簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃雅惠
論文名稱: 母親預防幼兒跌落行為相關因素之研究
指導教授: 姜逸群
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 健康促進與衛生教育學系
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 89
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 152
中文關鍵詞: 跌落母親安全措施PRECEDE-PROCEED模式幼兒
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:218下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究之目的在運用PRECEDE-PROCEED模式之教育與生態學評估過程,探討與預防幼兒跌落有關之素質因素、促進因素及增強因素與幼兒母親預防幼兒跌落行為間的關係,以提供未來有效協助母親預防家中幼兒跌落之參考。以分層隨機抽樣之方法,由台北市公立托兒所19所中抽出4所,以自編之結構式問卷針對幼兒母親進行問卷調查。所得資料以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及多元迴歸等進行分析。重要結果如下:一、在素質因素方面,發現研究對象對幼兒發展知識之認知情形較佳、自覺嚴重性較強、自我效能較高,而自覺障礙性較低者,較會採行預防幼兒跌落之安全措施;在促進因素方面,預防幼兒跌落之資源及能力較高者,較會採行預防幼兒跌落之安全措施;在增強因素方面,重要他人之贊同度較高者,較會採行預防幼兒跌落之安全措施。進一步發現,幼兒發展知識、自覺障礙性及自我效能對於母親預防幼兒跌落行為較具影響力。二、研究對象有關預防幼兒跌落資訊之來源,主要為媒體及重要他人。三、在預防幼兒跌落之安全措施方面,使用防滑設備、居家地面保持清潔乾燥及幼兒床加裝空隙適當的床欄等項目,都有50%左右的研究對象未採行。四、家中幼兒有跌落經驗之母親,其自覺罹患性及自覺嚴重性皆低於無經驗者。五、職業等級較低、社經地位較低、家中幼兒曾發生跌落及住家建築為大廈之研究對象,其家中採行預防幼兒跌落之安全措施較少。根據研究之結果,建議教育內容可由幼兒發展知識、自覺障礙性及自我效能方面著手;行政方面可促使相關設備之普及與提供教保人員安全教育課程;研究方面則可擴大研究對象,進行教育介入研究。 The main purpose of this study is to explore its relationship among Predisposing factors, Reinforcing factors, Enabling factors and mothers’ preventive behavior about early childhood fall, on the basis of the educational and ecological assessment process of the PRECEDE - PROCEED model, for reference of assisting mothers to prevent early childhood fall at home effectively in the future. With stratified random sampling method, 4 of 19 public daycare centers in Taipei were chosen, to give questionnaire survey to mothers with early childhood by structured questionnaire formulated by the author. The data was analyzed by descriptive analysis, One-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression, and the major findings were concluded as follows: 1.In the respect of Predisposing factors, it is found that the research subjects with relatively better recognition about early childhood development knowledge, higher self-efficacy, higher perceived seriousness, and lower perceived barriers, have adopted relatively more safety measures for preventing early childhood fall. For Reinforcing factors, those with relatively higher resources and ability in preventing early childhood fall have adopted relatively more safety measures against early childhood fall. For Enabling factors, those who have relatively higher acknowledgement from important others have adopted relatively more safety measures against early childhood fall. It is found, furthermore, that early childhood development knowledge, perceived barriers and self-efficacy have relatively significant influence on the prevention of early childhood fall by mothers. 2.The information source concerning safety measures about early childhood fall for research subjects is mainly media and important others. 3.In terms of safety measures preventing early childhood fall, items such as using skidproof facilities, home floor maintaining cleanness and dryness, early childhood bed being added with bed defending bar at proper gaps etc., have not been adopted by around 50% of research subjects. 4.For mothers who have early childhood with falling experience, their perceived susceptibility and perceived seriousness are universally lower than these without this kind of experience. 5.Research subjects with relatively lower professional grade, social and economic level, early childhood having fallen before at home, and residence being building have adopted relatively less safety measures against early childhood fall at home. Based on research results, it is recommended that education content can start from early childhood development knowledge, perceived barriers and self-efficacy; for the administrational aspect, it can promote the popularization of related equipments and provide safety education courses to child’s kindergarten and day-care center teachers; and in the respect of research, research subjects can be expanded to carry out education intervention research.

    The main purpose of this study is to explore its relationship among
    Predisposing factors, Reinforcing factors, Enabling factors and mothers’
    preventive behavior about early childhood fall, on the basis of the educational
    and ecological assessment process of the PRECEDE - PROCEED model, for
    reference of assisting mothers to prevent early childhood fall at home
    effectively in the future. With stratified random sampling method, 4 of 19
    public daycare centers in Taipei were chosen, to give questionnaire survey to
    mothers with early childhood by structured questionnaire formulated by the
    author. The data was analyzed by descriptive analysis, One-way ANOVA, Pearson
    ’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression, and the major findings
    were concluded as follows:
    1.In the respect of Predisposing factors, it is found that the research
    subjects with relatively better recognition about early childhood development
    knowledge, higher self-efficacy, higher perceived seriousness, and lower
    perceived barriers, have adopted relatively more safety measures for
    preventing early childhood fall. For Reinforcing factors, those with
    relatively higher resources and ability in preventing early childhood fall
    have adopted relatively more safety measures against early childhood fall. For
    Enabling factors, those who have relatively higher acknowledgement from
    important others have adopted relatively more safety measures against early
    childhood fall. It is found, furthermore, that early childhood development
    knowledge, perceived barriers and self-efficacy have relatively significant
    influence on the prevention of early childhood fall by mothers.
    2.The information source concerning safety measures about early childhood fall
    for research subjects is mainly media and important others.
    3.In terms of safety measures preventing early childhood fall, items such as
    using skidproof facilities, home floor maintaining cleanness and dryness,
    early childhood bed being added with bed defending bar at proper gaps etc.,
    have not been adopted by around 50% of research subjects.
    4.For mothers who have early childhood with falling experience, their
    perceived susceptibility and perceived seriousness are universally lower than
    these without this kind of experience.
    5.Research subjects with relatively lower professional grade, social and
    economic level, early childhood having fallen before at home, and residence
    being building have adopted relatively less safety measures against early
    childhood fall at home.
    Based on research results, it is recommended that education content can start
    from early childhood development knowledge, perceived barriers and self-
    efficacy; for the administrational aspect, it can promote the popularization
    of related equipments and provide safety education courses to child’s
    kindergarten and day-care center teachers; and in the respect of research,
    research subjects can be expanded to carry out education intervention research.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機及重要性 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 待答問題 4 第四節 研究假設 5 第五節 名詞界定 6 第六節 研究限制 10 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 幼兒事故傷害之流行病學特性 11 第二節 跌落與幼兒發展之關係 14 第三節 PRECEDE-PROCEED模式之應用 17 第四節 影響幼兒父母事故傷害預防行為之相關因素 21 第五節 預防幼兒跌落之安全措施 31 第三章 研究方法 37 第一節 研究架構 37 第二節 研究對象 38 第三節 研究工具 39 第四節 實施步驟 51 第五節 資料處理與分析 53 第四章 結果與討論 57 第一節 研究對象之背景描述 57 第二節 預防幼兒跌落之安全措施 61 第三節 預防幼兒跌落之素質因素、促進因素與增強因素 63 第四節 素質因素、促進因素及增強因素與安全措施 78 第五節 社會人口學特性影響素質因素、促進因素及增強因素之情形 84 第六節 社會人口學特性影響安全措施之情形 102 第五章 結論與建議 109 第一節 結論 109 第二節 建議 112 參考文獻 115 附錄一 效度考驗專家名單 123 附錄二 預試問卷 124 附錄三 正式問卷 138 附錄四 中華民國臺灣地區家庭收支調查報告 152 圖表目錄 表1-1 各等級之職業別 8 表1-2 社經地位等級分佈表 9 圖2-1 素質因素、促進因素及增強因素與行為之關係 22 圖2-4 與父母安全行為有關的學齡前兒童事故傷害過程 33 圖3-1 研究架構圖 37 表3-1 台北市公立托兒所收托之幼兒人數表 38 表3-2 預試問卷回收情形 41 表3-3 預試問卷信度分析 41 表3-4 預試幼兒發展知識之難度與鑑別度統計表 42 表3-5 正式問卷信度分析 51 表3-6 正式施測問卷回收情形一覽表 52 表3-7 各變項計分方式及意義 53 表3-7 各變項計分方式及意義(續) 54 表3-8 本研究統計方法摘要表 56 表4-1 研究對象社會人口學資料統計表 59 表4-1 研究對象社會人口學資料統計表(續) 60 表4-2 研究對象預防幼兒跌落安全措施統計表 64 表4-2 研究對象預防幼兒跌落安全措施統計表(續) 65 表4-3 幼兒發展知識題目答對率統計表 66 表4-4 研究對象自覺罹患性之得分統計 68 表4-5 研究對象自覺嚴重性之得分統計 69 表4-6 研究對象自覺利益性之得分統計 71 表4-7 研究對象自覺障礙性之得分統計 72 表4-8 研究對象自我效能之得分統計 74 表4-9 研究對象預防幼兒跌落之資訊來源 75 表4-10 研究對象預防幼兒跌落的資源之得分統計 76 表4-11 研究對象預防幼兒跌落的能力之得分統計 77 表4-12 重要他人對預防幼兒跌落的看法之得分統計 78 表4-13 素質因素與安全措施之相關係數表 80 表4-14 促進因素與安全措施之相關係數表 80 表4-15 增強因素與安全措施之相關係數表 81 表4-16 幼兒發展知識、自覺嚴重性、自覺障礙性、自我效能、預防跌落之資源、預防跌 落之能力及重要他人之意見之相關矩陣 82 表4-17 顯著變項對安全措施之多元迴歸分析 83 表4-18 顯著變項對安全措施之迴歸係數統計考驗 83 表4-19 社會人口學變項與素質因素之相關係數表 85 表4-20 社會人口學變項對幼兒發展知識之變異數分析摘要表 86 表4-21 社會人口學變項對自覺罹患性之變異數分析摘要表 87 表4-22 社會人口學變項對自覺嚴重性之變異數分析摘要表 90 表4-23 社會人口學變項對自覺利益性之變異數分析摘要表 91 表4-24 社會人口學變項對自覺障礙性之變異數分析摘要表 94 表4-25 社會人口學變項對自我效能之變異數分析摘要表 95 表4-26 社會人口學變項與促進因素之相關係數表 98 表4-27 社會人口學變項對預防幼兒跌落的資源之變異數分析摘要表 99 表4-28 社會人口學變項對預防幼兒跌落的能力之變異數分析摘要表 100 表4-29 社會人口學變項與增強因素之相關係數表 102 表4-30 社會人口學變項對重要他人之變異數分析摘要表 103 表4-31 社會人口學變項與安全措施之相關係數表 107 表4-32 社會人口學變項對安全措施之變異數分析摘要表 108

    一、中文部份
    王有欽(民75)。花蓮市民事故傷害及就醫情形之流行病學研究。台北:國防醫學院社會
    醫學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    王國川(民84)。從PRECEDE模式中教育與行為診斷來探討青少年預防事故傷害發生之影響
    因素。師大學報,42,75-93。
    王文科(民85)。教育研究法(增訂新版)。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    王秀媞、王瑞霞(民89)。以PRECEDE模式探討五專生愛滋病預防行為意圖。護理研究,8(
    3),349-361。
    白璐(民81)。學童家庭之家庭事故傷害流行病學研究。行政院衛生署委託計畫DOH81-TD-
    53。
    白璐(民83)。學齡前兒童事故傷害防制推動計畫。行政院衛生署委託計畫DOH83-HP-115
    行政院衛生署(民53-87)。衛生統計。台北:行政院衛生署。
    行政院衛生署(民86)。幼兒意外事故預防手冊。台北:行政院衛生署。
    行政院衛生署(民87)。幼兒居家安全手冊。台北:信誼基金出版社。
    行政院衛生署(民88)。中華民國八十七年台灣地區衛生統計(一)。台北:正中書局
    。82-84;104。
    杜友蘭、葉金川、林芸芸、趙秀雄(民69)。台北市幼稚園、托兒所兒童事故傷害流行病
    學之研究。醫學研究,3,951-966。
    李寶璽(民82)。三至六歲兒童意外災害城鄉的比較研究。台北:國防醫學院公共衛生研
    究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    李啟澤、李孟智(民87)。幼兒安全防護網。健康世界,148,105-116。
    吳明玲、季瑋珠、王榮德(民82)。1964-1990年間台灣地區兒童意外事故死亡趨勢及潛在
    生命損失分析。中華衛誌,12(4),421-433。
    邱啟潤、黃毓華、柯任桂、仇方娟、黃銹垣(民87)。以PRECEDE模式探討都市上班族群健
    康生活型態之相關因素。高雄醫誌,14,339-347。
    邱啟潤、吳瓊滿、王瑞霞、李淑婷(民88)。以PRECEDE模式分析老人健康檢查的行為。高
    雄醫誌,15,348-358。
    胡幼慧(民84)。社會流行病學。台北:巨流圖書公司。
    姜逸群、黃雅文(民81)。衛生教育與健康促進。台北:景文。
    常欣怡(民88)。幼兒園中幼兒安全之調查研究。台北:靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所
    碩士論文(未出版)。
    曹昭懿、王榮德(民84)。台灣的事故傷害防制。台北:健康世界雜誌社。
    郭雪英(民84)。家庭托育環境安全指導之實驗研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學衛生教育
    研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    梁繼權(民81)。學齡前兒童外傷害預防之預期指導。行政院衛生署委託計畫DOH81-HP-
    007
    張菡育(民83)。幼兒居家安全-事故傷害之探討。幼兒教育年刊,7,29-46。
    張劭勳、林秀娟(民84)。SPSS For Windows統計分析:初等統計與高等統計。台北:松
    岡圖書。
    張欣戊、徐嘉宏、程小危、雷庚玲、郭靜晃(民87)。發展心裡學。台北:國立空中大學

    張慧芝(民90)。人類發展-兒童心理學。台北:桂冠圖書。
    陳立慧、吳明玲、白璐、王榮德(民84)。兒童身邊的頭號殺手,事故傷害之防治。健康
    世界(新版109),64-79。
    陳霈儒(民89)。國中學生對菸害防治法之遵行意願與遵行行為相關因素之研究。台北:
    國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳麗霞(民89)。幼兒意外事故的預防。親子教育,94,14-16。
    黃松元(民89)。健康促進與健康教育。台北:師大書苑。
    黃碧桃(民88)。嬰幼兒的事故傷害。健康世界,158,65-71。
    黃昆輝(民67)。我國大學入學考試報考者與錄取者家庭社經背景之比較分析。教育研究所
    集刊,20,321-322。
    楊春貴(民80)。嬰兒事故傷害的流行病學研究。台北:國防醫學院公共衛生研究所碩士
    論文(未出版)。
    廖信榮(民82)。台北市房屋建築工地勞工使用個人防護具習慣及相關因素調查研究。台
    北:國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    鄧文蕙(民80)。幼兒家庭事故傷害與照顧者對幼兒事故傷害防範及處理之認識。台北:
    國防醫學院公共衛生研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    鄭英裕、張瓊云、黃麗娟(民88)。中美兒童居家安全之比較。兒童福利論叢,3,225-
    255。
    蔡悅琪、鐘嫈嫈、歐聖運,(民81)。馬偕紀念醫院住院燒傷病童之分析研究。中華家庭
    醫學雜誌,2(3),130-139。
    龔如菲、陳姣伶、李德芬、游淑芬(民90)。嬰幼兒發展與輔導。台北:啟英文化。
    二、英文部份
    Alwash, R., McCarthy, M., (1988). Accidents in the home among children under
    5: Ethnic differences or social disadvantage? British Medical Journal, 296,
    1450-1453.
    Baltimore, C.L., & Meyer, R.J., (1968). A study of storage, child behavioral
    traits,and mother's knowledge of toxicology in 52 poisoned families and 52
    comparison families. Pediatrics, 42, 312-317.
    Brown,G.W.& Davidson,S.(1978). Social class, psychiatric disorder of the
    mother, and accidents to children. Lancet, 1, 378
    Baker S.P. (1980). Prevention of childhood injuries. Medical Journal of
    Australia, 1, 466-470.
    Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Engleeood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1980).Gauging the relationship between self-efficacy judgment and
    action. Cognitive Therapy and Research,4,263-268.
    Baker S.P. (1981). Childhood injuries: The community approach to prevention.
    Journal of Public Health Policy, 2(3), 235-246.
    Baker S.P., Neill O.B., & Karpf S. (1984). The Injury Fact Book. Lexington,
    Mass, Lexington Books.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social
    Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Bangdiwala, S.I., & Anzola-Perez, E. (1990). The incidence of injuries in
    young people: Ⅱ Long-linear multivariable models for risk factors in
    collaborative study in Brazil, Chile, Cuba and Venezuela. International
    Epidemiological Association, 19(1), 125-132.
    Baker S.P. (1991). The Injury fact book. New York: University Press.
    Branko, K. & Thomas, M.W. (1996). Population based study of unintentional
    injuries in the home. American Journal of Epidemiology, 144(5), 456-462.
    Colver A.,Hutchinson P. & Judson E. (1982) Promoting children’s home safety.
    British Medical Journal, 285,1170-1180.
    Cliff K, Li H. (1983). Children in Danger: Accidents in the Home. Nursing
    Mirror, 16, i-viii.
    Cheung Y.B.(1998) Accident, assaults, and marital status. Soc Sci Med,47, 325-
    1329.
    Daniels, J.H., Hampton, E.L.,& Newberger, E.H. (1983).Child abuse and
    accidents in black families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 48, 595-603.
    Deal L.W., Gomby D.S., Zippiroli L., & Behrman R.E. (2000). Unintentional
    injuries in childhood: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children,
    10(1),4-21.
    Eichelberger,M.R., Gotsceall,C.S., Feely,H.B., Harstard,P. & Bowman,L.M. (
    1990) Parental attitudes and knowledge of child safety. American Journal of
    Diseases of Children, 144, 714-720.
    Fidell, L.S. & Tabachnick, B.G. 1996). Using multivariate statistics. 3rd.
    Harper collins College Publishers.
    Fedorchak & Paul(1999).Inventor keeps guard to ensure child safety.Indianapolis
    Business Journal,20(22),5-6.
    Gallahue,D.L. (1976). Motor development and movement experiences for young
    children.N.Y.:John Wiley & Sons.
    Gustafsson, L.H. (1977). Childhood accident: three epidemiological studies on
    the etiology. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 5,3-13.
    Green, L.W., Kreuter, M.W., Deeds, S. G., & Partridge, K. B. (1980). Health
    Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach. Mountain View,CA.: Mayfield Publish
    Company.
    Gallahue,D.L. (1982). Understanding motor development in children.N.Y.:John
    Wiley & Sons.
    Gallagher, S.S., Finison, K., Guyer B., & Goodenough, (1984). The incidence of
    injuries among 87,000 Massachusetts children and adolescents: Results of the
    1980-81 statewide childhood injury prevention program surveillance system.
    American Journal of Public Health, 74(12),1340 -1347.
    Gallagher SS, Hunter P, Guyer B, (1985). A home injury prevention program for
    Children. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 32(1), 95-112.
    Godding, P.R.,& Glasgow,R.E.(1985).Self-efficacy and outcome expectations as
    predictors of controlled smoking state. Cognitive Therapy and Research,9(5),
    583-590.
    Garling, T., Garling, A., Mauritzon-Sandberg, E. & Bjornstig,U.(1989) Child
    safety in the home: mother's perception of dangers to young children.
    Architecture & Comportement / Architecture & Behaviour, 5, 293-304.
    Glik D.,Kronenfeld J.,Jackson K. (1991). Predictors of risk perception of
    childhood injury among parents of preschoolers. Health Education Quarterly, 18(
    3), 285-301.
    Green,L.W. & Kreuter,M.W.(1991). Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and
    Environmental Approach. Mountain View, CA.: Mayfield Publishing CO.
    Garling,A. & Garling,T. (1993). Mothers’ Perception of Risk of Unintentional
    Injury to Young Children. Paper of the Symposium Conceptual Issues in Children
    ’s Injury Prevention.
    Glik D.,Kronenfeld J.& Jackson K. (1993a). Safety behaviors among parents of
    preschoolers. Health Values, 17(1), 18-27.
    Glik D., Greaves P., Kronenfeld J.& Jackson K. (1993b). Safety hazards in
    households with young children. Journal of Pediatric psychology,18(1), 115-131.
    Glanz, K., Lewis F.M. & Rimer, B.K. (1997). Health Behavior and Health
    Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass Inc.
    Green,L.W. & Kreuter,M.W.(1999). Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and
    Ecological Approach. Mountain View, CA.: Mayfield Publishing CO.
    Haddon W. & Baker S., (1981). Injury Control. In D.W. Clark & B. MacMahon (
    Eds.) Preventive and Community Medicine. New York: Little Brown and Company.
    109-140.
    Horwitz, S.M., Morgenstern, H., Dipietro, L.,& Morrison, C.L.(1988).
    Detreminants of pediatric injuries. American Journal of Diseases of Children,
    142, 605-611.
    Howat P.,Jones S., Hall M., Cross D. & Stevenson M.(1997). The PRECEDE-PROCEED
    model: Application to planning a child pedestrian injury prevention program.
    Injury Prevention, 3, 282-287.
    Kronenfeld J.J., Glik D., & Jackson K. (1991). Home fire safety and related
    behaviors among parents of preschoolers. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 8(
    3/4), 31-40.
    Kloos, H. (1995). Human behavior, health education and schistosomiasis
    control: a review. Soc Sci Med , 40, 1497-1511.
    Langley, J. & Silva,P.A.(1982) Childhood accident: parents' attitudes to
    prevention. Australian Paediatric Journal,18, 247-249.
    Murdock R. & Eva J. (1974). Home accidents to children under 15 years: survey
    of 910 cases. British Medical Journal, 3, 103-106.
    Matheny A.P. (1986). Injuries among toddlers: Contribution from child, mother,
    and family. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11(2), 163-176.
    Matheny A.P. (1987). Psychological characteristics of childhood accident.
    Journal of Social Issues, 43(2), 56-60.
    Mullen P.D., Hersey J.C. & Iverson D.C., (1989). Health behavior models
    compared. Soc Sci Med, 24, 973-981.
    McLaughlin E., & McGuire A., (1990). The causes, cost and prevention of
    childhood burn injuries. American Journal of Disease of the Child, 144, 677-
    683.
    National Safe Kids Campaign(1993). HALLOWEN--Safety measures.Good Housekeeping,
    217(4),94.
    National Safety Council Report (1981). Accident facts. Chicago: National
    Safety Council.
    Nersesian W.S., Petit M.R., & Shaper R. (1985). Childhood death and poverty: A
    study of all childhood deaths in Maine, 1976 to 1980. Pediatrics, 75, 41-50.
    National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control (1989). Injury Prevention:
    Meeting the Challenge. New York, N.Y.:Oxford University Press.
    Parcel G.S. (1984). Theoretical models for application in school health
    education research. Journal of School Health, 54, 39-49.
    Pless I.B. & Arsenault, L. (1987) The role of health education in the
    prevention of injuries to children. Journal of Social Issues, 43(2), 87-103.
    Peterson L., Farmer J., & Kashani JH. (1990). Parental injury prevention
    endeavors: a function of health beliefs? Health Psychology, 9(2),177 -191.
    Paton,T.J., Lee,N.J., Yacoub,W.R. & Angus,B. (1991) A health centre survey of
    childhood injury in Edmonton. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 82, 436-437.
    Rivara, F.P. (1982). Epidemiology of Childhood Injuries. In A.B. Bergman (Ed.)
    Prevention Childhood Injuries. Columbus: Ross Roundtable Laboratories.
    Rivara, F.P. & Howard, D. (1982). Parental knowledge of child development and
    injury risk. Development and Behavioral Pediatrics, 3, 103-105.
    Ringwalt C.L., DeVellis,B.M., Runyan,C.W.,DeVellis, R.F. & Willenbreaker I.E.(
    1986) Parental beliefs associated with the use of child restraint devices.
    Health Education Research;1(4),236-271.
    Rice D.P. & MacKenzin E.J., (1989). Cost of Injury in the United States: A
    Report to Congress. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health and Aging,
    University of California Injury Prevention Center, The Johns Hopkins
    University.
    Selby M.L., Riportella-Muller R., Sorenson J.R. & Walters, C.R. (1989).
    Improving EPSDT use: development and application of a practice-based model for
    public health nursing research, Public Health Nursing, 6, 174-181.
    Sherer, M., Maddux, J.E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., &
    Rogers, R.W.(1982).The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation.
    Psychological Reports, 51,663- 671.
    Silver & Julie(2001).Is your home a safe haven? Accent on Living, 46(1), 60-
    65.
    Steel K., Grandidier H., Mills K., McGlade K.&Reilly P. (1994). Accidents in
    the community: A role for the primary care team? Health Education Journal, 53,
    73-80.
    Sellstorm E., Bremberg S. & Chang, A. (1994). Injuries in Swedish day-care
    centers. Pediatrics supplement, 94(6), 1033-1036.
    Sellstrom E., & Bremberg, S. (1996). Perceived social norms as crucial
    determinants of mother’s injury-preventive behaviour. Acta paediatr, 85, 702-
    707.
    Sellstrom E., Bremberg S., Garling A., & Homquist JO. (2000). Risk of
    childhood injury: predictor of mother’s perception. Scand Journal of Public
    Health, 28:188-193.
    Tokuhata G.K., Colfesh V.G. Digton E. (1974). Childhood injuries associated
    with consumer products. New York, Academic Press, 245-256.
    Towner E. (1995). The role of health education in childhood injury prevention.
    Injury Prevention, 1, 53-58.
    Wortel, E. & Ooijendijk,W.T.M(1988) Prevention of Home- related accidents of
    children: Research on Parental preventive behavior and behavioural determinants
    .NIPG-TNO.Leiden.
    Wortel, E. & De Geus G.H. (1993). Prevention of home related injuries of pre-
    school children: safety measures taken by mothers. Health Education Research,
    8,217-231.
    Wortel E.,De Geus G.H.,Kok G.& van Woerkum C. (1994). Injury control in pre-
    school children: a review of parental safety measures and the behavioural
    determinants. Health Education Research, 9(2), 201-213.

    QR CODE