簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王秀梅
論文名稱: 多納魯凱語事件參與者之構詞語法表現
Morphosyntactic Manifestations of Participants in Tona (Rukai)
指導教授: 齊莉莎
Elizabeth Zeitoun
黃美金
Huang, Mei-Jin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 144
中文關鍵詞: 多納魯凱語構詞語法
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:345下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文以描述的觀點探討事件參與者在魯凱語多納方言中的構詞語法表現,包括格位標記系統和代名詞系統。魯凱語是台灣南島語的一支,而使用者多納方言的魯凱族主要分布於高雄縣茂林鄉多納村。
    本論文共分四章。第一章簡介多納魯凱語的地理位置及語言背景、本論文的研究方法、音韻系統和動詞詞型變化。
    第二章探討多納魯凱語的格位標記系統。該方言共有兩組格位標記:ki和-an«屬於人稱專有名詞,區分為主格/屬格和斜格;ko和na屬於普通名詞,格位標記功能已經消失,反而表現出「前指」與「非前指」功能的分別。再者,人稱專有名詞的格位標記一定要出現,而普通名詞的格位標記則可省略,但是根據名詞的定指性和在不同的句法結構中會有例外產生。名詞片語的詞序基本上是自由的,但是當格位標記無法指出其句法上的角色時,詞序固定為「動詞─主詞─受詞」。此外,本章也討論了複合名詞片語的內部詞序。接著在有關人類的名詞使用上,發現兩組格位標記皆可使用,此現象反映出說話者可藉由使用不同的格位標記來改變名詞的語意性質。本章最後討論格位標記在名物化的詞或子句中之使用情形。
    第三章探討代名詞系統。以句法功能而論,多納魯凱語有五組人稱代名詞:主題、自由式主格、附著式主格、斜格和屬格。主題代名詞出現在謂語之前,作為句子的主題,和自由式主格同樣的詞形,但是可附加主題標記a-並且後面跟著ka。自由式主格代名詞作為主要子句及補語子句的主詞。附著式主格代名詞加在動詞詞幹之前,可標示說話者/主事者的意願;在命令句中則有強調主事者或命令者的功能。此外,我們發現附著式主格代名詞只用在非實現式的語態中。斜格代名詞基本上作為句子的受詞,不過還可以用來標示一些靜態動詞的經驗者、親屬關係中的所有者,也可以表示時間與地點。屬格代名詞作為領屬關係中的所有者;在疑問句和從屬子句中作為主事者,在這兩種句構中,發現屬格代名詞會與否定詞i-/非實現詞素ni-有語音同化的現象。再者,本章亦討論了代名詞與名詞片語的詞序、代名詞變體出現的語境、第三人稱代名詞的相關特性(包含指示代名詞和可見性)、發現一組非人稱代名詞的使用時機、複數代名詞指涉的慣用法、及人稱代名詞與普通名詞片語共同指涉的用法。
    第四章總結本論文的研究結果,並對未來所要作的研究提出一些看法。附錄則收錄了以前有關多納魯凱語格位標記系統與代名詞系統的研究,並以表格呈現之。

    This thesis investigates the Tona dialect of Rukai, a Formosan language spoken in the Tona Village, Maolin County, Kaohsiung Prefecture, Taiwan. The aim of this thesis is to provide a comprehensive description of the morphosyntactic manifestations of participants including the nominal case marking system and the pronominal system.
    The thesis is organized into four chapters: Chapter One provides a general geographical and linguistic background of Tona (Rukai). It contains the research method and a brief introduction to the phonological system and verb conjugation.
    Chapter Two investigates the nominal case marking system. First, there are two sets of case markers in Tona. The ones for personal proper nouns, ki and -an«, distinguish the nominative/genitive case and the oblique case. Those for common nouns have been neutralized in case distinction but indicate an anaphoric vs. non-anaphoric contrast (ko vs. na). Second, concerning obligatority, the case markers for personal proper nouns are canonically obligatory while those for common nouns are optional. However, they may behave differently according to the definiteness of the head nouns and linguistic structures. Third, the word order of lexical arguments is basically free unless the case markers fail to distinguish their grammatical roles, where the order appears to be VSO. The internal ordering of complex NPs is also discussed. Fourth, an overlapped use of different sets of case markers is found in human nouns, which shows the shift of semantic properties of human nouns. Finally, case markers can be used in nominalized words or clauses.
    Chapter Three discusses the pronominal system. There are five sets of personal pronouns: topic, free nominative, bound nominative, oblique and genitive. Topic pronouns with the same forms as free nominative set serve as the topic of a sentence. They appear before the predicates, followed by ka or/and prefixed by a-. Free nominative pronouns serve as the subject in a matrix or complement clause. Bound nominative pronouns are prefixed to non-finite verbs. They may designate volition of the speaker/agent and serve an emphatic function in imperative sentences but always appear in the irrealis mode. Oblique pronouns canonically serve the object role but in Tona they can also denote experiencers of some stative verbs, designate possessive relation in kinship, time and location. Genitive pronouns denote the possessors in possessive relation. In Tona, they are used in interrogative sentences and subordinate clauses to designate the agent role. Besides, they are assimilated with the negator i- and the irrealis morpheme ni- in these two structures. In addition, this chapter also discusses word order of pronouns and lexical noun phrases, the types of environment where variants of pronouns appear, some idiosyncratic features of third person pronouns including demonstratives and visibility, the contexts for the use of impersonal pronouns, some referential features of plural pronouns and a coreferential property of pronouns and lexical NPs.
    Chapter Four sums up the findings and provides suggestions for future research. The previous analyses concerning the case marking system and the pronominal system of Tona (Rukai) are presented in tables in the appendices.

    1. Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1 General Background …………………………………………… 1 1.2 Literature Review ……………………………………………..... 5 1.3 Motivation and Goals …………………………………………… 8 1.4 Theoretical Framework and Method …………………………… 9 1.5 Source of the Linguistic Data …………………………………… 9 1.6 Prominent Linguistic Features …………………………………... 10 1.6.1 Phonological System ………………………………….. 11 1.6.2 Verb Conjugation ……………………………………... 12 1.7 Thesis Organization ……………………………………………... 14 2. Nominal Case Marking System ………………………………………... 16 2.1 Previous Studies ………………………………………………... 16 2.2 Sets of Case Markers in Tona Rukai …………………………… 18 2.3 Canonical Semantic Properties and Syntactic Roles Designated by Case Markers ……………………………………………….. 19 2.3.1 Semantic Properties ………………………………….. 20 2.3.2 Syntactic Roles ………………………………………. 23 2.3.2.1 ki and -an« ……………………………….. 24 2.3.2.2 ko and na ………………………………..... 26 2.3.2.3 Genitive Case …………………………….. 29 2.4 Distinction between ko and na ………………………………..... 32 2.4.1 Distal vs. Proximal in Huang et al. (1998) …………... 32 2.4.2 Anaphoric vs. Non-anaphoric in the Current Study ………………………………………………….. 35 2.5 Obligatority or Optionality ..…………………………………..... 44 2.5.1 Nominal Predicate ………………………………….... 47 2.5.2 Case Markers in Coordination ……………………….. 48 2.5.3 Case Markers in Topicalized Noun Phrases …………. 50 2.5.4 Case Markers in Coreferential Noun Phrases ……. 52 2.6 Word Order ……………………………………………………... 54 2.7 Overlapped Use of Case Markers in Human Nouns …………… 57 2.8 Case Markers in Nominalization ……………………………….. 60 2.9 Summary ………………………………………………………... 63 3. Pronominal System ……………………………………………………... 66 3.1 Literature Review ……………………………………………..... 66 3.1.1 Phonological Attrition ………………………………... 68 3.1.2 Morphological Shapes ……………………………….. 68 3.1.3 Case Marking ………………………………………… 69 3.1.4 Free/Long Nominative Forms and Topicalization ……. 70 3.1.5 Modal Information Designated by Short Nominative Forms………………………………………………….. 71 3.1.6 Accusative/Oblique Pronouns ………………………... 71 3.1.7 Genitive Pronouns …………………………………..... 72 3.1.8 Ordering of Pronouns ………………………………… 72 3.1.9 Case Realization of the Experiencers of Some Stative Verbs ………………………………………………….. 72 3.1.10 Case Contrast in the Possessive Relation of Kinship and Non-kinship ……………………………………… 73 3.2 Sets of Personal Pronouns in the Current Study ………………... 73 3.3 Free Nominative Pronouns ……………………………………... 75 3.3.1 Subject in the Post-predicate Position ………………... 75 3.3.2 Subject in Complement Clauses ……………………… 79 3.4 Topic ……………………………...……………………………... 81 3.5 Bound Nominative Pronouns ………………………………….... 84 3.5.1 Designating Volition of the Speaker/Agent …………… 84 3.5.2 Irrealis Mode ……..…………………………………… 86 3.5.3 In Imperative Sentences ………………………………. 88 3.6 Oblique Pronouns ……………………………………………...... 89 3.6.1 Syntactic Roles and Distribution ……………………... 89 3.6.2 Experiencers of Some Stative Verbs ………………….. 91 3.6.3 Possessive Relation in Kinship ……………………….. 93 3.6.4 Designating Time and Location ………………………. 96 3.7 Genitive Pronouns ………………………………………………. 97 3.7.1 Possessive Relation …………………………………… 98 3.7.2 In Interrogative Sentences …………………………...... 99 3.7.3 In Subordinate Clauses ……………………………….. 103 3.7.4 Assimilation with the Negator i- and Irrealis Morpheme ni- …………………………………………. 105 3.8 Word Order ……………………………………………………… 108 3.9 Variants ………………………………………………………….. 109 3.9.1 Phonological Environment ……………………………. 110 3.9.2 Morphological Environment: Form Reducing ………... 110 3.9.3 Syntactic Environment ………………………………... 111 3.10 Third Person Pronouns ………………………………………….. 112 3.10.1 Demonstratives as Third Person Pronouns …………… 112 3.10.2 Visibility in Third Person Pronouns …………………... 116 3.11 Impersonal Pronouns …………………………………………..... 118 3.12 Plural Pronouns ………………………………………………..... 122 3.13 Coreferential with Other Pronouns or Lexical Noun Phrases …... 123 3.14 Summary ………………………………………………………… 124 4. Conclusion ………………………………………………………………. 128 4.1 Summary ………………………………………………………… 128 4.2 Suggestions for Future Researches ……………………………… 131 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………….... 133 Appendix A …………………………………………………………………….. 139 Appendix B …………………………………………………………………….. 141

    Blust, Robert. 1997. Rukai stress revisited. Oceanic Linguistics 36.2. 398-403.
    -----. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian
    comparative linguistics. Selected Papers from the Eighth International
    Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-
    kuei Li. 31-94. Symposium series of the Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory
    Office) Academia Sinica, Number 1. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    Chang, Yung-li. 2000. Kavalan Reference Grammar (in Chinese). Taipei: Yuan-liou.
    Chen, Cheng-fu. 1999. Wh-words as Interrogatives and Indefinites in Rukai. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University.
    -----. 2002. Nominalization of interrogatives in Kucapungan Rukai. Language and Linguistics 3.2, ed. by E. Zeitoun (Guest editor), 369-92.
    Clark, Eve. 1978. Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4, Syntax, ed. by J. Greenberg, 85-126. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Comrie, Bernard, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Lexical nominalization. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 349-398. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dyen, Isidore. 1963. The position of the Malayo-polynesian languages of Formosa. Asian Perspectives 7. 261-71.
    Ferrell, Raleigh. 1969. Taiwan Aboriginal Groups: Problems in Cultureal and Linguistic Classification. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
    -----. 1974. Construction markers and subgrouping of Formosan languages. Paper presented to the First International Conference on Comparative Austronesian Linguistics, January 2-7, 1974, Honolulu. Also in South-East Asian Linguistic Studies 3, 199-211, 1979, ed. by Nguyen Dang. Liem.
    -----. 1979. Construction markers and subgrouping of Formosan languages. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies 3, 199-211, ed. by Nguyen Dang Liem. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, C-45.
    Foley, William A. and Mike Olson. 1985. Claushood and verb serialization. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field, ed. by Johanna Nicholsand Anthony Woodbury, 17-60. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Givo@n, T. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Languages 4. 333-77.
    -----. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction Vol. II. Amesterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    -----. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction Vol I. Amesterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Ho, Dah-An. 1983. The Position of Rukai in the Formosan Languages (in Chinese). Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 54. 121-68.
    Huang, Lillian M. 1993. A study of Atayal syntax. Taipei: The Crane Pub Co.
    -----. 1995. A study of Mayrinax syntax. Taipei: The Crane Pub Co.
    -----. 2000. Puyuma reference grammar (in Chinese). Taipei: Yuan-liou.
    -----. 2002. Nominalization in Mayrinax Atayal. Language and Linguistics 3.2, ed. by E. Zeitoun (Guest editor), 197-226.
    Huang, Lillian M. et al. 1998. A typological overview of nominal case-marking
    of the Formosan languages. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, ed. by Shuan-fan Huang, 21-48. Taipei: The Crane Pub Co.
    -----. 1999a. Interrogative constructions in some Formosan languages. Chinese
    Language and Linguiatics V: Interactions in Language, ed. by Yuen-mei Yin, I-li
    Yang and Hui-chen Chan, 639-80. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -----. 1999b. A typological overview of pronominal systems of some Formosan
    languages. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Chinese
    Linguistics, ed. by Hsu Wang, Feng-fu Tsao, and Chin-fa Lien, 165-98. Taipei:
    The Crane Pub Co.
    Hsin, Tien-Hsin. 2000. Aspects of Maga Rukai Phonology. Ph. D. Dissertation.
    University of Connecticut.
    Kuo, John Ching-hua. 1979. Budai Complementation. MA Thesis, Taipei: Fu
    Jen Catholic University.
    Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1973. Rukai structure. Institute of History and Philology, Special Publication 64. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -----. 1975. Rukai texts. Institute of History and Philology, Special Publications 64.2. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -----. 1977. The internal relationships of Rukai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 48. 1-92.
    -----. 1978 Linguistic areal features (in Chinese). Festschrift in honour of Professor Wan-li Chu on His 70th Birthday. 475-89. Taipei: Lian-ching Publisher, Inc.
    -----. 1990. Classification of Formosan languages: Lexical evidence. Bulletin of
    the Institute of History and Philology 61. 811-37.
    -----. 1992. Orthographic Systems for Formosan Languages. Taipei: Ministry of Education, Republic of China.
    -----. 1995. Distribution of the Formosan languages and migration of the tribes (in
    Chinese). Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Languages in
    Taiwan, ed. by Feng-fu Tsao and Mei-hui Tsai. The third keynote speech, 1-14.
    Taipei: The Crane Pub Co.
    -----. 1996a. The Formosan Tribes and Languages in I-Lan (in Chinese), Monograph Series of I-Lan History Linguistics 1. I-Lan: I-Lan Prefecture Government.
    -----. 1996b. The pronominal systems in Rukai. Festschrift in honour of Professor Isidore Dyen, ed. by Nothofer Bernd, 210-30. Hamburg: Abera Verlag Meyer.
    -----. 1997a. The Tona dialect (in Chinese). The Formosan languages of Kaohsiung, ed. by Paul Jen-kei Li, 119-158. Kaohsiung: Kaohsiung Prefecture Government.
    -----. 1997b. A syntactic typology of Formosan languages – case markers on
    nouns and pronouns. Chinese languages and linguistics: Typological studies of
    languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 343-78. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -----. 2002. Nominalization in Pazih. Language and Linguistics 3.2, ed. by E. Zeitoun (Guest editor), 227-240.
    Li, Paul Jen-kei and Claire Saillard. 1997. The Maga dialect (in Chinese). The
    Formosan languages of Kaohsiung, ed. by Paul Jen-kei Li, 8-118. Kaohsiung:
    Kaohsiung Prefecture Government.
    Lo_bner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4. 279-326.
    Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Martin, Robert M. 1988. The meaning of language. Massachusetts: The MIT
    Press.
    Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62.1. 56-119.
    Ogawa, Naoyoshi, and Asai Erin. 1935. The myths and traditions of the Formosan
    native tribes. Taihoku: Taihoku Teikoku Daigaku Geng-gaku Kenkyu shitsu.
    Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Saillard, Claire. 1995. Is Maga accusative or ergative? Evidence from case
    marking. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Languages in
    Taiwan, ed. by Feng-fu Tsao and Mei-hui Tsai, A2-01-A2-15. Taipei: The Crane Pub Co.
    -----. 1997. The Maga dialect (in Chinese). The Formosan Languages of Kaohsiung, ed. by Paul Jen-kei Li, 8-119. Kaohsiung: Kaohsiung Prefecture Government.
    Searle, John R.. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Shelley, George LeRoy. 1978. Vudai Dukai: the language, its context, and its
    relationships. Ph.D. Dissertation. Hartford: The Hartford Seminary Foundation.
    Starosta, Stanley. 1988. A grammatical typology of Formosan languages. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology in Memory of Dr. Fang Kuei Li 59.2. 541-76.
    -----. 1995. A grammatical subgrouping of Formosan languages.
    Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan, ed. by Paul Jen-kuei Li, Cheng-hwa
    Tsang, Ying-kuei Huang, Dah-an Ho and Chiu-yu Tseng, 683-726. Symposium
    Series of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica No. 3. Taipei:
    Academia Sinica.
    Tan, Cindy Ro-lan. 1997. Simple sentences in Puyuma. MA thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Teng, Stacy F. 1997. Complex sentences in Puyuma. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Trask, R.L. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
    Tsuchida, Shigeru. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology. Study of
    Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Monograph Series No. 5, Tokyo.
    -----. 1995. Alienable and inalienable distinction in Puyuma? Austronesian Studies. 793-804.
    Tu, Wen-chiu. 1994. A Synchronic Classification of Rukai Dialects in Taiwan: A
    Quantitative Study of Mutual Intelligibility. Ph. D. Dissertation, Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Wu, Joy Jing-lan. 1995. Complex sentences in Amis. MA thesis, Taipei: National
    Taiwan Normal University.
    Yeh, Marie M., et al. 1998. A preliminary study on negative constructions in some
    Formosan languages. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on
    Languages in Taiwan, ed. by Shuan-fan Huang, 79-110. Taipei: The Crane Pub
    Co.
    Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 1992. A Study of Focus and Case Markers in Tsou: Syntax and Semantics. MA Thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
    -----. 1993. A semantic study of Tsou case markers. Bulletin of
    the Institute of History and Philology 64.4. 969-89.
    -----. 1995. Problmes de linguistique dans les langues aborignes de
    Taiwan. Ph. D dissertation. [English version: Issues on Formosan linguistics] Paris, France: Universit Rn Diderot Paris 7. (June, 14, 1995)
    -----. 1997a. Coding of grammatical relations in Mantauran (Rukai). Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 68.1. 149-81.
    -----. 1997b. The pronominal system of Mantauran (Rukai). Oceanic Linguistics 36.2. 114-48.
    -----. 1997c. The Mantauran dialect (in Chinese). The Formosan languages of Kaohsiung, ed. by Paul Jen-kei Li, 159-225. Kaohsiung: Kaohsiung Prefecture Government.
    -----. 2000a. Rukai reference grammar (in Chinese). Taipei: Yuan-liou.
    -----. 2000b. Notes on a possessive construction in the Formosan languages. Grammatical analysis: Morphology, syntax and semantics, ed. by De Guzman, Videa P and Byron Bender, 241-57. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
    -----. 2000c. Dynamic vs. stative verbs in Mantauran (Rukai). Oceanic Linguistics 39.2. 415-427.
    -----. 2000d. Bunun reference grammar (in Chinese). Taipei: Yuan-liou.
    -----. 2000e. Tsou Reference Grammar (in Chinese). Taipei: Yuan-liou.
    -----. 2001. The Tona Dictionary. ms. (Report project for the Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan)
    -----. 2002. Nominalization in Mantauran (Rukai). Language and Linguistics 3.2, ed. by E. Zeitoun (Guest editor), 241-82.
    -----. 2003. Annotated Tona Texts. ms. (Can be found in the “Formosan Language Archive” in www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/formosan)
    -----. 2003. Toward a reconstruction of Proto-Rukai morpho-syntax. Keynote address at AFLA X, Hawaii, March 28-30, 2003.
    Zeitoun, Elizabeth, and Lillian M. Huang. 1997. Toward a typology of tense, aspect and modality in the Formosan languages: a preliminary study. Chinese languages and linguistics: Typological studies of languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 595-618. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -----. 2000. Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 39.2. 391-414.
    Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Ching-hua Yu, and Cui-xia Weng. 2003. The Formosan Language Archive: Development of a multimedia tool to salvage the languages and oral traditions of the indigenous tribes of Taiwan. Oceanic Linguistics 42.1. 218-32.
    Zeitoun, Elizabeth, et al. 1999. Existential, possessive and locative constructions in the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 38.1. 1-42.

    QR CODE