科技進步使得遠距教學在COVID-19時期大放異彩，發展出更多教學樣式，也出現不同的混合情形。在這樣一個特殊的時期下，教學過程如何開展，同儕關係如何變化、同儕互動如何進行及對學生與教學產生的影響為何，是本研究關注的重點。本研究著眼在學生構成更多元化的大專校院，選取了就讀於海內外各大高校具有混合遠距教學經驗的在校學生進行了半結構式深入訪談。在分析他們提供的訪談資料後，本研究總結出若干種混合遠距教學的混合方式及影響其品質的因素，包含教學方式混合比例、課程內容與專業準備度、遠距持續狀況。研究發現遠距學生相較於現場學生遭遇更多困難，主動與被動的遠距教學也存在差別。不過在混合遠距教學過程中，任何形式的學生同儕互動在影響學生狀態、學習成效方面，都起到一定的作用。文化因素、是否存在社交基礎則會很大影響學生同儕互動對象的選擇、互動方式、頻率與深度。除了物理距離，研究還歸納出互動距離、社會心理距離對於學生同儕互動的影響。最後，研究結合超人際模型、社會臨場感理論討論了混合遠距教學中學生的不適應現象、學生同儕互動的重要性及遭遇的困難、學生們的混合傾向，並提出教學與互動設計的相關建議，可供各方參考，共同完善混合體驗，提升教學品質。

Distance learning has become one of the teaching/learning styles in the COVID-19 era and evolved with diverse teaching styles and different variations. This study focuses on how the teaching process is carried out and how the peer relationship changes. More importantly, the study features peer interaction along with its impact on students and teaching in such a special period. The study conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with the students of undergraduate and post-graduate levels because the student composition was more diverse. This study identifies several hybrid distance learning styles and the factors that affect the quality of hybrid learning, including the proportion how students participated online, the curriculum contents, and the preparedness for hybrid learning in different disciplines. The study found that remote students encountered more difficulties than on-site students, which is accompanied by the complexity due to a huge difference between active and passive distance teaching. Our results suggest that any form of student-peer interaction plays a positive role in not only student states but also learning efficiency. Cultural factors and whether there is prior interaction history among interactants also greatly affect whom, ways, frequency, and depth of the interaction. Furthermore, the study also proposes the impact of interaction distance as well as social psychological distance on students' peer interaction in addition to physical distance. We also drew on the hyperpersonal model and the social presence theory and discuss the phenomenon of students' maladaptation in hybrid distance learning, the importance and the difficulties students encountered during peer interaction, and students' preference for hybrid learning. Finally, the study puts forward relevant suggestions for teaching and communication tool design, aiming to shed lights on providing support for hybrid learning in order to improve learning experience and the quality of teaching.

世界衛生組織。（2021年5月13日）。檢自：https://www.who.int/zh/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19
呂冬梅（2014）。現代信息技術在高校成人教育學籍檔案管理中的應用。中國成人教育，3，64-65。
李雁晨、周庭銳、周琇（2009）解釋水平理論:從時間距離到心理距離。心理科學進展，17(4)，667-677。
周永康（2008）。大學生角色認同實證研究（未出版之博士論文）。西南大學，重慶市。
崔光宙（2000年8月23日）。心理距離說。教育大辭書。檢自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1303154/
郭文革（2011）。教育的「技術」發展史。北京大學教育評論，9(3)，137-192。
陳昭珍（2020年6月22日）。檢自：https://ttrc.aca.ntu.edu.tw/Images/1_4/2020_2/02_%E5%B8%AB%E7%AF%84%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8_%E9%99%B3%E6%98%AD%E7%8F%8D.pdf
華生旭、呂厚超（2012）。心理距離的維度、關係及相關研究領域擴展。心理學進展，2，52-59。http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2012.22009
黃盟升（2014）。影響傳統教室與網路同步教室混成學習環境之互動因素探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學，高雄市。
詹姆斯·S·科爾曼（1999）。社會理論的基礎。北京市：社會科學文獻出版社。（原著出版於1994年）
賴曉黎（2012）。資通科技的工具面向－從科技決定論談起。資訊社會研究，23，1-35。
羅建河、吉苑輝（2011）。學歷歧視與成人教育的信譽危機。成人教育，4，39-40。
渡部和雄（1997）。インタネットを利用した教育の現状と課題。「経営と情報」静岡県立大学・経営情報学部紀要，9(2)，63-71。
Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 831-836. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9945
Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of management journal, 40(6), 1369-1397. https://doi.org/10.5465/257037
Baten, R. A., Clark, F., & Hoque, M. (2019). Upskilling together: How peer-interaction influences speaking-skills development online. In 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (pp. 662-668). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2019.8925448
Bersin & Associates. (2003). Blended learning: What works? An industry study of the strategy, implementation, and impact of blended learning. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.
Biocca, F., Harms, C. & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (2004). The Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Brown, G.W., & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. New York: Free Press.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social psychology quarterly, 43(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033745
Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003.
Byler, B. L., & Byler, L. F. (1984). Analysis of student teacher morale before and after student teaching. The Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 25(3), 22-28.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 127–149).
Czerniewicz, L. (2020, March 15). What We Learnt from “Going Online” during University Shutdowns in South Africa," PhilOnEdTech. https://philonedtech.com/what-we-learnt-from-going-online-during-university-shutdowns-in-south-africa/fdsscxxx
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.
Eastmond, D. V. (1992). Effective facilitation of computer conferencing. Continuing Higher Education Review, 56(1/2), 23-34.
Edwards, R. (1996). Troubled times? Personal identity, distance education and open learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 11(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051960110101
Habermas (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol.1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Field, J. (1994). Open learning and consumer culture. Open Learning, 9(2), pp.3-11.
Friesen, N. (2012). Report: Defining Blended Learning. https://www.normfriesen.info/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf
Friga, P. N. (2020, March 24). The great recession was bad for higher education: Coronavirus could be worse. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-great-recession-was-bad-for-higher-education-coronavirus-could-be-worse/
Garrison, D. R., Archer, W., & Anderson, T. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In M. Moore & G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Gašević, D., Zouaq, A., & Janzen, R. (2013). “Choose Your Classmates, Your GPA Is at Stake!”: The Association of Cross-Class Social Ties and Academic Performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1460–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479362.
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interactions. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428985
Glazer, H.R., & Wanstreet, C.E. (2011). Connection to the academic community perceptions of students in online education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(1), 55–62.
Graham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended learning environments. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 269-276). Routledge.
Hartnett, M. (2016). The importance of motivation in online learning. In M. Hartnett (Ed.), Motivation in online education (pp. 5-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2
Hartup, W. W. (1998). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review Online. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
House, R. (2002). Clocking in column. The Spokesman-Review, 61(2), 179-211.
Johnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational researcher, 10(1), 5-10.
Keegan, Desmond (1990). Foundations of Distance Education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(4): 384-386. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3121033
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315004822
Orey, M. (2002, February). One year of online blended learning: Lessons learned. In annual meeting of the eastern educational research association, Sarasota, FL.
Kushlev, K., Proulx, J. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Digitally connected, socially disconnected: The effects of relying on technology rather than other people. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.001
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
Lin, T. J. (2021). Exploring the differences in Taiwanese university students’ online learning task value, goal orientation, and self-efficacy before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00553-1
Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. K. (2010). Human motives, happiness, and the puzzle of parenthood: Commentary on Kenrick et al.(2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369473
Marinucci, M., Pancani, L., Aureli, N., & Riva, P. (2022). Online social connections as surrogates of face-to-face interactions: A longitudinal study under Covid-19 isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107102
Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moorhouse, B.L., Kohnke, L. Thriving or Surviving Emergency Remote Teaching Necessitated by COVID-19: University Teachers’ Perspectives. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 30, 279–287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00567-9
Natalie, R., Yuan, C. W., & Wang, H. C. (2018, April). Understanding information seeking behavior among international students for adaptation. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (pp. 148-151). https://doi.org/10.1145/3202667.3202693
Pennington, N. (2021). Communication outside of the home through social media during COVID-19. Computers in human behavior reports, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100118
Piccoli, G. et al. (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic Skills Training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401- 426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250989.
Fullwood, C., & Attrill-Smith, A. (2018). Up-dating: Ratings of perceived dating success are better online than offline. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0631
Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning - a fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4(3), 6.
Riley, A., & Smith, A. (2011). Perceived coach-athlete and peer relationships of young athlete ad self-determined motivation for sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42, 115-133.
Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management, 55(5), 26-32.
Rossett, A. (2002). The ASTD E-Learning Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
Rovai A. P., Ponton, M. K., Wighting, M. J., & Baker, J. D. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and E-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413–432.
Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.022
Russo, T. C., & Benson, S. (2005, January). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. International Forum of Educational Technology and Society. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.8.1.54.pdf
Sackman, H., Erikson, W. J., & Grant, E. E. (1968). Exploratory experimental studies comparing online and offline programming performance. Communications of the ACM, 11(1), 3-11. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/362851.362858
Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 12-23.
Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613502990
Scott, G. G., & Fullwood, C. (2020). Does recent research evidence support the hyperpersonal model of online impression management?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.005
Short, J., Williams,E., & Christie (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra software, 1, 1-11. http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wbts/wbt2014/blend-ce.pdf
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A.. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Stets, J. E., & Tsushima, T. M. (2001). Negative emotion and coping responses within identity control theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 283-295.
Sun, N., Wang, X., & Rosson, M. B. (2019, May). How Do Distance Learners Connect?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
Swan, J. E., Richardson, L. D., & Hutton, J. D. (2003). Do appealing hospital rooms increase patient evaluations of physicians, nurses, and hospital services?. Health care management review, 254-264.
Thomson, I. (2002). Thomson job impact study: The next generation of corporate
learning. Thompson, Inc. From: https://mdavidmerrill.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/thompsonjobimpact.pdf
Triandis, H.C. (1999), Cross-cultural Psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00029
Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of network and computer applications, 23(1), 27-37.
Urdan, T. A., & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate elearning: Exploring a new frontier. http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/2c7d.content.pdf
Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities. Online journal of distance learning administration, 5(3), 1-11. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/valentine53.html
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
Walther J. B.& Tidwell L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer‐mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5(4), 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399509540258
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23(1), 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication research, 36(2), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330251
Ward, J., & LaBranche, G. A. (2003). Blended learning: The convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World, 35(4), 22-24.
Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2018). Does online technology make us more or less sociable? A preliminary review and call for research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617746509
Wong, K. M., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). The impact of social uncertainty, protests, and COVID-19 on Hong Kong teachers. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(8), 649–655. • https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1776523
Yacci, M. (2000). Interactivity demystified: A structural definition for online learning and intelligent CBT. Educational Technology, 40(4), 5-16. http://www.it.rit.edu/~may/interactiv8.pdf
Young, J. R. (2002). 'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education,48(28), 33-34.
Yuan, C. W., Setlock, L. D., Cosley, D., & Fussell, S. R. (2013, February). Understanding informal communication in multilingual contexts. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 909-922). https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441880