簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡佩勳
Tsai, Pei-Hsun
論文名稱: 探究關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感之關係
Exploring The Association Between Nature Connectedness and Psychological Well- Being of Volunteer in Guandu Nature Park
指導教授: 周儒
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 166
中文關鍵詞: 自然連結感心理幸福感自然公園志工
英文關鍵詞: nature relatedness, nature connectedness, psychological well-being, volunteer
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GEE.010.2018.F02
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:210下載:21
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 有健康的環境,才會有健康的人類。隨著科技的日新月異,以及都市化程度 日益增加,人與自然之間的關係漸漸疏離,這樣的情形可能影響人類的健康;在 臺灣,罹患「文明病」如憂鬱症、焦慮症的人有增加的趨勢。然而,越來越多的 研究發現,接觸自然對身心健康皆有益處。
    本研究基於對環境與人類健康的關懷,探討經常接觸自然的關渡自然公園志 工,他們和自然連結的情形,與心理幸福感的狀況;並探索自然連結感與心理幸 福感之間,是否存在著可以描繪的正向關係;以及志工們不同個人背景,對於自 然連結感的影響;最後,瞭解自然連結感可能的預測因子。
    研究結果發現,關渡自然公園志工們自然連結感與心理幸福感的狀況,皆在 中等偏上的程度;自然連結感與心理幸福感之間,具有顯著的正向關係;志工們 不同的教育程度與職業,對於其自然連結感有顯著差異;志工們從事服務業與自 由業,自然連結感有較低的情況,整體模型可以解釋自然連結感的變異量為 10.9%。
    人類有喜愛親近自然的天性,本研究結果驗證了當人們經常接觸自然,與自 然建立連結,會促進其心理幸福感。透過修復與自然之間的關係,讓人們獲得身 心的健康,當人們體會到擁有美好的自然環境,才有健康幸福的生活,人們也許 就願意愛護他所屬的環境,與自然和諧共處,最終創造人與自然之間良性的互動 與循環。

    The health and well-being of human are linked to the state of our environment. With the rapid development of technology and increasing urbanization, human gradually became alienated from nature. This alienation might have negative effect on human health. In Taiwan, the number of people suffering from mental disease such as depression and anxiety has increased. However, contact with nature may improve human health. More and more studies have found that nature environment is beneficial to physical and mental health.
    Based on the concern for environment and human health, the present study investigate Guandu Nature Park’s volunteers – a group of people who usually contact with nature, their Nature Relatedness(NR), and the current state of Psychological Well- Being(PWB). Moreover, we explore associations between NR and PWB, and the influence of volunteers with different personal backgrounds on the sense of NR. Additionally, we use stepwise multiple regression analyses to explore the potential predictors of NR.
    The participants of this study is the volunteers of Guandu Nature Park. We conducted a questionnaire survey to investigate the relationship between NR and PWB. Participants were directed to complete online questionnaire. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 22 .0 software. We use descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis and multiple regression to address the goal of this study. The results indicates as following:
    vi
    1. The mean of NR scale shows Guandu Nature Park’s volunteers have moderate to high degree of agreement on their nature relatedness.
    2. The mean of PWB scale shows Guandu Nature Park’s volunteers have moderate to high degree of agreement on their psychological well-being.
    3. There was significant positive associations between NR and PWB.
    4. NR-Self is a significant predictor of PWB. NR-Self can predict 36.8% of the variance in PWB independently.
    5. Guandu Nature Park’s volunteers’ different education level and occupation has significant different on their NR.
    6. Guandu Nature Park’s volunteers who work in the service industry and freelance may predict lower NR. The regression model can explain 10.9% of the variance in NR.
    Human has innate love for nature. Our results support the notion that connect with nature can contribute to psychological well-being. Through connect with nature, people improve both physical and mental health. By realizing how their well-being link with healthy environment, people may be willing to care for the environment which they belong, and finally build a harmonious relationship between nature and human.

    謝誌 i 摘要 v Abstract vi 目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究的需求與重要性 1 第二節 研究問題 5 第三節 研究目的與目標 5 第四節 研究主要概念說明 6 第五節 研究範圍與限制 7 第二章 文獻回顧9 第一節 接觸自然的重要性 10 第二節 自然連結感之相關研究與趨勢 17 第三節 幸福感之定義及發展趨勢 31 第四節 自然連結感與心理幸福感之關係 37 第三章 研究方法 47 第一節 研究設計與流程 47 第二節 研究場域與參與者 49 第三節 研究工具 50 第四節 研究工具的發展與品質 59 第五節 正式問卷調查 77 第六節 資料處理與分析 78 第七節 研究倫理 80 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 83 第一節 關渡自然公園志工背景資料描述 83 第二節 描述性統計分析 91 第三節 個人背景在自然連結感上表現差異 99 第四節 自然連結感與心理幸福感之關係 106 第五節 探究志工自然連結感之可能預測因子 110 第六節 綜合討論 111 第五章 結論與建議 123 第一節 研究結論 124 第二節 研究發現對環境教育與關懷健康的意義 127 第三節 建議 130 參考文獻 135 附錄 145 【附錄一】 自然關聯性量表中文版—專家審查意見彙整 145 【附錄二】 致關渡自然公園志工的研究簡要說明信155 【附錄三】 正式調查問卷159 圖目錄 圖 2-1 自然連結感概念示意圖 19 圖 2-2 負責任的環境行為模型 27 圖 3-1 研究流程圖 48 表目錄 表 2-1 接觸自然環境與健康之間關係的研究 13 表 2-2 培養自然連結感在個人層次與群體層次的實踐 20 表 2-3「生態自我」的主要概念 25 表 3-1 心理幸福感量表 53 表 3-2 自然關聯性量表中英翻譯對照表 56 表 3-3 第二階段研究問卷審查專家學者名單 60 表 3-4「心理幸福感量表」極端組比較與同質性檢驗表 63 表 3-5 「自然關聯性量表」極端組比較與同質性檢驗表 65 表 3-6 「心理幸福感量表」綜合判斷表 69 表 3-7 「自然關聯性量表」綜合判斷表 70 表 3-8 「心理幸福感量表」預試問卷信度表 73 表 3-9 「自然關聯性量表」預試問卷信度表 74 表 3-10 「自然關聯性量表」各構面逐題之 Cronbach’s α 分析 75 表 4-1 關渡自然公園志工性別與年齡分佈情形統計表 84 表 4-2 關渡自然公園志工教育程度與職業分佈情形統計表 85 表 4-3 居住縣市分佈情形統計表 86 表 4-4 居住地類型分佈情形統計表 86 表 4-5 擔任志工原因分佈情形統計表 87 表 4-6 接觸自然時之內心感受分佈情形統計表 88 表 4-7 服務年資分佈情形統計表 89 表 4-8 從事與自然保育相關志願服務工作年資分佈情形統計表 90 表 4-9 關渡自然公園志工的自然關聯性量表狀況 91 表 4-10 關渡自然公園志工自然關聯性量表各構面與題項狀況 93 表 4-11 關渡自然公園志工的心理幸福感量表狀況95 表 4-12 關渡自然公園志工心理幸福感量表各構面與題項狀況 97 表 4-13 關渡自然公園志工不同性別在自然連結感的差異檢定 99 表 4-14 關渡自然公園志工不同年齡在自然連結感的差異檢定 100 表 4-15 關渡自然公園志工不同教育程度在自然連結感的差異檢定 101 表 4-16 關渡自然公園志工不同職業在自然連結感的差異檢定 103 表 4-17 關渡自然公園志工不同居住地類型在自然連結感的差異檢定 104 表 4-18 關渡自然公園志工個人背景在自然連結感的差異情形摘要表 105 表 4-19 關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感相關係數矩陣表 106 表 4-20 關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感相關係數矩陣表 107 表 4-21 關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感同時迴歸分析摘要表 108 表 4-22 關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感逐步迴歸分析摘要表 109 表 4-23 關渡自然公園志工自然連結感預測因子逐步迴歸分析摘要表 110 表 4-24 國內使用自然關聯性量表的相關研究結果摘要表 115

    一、 中文文獻
    王文科、王智弘(2012)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    王嘉陵(2016)。「生態自我」理念及其對生態教育之意涵。教育學報,44(2),127-142。
    王喜青、周儒(2018)。埋下幸福的種子:以東眼山自然教育中心過夜型環境教育課程為例。環境教育研究,14(1),77-116。
    李仁豪、余民寧(2014)。臺灣中老年人外向性及神經質人格、社會支持與主 觀幸福感關係之模型建構及其結構係數比較。教育心理學報,45(4), 455-474。
    李仁豪、余民寧(2016)。心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性: 以大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題。中華輔導與諮商學報,46,127- 154。
    李毓昭(譯)(2006)。驚奇之心:瑞秋卡森的自然體驗(原作者:Rachel Carson)。臺中市:晨星出版有限公司。
    李芳齡(譯)(2013)。幸福的魔法:更快樂的 101 個選擇(原作者:Tal Ben -Shahar)。臺北市:天下雜誌。(原著出版年:2012)
    余家斌、趙彥琛、陳薇如(2015)。森林環境對生心理狀態效益之研究。中華 林學季刊,4,363-376。
    余家斌、袁孝維、蔡明哲、邱祈榮(2015)。森林遊憩與健康。中華林學季刊 48(2),173-184。
    孟祥森(譯)(1986)。湖濱散記(原作者:Thoreau, Henry David)。臺北 縣:書華。
    邱皓政(2006)。量化統計與統計分析—SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。 臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    邱皓政(2012)。量化研究法(三)—測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北市:雙 葉書廊有限公司。
    邱皓政、林碧芳(2017)。統計學:原理與應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份 有限公司。
    宋上仁(2018)。探討林務局解說志工自然連結與環境行動之關係(未出版碩 士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    周永明(2010)。「幸福」在中國的不幸。二十一世紀雙月刊,121,34-38。 周儒(2001)。尋找一個環境教育的實踐場所—「環境學習中心」的需求與概念。2001 環境教育國際學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學。
    周儒(2016 年 11 月)。重新連結人與自然—森林中尋找「更好的我」。兩岸林業論壇,集思台大會議中心—米開朗基羅廳。
    林一真(2016)。森林益康:森林療癒的神奇力量。臺北市:心靈工坊文化。
    林佑齡(譯)(2016)。環境解說實務指南(原作者:Carolyn Winder Ward, Alan E. Wilkinson)台北市:華都文化。
    林秀珍(2007)。經驗與教育探微—杜威教育哲學之詮釋。臺北市:師大書苑 有限公司。
    吳美真(譯)(1998)。沙郡年記:李奧帕德的自然沈思(原作者:Aldo Leopold )。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:1966)
    姚巧梅(譯)(2013)。療癒之森。(原作者:上原 嚴)臺北市:張老師文化 事業股份有限公司。
    洪如玉(2014)。深層生態學內涵探究及其教育蘊義。新竹教育大學教育學 報,31(2),103-133。
    荒野保護協會志工群(譯)(2010)。生態心理學:復育地球,療癒心靈。臺 北市:荒野保護協會出版。
    郝冰、王西敏(譯)(2009)。失去山林的孩子(原作者:Richard Louv)。新 北市新店區:野人文化出版。(原著出版年:2006)
    徐子惠(2014)。登山者自然關聯性之探究-以臺灣大專校院登山團為例(未出 版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    陳俊霖(2017 年 11 月)。森林療癒與綠色心理治療。2017 森林療癒研討會專 題演講,林務局 2 樓國際會議廳。
    黃怡(2013)。綠色先行者:生態運動關鍵 12 人。台北市:水牛文化事業有限 公司。
    黃懿翎(譯)(2015)。像山一樣思考(原作者:John Seed 等)。臺北市 : 紅桌文化/左守創作出版。
    葉育瑜(譯)(2018)。自然維他命:虛擬時代連結生命的最佳補給(原作 者:Richard Louv)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2011)
    臺北市政府主計處(2017 年 5 月 16 日)。國際都市統計指標。取自 http://dbas.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=61707&CtNode=24975&mp=120001
    關渡自然公園(2017 年 5 月 16 日)。大事記。取自 http://gd-park.org.tw/
    二、 英文文獻
    Ariana Eunjung Cha. (2015, April 8). In the future, doctors may tell you take two ‘doses of nature’ and call in the morning. The Washinhton Post. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/TG3NgS
    Bratman, G., Hamilton, J., & Daily, G. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118-136.
    Bragg, E. (1996). Towards ecological self: deep ecology meets constructionist self- theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93-108.
    Bögeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 65-84.
    Chih-Che, L. (2015). Chinese Revision of the “Psychological Well-Being Scale” Psychological Testing, 62(4), 261-277.
    Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research. Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
    Cobern, W. W. (1993). College students’ conceptualizations of nature: An interpretive world view analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 935-951.
    Conn, S. (1998). Living in the earth: ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 179-198. doi: 10.1080/08873267.1998. 9976972
    Connect. (2017). In Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved May 7, 2017, from https ://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/connect
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. doi: 10.1037/0033- 2909.95.3.542
    Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 34-43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X. 55.1.34
    Diener E, Lucas RE and Oishi S (2002) Subjective well-being:The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: Snyder CR and Lopez SJ (eds) The Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 63-73.
    Duerden, M. D., & Witt, P. A. (2010). The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 379-392. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well- being. Prevention and Treatment, 3.
    Fritz-Vietta, N. V. (2016). What can forest values tell us about human well-being? Insights from two biosphere reserves in Madagascar. Landscape And Urban Planning, 147, 28-37. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.006
    Fu, T. T., Lee, C. S., Gunnell, D., Lee, W. C., & Cheng, A. A. (2012) Changing trends in the prevalence of common mental disorders in Taiwan: a 20-year repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet. published online Nov 12. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61264-1.
    Gifford, R.; Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro- environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141–157. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034
    Gullone, E. (2000). The biophilia hypothesis and life in the 21st century: increasing mental health or increasing pathology? Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 293-321.
    Hari, J. (2018). Lost Connections: Uncovering the Real Causes of Depression—and the Unexpected Solutions. New York: Bloomsbury.
    Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
    Hines, J.M.; Hungerford, H.R.; Tomera, A.N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal ofEnvironmental Education, 18, 1–8.
    Hiroko, O., Harumi, I., Chorong, S., Maiko, K., Takashi, M., Takahide, K., & ... Yoshifumi, M. (2015). Physiological and Psychological Effects of a Forest Therapy Program on Middle-Aged Females.International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 12(12), 15222-15232. doi:10.3390/ijerph121214984
    Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness.Personality And Individual Differences, 51, 166-171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
    Howell, A. J., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in Nature: Meaning in Life as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Nature Connectedness and Well- Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1681-1696. doi:10.1007/s10902- 012-9403-x
    Lee, J.; Park, B.J.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Ohira, T.; Kagawa, T.; Miyazaki, Y.(2011). Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young male subjects. Public Health, 125, 93-100.
    Li, R. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff ’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73(4), 446-452. doi: 10.1177/0017896913485743
    Lucas, A. M. (1972). Environment and environmental education: conceptual issues and curriculum implications. Michigan: University Microfilms Company.
    Jill Suttle(2016, March). How Nature Can Make You Kinder, Happier, and More Creative. GreaterGood. Retrieved fromhttps://goo.gl/Hb3tsd
    Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature : a psychological perspective. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182
    Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–69). Washington: Island Press.
    Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn, & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117- 151). Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Kjellgren, A., & Buhrkall, H. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 464-472. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.011
    Light, A. (2000). What is an ecological identity? Environmental Politics, 9, 59-82. Li, R. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff ’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73(4), 446-452. doi: 10.1177/0017896913485743
    Li, Q. (2010). Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function. Environment Health Prevent Medicine, 15, 9-17.doi: 10.1007/s12199-008-0068-3
    Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515.
    Martyn,P., &Brymer, E. (2016). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(7), 1436-1445.
    Marselle, M., Irvine, K., & Warber, S. (2014). Examining group walks in nature and multiple aspects of well-being: A large-scale study. Ecopsychology, 6(3), 134-147. doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0027
    Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (1996). The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive responses and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 561-579.
    Naess, A. (1995). Ecosophy and gestalt ontology. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep ecology for the twenty-first century (pp. 240-245). Boston, MA: Shambhala.
    Naess, A. (1995b). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. In A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology (pp. 13-30). Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.
    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303-322.
    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature
    relatedness. Frontiers In Psychology, 4, 1-11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813 140
    Obery, A., & Bangert, A. (2017). Exploring the Influence of Nature Relatedness and Perceived Science Knowledge on Proenvironmental Behavior. Education Sciences, 7(17), 1-14. doi:10.3390/educsci7010017
    Ochiai, H.; Ikei, H.; Song, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Takamatsu, A.; Miura, T.; Taue, M.; Kagawa, T.; Li, Q.; Kumeda, S.; et al. (2015). Physiological and psychological effects of forest therapy on middle-age males with high-normal blood pressure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12, 2532-2542.
    Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health And Preventive Medicine, 15, 18-26. doi: 10. 1007/s12199-009-0086-9
    Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15, 319-337.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
    Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.57.6.1069
    Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
    Razak, M. A., Othman, N., & Nazir, N. M. (2016). Connecting People with Nature: Urban Park and Human Well-being.Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 222, 476-484. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.
    Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding human- nature interactions. In P. Schmuck, & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). NewYork: Kluwer.
    Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31-42.
    Sifferlin, A. (2016). The Healing Power of Nature. Time, 188(4), 24-26.
    Stapp, W. B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 30-31.
    Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
    Steuer, N. &Marks, N.(2008). Local wellbeing: can we measure it. Audit Commission. London: Report for the Local Wellbeing Project. Retrieved from http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Local-Wellbeing-Can- we-Measure-it-September-2008.pdf
    Tseng, Y. C. (2016). Promotion of sense of nature connection and the development of environmental affect: Comparative multiple case studies of four outdoor environmental education programs in America and Taiwan. Report of Overseas Project for Postgraduate Research, Unpublished report. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
    Ulrich, R.S., R. Simons, B. Losito, et al. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201- 230.
    Ulrich, R.S. (1993). ‘Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes’, In S.R. Kellert and E.O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 77-137) Washington DC: Island Press.
    USEPA. (2018, May 16). What is environmental education? Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/education/what-environmental-education
    HHS(2017, May 15). What Is Mental Health? Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealth.gov/basics/what-is-mental-health/index.html
    Ferreira, J. G., & Venter, E. (2016). The interconnectedness between well-being and the natural environment. Environmental Education And Communication, 15(4), 291-300. doi:10.1080/1533015X.2016.1237902
    United Nations(2014). World Urbanization Prospects. Retrieved from https://esa.un. org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.pdf
    Van den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science & Medicine, 701203-1210. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002
    Van den Bosch, M., & Ode Sang, Å. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature- based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmenta Research, 158373-384. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
    Ward Thompson, C., Roe, J., Aspinall, P., Mitchell, R., Clow, A., & Miller, D. (2012). More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape And Urban Planning, 105, 221-229. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
    WHO (2017, May 7). What is the WHO definition of health? Retrieved from http://www.who.int/suggestions/faq/en/
    WHO (2017, June 5). World Environmental Day. Retrieved from http://worldenvir onmentday.global/
    World Health Organization (1948). Constitution for the World Health Organization. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
    Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University
    Wilson, E.O.: 1993, ‘Biophilia and the conservation ethic’, In S.R. Kellert and E.O.
    Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 31-41) Washington DC: Island Press.
    Wolf, I. D., & Wohlfart, T. (2014). Walking, hiking and running in park: A multidisciplinary assessment of health and well-being benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30, 89-103.
    World Federation for Mental Health. (2012). Depression: A global crisis. World Mental Health Day, October 10, 2012. Occoquan, VA: World Federation for Mental Health. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/ management/depression /wfmh_paper_depression_wmhd_2012.pdf
    Worldview. (2018). In Merriam-Webster Dictionaries. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worldview
    Zelenski, J., & Nisbet, E. (n.d). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment And Behavior, 46(1), 3-23.
    Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1-2), 119-143.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE