教育部公布103學年度圖書館電子書館藏於趨近於紙本書館藏，反映出電子書出版量急劇成長，圖書館電子書館藏也逐年遞增。電子書目錄與圖書目錄最大的不同點，在於電子書目錄能提供全文預覽。讀者除在圖書館目錄瀏覽電子書書目紀錄外，亦能經由網路書店、電子書商城所提供多種電子書書目加值資訊與功能，選擇符合需求的電子書。爰此，圖書館應著重了解讀者檢索取得電子書使用行為，與電子書書目加值資訊的需求，及近一步探討圖書館電子書目錄資訊提供與功能設計的規劃，以改善圖書館目錄呈現電子書的方法。
本研究採質性取向，徵選15位碩士生為研究對象。選擇4種電子書目錄：圖書館館藏查詢系統、凌網電子書平台、亞馬遜網路書店與DPLA StackLife；與2種途徑：圖書館網站、網際網路。研究方法以訪談法進行資料蒐集，並搭配6個任務給予受訪者執行。每一實測任務完成後，將會針對此任務目的進行一次訪談，屬任務導向的訪談。並將訪談錄音轉譯成逐字稿，進行組織與編碼，來了解受訪者對於電子書目錄書目資訊提供的使用狀況與電子書目錄功能設計的看法。
本研究針對受訪者檢索與取得電子書的現況提出結論共3項：1.受訪者得知電子書訊息來源多元，在網際網路上主要使用搜尋引擎來檢索與取得電子書；2.受訪者在圖書館館藏目錄偏好同時得知紙本書與電子書訊息；3.受訪者對於取得電子書之過程感覺煩雜，對館藏查詢搜尋功能沒有信任感。本研究針對受訪者對現有電子書目錄的使用現況提出結論共4項：1.受訪者認為必備的前十項書目基本資料項目依序為書名、作者、出版年、封面、出版社、摘要簡介、目次、主題、評論、星級評分；2.受訪者提到最喜歡功能是摘要，但行為上更常用全文預覽/試閱功能；3.受訪者會參考星級評論、社群分享與推薦功能但尚未形成使用習慣；4.受訪者認為交叉行銷最能協助瀏覽相關書籍。本研究針對受訪者對電子書目錄功能需求提出結論共3項：1.偏好電子書目錄以條列式呈現檢索結果與提供檢索後分類功能，而封面是影響受訪者在檢索結果中選擇書目的最重要因素；2.偏好具充分書目基本資料且排版整潔的電子書目錄；3.受訪者贊成圖書館建置獨立的電子書目錄及檢索系統。
根據研究目的，本研究針對圖書館提供檢索與取得電子書方式提出2項建議：1. 加強圖書館館藏查詢系統之搜尋功能；2.主動安排圖書館電子書利用教育課程。針對圖書館電子書目錄書目資料呈現提出2項建議：1.建議呈現詳細的書目資料項目；2.建議修改電子書相關連結名稱。針對圖書館電子書目錄社群分享與行銷模式服務提出2項建議：1.活絡星級評分功能；2.提供交叉行銷最能協助瀏覽相關書籍。針對圖書館電子書目錄功能需求提出3項建議：1.以條列式呈現檢索結果；2.提供檢索後分類功能；3.檢索結果提供圖書封面。

Since Ministry of Education of Taiwan announced that collections of ebooks in libraries approached that of print books in 103 academic year, it reflects the dramatic increases of ebook publications and collections in libraries. The most significant advantage of ebook catalogs over print book catalogs is full text preview. In addition to libraries, users can pick up ebooks through online print book and ebook stores with additional information and functions. As a result, to improve library ebook catalogs, libraries should investigate the design of the catalogs by understanding the behaviors that users search and acquire ebooks and the need of bibliographic enhancements of ebook.
This study adopted the qualitative approach, recruiting 15 master students for interview. Four ebook catalogs, including Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC), HyReadeBooks, Amazon, and DPLA StackLife, were chosen; two searching paths, including the web site of library and internet, were considered. Interview method was used in this study and 6 tasks were assigned to the interviewers. After the completion of each task, the interview proceeded for the object related to the task. The interview audio files were transcribed and encoded to understand the usage and opinions of interviewers on the ebook catalogs.
The conclusions for searching and acquiring ebooks are: 1) the interviewers learn the information of ebooks from many sources, and they mainly use search engine to search and acquire ebooks; 2) the interviewers prefer getting search results of both books and ebooks from OPAC; 3) the interviewers feel trouble on the procedures acquiring ebooks, and are unconfident in the search functions of OPAC. The conclusions for usage of the present ebook catalogs are: 1) the 10 basic bibliographic records which should be included in Ebook catalogs are, sorted by importance, tile, author, year of publication, cover, press, abstract, contents, topic, review, and star rating; 2) while the interviewers stated they prefer abstract in the interviews, they more frequently used full text preview in behaviors; 3) the interviewers would consider star rating, review, social network sharing, and suggestion, but they have not been used to these functions; 4) cross marketing can help the interviewers browsing related books. The conclusions of the additional functions the interviewers need are: 1) the interviewers prefer the search results in list forms and the function of categorizing after searching. Covers influence what the interviewers choose a book most significantly; 2) the interviewers prefer ebook catalogs which have detailed bibliographic records and clear interfaces; 3) the interviewers support the idea to establish separated ebook catalogs and searching interfaces in library web sites.
The suggestions for the ways of searching and acquiring ebooks provided by libraries are: 1) the search function of OPAC should be improved; 2) providing courses for using ebooks in libraries is necessary. The suggestions for the search results of OPAC are: 1) detailed bibliographic records is required; 2) the links to ebooks need to be improved. The suggestions for social network sharing and marketing are: 1) giving star rating should be motivated; 2) cross marketing can significantly help browsing related books. The suggestions for ebook catalogs of libraries are: 1) using list forms to show search results is favorable; 2) providing the function of categorizing after searching is suggested; 3) covers are necessary in searching results.

一、中文部分
王梅玲（2013）。從電子書數位閱讀探討圖書館推廣策略。臺北市立圖書館館訊，30(4)，9-24。
何雯婷、黃文良（2013）。國立公共資訊圖書館電子書服務平台使用者滿意度之研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，31(2)，60-76。
何頓（2012）。我們是否滿足學生的研究需求？2012臺灣高校電子書使用習慣調查。「數位圖書館的創新挑戰:邁向知識化的環境」研討會發表之簡報。台灣大學應用力學研究所。線上檢索日期：2013年11月16日，取自：http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/Conferences/Details/24
阮綠茵（2010）。第八章：訪談法。載於管倖生（主編），設計研究方法二版(125-148)。新北市：全華。
唐牧群、吳宛青（2009）。由透鏡理論看大學圖書館讀者選書決策過程。圖書資訊學刊，7（1/2），37–52。
林奇伯（2010）。台灣數位閱讀大調查，閱讀革命來臨！23.2%優先選擇電子書。遠見雜誌，292。線上檢索日期：2013年8月4日，取自：http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_16715.html
林珊如、劉應琳（2011）。休閒閱讀找書策略及影響選書因素之探討--以臺大BBS Books 版愛書人為例。資訊傳播與圖書館學，8（2），23–37。
林淑玲（2010）。科技應用：行動閱讀設備(電子書)之發展及使用。生活科技教育月刊，43(4)，13-19。
吳明德（1987）。線上目錄的主題檢索。圖書館學刊，5，37-49。
許靜芬（2012）。中文網路書目資源轉換為圖書館書目格式的可行性初探。國家圖書館館刊，101(2)，65-85。
陳昭珍（2013）。圖書館電子書書目資料維護問題之探討。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告， NSC 101-2410-H-003 -120），臺北市：臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
陳昭珍、謝文真、詹麗萍、陳雪華（2011）。台灣地區大學圖書館電子書使用現況調查。數字圖書館論壇，84，29-40。
教育部統計處（2015）。大專校院圖書館統計。線上檢索日期：2015年1月15日，取自：http://www.edu.tw/
張慧銖（2010）。書目紀錄加值對目錄使用者辨識與選擇行動影響之研究。圖書資訊學研究，5(1)，1-22。
國立公共資訊圖書館（2014a）。國立公共資訊圖書館業務統計。線上檢索日期：2014年8月14日，取自：http://www.nlpi.edu.tw/FileDownLoadC613.aspx?appname=FileDownLoadC613
國立公共資訊圖書館（2014b）。電子書服務平台平台網頁。線上檢索日期：2014年8月16日，取自：http://ebook.nlpi.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
國家教育研究院（2014）。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網-圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。線上檢索日期：2014年4月4日，取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1623479/
國家圖書館（2010）。國家圖書館虛擬電子資源編目原則。線上檢索日期：2013年12月2日，取自：http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/2-1-36.pdf
詹麗萍（2005）。大學圖書館數位化館藏之可及性研究。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，77-88。
國立臺灣大學圖書館（2013）。臺灣大學圖書館電子書清單網頁。線上檢索日期：2013年12月16日，取自：http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/custom/ebook.php
國立臺灣師範大學圖書館（2013）。臺灣師範大學圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統網頁。線上檢索日期：2013年12月16日，取自：http://hyint.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnuhyint/search1.jsp
臺北市立圖書館（2014a）。臺北市立圖書館數位影音平台網頁。線上索日期：2014年7月20日，取自：http://taipei.lib.overdrive.com/
臺北市立圖書館（2014b）。數位影音平臺。線上索日期：2014年8月14日，取自：http://blog.roodo.com/overdrive/
臺灣學術電子書聯盟（2012）。101年大專校院電子書使用情況與滿意度調查報告。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
賴玲玲（2011）。我國電子書使用現況與體驗模式研究。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 99-3114-Y-084 -002-5）。新北市：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。
賴忠勤、岳麗蘭（2011）。建立電子書服務平台 國中圖精益求精。書香遠傳，98，22-27。
歐陽崇榮、黃琇薇（2005）。從介面設計初探電子資源管理(ERM)系統。國家圖書館館刊，1，75-97。
謝宜瑾、唐牧群（2013）。從透鏡模式探討影響讀者尋書滿意度之因素—以aNobii為例。圖書資訊學學研究，8(1)，69-119。
二、西文部分
Abdullah, N., & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ Attitudes towards E-books in a Scottish Higher Education Institute: Part 2: Analysis of E-book Usage. Library Review, 57(9), 676-689.
American Library Association (2012). The 2012 State of America's Libraries: A Report From the American Library Association [Special issue]. American Libraries. Retrieved August 22, 2013, from: http://www.ala.org/news/sites/ala.org.news/files/content/StateofAmericasLibrariesReport2012Finalwithcover.pdf
Armstrong, C., & Lonsdale, R. (2005). Challenges in Managing E-books Collections in UK Academic Libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 29(1), 33-50.
Armstrong, C. (2008). Books in a virtual world : the evolution of the e-book and its lexicon. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(3), 193-206.
Belanger, J. (2007). Cataloguing E-books in UK Higher Education Libraries: Report of a Survey. Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(3), 203-216.
Boog, J. (2012, June 15). Ebook Revenues Top Hardcover [Web blog message]. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from: http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ebooks-top-hardcover-revenues-in-q1_b53090
Collins, M., & Gorgg, J.E. (2011). Building a Better ERMS. Library Journal, 136(4), 22.
Dinkelman, A., & Stacy-Bates, K. (2007). Accessing e-Books through academic library web Sites. College & Research Libraries, 68(1), 45-58.
DPLA (2013). DPLA’s Bookshelf. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from: http://dp.la/timeline?q=information+network&utf8=%E2%9C%93
Dorner, D. (2000). Cataloging in the 21st Century- part 2: Digitization and Information Standards. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 24, 73-87.
Foust , J.E., Bergen, P., & Maxeiner, G.L. (2007). Improving Improving e-book access via a library-developed full-text search tool, Journal of the Medical Library Assocation, 95(1), 40-44.
Google (2013). Google's Infinite Digital Bookcase. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from: http://workshop.chromeexperiments.com/bookcase/
Google Play (2013). Books on Google Play. Retrieved December 29, 2013, from:　 https://play.google.com/store/books?hl=zh_TW
Gravett, K. (2006). The Cataloguing of E-books at the University of Surrey. Serials,19(3), 202-207.
Harvard Library (2013). StackLife: A Unique Way to Browse, Read Digital Public Library of America Books. Retrieved December 22, 2013, from: http://library.harvard.edu/stacklife-browse-read-digital
Harvard Library Innovation Lab (2013). DPLA StackLife. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from: https://stacklife-dpla.law.harvard.edu/
Jewell, T.D. (2010). Electronic Resource Management in Libraries. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
JISC (2009). JISC national e-books observatory project: Key findings and Recommendations. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from: http://observatory.jiscebooks.org/reports/jisc-national-e-books-observatory-project-key-findings-and-recommendations/
Koolen, M., Kamps, J., & Kazai, G. (2012). Social book search: comparing topical relevance judgments and book suggestions for evaluation. In X. Chen, G. Lebanon, H. Wang, & N. J. Zaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (p. 185–194). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2396761.2396788
Li, J., Robertson, J.C., Wright, A.L., & Britton, R.M. (2012). E-Book Management: A Multiple Access Points Approach. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 9(2), 103-113. doi: 10.1080/15424065.2012.680344
Library Journal (2012). 2012 Ebook Usage in U.S. Academic Libraries. New York, NY : Library Journal. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from: http://www.thedigitalshift.com/research/ebook-usage-reports/academic/
LibraryThing(2014a). LibraryThing. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from: https://www.librarything.com/
LibraryThing(2014b). LibraryThing. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from: http://www.librarything.com/unsuggester
LibraryThing(2014c). LibraryThing. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from: https://www.librarything.com/work/4979986
Lynema, E., Lown, C., & Woodbury, D. (2012). Virtual Browse: Designing User-Oriented Services for Discovery of Related Resources. Library Trends, 61(1), 218-233.
Majurey, M. (2009). Dealing With EBook Metadata. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from: http://www.editeur.org/files/Events%20pdfs/Supply%20chain%20presentations/Dealing%20with%20eBook%20metadata%20article.pdf
Martin, K.E., & Mundle, K. (2009). Notes on Operations Cataloging E-Books and Vendor Records: a Case Study at the University of Illinois at Chicago. LRTS, 54(4), 227-237.
Maynard, S., Mackay, S., & Smyth, F. (2008). A survey of young people’s reading in England. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(4), 239 –253. doi:10.1177/0961000608096714
McKay, D., Buchanan, G., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Cunningham, S.J., & Hinze, A. (2012). Judging a Book by Its Cover: Interface Elements that Affect Reader Selection of Ebooks. OzCHI '12 Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 381-390). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2414536.2414597
McKiel , A.W. (2008). 2008 Global Student E-book Survey. Retrieved August 25, 2013, from: http://www.ebrary.com/corp/collateral/en/Survey/ebrary_student_survey_2008.pdf
McKiel , A.W. (2011). 2011 Global Student E-book Survey. Retrieved August 25, 2013, from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/surveys/docDetail.action?docID=80076107
Miller, R. (2011). Dramatic Growth: LJ’s Second Annual E-book Survey, October 12, 2011. Library Journal, 136(16), 32-34.
Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., & Olle, C. (2008). UK Scholarly E-book Usage: a Landmark Survey. Aslib Proceedings and New Information Perspectives, 60(4), 311–334.
Reuter, K. (2007). Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children’s book selection in a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1745–1763.
Springer (2010). A Survey of eBook Usage and Perceptions at the University of Liverpool: University of Liverpool eBook Study: part 2 (White Paper, Springer 11/10. V7671). Retrieved October 25, 2013, from: http://static.springer.com/sgw/documents/1343310/application/pdf/V7671_Liverpool_White_Paper_Part2%5B1%5D.pdf
Tedd, L.A. (2005). E-books in Academic Libraries: An International Overview. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 11(1), 57-79. doi: 10.1080/13614530500417701
Vassiliou, M., & Rowley, J. (2008). Progressing the Definition of “E-Book”. Library Hi Tech, 26(3), 360-363.
University of California Libraries (2011). UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey: Springer e-Book Pilot Project. Retrieved August 25, 2013, from: http://www.cdlib.org/services/uxdesign/docs/2011/academic_ebook_usage_survey.pdf
University of Pittsburgh (2013).University of Pittsburgh’s E-Book Full Text. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from: http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/
Wu, M.D., & Chen, S.C. (2011). Graduate students’ usage of and attitudes towards e-books: experiences from Taiwan. Electronic library and information systems, 45(3), 294-307.
Zhao, S., & Zhao, W. (2010). Addressing the Challenge: Cataloguing Electronic Books in Academic Libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(1), 93-103.