsen. (2018). (Smart) speaking my language: Despite their vast capabilities, smart speakers are all about the music. Insights. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2018/smart-speaking-my-language- despite-their-vast-capabilities-smart-speakers-all-about-the-music/
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp.59–86). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524735.006
Rao, L. (2017). Amazon is dominating the voice-assisted speaker market. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2017/05/08/amazon-echo-alexa-speakers
Segan, S. & Greenwald, W. (2021). The best smart speakers for 2021. PCMag. https://www.pcmag.com/article/357520/the-best-smart-speakers
Shank, G. D. (2002). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. Prentice Hall.
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177
Tai, T, Y. & Chen, H. H. J. (2020). The Impact of Google Assistant on Adolescent EFL
learners’ Willingness to Communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801
Thompson C. (2017) Amazon’s Alexa is officially coming to Ford cars. Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-alexa-coming-to-ford-cars-2017-1
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
Villas-Boas A. (2017) 14 ways you can control your home with your voice using Amazon’s Echo and Alexa. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-echo-alexa-control-smart-home-with-voice-2017-1
Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 72–93. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44227
Zheng, P. & Ni, L. (2006.) Smartphone and next generation mobile computing. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-088560-2.X5000-X