研究生: |
吳美頤 Wu, Mei-Yi |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
技術型高中普通班身心障礙學生參與個別化教育計畫之現況與支持需求研究 Individualized Education Program Involvement and Support Needs of Vocational High School Students with Disabilities in Regular Classes |
指導教授: |
盧台華
Lu, Tai-Hua |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 140 |
中文關鍵詞: | 個別化教育計畫 、學生參與 、支持需求 、技術型高中身心障礙學生 、檢核表 |
英文關鍵詞: | Individualized Education Program, student involvement, support needs, vocational high school students with disabilities, checklist |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202510 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:199 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探究新北市公立技術型高中普通班身心障礙學生參與IEP之現況與支持需求。第一部分依照各校各障礙類別學生比例隨機抽取,91位完成「IEP參與情況與支持需求」檢核表填寫,13位資源教師則以負責個案管理學生整體情況進行檢核表填寫`,以利進行資料比對與分析;第二部分學生團體訪談係以立意取樣之方式選取每校「IEP參與情況」檢核表總分分布於高、中、低各兩位,進行6場學生團體座談;第三部分進行資源教師個別訪談,綜合訪談與檢核表資料,彙整增進學生參與IEP之具體作法。
研究結果茲說明如下:
一、所有學生的IEP相關知識均待加強;生理障礙學生在法源依據與目的等六題項均高於心理障礙學生;且接受直接服務學生在法源依據與目的等三題項均高於接受間接服務學生。
二、所有學生的IEP參與情況均待加強;生理障礙學生在特教服務與行政、普教環境、家庭環境與自我倡導四向度均高於心理障礙學生;接受直接服務學生在普教環境向度高於接受間接服務學生。
三、學生IEP參與支持需求較低,然資源教師則認為其需求較高;高一學生在特教服務與行政、普教環境二向度高於高二學生;接受普教教師直接服務學生在特教服務與行政向度高於接受資源教師直接服務學生。
四、學生參與IEP有讓親師與學生三方同步資訊、幫助學生更瞭解自身學習情況、增進自我倡導能力等優點,並可從以下二方面著手。
(一)學校方面包括晤談學生,幫助學生瞭解自己的學習情況;鼓勵學生參與IEP會議,並提供相關訓練;安排特殊需求領域課程,提供學生IEP相關知識、身心障礙等資訊與權益,增進學生自我倡導與人際互動能力;使用正向語言讓任課教師知悉學生的情況,並視情況進行教師或班級特教宣導;彙整校內特教與相關資源供學生、家長與普教老師等知悉;營造支持特殊教育的生態環境,與行政處室、普教老師相互聯繫支援。
(二)家庭與社會方面則應該增進對身心障礙者特質的瞭解與接納,給予身心障礙者正向支持與關懷;家長應與學校維持雙向聯繫,以增進IEP會議的成效。
本研究並根據上述研究發現提出未來對教學與研究之建議。
The purpose of this study was to explore the Individualized Education Program(IEP) involvement and support needs of public vocational high school students with disabilities in New Taipei City. Ninety-one subjects ramdomly selected to fill in the “IEP involvement and support needs checklist” were based on the physical and psychological categories. In order to compare the students’ opinions with those of the teachers, 13 resource teachers were also invited to fill in the teacher version checklist at the same time. After the checklist filled, student group interviews and resource teacher individual interviews for each school were also conducted for in-depth exploration. The major findings were as follows.
1.All students’ IEP knowledge needed to be strengthened. Students who were physically disabled got higher scores on the law and aim of IEP than those of the psychologicaly disabled. Students who attended the special education courses got higher scores on the law and aim of IEP.
2.All students’ IEP involvement neeeded to be increased. Students who were physically disabled got higher scores on the aspects of special education services, classroom environment, family environment, and self-advocate than those who were psychologicaly disabled. Students who attended the special education courses got higher scores than those who were not.
3.All students’ IEP support needs were low, while resource teachers thought they were high. The tenth graders got higher scores on the aspects of special education service and classroom environment than those of the eleventh graders.
4.There were lots of advantages for students participating in IEP, such as helping the school, family, and the student to share the same information with one another, helping students know more about themselves, promoting students’ skill of self-advocacy. The followings could enhance students to participate in their IEP including (a) Schools should make general education teachers know more about the students by using positive languages, encourage students to participate in IEP meetings, cooperate with administrators and teachers to create a friendly environment for the students with special needs, and (b) Family and community should know more about people with special needs. Besides, in order to make IEP meeting more effective, teachers should keep close contacts with parents.
Based on the above results, some suggestions were made for future implementations.
十二年國民基本教育實施計畫(2015):行政院一○四年六月二十三日院臺教字第1040033079號函核定。
王明泉(2000):高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力相關影響因素及教學方案成效之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系博士論文,彰化。
王淑姿(2007):特殊教育學校家長參與網路個別化教育計畫之現況與需求研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修班碩士論文,臺北。
王琴珍(2012):特殊教育教師提升技術型高中階段重度肢體障礙學生自我決策能力之實務探究。特教園丁,27(3),33-40。
王馨怡(2008):台灣北區國民中學身心障礙資源班教師執行個別化教育計畫現況之研究(未出版)。銘傳大學教育研究所在職專班碩士論文,台北。
江宜錚(2010):國立高中職校身心障礙資源班運作現況與需求之調查研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系碩士論文,彰化。
身心障礙學生支持服務辦法(2013):民國一○二年九月二十七日。
李宜倫(2005):高中職特殊教育教師自我決策教學態度之研究(未出版)。國立屏東師範學院碩士論文,屏東。
李翠玲(2007):個別化教育計畫(IEP)理念與實施。臺北:心理。
李慧韻(2008):身心障礙學生學校支持系統之探討。台東特教,27,1-4。
吳芊宜(2005):國小普通班教師參與個別化教育計畫會議現況及相關因素之研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修班碩士論文,臺北。
吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯)(2001):質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(A. Strauss. & J. Corbin著: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory)。濤石文化,嘉義。(原著出版於1998)
吳莉莉(2001):國小資源班教師對個別化教育計畫態度之研究(未出版)。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,臺中。
邱上真(2001):普通班教師對特殊需求學生之因應措施、所面對之困境以及所需之支持系統。特殊教育研究學刊,21,1-26。
邱上真(2005):特殊教育導論第二版。臺北:心理。
周雅容(1997):焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究,3,51-73。
林妙(2006):國小聽障生家長參與個別化教育計畫之調查研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職專班碩士論文,臺北。
林宏熾、丘思平、江佩珊、吳季樺、林佩蓁(2003):高職輕度智能障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。東臺灣特殊教育學報,5,25-46。
林宏熾、林巾凱(2003):高中職階段身心障礙青年生涯自我概念之研究。特殊教育學報,17,63-94。
林佳靜(2006):國民教育階段普通班教師參與個別化教育計畫之研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
林恆嘉(2005):臺北市國小普通班教師對學習障礙學生個別化教育計畫意見之研究(未出版)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
林素貞(2009):資源教室方案與經營第二版。臺北:五南。
林瑞芬(2009):學前特教班教師實施個別化教育計畫現況之研究(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學早期療育研究所碩士論文,臺中。
洪怡璇(2014):私立幼兒園教師實施個別化教育計畫現況之探究(未出版)。國立東華大學特殊教育學系身心障礙與輔助科技碩士論文,花蓮。
胡翠珊(2013):屏東縣國小普通班導師參與個別化教育計畫的現況與困難之研究(未出版)。國立屏東教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,屏東。
柳健玫(2006):桃園縣國小特教教師支援普通班教師撰寫個別化教育計畫之研究(未出版)。中原大學教育學系碩士論文,桃園。
孫孝儀(2007):三縣市國小智能障礙學生個別化教育計畫執行困難之調查研究(未出版)。臺北市立教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
徐宗國(1996):紮根理論研究法:淵源、原則、技術與涵義。載於胡幼慧主編:質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(47-73頁)。臺北:巨流。
高級中等教育法(2013):中華民國一○二年七月十日總統華總─義字第 10200131151 號公布。
特殊教育法(1997,2009,2013,2014):中華民國八十六年五月十四日總統華總─義字第8600112820號令公布。中華民國九十八年十一月十八日總統華總─義字第09800289381號令修正公布。中華民國一○二年一月二十三日總統華總─義字第10200012441號令修正公布。 中華民國一○三年六月十八日總統華總─義字第10300093311號令修正公布。
特殊教育支援服務與專業團隊設置及實施辦法(2012,2013,2015):中華民國一○一年八月一日臺參字第1010139441C號令。中華民國一○二年九月二十四日臺教學(四)字第1020139576B號令。中華民國一○四年七月三日臺教學(四)字第1040082923B號令。
特殊教育法施行細則(1999,2012,2013):中華民國八十七年五月二十九日教育部臺參字第87057266號令。中華民國一○一年十一月二十六日教育部臺參字第1010214785C號令修正發布。中華民國一○二年七月十二日教育部臺教學(四)字第1020097264B號令修正。
特殊教育課程教材教法及評量方式實施辦法(2010):中華民國九十年十二月三一日教育部臺參字第0990218743C號令修正發布。
翁雁秋(2014):金門縣幼兒園教師參與擬定與實施個別化教育計畫現況與困難(未出版)。國立東華大學特殊教育學系教學碩士論文,花蓮。
教育部(2011):技術型高中教育階段特殊教育課程綱要總綱。特殊教育課程發展共同原則及課程大綱總綱及配套措施。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2011):國民教育階段身心障礙資源班實施原則。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2015):十二年國民基本教育實施計畫之配套措施九「高中職身心障礙學生就學輔導發展方案」。臺北:教育部。
陳韻婷、趙本強(2011):國中智能障礙學生自我決策力現況暨影響因素及支持情形之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報,24,81-106。
陳傳枝(2003):國民小學身心障礙資源班教師執行個別化教育計畫現況之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士論文,彰化。
陳麗如(2004):國民中小學轉銜服務工作之執行現況研究。特殊教育學報,20,141-170。
陳麗如(2008):教導身心障礙的學生自我決策技能。特殊教育季刊,107,1-8。
許銘容(2004):高職特教班教師對學生學習自我決策態度與實施現況之調查(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
許維婷(2011):國中資源班學生自我決策與生活適應之研究(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士論文,臺中。
張宇樑、吳樎椒(譯)(2008):研究設計:質化、量化及混合方法取向(John W. Creswell著:Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods, Approaches)。臺北:學富。(原著出版於2003)
張芳全(2013):研究設計:統計就是要這樣跑第三版。臺北:心理。
張慧美(2008):臺北市國小自閉症學生家長參與其子女個別化教育計畫及特殊教育服務需求之調查(未出版)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系教學碩士論文,臺北。
莊佳萍(2015):學前融合班教保服務人員參與個別化教育計畫現況之擬訂與實施─以高雄市為例(未出版)。國立臺南大學幼兒教育學系在職進修碩士論文,臺南。
鈕文英(2010):自我決策在個別化教育計畫中之實踐。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,2010,95-120 。
鈕文英(2013):邁向優質、個別化的特殊教育服務。臺北:心理。
鈕文英(2014):質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北:雙葉。
湯君穎(2007):國民小學普通班教師參與個別化教育計畫之研究(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系在職專班碩士論文,臺中。
黃柏華(2012):高中職資源服務的現況與運作模式。特殊教育季刊,124,55-64。
黃柏華(2014):高職資源班學生參與個別化教育計畫的支持模式。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,2014,163-178。
黃柏華(2015):高職資源班學生參與個別化教育計畫之行動研究。(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,臺北。
黃俊豪(2016):學校特殊教育行政支援相關服務與運作。嘉義縣特教資訊網,取自http://spcedu.cyc.edu.tw/spcedu/pub/page/down.php?fn=1521。
黃淑婷(2012):身心障礙學生參與個別化教育計畫在增進自我決策能力的應用。國小特殊教育,52,96-103。
黃瑄媚(2014):高中職身心障礙學生自我決策及相關因素之調查研究。(未出版)。中原大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,桃園。
黃韻如(2004):高雄市高中職學習障礙學生學習適應與學校支持系統之研究(未出版)。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,高雄。
黃麗卿(2013):家長參與特殊幼兒個別化教育計畫現況之研究(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學幼兒教育系早期療育在職專班碩士論文,臺中。
曾睡蓮(2004):家長參與個別化教育計畫之現況及其問題之探討──以高雄市立成功啟智學校為例(未出版)。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,高雄。
鄒小蘭(2009):身心障礙資優生優弱勢分析及支援服務系統之探究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育系博士論文,臺北。
新北市高級中等學校輔導普通班身心障礙學生實施計畫(2015):新北市政府教育局新北教特字第1041359671號函核定。
詹沛珊(2006):國小啟智班家長參與個別化教育計畫會議之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育行政碩士論文,彰化。
塗佩珣(2015):學前巡輔教師輔導幼兒園融合班教師了解個別化教育計畫(IEP)之成效(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學幼兒教育系早期療育在職專班碩士論文,臺中。
趙本強(2011):學齡階段身心障礙學生自我決策量表之編製。特殊教育學報,34,101-134。
趙本強(2013):高中職以下身心障礙學生自我決策能力之探究──跨性別、教育階段及障礙類別之分析研究。特殊教育學報,37,11-148。
劉佩嘉(2005):自我決策是遙不可及的夢想嗎?促進智能障礙學生參與IEP/ITP會議之建議作法。特殊教育季刊,97,27-31。
劉佩嘉、林宏熾(2004):高中職特教班智能障礙學生自我決策之研究。特殊教育學報,19,123-156。
劉曉娟(2002):中部地區國中啟智班家長參與個別化教育計畫之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系教學碩士論文,彰化。
劉曉娟、林惠芬(2003):中部地區國中啟智班家長參與個別化教育計畫會議之研究。特殊教育學報,18,1-19。
蔡孟曉(2007):高中職教育階段視覺障礙學生自我決策及相關因素研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,彰化。
蕭佼虹(2011):一位學前巡迴輔導教師參與個別化教育計畫之個案研究(未出版)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
顏婞渝(2015):學前融合班個別化教育計畫實施現況研究(未出版)。南華大學國際事務與企業學系亞太研究碩士論文,嘉義。
盧台華(2011):從個別差異、課程調整與區分性教學的理念談新修訂特殊教育課程綱要的設計與實施。特殊教育季刊,119,1-6。
盧台華主編(2011):高級中等以下學校特殊需求領域課程大綱手冊。臺北:教育部。
盧台華、張靖卿(2003):個別化教育計畫評鑑檢核表之建構研究。特殊教育學刊,24,15-38。
蕭朱亮(2003):高雄市國小啟智班個別化教育計畫實施現況調查及內容檢核之研究(未出版)。國立花蓮師範學院特殊教育教學碩士論文,花蓮。
龔盈涵(2008):學前融合班個別化教育計畫實施現況之研究(未出版)。國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文,新竹。
Abery, B., & Stancliffe, R. (1996). The ecology of self-determination. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp.111-145). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
Agran, M.,& Hughes, C. (2008). Asking Students Input: Students’ Opinion Regarding Their Individulized Education Program Involement. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 69-76.
Algozinne, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D.W., & Wood,W.M. (2001).
Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219-77.
Allen, S., Smith, A., Test, D. W., Flowers, C., & Wood, W. M. (2001). The effects of Self-Directed IEP on student participation in IEP meetings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 107-120.
Arndt, S. A., Konrad, M., & Test, D. W. (2006). Effects of the self-directed IEP on student participation in planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 27(4), 194-207.
Bambara, L. M., & Kern, L. (2005). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Bateman, B.D.& Linden, M.A. (2006). Better IEPs:How to Develop Legally Correct and Educationally Useful Programs. Longmont:Attainment Company.
Bigge, J. L., Stump, C. S., Spagna, M. E., Silberman, R. K.(1999). Curriculum, assessment, and instruction for students with disabilities. Belmont,CA:Wadsworth.
Buntinx, Wil H. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Models of Disability, Quality of Life, and Individualized Supports: Implications for Porofessional Practice in Intellectual Disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 283-294.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational Psycholigist, 26(3&4), 325-346.
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternatives. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
Dipeolu, A., Sniatecki, J. L., Storlie, C. A., Hargrave, S. (2013). Dysfunctional career thoughts and attitudes as predictors of vocational identity among young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 79-84.
Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students’ decisions to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 314-323.
Farmer, T. W., Hall, C. M., Weiss, M. P., Petrin, R. A., Meece, J. L., & Moohr, M. (2011). The school adjustment of rural adolescents with and without disabilities: Variable and perso-center approaches. Journal of Children & Family Studies, 20, 78-88.
Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). Self determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21(2), 113- 128.
Gartin, B. C., & Murdick, N. L. (2005). IDEA 2004: The IEP. Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 327-331.
German, S. L., Martin, J. E.,Marshal, L. H., & Sale, R. P. (2000). Promoting self determination: Using take action to teach goal attainment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23, 27-38.
Grigal, M., Test, D. W., Beattie, J., & Wood, W. M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 63, 357-372.
Grigal, M., Neubert, D.A., Moon, M. S., & Graham, S. (2003). Self-Determination for Students with Disabilities: Views of Parents and Teachers. Exceptional Children, 70 (1), 97-112.
Harris, W. J., & Schultz, P. N. B. (1990). The special education resource program: Rationale and implementation. London: Merrill Publishing Company.
Hartman J. (2016). 5 Points Students With Disabilities Should Know About Their IEPs. Retrieved from https://iachievelearning.com/2016/02/5-points-students-with-disabilities-should-know-about-their-ieps/
Inclusion International(1996). The standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Inclusion International,3, 2-3.
Johnson, D. R., & Emanuel, E. J. (Eds.) (2000). Issues influencing the future of transition programs and services in the United States. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Johnson, D. R., & Sharpe, M. N. (2000). Results of a national survey on the implementation transition service requirements of IDEA of 1990. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 13(2), 15-26.
Kochhar-Bryant, C. & Greene, G. (2009). Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities: A developmental process (Second Edition). Englewood, N.J.: Prentice Hall-Merrill Education Publishers.
Konrad, M., &Test, D. W. (2004). Teaching middle school students with disabilities to use and IEP template. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 101-124.
Konrad, M., Trela, K., & Test, D. W. (2006). Using IEP goals and objectives to teach paragraph writing to high school students with physical and cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 111-124.
Konrad, M. (2008). Involve students in the IEP process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(4), 236-239.
Kroeger, S., Burton, C., Comarata, A., Combs, C., Hamm, C., Hopkins, R., & Kouche, B. (2004). Student voice and critical reflection. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 50-57.
Landmark, L.J., & Zhang D. (2012). Compliance and practices in transition planning: A review of individualized education program documents. Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 327-331.
Licardo, M., & Krajnc, M. S. (2016). Structural Differences in the Self-determination of Upper Secondary Students with and without Disabilities in Vocational Education. Revija za Elementarno Izobrazevanje, 9 (3), 35-52.
Martin, J. E., & Marshall, L. (1997). Choice making: Description of a model project. In M. Agran (Eds.), Student-directed learning: Teaching self determination skills (pp. 224-248). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.
Martin, J. E., Marshall, L. H., & Sale, P. (2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 285-297.
Martin, J.E., Van-Dycke, J.L., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J.E., & Lovett, D.L. (2006). Increasing student participation in their transition IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children,72, 299-316.
Mason, C., Field, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (2004a). Implementation of self determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 441-451.
Mason, C., McGehee-Kovac, M., & Johnson, L. (2004b). How to help students lead their meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 18-24.
Mckim, B. J., & Cowen, E. L. (1987). Multiperspective assessment of young children’s school adjustment. School Psychology Review, 16(3), 370-381.
Morgan, D. L. & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to Use Focus Groups and Why. In D. L. Morgan (Eds.), Successful Focus Group (pp. 3-19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
NICHCY (2002). Helping Student Develop Their IEPs﹝and﹞A Student’s Guide to the IEP (2nd). NICHCY Technical Assistance Guide. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477659.pdf
Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Soresi S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2007). Self‐determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,51, 850-865.
Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 119-138.
Ryan, R. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, school development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E.,
Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., et al. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition,
classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American
Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Seong, Y., Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S.B., Little, T.D. (2015). Effects of the self-directed individualized education program on self-determination and transition of adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 132-141.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Soukup, J. H., Little, T.D., Garner, N., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 2, 488-509.
Steiner, D. M., Cort, R. H., & Delorenzo, J. P.(2010). Guide to Quality Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development and Implementation. New York:The University of the State Education Department of New York the State Education Department.
Test, D. W., Mason, C., Hughes, C., Konrad, M., Neale, M., & Wood, W. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 391-412.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-Determination and Persistence in a Real-Life Setting: Toward a Motivational Model of High School Dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176.
VanReusen, A. K., & Bos, C. (1994). Facilitating student participation in individualized educational programs through motivational strategies and instruction. Exceptional Children, 22, 30-32.
Uphold, N. M., Walker, A. R., & Test, D. W. (2007). Resources for involving students in their IEP process. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 3(4) Article1. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol3/iss4/art1
Ward, M. J. (1988). The many facets of self-determination. NICHCY transition summary. National Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities, 5, 2-3.
Wehmeyer, M. L.(1994). Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescent with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 9-21.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Disability. Oxford University Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C.(2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58-68.
Wehmeyer, M. L. & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,45(5),371-383.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Kelchner, K.(1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington. TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Metzler, C. A.(1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Mental Retardation, 33(2), 111-119.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
Wells, J. C., & Sheehey, P. H. (2012). Person-centered planning: Strategies to encourage participation and facilitate communication. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(3), 32-39.
Wiederholt, J. L., Hammill, D. D., & Brown, V. L.(1993). The Resource Program: Organization and Implementation.Texas: PRO-ED Incorporated.
Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational Psychology(11th ed.) Columbus, OH: Pearson.
Zeitlin, V. M., & Curcic, S.(2014). Parental voices on Individualized Education Programs: ‘Oh, IEP meeting tomorrow? Rum tonight!’ Disability & Society, 29(3). doi: 10.1080/09687599.2013.776493.