隨著社會越趨複雜與多元，發展學生獨立思考與提昇問題解決的能力，以促進適應瞬息萬變的社會，此為十二年國教以素養為導向的課程所重視之精神。本研究旨在透過國小六年級學童體育課實施戰術遊戲比賽模式，了解學生在戰術遊戲比賽模式的學習過程中，其批判思考能力的展現情形。本研究採準實驗設計，以臺北市某國民小學六年級2班學生為研究對象，分為戰術遊戲比賽模式之實驗組（男15人，女15人）與技能取向之控制組（男16人，女13人），採原班上體育課方式，每班10節（400分鐘）共為期10週。在教學實驗前、後進行批判思考能力前、後測。統計方法採混合設計二因子變異數分析進行考驗，比較其批判思考能力在各項得分顯著情形。此外，在教學實驗過程中，觀察學生小組意見討論影片口語資料轉譯為逐字稿，並使用序列分析處理小組討論資料。結果顯示實驗組與對照組在運動批判性思考能力的主要差異與討論過程。結論為一、戰術遊戲模式對於提升國小高年級學童在「整體批判思考」、「演繹」能力的得分具有明顯提高。二、戰術遊戲模式組中共四組，其中二組在運動批判思考能力的「演繹」能力構面達顯著差異。三、同儕小組成員在戰術遊戲模式中的討論與互動，有助於國小高年級學童在批判思考能力的發展。

Within the increasingly complex and diverse society, it is crucial to develop students’critical thinking and problem solving competencies. The study aimed to investigate primary school students' critical thinking competencies in physical education class through a tactical approach for invasion games learning. Participants were 59 pupils(sixth grade, male=31, female=28). They were divided into experimental group (EG,n=30) and control group (CG, n=29). Pre-test and post-test were conducted through critical thinking ability questionnaires. During the learning cycle, 20 lessons were implemented by tactical approach. For 10 weeks a total of 10 (400 minutes) of the tactical game game mode and skills orientation ball teaching physical education, 10 classes per class for ten weeks. The two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of mixed design was used to analyse and compare the scores of critical thinking competencies. In terms of EG, critical thinking behavior assessment observation form was also used to analyze the observational data. Results showed the process of group discussion with relation to critical thinking and the major deferences between EG and CG. The findings of this study were as follows: 1. Tactical game model strategy for the promotion of junior high school students in the "overall critical thinking", "deductive" ability to score has improved significantly.2. Tactical game mode strategy will be divided into red, purple, yellow, orange four groups, and the red team, purple team in the movement of critical thinking ability "deduction" capacity facets significant difference.3. Tactical game model strategy will help the junior high school students in the learning process, through peer group members interaction and discussion analysis run, help children in the critical thinking ability to show.

引用文獻
一、中文部分
王美琇 (2008)。小組討論中同儕互動之言談分析 (未出版碩士論文)。國立台東大學，台東縣。
吳淑芬 (2005) 。國小高年級學童科學批判思考歷程與行為表徵之探討 (未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
吳淑惠 (2007)。從認知學習觀點談六大技能「體驗專家」教學模組。教師之友，48(2)，101-108。
周建智、涂馨友 (2009)。以合作式概念構圖發展學童運動學習。中華體育季刊，23(4)，117-127。
周建智、黃美瑤 (2010)。健康體適能教學方案在高中體育課的應用：問題導向學習理論觀點。體育學報，43(2)，149-170。
林信宏、周建智、黃美瑤 (2008)。合作學習對大專生批判思考能力的關聯性之影響。大專體育學刊，10(2)，17-28。
林雅博、林子鈺、王文宜 (2013)。合作學習教學策略對不同學習風格學童批判思考與學習態度之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，8(1)，15-30。
林靜萍 (2009)。「中等以下學校體育教師增能計畫」簡介。學校體育，19 (2)，19-24。
徐岳聖、林錚、周建智 (2007)。探究合作學習與概念構圖策略介入桌球課對大學生批判性思考能力與桌球動作技術之影響。北體學報，15，67-80。
涂馨友、周建智、張思敏 (2014)。合作式概念構圖教學對學童批判思考能力與動作技能之影響。體育學報，47(2)，291-302。
張春興 (2007)。教育心理學。臺北市：東華。
教育部 (2008)。學校體育統計年報 (2007年版)。臺北市：教育部。
陳文典 (2001)。國民中小學自然的教學與教材。國民中小學九年一貫課程政策與執行整合研討會生活課程、自然與生活科技，76-92。教育部臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
陳春蓮 (2002)。在體育教學中涵養批判思考能力之探討。大專體育，62，100-106。
陳萩慈、掌慶維 (2015)。職前體育教師實施理解式教學之探討。中華體育季刊，29(4)，265-272。
掌慶維 (2006)。國小五年級建構取向籃球遊戲學習之研究 (未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
掌慶維 (2008)。理解式球類遊戲之創意教材變化要素。學校體育，18(6)，54-63。
掌慶維 (編輯中)。國小體育教學模組之設計理念與實踐策略。學校體育。
掌慶維、Grehaigne, J. F., Wallian, N. (2014)。壹、促進球類理解之體育教材教法－遊戲中心取向。載於黃嘉莉編：遊戲取向教學法與多元評量（3-10頁）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。
黃美瑤 (2010)。戰術遊戲教學模式介入體育課對國小高年級學生批判思考與社交技巧之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立體育大學，桃園市。
葉玉珠 (1991)。中小學生批判思考及其相關因素之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
葉玉珠 (2003)。批判思考測驗－第一級（指導手冊）。臺北市：心理。
葉玉珠 (2005)。批判思考測驗-第二級題本。2007 年 8 月 21 日，資料引自國立政治大學師資培育中心葉玉珠教授個人網站：http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~ycyeh/_private/13CTT-II-30%202004.pdf
廖怡菁 (2011)。小組遊戲競賽法介入對大學生批判思考能力與滿意度之影響 (未出版碩士論文)。國立體育大學，桃園市。
賴伊麒 (2009)。運用概念構圖學習單提升國小學童運動批判思考能力之研究。(未出版碩士論文)。國立體育大學，桃園市。
羅玉枝 (2008)。不同教學方法透過籃球競賽活動對高中學生批判思考的影響。臺灣運動教育學報，3(1)，35-50。

二、英文部分
Abdullah, B., Badiei, M., Sulaiman, T., & Baki, R. (2014). Enhance critical thinking in physical education among Malaysian University students. International Journal of Sports Science, 4(5), 198-203.
Allison, S., & Thorpe, R. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education: A skills approach versus a games for understanding approach. The British Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), 9-13.
Anshel, M. H. (1990). Toward validation of a model for coping with acute stress in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(1), 58-83.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edition.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barrow, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Beyer, B.K. (1985). Critical thinking: What is it? Social Education, 49, 270-276.
Bowers, J.W.(1970). Content analysis. In Methods of Research Communication. P.Emment and W. Brooks (eds.), Boston: Hougton Miffinco Press.
Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5-8.
Buschner, C. (1988, December). Can we help children move and think critically? Paper presented at the International Early Childhood Conference, Washington, DC.
Chen, S., & Light, R. (2006). “I thought I’d hate cricket but I love it!”: Year six students’ responses to Games Sense pedagogy. Change: Transformation in Education, 9(1), 49-58.
Chen,W., Rovegno, I., Cone, S. L., & Cone, T. P. (2012). An accomplished teacher's use of scaffolding during a second-grade unit on designing games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(2), 221-234.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1909). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Health and Co.
Dodds, P., Griffin, L. L., & Placek, J. H. (2001). Chapter 2: A selected review of the literature on development of learners’ domain-specific knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(4), 301-313.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: Freeman.
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
Fry, J. M., Tan, C. W. K., McNeill, M., & Wright, S. (2010). Children’s perspectives on conceptual games teaching: A value-adding experience. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 139–158.
Gholson, B. (1980). The cognitive-developmental basis of human learning. Studies in hypothesis testing. New York: Academic Press.
Glaser, E. M. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: AMS.
Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. M. & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign.IL: Human Kinetics.
Griffin, L., & Sheehy, D. (2004). Using the tactical games model to develop problem-solvers in physical education. In J. Wright, D. Macdonald, & L. Burrows (Eds.), Critical Inquiry and Problem-Solving in Physical Education (pp. 32-48). London: Routledge.
Hudgins, B. B., & Edelman, S. (1988). Children’s self-directed critical thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 81, 262-273.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the bunker-thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 177–192.
Launder, A., & Piltz, W. (2006). Beyond ‘understanding’ to skilful play in games, through play practice. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 39(1), 47–57.
Light, R. (2006). Game Sense: Innovation or just good coaching? Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 39(1), 8–19.
McBride, R. (1988). Teaching critical thinking in the psycho-motor learning environment-A possibility or a passing phase? The Physical Educator, 46, 170-173.
McBride, R. E. (1992). Critical thinking--An overview with implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 112-125.
McBride, R. E. (1999). If you structure it, they will learn it: Critical thinking in physical education classes. The Cleaning House, 72(4), 217-220.
Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1999). An investigation of tactical understanding in net games. European Journal of Physical Education, 4, 162-172.
Nelson, L. P., & Crow, M. L. (2014). Do Active-Learning Strategies improve students’ critical thinking? Canadian Center of Science and Education, Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 77-90.
Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press.
Oslin, J., & Mitchell, S. (2006). Game-Centred Approaches to teaching physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The Handbook of Physical Education (pp. 627–651). London: Sage.
Paul, R.W. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. CA: Sonoma State University.
Pitt, R. (1983). Development of a general problem-solving schema in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 547-584.
Prain, V., & Hickey., C. (1995). Using discourse analysis to change physical education. Quest, 47, 76-90.
Tallir, I. B., Lenoir, M., Valcke, M., & Musch, E. (2007). Do alternative instructional approaches result in different game performance learning outcomes? Authentic assessment in varying game condition. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(3), 263-282.
Thorpe, R. (1992). The psychological factors underpinning the “teaching for understanding games” movement. In L. Almond T. Williams & A. Sparks (Eds.), Sport and physical activity: Moving towards excellence (pp. 209-218). London: E and FN Spon.
Tishman, S., & Perkins, D. N. (1995). Critical thinking and physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 66(6), 24-30.
Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51(1), 1-10.
Walton, H. J., & Matthews, M. B. (1989). Essentials of problem-based learning. Medical Education, 23(6), 542-558.
Wang, L., & Ha, A. (2012). Mentoring in TGIT teaching: Mutual engagement of pre-service teachers, cooperating teachers and university supervisors. European Physical Education Review, 18(1), 47-61.
Whitehead, M. E. (2010). Physical literacy throughout the lifecourse. New York, NY: Routledge.