研究生: |
黃于亭 Huang, Yu-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
羽化的無序樂園─黃于亭創作論述 The Transformation of Disorderly Paradise The Research of Artistic Creation by Huang,Yu-Ting |
指導教授: |
蔡芷芬
Tsai, Chih-Fen |
口試委員: |
林偉民
Lin, Wei-Min 郭博州 Kuo, Bor-Jou 蔡芷芬 Tsai, Chih-Fen |
口試日期: | 2023/12/26 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
美術學系 Department of Fine Arts |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 100 |
中文關鍵詞: | 羽化 、樂園 、價值覆寫 、商業化 、消費社會 |
英文關鍵詞: | transformation, paradise, value reinscription, commercialization, consumer society |
研究方法: | 參與觀察法 、 歷史研究法 、 文件分析法 、 內容分析法 、 創作實踐法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400057 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:103 下載:44 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在這個資訊快速流通、科技發達的時代,大數據和演算法不知不覺的決定我們的思考與目標,在我們的日常生活中投放計算好的誘惑與思維,收集我們在雲端上殘存的足跡,預測我們的喜好、左右我們的選擇,如果只是一昧的接受,人的生活將完全受大數據的擺佈。因此,生活中時常思辨、覺察自我感受變得尤其重要。以筆者為例,身為一位蝴蝶愛好者,從自身對蝴蝶的網路消費、收藏到販售,這一系列行動的心態轉變中,意識到人對於生物的觀點可以隨著周邊的信息,輕易的被改變。並且此現象也會隨著資訊時代的普及加劇,因此筆者以蝴蝶為探究的起點,試圖撥開社會賦予的層層意義的面紗。
蝴蝶對筆者而言,不只是時常見到的生物、童年的寵物、姿態的憧憬,更是從小象徵意象的灌輸。從生活環境中累積對這個符號的大量情感,形成專屬於個人的符號記憶。在觸碰到消費以後,就彷彿抓到一個可以重新擁有、召喚這些回憶的鑰匙。以消費作為契機,筆者開始思辨、參與消費文化的塑造,同時也對於自身思考的角度提出質疑,究竟該將蝴蝶視作生物、商品、材料,抑或是其他象徵來看待。
生物消費雖已逐漸普遍於市,但在環境倫理、道德上仍常為人所質疑,筆者作為此議題的參與者,也從中體會到各種矛盾而無法自拔的感情。並透過創作抒發自身對蝴蝶價值的認知衝突、以及賦予蝴蝶的情感意義。本次以蝴蝶為主軸的作品分為立體雕塑與平面繪畫兩種面向;立體作品透過使用蝴蝶標本作為媒材,以行動體現對物件意義的改寫,平面繪畫則多以蒙太奇的手法穿插多種網路、消費符號、筆者的記憶與蝴蝶生存狀態的描寫。透過視覺圖像與高飽和的色彩,反應科技世代的視覺經驗,創造一個在當代環境下,蝴蝶如何重新羽化、重生的無序樂園。
In this fast-paced technological era, big data and algorithms determine our thoughts and goals in ways we do not perceive. Calculated temptations and thoughts are constantly projected onto people in their everyday lives. Digital footprints on the cloud are collected and used to predict people's preferences as well as influence their choices. If people choose to blindly accept everything, human lives are destined to fall under the control of big data. Therefore, having the ability to think critically and perceive our own feelings has become particularly crucial. Due to a perspective shift caused by actions such as shopping online, collecting, and selling butterflies, the author—a butterfly enthusiast—came to the realization that people's viewpoints of living things can be easily modified by the information around them. This phenomenon has become increasingly prominent through the popularization of the information age. As a result, the author aims to unveil the various levels of meaning given by society, with butterflies serving as the starting point of the discovery.
Not only are butterflies a common living being, childhood pet, yearning for stance, but they have also been an instillation of emblem since youth. The accumulation of abundant emotions towards this symbol came from the surroundings and became a personal memory. After being exposed to consumerism, it was like being offered a key to reacquaint with and recall these memories. With the act of consumption serving as the turning point, the author started to reflect on and participate in the shaping of consumer culture while casting doubts on their own perspectives. Should people view butterflies as living beings, merchandise, materials, or other symbols?
Despite the popularity of consumerism that pertains to living beings, people still hold doubts when it comes to environmental ethics and morals. As a participant in this issue, the author is also deeply drawn into the emotion of controversy. In addition, the author wishes to express the cognitive conflict of the value of butterflies as well as the emotional meaning given to them through artistic creations. This collection of artworks is centered on butterflies and includes the following two aspects: three-dimensional sculptures and two-dimensional paintings. Three-dimensional artworks use specimens of butterflies as media and rewrite the meaning of objects through actions. Two-dimensional paintings make use of the montage technique and include multiple online imageries, symbols related to consumerism, memories of the author, and the depiction of the survival state of butterflies. Through visual graphics and highly saturated colors, which reflect the visual experience of the technological era, the author wishes to create a disorderly paradise in which the butterflies eclose and are reborn in this modern environment.
汪民安,《文化研究關鍵詞》,台北:麥田出版,2015年。
李依依,《杜布菲:反美學的現代藝術大師》,台北:藝術家出版社,2013年。
李俊延、王效岳,《台灣蝴蝶圖鑑》,台北市,貓頭鷹出版社,2021年。
陳永賢,《英國當代藝術》,台北:藝術家出版社,2014年。
歐陽盛芝、楊平世,《蝴蝶與福蝶-藝術與科學的共鳴》,台北:國立臺灣博物館,2020年。
Della Thompson編,《牛津現代簡明英漢雙解詞典》,台北市:旺文社,2009年。
大衛‧克羅 (David Crow),羅亞琪譯,《看得見的符號》(Visible Signs-An Introduction to Semiotics in Visual Arts),台北市:麥浩斯出版,2016年。
里克・賽瑟蘭、芭芭・卡格(Rick Sutherland,Barb Karg),陳寬祐譯,《印刷設計與色彩管理》,新北:視傳文化,2004年。
沙曼・阿普特・羅素(Sharman Apt Russell),張琰譯,《蝴蝶法則:柔弱物種在演化競賽中的生存智慧》(An obsession with butterflies),台北:貓頭鷹出版社,2007年。
尚‧布希亞 (M. Jean Baudrillard) ,林志明譯,《物體系》(Le Systeme Des Objects)。 台北市:城邦文化出版,2018年
亞里士多德(B.C.384-322),吳壽澎譯,《動物誌》(Historia Animālium),上海:商務出版社,2010年
迪倫・埃文斯(Dylan Evans),劉紀蕙、廖朝陽、黃宗慧、龔卓軍譯,《拉岡精神分析詞彙》,台北:巨流圖書有限公司,2009年。
星野克美、岡本慶一、稻增龍夫、柑野登、青木貞茂。黃恆正譯,《符號社會的消費》,台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司,1990年。
麥克・費瑟斯通(Mike Featherstone),趙偉妏譯,《消費文化與後現代主義》,台北:韋伯文化國際,2009年。
詹姆斯・沃漫(James Wallman)著,謝樹寬譯,《物窒欲》,台北:漫遊者文化事業股份有限公司,2016年。
瑪莉塔‧史特肯 (Marita Sturken)、莉莎‧卡萊特 (Lisa Cartwright)。陳品秀 譯。《觀看的實踐:給所有影像世代的視覺文化導論》(Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture) ,台北市:臉譜,2009年。
聖經神學辭典編譯委員會編譯,《聖經神學辭典》,臺北市:光啓文化事業,2007年。
簡・羅森伯格(lean Robertson)、克雷格・麥克丹尼爾(Craig McDaniel)著,匡驍譯,《當代藝術的主題-1980年以後的視覺藝術》,南京:江蘇美術出版社,2015年。
藤依里子,李璦祺譯,《日本紋樣圖解事典》,新北:遠足文化事業股份有限公司,2017。頁39。
Collins, N. Mark and Morris, Michael G. “Threatened swallowtail butterflies of the world,The IUCN Red Data Book”, Switzerland:International Union for Conservation of Nature,1985.
Damien Hirst, “I Want to Spend The Rest of my Life Everywhere,With Everyone,One to One,Always,Forever,Now”,London:Booth-ClibbornEditions,1997.
J E Cirlot , Translated by Jack Sage ,” A Dictionary of Symbols” , New York :Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001.
Keith Wheldon, “Van Gogh”,London:Bison Books,1989
Luis-Martin Lozano, “Frida Kahlo” ,London:Bulfinch Press/Little,Brown and company,2001.
Martin Gayford, “The Yellow House: Van Gogh, Gauguin, and Nine Turbulent Weeks in Provence” ,New York:Houghton Mifflin company ,2008.
Marcel Paquet ,“Dubuffet”, Paris:Casterman,1993.
Marije Vellekoop ,“Van Gogh at work” ,New Haven:Yale University Press,2013.
吳幸慈,《台灣埔里地區蝴蝶產業發展》,逢甲大學歷史與文物研究所碩士論文,2012。
陳寬祐著,《蝴蝶的故事-神話、傳說與象徵》,《鳥語雜誌》354期,高雄:社團法人高雄市野鳥學會,2020。
楊平世著,《昆蟲資源產業》,《科學發展》449期,台北:財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心,2010年5月。
Michael Boppréa,# and R.I. Vane-Wrightb ,《The Butterfly House Industry:Conservation Risks and Education Opportunities 》, Conservation and Society 10(3): 285-303, 2012.