研究生: |
張馨方 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
社會投資形模與其責信之研究 Studies in Formation and Accountability of Social Investment |
指導教授: | 鄭勝分 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
社會教育學系 Department of Adult and Continuing Education |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 105 |
中文關鍵詞: | 社會投資 、社會企業 、責信 、企業社會責任 |
英文關鍵詞: | Social Investment, Social Enterprise, Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:247 下載:22 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究目的—社會投資源自於社會企業中,企業社會責任底下的一環,它之所以會興起,主要原因是在解決傳統捐贈效能的問題,然而,由此所衍生出的核心價值之衝突,使得捐贈者/企業與受贈者/非營利組織往往在社會投資的模式中,無法達成雙方平等自主的可能性。故本研究旨在探討社會投資的內涵及其樣態,與其所需的責信機制架構,以開創彼此在社會投資策略中的雙贏局面。
研究問題—為了達成企業與非營利組織在社會投資模式中的雙贏局面,瞭解社會投資之模型與其責信內涵,則為本研究的重點所在。據此,本文擬探討以下三個研究問題:1.何謂社會投資?社會投資的責信內涵為何?2.何謂社會投資之模型?社會投資的整體概念為何?3.各種社會投資的樣態,其所需要的責信機制為何?
研究方法—本研究在資料搜集的部份將透過文獻探討的方式來進行;在資料分析的部份則將透過次級資料分析法中的彙總/後設研究法來進行;在研究對象的部份,因本文關注的焦點主要是在社會投資與其相關的責信議題,故社會投資及其責信內涵即為本文之研究對象;而在分析單位的部份則是著重在企業組織及非營利組織的組織層級。
研究發現—就社會投資的樣態而言,本研究根據社會投資之形模過程,建構出狹義的社會投資、公益創投、許可同意、以業務為基礎的倡導、贊助、聯合議題倡導、社會合作社、微額貸款/微型創業、社區企業、庇護工廠、公益平台等十一種社會投資的類型,其中,並區分為由企業或由非營利組織所主導的兩種樣態。而就社會投資之責信內涵而言,本研究是採用Suchman對於合法性的解釋,即實用性合法性(成文法)、道德性合法性(不成文法),與認知性合法性(內化)的概念,以及責信的控制機制,即強制力、規範及誘因的面向來建構出社會投資之責信架構。
關鍵字:社會投資、社會企業、責信、企業社會責任
Social investment is one of the implications of social enterprise and corporate social responsibility. The emergence of social investment is in order to recover traditional questions of donation deficit. However, the conflict of core value results in donors/enterprises and beneficiaries/NPOs can’t obtain the possibility of equity and autonomy in the model of social investment. Therefore, the purpose of research focuses on the contents, types and the framework of social investment and its accountability.
In order to obtain the win-win situation of enterprises and NPOs in the model of social investment, it’s very important for us to understand the model of social investment and the content of accountability. Therefore, the questions of research are: first, what’s social investment? What’s the content of accountability within social investment? Second, what’s the model of social investment? What’s the whole concept of social investment? Third, what kind of accountability is available for social investment?
Data collection is based on the way of literature review, and data analysis is based on the meta analysis of secondary data analysis. The theme of research focuses on the contents and the issues of social investment and its accountability. Meanwhile, analysis unit is focused on the organization level of enterprises and NPOs.
According to the process of formation within social investment, 11 types of social investment are proposed, including narrow social investment, venture philanthropy, licensing agreement, transaction-based promotion, sponsorship, joint issues promotions, social co-operative, microcredit/microbusiness entrepreneurship, community enterprise, sheltered workshop, public welfare platform. By the way, the types of social investment can be separate from two parts of operating by enterprises and NPOs. Meanwhile, this article adopts Suchman’s points of pragmatic legitimacy, moral legitimacy, and cognitive legitimacy. And then we construct the accountability model within social investment by the dimensions of coercive, norms and incentives.
Key words: Social Investment, Social Enterprise, Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility
中文部份
王丹云(2006)。善因行銷對品牌價值創造之影響—以顧客信任和承諾為中介。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
王姿婷(2008)。企業與非營利跨界合作 給弱勢婦女脫貧機會。民97年10月16日上網,取自:http://npo-emba.blogspot.com/2008/07/blog-post_08.html
丘昌泰、江明修(2007)。第三部門、公民社會與政府:台灣第三部門發展經驗的省思與前瞻。國立中央大學客家學院客家政治經濟研究所:亞太非營利部門國際研討會—第三部門與政府跨域比較。
朱竹元(2006)。國際企業社會責任發展對我國跨國企業的衝擊與契機—以手機代工業為例。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
江明修譯(2003),Burton A. Weisbrod 著。非營利產業。台北市:智勝文化。
江明修、梅高文(2003)。自律乎?他律乎?財團法人監督機制之省思。中國行政評論,12(2):137-160。
江明修、鄭勝分(2005)。台灣非營利組織公共課責與自主性之探討。北京大學公民社會研究中心:轉型期中國公民社會的發展—國際的視角國際研討會。
李志艷(2007)。CSR定義的五個維度。民97年5月12日上網,取自:http://www.csrglobal.cn/l2face/display.jsp?fid=300509
李孟芬(2006)。社會事業導入公益創投之策略分析—以某社福基金會為個案。逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
李崇信(1995)。殘障者庇護工廠之經營與管理。許天威、徐享良主編,殘障者職業訓練與就業輔導之理論與實務(頁66-108)。台北市:勞委會職委會職業訓練局叢書。
吳定(1997)。公共政策辭典。台北市:五南。
吳定、李盈盈、鄭勝分(2005)。組織發展應用技術。台北市:智勝文化。
吳必然(2006)。企業社會責任概念的理論與實踐。證券櫃檯,122:31-42。
邱靖娟(2006)。從社會企業觀點探討地方博物館合作關係—以「台北縣立鶯歌陶瓷博物館」為例。南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
金玉琦(2003)。非營利組織資源開發新途徑—公益創投與社會企業之可行性研究。南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
林公孚(2005)。道德倫理與企業社會責任探微。品質月刊,41(9):24-28。
林吉郎(2007)。公益創投與社會企業。行政院青輔會:2007非營利組織青年人才培訓計畫。
林雅惠(2005)。臺灣企業社會責任發展之現況研究。國立台北科技大學環境規劃與管理研究所碩士論文。
林慶仁(2003)。由美國庇護工廠的發展看台灣推動的願景。就業安全,2(1):83-90。
官有垣(2007)。社會企業組織在台灣的發展。中國非營利評論,創刊號。
胡憲倫(2005)。道德乎?策略乎?談企業社會責任與永續發展的關聯。工業污染防治,24(3):137-153。
胡憲倫、許家偉、蒲彥穎(2006)。策略的企業社會責任:企業永續發展的新課題。應用倫理研究通訊,40:37-50。
孫煒(2007)。第三部門的治理研究。台北市:翰蘆圖書。
陳金貴(2002)。非營利組織社會企業化經營探討。新世紀智庫論壇,19:39-51。
陳定銘(2007)。非營利組織、政府與社會企業 : 理論與實踐。台北市:智勝文化。
張友馨(2007)。非營利組織財務管理取向、方案服務品質維持與責信承諾之相關性研究。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
黃正忠(2003)。21世紀企業經營的核心價值—企業社會責任。國際投資季刊,14:14-33。
黃德舜(2003)。非營利組織的財務管理觀念:公益創投。研考雙月刊,27(6):40-51。
曾育慧(2004)。非關慈善,窮人翻身—談微額貸款。民98年5月15日上網,取自:http://blog.yam.com/hungya/article/16897120
馮燕(2005)。台灣的企業基金會公益實踐特色。第三部門學刊,4:27-52。
鄭勝分(2005)。歐美社會企業發展及其在台灣應用之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文。
鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,7:65-108。
鄭勝分(2008a)。社會企業治理之初探。行政院勞工委員職業訓練局中彰投區就業服務中心主編,多元開發就業方案—民間團體發展成為社會企業論述精選集(頁14-24)。台中市:勞委會職訓局中彰投區就業服務中心。
鄭勝分(2008b)。社會企業之責信。江明修主編,第三部門與政府:跨部門治理(頁101-119)。台北市:智勝文化。
鄭勝分(2008c)。社會企業:市場、公共政策與公民社會的交叉點。公共行政學報,27:119-206。
鄭勝分(2008d)。社會企業發展之政策研究。國立中央大學客家學院客家政治經濟研究所:2008年公民社會國際論壇。
謝宗學、劉坤億、陳衍宏譯(2002),Jon Pierre & B. Guy Peters 著。治理‧政治與國家。台北市:智勝文化。
蕭新煌(1990)。企業倫理的重建。蕭新煌等編,企業倫理系列座談實錄(頁13-14)。台北市:中華民國管理科學學會。
藍科正、鄭讚源(2003)。在地型勞工的就業促進:公益創投的可行性分析。行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究計畫。
英文部份
Alter, K. (2004). Social Enterprise Typology. http://www.virtueventures.com/setypology/index.php. Accessed 10 May 2008.
Anheier, Helmut K. (2003). Dimensions of the nonprofit sector: Comparative perspectives on structure and change. In Helmun K. Anheier & Avner Ben-Ner (eds.). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approach (pp.247-275). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.
Birkett, W. P. (1988). Concepts of Accountability. Paper presented to the British Accounting Association Annual Conference. Trent Polytechnic.
Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.
Branco, Davide (2008). An exhaustive economic, training and educational needs analysis in Italy in the sector of social economy and social entrepreneurship Country Analysis Italy. http://www.teses.eu/upload/File/Davide%20Branco_CID_national_report.ppt#256,1,投影片1. Accessed 20 May 2009.
Brown, Howard H. & Donald L. Ruhl (2003). Breakthrough Management for Non-for-Profit Organizations: Beyond Survival in the 21 Century. Westport: Praeger.
Chesters, Graemw (2004). Global complexity and global civil society. Voluntas, 15(4): 323-342.
Council on Foundations (2001). Board Briefing on Venture Philanthropy: A Model of Innovation vs. a Model of Intrusion. http://www.cof.org/files/Documents/Governing_Boards/bb2venturephil.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2009.
Crudden, A., Moore, E. & Giesen, J.M. (1996). Satisfaction of direct-labor workers who are blind and employed in industries for the blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 90(6): 479-485.
Dart, R. (2004). The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14: 411-424.
deCourcy Hero, P. (2001). Understanding Donor Dynamics: The Organizational Side of Charitable Giving. Giving Back the Silicon Valley Way: Emerging Patterns of a New Philanthropy, 32.
Dees, J. Gregory (1999). Enterprising nonprofits. In Harvard Business Review on Nonprofits (pp.135-166). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Defourny, Jacques (2001). Introduction: From third sector to social enterprise. In Carol Borzaga & Jacques Defourny (eds.). The Emergence of Social Enterprise (pp.1-28). London: Routledge.
Defourny, J. (2004). L’émergence du concept d’entreprise sociale. Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique, XLIII(3): 9-23.
Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining Social Enterprise. In Nyssens, M. (eds.). Social Enterprise - At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp.3-26). London: Routledge.
Ducci, G., Stenteella, C. & Vulterini (2002). The Social Enterprise in Europe.
Internation Journal of Mental Health, 31(3): 76-91.
Europa (2003). Social Economy enterprises. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entrepreneurship/coop/introduction.htm. Accessed 9 May 2008.
Fowler, A. (2000). NGDOs as a moment in history: beyond aid to social entrepreneurship or civic innovation? Third World Quarterly, 21(4): 637-654.
Frederickson, H. G. & Johnston, Jocelyn M. (1999). Public Management Reform and Innovation: Research , Theory, and Application. Tuscaloosa & London: The University of Alabama Press.
Greater London Enterprise. (2004). SOCIAL ENTERPRISE BRIEFING NOTE.
http://www.thelearningnetwork.net/Downloads/Social%20Enterprise%20briefing%20Nov%202004.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2008.
Hansmann, Henry B. (2003). The role of trust in nonprofit enterprise. In Helmun K. Anheier & Avner Ben-Ner (eds.). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approach (pp.115-122). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.
Johnson L. C. (2005). Understanding the Role of Cross-Sector Strategic Alliances in the Age of Corporate Social Responsibility. Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy of Fletcher Public School.
Jones, G. R. (1995). Organization Theory: Text and Case. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprises in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17: 247-263.
Kettl, Donald F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60(6): 488-497.
Koppell, J. GS. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of Multiple Accountabilities Disorder. Public Administration Review, 65(1): 94-108.
Light, P. C. (1994). Federal Inspectors General and the Paths to Accountability. In T. L. Cooper (eds.). Handbook of Administrative Ethics (pp.267-283). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Low, Chris (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6): 376-385.
Mak’ochieng, A. A. (2003). A Case Study of the Strategic Nature of Daimler Chrysler South Africa’s Corporate Social Investment Programmes in the Local Communities of the Border-Kei Region in the Eastern Cape Province. Master in Commerce (Management) of Rhodes University.
Mason, C. Kirkbride, James & Bryde, David (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Design, 45(2): 284-301.
May, J. P. (2006). An Understanding of Corporate Social Investment Within the Context of the Sappi Forest Products Division in South Africa. Master in Business Administration of Rhodes University.
Milward, H. Brinton & Provan, Keith G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2): 359-379.
Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration, 78(3): 555-573.
Nwankwo, E. Phillips, N. & Tracy, Paul (2007). Social Investment through Community Enterprise: the Case of Multinational Corporations Involvement in the Development of Nigerian Water Resources. Journal of Business Ethics, 73: 91-101.
OECD (1999). Social Enterprise. OECD.
OECD (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility. OECD.
Page, S. (2004). Measuring Accountability for Results in Interagency Collaborative. Public Administration Review, 64(5): 591-606.
Parker, R. & Szymanski, E. (1998). Rehabilitation Counseling: Basic and Beyond. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
Philip L. Cochran (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50: 449-454.
Rockey, V. (2004). The CSI Handbook. ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Trialogue Publications.
Salamon, Lester M. (1990). The nonprofit sector and government: The American experience in theory and practice. In Anheier, H. K. & Seibel, W. (eds.). The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations (pp.219-240). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Salamon, Lester M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salamon, Lester M. & Anheier, Helmut K. (1997). Introduction: In search of the nonprofit sector. In Salamon, Lester M. & Anheier, Helmut K. (eds.). Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis (pp.1-8). Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.
Shaw, Eleanor (2004). Marketing in the Social Enterprise Context: Is it Entrepreneurial? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(3):194-205.
Stroup, M. A. & Neubert, R. L. (1987). The Evolution of Social Responsibility. Business Horizons, 30: 22-24.
Thomas, Antonio (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15(3): 243-263.
Wagner, Lilya (2002). The New Donor: Creation or Evolution? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(4): 343-352.
Wymer Jr., Walter W. & Sridhar Samu. (2003). Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships. In Walter W. Wymer, Jr. & Sridhar Samu (eds.). Nonprofit and Business Sector Collaboration: Social Enterprises, Caused-Related Marketing, Sponsorships, and Other Corporate-Nonprofit Dealings. New York: The Hawthorne Press.
Young, Dennis R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organization: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(2):139-157.
Young, Dennis R. (2003a). New trends in the US non-profit sector: Towards market integration. In Noya, Antonella & Nativel, Corinne (eds.). The Non-profit Sector in a Changing Economy (pp.61-77). OECD.
Young, Dennis R. (2003b). Entrepreneurs, managers, and the nonprofit enterprise. In Anheier, Helmun K. & Avner Ben-Ner (eds). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approach (pp.161-168). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.