研究生: |
賴麗琴 Li-chin, Lai |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以「地球系統」為統整主軸之多元教學模組的研發與實踐 A study on the development and implemention of an "Earth System" integrated instructional module |
指導教授: |
張俊彥
Chang, Chun-Yen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
地球科學系 Department of Earth Sciences |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 170 |
中文關鍵詞: | 中等教育 、統整課程 、地球系統教育 、教學方法 |
英文關鍵詞: | Secondary Education, Integrated Curriculum, Earth System Education, Instructional Method |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:573 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究之目的在研發以「地球系統」(Earth system)概念為統整主軸之「地球資源」主題的多元教學模組(Earth System - Earth Resources Instructional Module, ESERIM),並透過實驗教學研究評估此多元教學模組對高二學生之影響。研究結果期能提供中學科學教育在統整課程教學上的具體建議與設計參考。ESERIM的設計是以「地球系統」概念為統整主軸,參酌Mayer所提倡之「地球系統教育」為課程設計之理念與精神,並根據四階段的「學習環模型」(A learning cycle model):引起動機、調查研究、分析解釋和應用評估,作為統整各個教學策略的主要設計架構(張俊彥,2000a)。研究工具包括「ESER常識問卷」(rKR-20= .55~ .71)、「環境態度量表」(Cronbach’s α= .79~ .84)、「ESER課程回饋表」(其中包括課程分和環境分兩部分,Cronbach’s α= .93~ .95)與晤談工具。研究設計採用實驗研究法之單一組前後測設計,並以台灣東部某國立男女合校之高中二年級第一類組選修地球科學之學生為研究對象。上述評量工具分別實施於ESERIM教學之前後與教學後八週,另於教學後二週內進行教師及學生之晤談工作。最後,以敘述性統計與t考驗(t test)、相關分析(correlation)、線性迴歸分析(linear regression)與變異數分析(ANOVA)等統計方法分析量的資料;而質的資料經三角校正及交叉分析後,作出適切的討論。研究結果顯示:
一、ESERIM有助於增進學生在地球資源方面的相關知識
二、從「ESER常識問卷」前、後測與延宕測驗來看,學生在認知方面的學習表現,似乎因性別、家長教育程度和最喜歡的學科而有不同的趨勢。
三、在實驗教學後,學生環境態度之表現有降低的趨勢,且學生所抱持的環境態度,因其性別和最喜歡的學科而有不同。
四、學生之環境態度與其在ESER課程回饋反應之間呈中度之正相關。
五、學生之環境分和環境態度後測成績對於其課程分表現的影響,具有中度的解釋力。
六、學生主動的正向回饋與表現,例如「覺得上課方式活潑有趣,能引起學習興趣」、「學習到很多東西或日常生活的知識與常識」、「透過公聽會,我學習到以不同的角度去看待環境污染的問題」,以及「體認經濟發展與環境保護之兩難」等等,均呼應了ESERIM之設計理念與期望。同時,任課教師亦表示十分滿意學生的學習表現,而對於其在ESERIM之教學情形也抱持肯定的態度。
七、少數學生認為加油站訪查題目重複、公聽會資料不足與考試等因素造成其學習上的困擾。另外,教師認為在教學上並未出現太大的困擾,唯時間掌控方面可能是比較需要調整的地方。
八、整體而言,教師與學生對ESERIM均表示滿意;教師亦認為此多元教學模組值得在中學階段推行。
中國石油股份有限公司石油通訊編輯委員會(1996):來自地心。台北:中國石油股份有限公司。
中華民國課程與教學學會編(2000)。課程統整與教學。台北:揚智文化。
方德隆(2000a):九年一貫課程學習領域之統整。課程與教育季刊, 3(1), 1-18。
方德隆(2000b):課程統整之模式與實務。高雄師大學報, 11, 181-212。
王正雄(2001):花蓮縣試辦九年一貫課程之支持系統研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
王秀雲和李惠銘(1999):跨世紀之夢:柑園國中學校本位課程統整機制的營造歷程。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所「九年一貫課程研討會」研習資料,網址:http://s2.ntptc.edu.tw
朱桂芳(1999):學校自主的課程設計:談柑園國中、北政國中、曉明女中的教育實驗方案。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所「九年一貫課程研討會」研習資料,網址:http://s2.ntptc.edu.tw
何縕琪(1999):國小教師主題統整教學歷程之分析暨合作省思專業成長模式之建構。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
吳清山和林天佑(1999):課程統整。教育資料與研究, 26, 82。
李坤崇和歐慧敏(2000)。統整課程理念與實務。台北:心理。
李春生(1996):簡介美國地球體系教育(ESE)。科學教育月刊, 187, 28-41。
李春生(1997):怎樣教好國民中學地球科學新課程。國立編譯館通訊, 10(2), 5-10。
李春生(1998):高級中學地球科學新課程的精神與特色。科學教育月刊, 212, 22-27。
林佩璇等合譯(2000)。課程統整。台北,學富文化。
林怡秀(1999):國民小學課程統整模式之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林政宏和毛松霖(1994):科學教育指標之研究:科學學習進展指標—科學過程技能學習進展測驗(高中)。國立台灣師範大學地球科學系印行。
林靜芳(1999):國中社會科統整課程的設計與發展。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
邱美虹 (1994): 科學課程革新—評介Project 2061, SS & C 和STS理念。科學教育月刊, 174, 2-12。
張俊彥(2000a):地球系統為整合主軸之多元化教學模組研究。未出版之行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫書,NSC 89-2511-S-003-144。
張俊彥(2000b):地球系統為整合主軸之多元化教學模組研究補充說明。未出版之行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫書,NSC 89-2511-S-003-144。
教育部(1998):國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北,教育部。
莊佩螢(2001):九年一貫藝術與人文領域課程統整之研究-以台北市國中為例。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文。
許心欣(1995):參與環境保護工作之民間團體主要幹部環境態度調查。國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
許信雄(1999):課程統整。現代教育論壇, 4, 240-247。
陳芙蓉(1999):愛籽國小「主題活動」統整課程發展之研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
陳是瑩和曾怡禎(1991):台灣地區國小教師環保意識的調查研究。載於周昌弘編:台灣環境教育研究(pp. 1-18)。中央研究院植物研究所印行。
陳美如(2000):多元文化課程統整的理想與實踐。中華民國課程與教學學會編:課程統整與教學(pp. 119-151)。台北:揚智文化。
陳新轉(2000):課程統整之理論性研究及其對九年一貫社會領域課程綱要(草案)之啟示。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳瓊森譯(1997):開啟多元新世紀。台北:信誼。
曾世君(1999):主題式教學活動設計實施之個案研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
游家政(2000):學校課程的統整及其教學。課程與教學季刊, 3(1), 19-38。
黃永和(1999):課程統整的理論與方式之探討。新竹師院學報, 12, 231-260。
黃政傑(1992):課程設計。台北:東華。
黃炳煌(1995):談課程發展的一些概念。教改通訊, 11, 41-43。
黃炳煌(1999):九年一貫之課程統整。健康國小新進教師研習手冊。 台北:健康國小。
黃慧仙(1999):天藍國小「主題活動」的成長足跡:一個統整課程實施之個案研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
黃譯瑩(1998):課程統整之意義探究與模式建構。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學, 8(4), 616-633。
楊坤原(1996):統整科學課程之論題與趨勢。科學教育月刊, 190, 13-22。
楊智穎(2000):台南縣新化區國小鄉土教材發展之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
葉興華(2000):我國國小推行課程統整之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
董家莒(2000):「問題解決」為基礎之電腦輔助教學成效。國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。
熊同鑫(1999):以自然科為核心之統整課程教學研究。論文發表於中華民國第十五屆科學教育學術研討會。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學理學院科學教育研究所。
熊同鑫、陳淑麗和王振興(2000):以自然科為核心之統整課程教學研究。論文發表於中華民國第十六屆科學教育學術研討會。台北市:國立台灣師範大學理學院科學教育研究所。
歐用生(1999):從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教師天地, 101, 15-24。
鄭明長(2000):統整教學的意涵與模式。中華民國課程與教學學會編:課程統整與教學(pp. 155-181)。台北:揚智文化。
鄭東昇(1994):高中學生環境態度之研究。國立高雄師範大學工藝教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭春蕓和邱美虹 (1995): 環境教育與以STS為導向的科學教育。科學教育月刊, 180, 17-20。
賴麗琴和張俊彥(2000a):美國地球系統科學社區化課程發展計畫(EarthComm)簡介。科學教育月刊, 232, 61-67。
賴麗琴和張俊彥(2000b):統整課程之研發與其初步成效之探討。論文發表於中華民國第十六屆科學教育學術研討會。台北市:國立台灣師範大學理學院科學教育研究所。
戴玲慧(1997):台北縣開放教育實施之探究:以一個都市型國民小學為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
薛梨真(1999a):國小實施統整課程的可行性研究。初等教育學報, 12, 125-167。
薛梨真(1999b):國小課程統整的理念與實務:高雄市國小統整課程教學種子教師培訓成果彙編。高雄:高雄市教育局。
薛梨真(2000):國小教師統整課程實施成效之評估。課程與教學季刊, 3(1), 39-58。
羅珮華(1996):地球科學教育在STS扮演的角色。科學教育月刊, 190, 23-27。
Aldridge, B.G. (1993). Basic components of the natural sciences. In National Science Teachers Association (Ed.), Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science: Vol. 1. The content core (pp. 25-40). Washington, D. C.: The National Science Teachers Association
Alleman, J. & Brophy, J. (1993). Is curriculum integration a boon or a threat to social studies? Social Education, 57(6), 287-291.
American Geological Institute (1991). Earth science education for the 21st century: A planning guide. Alexandria, VA: AGI.
Apple, M. W. (1995). Commentaries on the search for coherence in the curriculum --Facing reality. In J. A. Beane (Eds.) . Toward a coherent curriculum. Alexandria, VA.: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development.
Arcury, T. A. (1990). Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Humam Organization, 49(4), 300-305.
Atkinson, R. L, R. C. Atkinson and E. R. Hilgard. (1983). Introduction to psychology. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Inc. New York.
Beane, J. A. (1993). Problems and possibilities for an integrative curriculum. Middle School Journal, 25(4), 18-23.
Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 4, 616-622.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration—Designing the core of democratic Education. New York: Teacher College Press.
Bereiter, C. (1984). How to keep thinking skills from going the way of all frills. Educational Leadership, 42, 75-77.
Blythe, M. (1996). Research, development, and validation of a training handbook for developing integrated units of study through a systematic approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas. (University Microfilms No. 9714475)
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D.(1989). Educational research ( 5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Group Ltd.
Bradley, J. C., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17-22.
Brady, M. (1995). A supradisciplinary curriculum. In J. A. Beane (Ed.), Toward a cohent curriculum, 1995 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 26-33). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brazee, E. N., & Capelluti ,J. (1995). Dissolving boundaries: Toward an integrative curriculum.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397 982)
Brazee, Edward, & Capelluti, Joseph. (1995). Dissolving boundaries: Toward an integrative middle school curriculum. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Burns, R. C. (1995). Dissolving the boundaries: Planning for curriculum integration in middle and secondary schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384 455)
Carter, C. C., & Mason, D. A. (1997). A review of the literature on the cognitive effects of integrated curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED419 837)
Carter, K. (1994). Improving teachers’ understanding and planning of an integrated curriculum with a staff development plan. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379 108)
Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Jounal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346.
Clark, E. (1986). Optimizing learning: The integrative education model to the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merril Publish Company.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Cohen, M. J. (1973). Environmental information versus environmental attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 5(2), 5-8.
DeGarmo, C. (1895). Herbart and the Herbartians. London: Heineman.
Dewey (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.
Dewey (1915). The school and society (rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Drake (1992). A story model: An integrated curriculum project. Ontario: Catharines.
Earth System Science Committee (1988). Earth system science: Washington, DC, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 48.
Earth system science in the community. http://www.agiweb.org/earthcomm
Environmental Education Materials: Guidelines for Excellence. http://naaee.org/npeee/materials.html
Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school how to integrate the curricula. Glen Elyn, IL.: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
Fogarty, R., & Stoehr, J. (1995). Integrating curricula with multiple intelligences—teams, themes, and threads. Glen Elyn, IL.: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
Fortner, R. W. (1991). Special issue on Earth systems education. Science Activities, 28, 1.
Fortner, R. W. (2000). A web-based slide presentation on Earth Systems Education (ESE) & Environmental Education (EE). http://earthsys.ag.ohio-state.edu/
Fortner, R. W., & Mayer, V. J. (Eds.) (1998). Learning about the Earth as a system: Proceedings of the second international conference on geoscience education. Columbus: Earth System Education, The Ohio State University.
Fortner, R. W., Pinnicks R., Shay, E., Barron, P., Jax, D., Steele, W., & Mayer, V. J. (1992). Biological & Earth Systems Science: A program for the future. The Science Teacher, 59(9), 32-37.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Fraser, S. J. (1983). The relationship of socio-cultural factors to environmental attitudes. Dissertation Abstracts International, A44/03, 720. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Foshay, A. W. (1991). Integrated curriculum. In A. Lewy (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, (pp. 160-162). Oxford: Pregamon Press.
Grassman, G. M. (1985). Stratum and social base correlates of differential attitudes toward community environmental issue: Competing structural models and leader/non-leader comparisons. Dissertation Abstracts International, A 47/03, 1064. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Grisham, D. L. (1995). Integrating the curriculum: The case of an award- winning elementary school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED385 502)
Hall, D. A., & McCurdy, D. W. (1990). A comparison of a Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) laboratory and a traditional laboratory on student achievement at two private liberal arts colleges. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 625-636.
Henry, G.. H. (1956). Foundations of general education in the high school. In what shall the high schools teach? 1959 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 127-175). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hinkle, E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, G., (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences.: Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Hurd, P. D. (1997). Inventing science education for the new millennium. New York: Teachers College Press.
Iran-Nejad, A., Mckeachie, W. J., & Berliner, D. C. (1990). The multisource nature of learning: An introduction. Educational Research, 60, 509-515.
Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.). (1989). The interdisciplinary model: A step-by-step approach for development integrated units of study. In H.H. Jacob (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 53-66). Alexandria, VA: The Association of Supervision.
Kilpatrick, W. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319-335.
Kovalik, S. (1993). ITI the model: Integrated thematic instruction. Arizona: Village of Oak Creek.
Kovalik, S., & Olsen, K. (1994). ITI the model: Integrated thematic instruction (3rd ed. ). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374 894)
Mayer, V. J. (1991a). Framework for Earth system education. Science Activities, 28(1), 8-9.
Mayer, V. J. (1991b). Earth system science. Science Teacher, 58, 34-39.
Mayer, V. J. (1993). Earth system education. ERIC/CSMEE Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED359 049)
Mayer, V. J. (1995). Using the earth system for integrating science curriculum. Science Education, 79(4), 375-391.
Mayer, V. J. (1997). Global science literacy: An earth system view. Journal of research in science teaching, 34(2), 101-105.
Mayer, V. J. (in press). Earth system education: A case study of a globally oriented science education program. In M. Merryfield, E. Jarchow, & S. Pickert (Eds.), Preparing teachers to teach global perspectives: A handbook for teacher educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mayer, V. J. & Armstrong, R. E. (1990). What every 17-year old should know about planet Earth: The report of a conference of educators and geo-scientists. Science Education, 74 (2), 155-165.
Mayer, V. J., Armstrong, R. E., Barrow, L. H., Brown, S. M., Crowder, J. N., Fortner, R. W., Graham, M., Hoyt, W. H., Humphris, S. E., Jax, D. W., Shay, E. L., & Shropshire, K. L. (1992). The role of planet earth in the new science curriculum. Journal of Geological Education, 40, 66-73.
Mayer, V. J. & Tokuyama, A. (2001). Guidelines for global science literacy curricula. In V. J. Mayer (ed.) Global Science Literacy (1st volume) (chapter 2). http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~earthsys/global/Chap02.html
Mayer, V. J., Fortner, R. W., & Kumano Yoshisuke (2001). Reforming the representation of science in pre-college curricula. In V. J. Mayer (ed.) Global Science Literacy (1st volume) (chapter 1 & 3). http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~earthsys/global/Chap01.html http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~earthsys/global/Chap03.html
McMurry, C. A. (Ed.). (1895). First yearbook of the Herbart Society. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
McMurry, F. M. (1927). Some recollections of the past forty years of education. Peabody Journal of Education, 4, 325-332.
Miller, J. (1992). Toward a spiritual curriculum. Holistic Education Review, 5(1), 43-49.
Miller, K. W., & Davison, D. (1998). Is thematic integration the best way to reform science and mathematics education? Science Educator, 7, 7-12.
NASA Teaching Earth Science http://www.earth.nasa.gov/education/catalog/2-Students.html
National Research Council (1993). Solid-earth science and society—summary and global overview. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
National Research Council (1995). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Board (1989). Science and engineering indicators-1989: Washington, DC, U. S. Government Printing Office, NSF 89-1, 45.
Ohio Sea Grant Education Program. http://www.sg.ohio-state.edu/osgrant/education/f-education.html
Palmer, J. M. (1991). Planning wheels turn curriculum around. Educational Leadership, 49, 57-66.
Palmer, J. M. (1995). Interdisciplinary curriculum – again. In J.A. Beane (Eds.). Toward a coherent curriculum. Alexandria, VA.: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development.
Pate, P. E., McGinnis, K., & Homestead, E.(1995). Creating Coherence Through Curriculum Integration. In J. M. Beane (Eds.). Toward a coherent curriculum. Alexandria, VA.: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development.
Pizarro, R. A. E. (1993). Exploring integrative curriculum for more effective learning by primary students in Costa Rica. Master Thesis. New Mexico State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED363 420)
Relam, A., & Kimpston, R. (1991). Curriculum integration: A critical analysis of practical and conceptual issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 677)
Smith, J. L., & Johnson, H. (1993). Bringing it together: Literature in an integrative curriculum. In R. Fogarty (Ed.), Integrating the curricula: A collection (pp. 145-156). Glen Elyn, Illinois: IRI / Skylight Training and Publishing.
Stapp, W. B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(1), 13-22.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1996). The interdisciplinary teacher’s handbook: A guide to integrated teaching across the curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Trend R. (2001). Thomas Huxley and Earth system science: Opportunities for fostering global science literacy in UK schools. In V. J. Mayer (ed.) Global Science Literacy (2nd volume) (chapter 4). http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~earthsys/global/Chap17.html
UNESCO (1981). Integration subject areas in primary education curriculum: A joint innovative project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED211 327)
Walter R. Borg & Meredith D. Gall (1989). Experimental designs: Part I. basic types of educational research. Longman Group Ltd.
Ward, J. M., Suttle, J. E., & Otto, H. J. (1960). The curriculum integration concept applied in the elementary school. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Weiss, I. R. (1987). Report of the 1985-86 national survey of science and mathematics education: Research Triangle Park. North Carolina Research Triangle Institute, 235.
Young, J. (1992). Curriculum integration: Perceptions of pre-service teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 13(4), 1-9.