以往研究多顯示新住民子女在學業表現及生活適應之困難，但近期許多國外文獻顯示多元文化經驗會對創造力產生正向的影響。國內一系列關於新住民子女創造力的研究也得到了類似的結果，支持了多元文化經驗促進創造力的論述。然而，此現象的內在心理機制仍有待探索。此外，過去新住民的研究常將新住民族群視為單一且同質的個體，在創造力作業上也常以單一創造力指標以類推所有創造力表現。據此，在本研究中除了會將新住民子女視為豐富且具異質性的群體進行區分外，也會將不同類型的創造力（認知向度創造力：封閉式／開放式創造力；情意向度創造力：創意自我效能）納入分析，以期能更深入且全面性地探討多元文化與創造力間的內在機制。
研究一從個人動機層次的種族增長觀信念切入，研究假設具多元文化背景的個體會偏好多元、開放的訊息處理風格（例如：低認知閉鎖性），這不僅讓他們能以開放的態度來處理社會訊息（例如：種族增長觀信念），也能使個體在思考上更靈活，進而增進其認知向度創造力表現。在研究一中，共選取了439位中學生（363位一般生；76位新住民）做為研究樣本，其結果支持研究假設，種族增長信念會中介新住民子女在開放式創造力的優勢。進一步的序列中介分析裡也發現，種族增長信念的中介效果係透過新住民子女開放的訊息處理風格（低認知閉鎖性）。
研究二與研究三則分別探討影響多元文化經驗效果的兩個文化變項：「文化距離」與「涵化程度」。研究二以環境本身的「文化距離」作為切入，文化距離意指個體雙文化之間的價值觀多樣性程度，當文化距離越大時，個體越有機會能體驗到文化上的衝突，進而有尋求解決方案促進創意想法之可能性。研究二以472位中學生（370位一般生；102位新住民）做為研究對象，區辨不同文化距離的新住民族群並比較之。結果即發現兩新住民族群的差異性：東南亞新住民（遠距文化距離）在背景變項上較為弱勢，在學業科目上也比一般生與中國新住民（近距文化距離）來差，但在認知的開放式創造力表現有較佳的趨勢。中國學童雖在背景變項也較弱勢，但在學科分數上與一般生無異，在認知向度的創造力也有較佳的表現。透過中介分析也顯示，新住民在認知向度的開放式創造力優勢，是來自文化距離的正向效果。意即文化距離能中介新住民在開放式創意上的好表現。
研究三則探討新住民子女「涵化程度」之影響，將新住民子女對主流文化（例如：臺灣文化）與原生文化（例如：母國文化）的認同程度納入考量。研究三以728位中學生做為研究對象（525位一般生；203位新住民），結果顯示，新住民子女的涵化程度與其心理調適性（正向情緒、正向情緒複雜度）及情意向度創造力呈正相關，同時涵化程度也會透過正向情緒促進其情意向度創造力的表現。更重要的是，透過區分高、低涵化程度的新住民子女發現，高涵化的新住民子女不僅在心理調適度與一般生無差異，更在認知的開放式創造力上明顯優於一般生；相反的，低涵化程度的新住民子女則在心理調適度（正向情緒、生活滿意度）較一般生來得低，創造力表現上也與一般生無差異。而進一步的分析也發現，涵化程度與正向情緒複雜度對開放式創造力（變通力）具交互作用：只有在高涵化新住民組，正向情緒複雜度才能有效促進開放式創造力，並較一般生來的有優勢；反之，在低涵化組，正向情緒複雜度對創造力無影響，同時也與一般生表現無顯著差異。這也代表高涵化者能有效接收到情緒多樣性的正向影響，並展現出多元文化經驗的優勢；低涵化者則不受到情緒多樣性的影響。最後研究三也將「文化距離」與「涵化程度」同時納入分析，結果發現，只有在高涵化組，新住民文化距離的中介效果才會成立。本研究透過三個研究突顯出影響新住民創意優勢的心理機制與潛在影響影響多元文化經驗效果的文化變項。並以此結果進行討論與延伸，同時也為未來的研究提出相關建議。

Previous research has shown that new immigrants’ children often face difficulties in academic performance and adaptation to life, but recent literature from abroad have demonstrated that exposure to multiple cultures can have a beneficial impact on creativity. However, the internal psychological mechanism of this phenomenon is still to be explored. Furthermore, previous research on new immigrants often views new immigrant groups as a single and homogeneous individual, and creativity tasks are often inferred by a single creativity indicator. Therefore, in this research, in addition to viewing children of new immigrants as a rich and heterogeneous group, different types of creativity (cognitive and affective domain of creativity) will also be included in the analysis to further explore the internal mechanism between multiculturalism and creativity. Study 1 examines the individual level of motivation through one’s incremental belief of race. In study 1, 439 middle school students (363 local students; 76 new immigrant students) were selected as the research sample. The results of the study supported the research hypothesis; the incremental belief of race mediated the cognitive dimension of creativity enhancing children’s fluency and originality. Furthermore, a subsequent sequence mediation analysis revealed that this mediating effect is achieved through the open information processing style, characterized by low cognitive closure, exhibited by children of new immigrants. Study 2 focuses on the “cultural distance” within the environment, with cultural distance referring to the degree of diversity in the values between bicultural individuals. In study 2, 472 middle school students (370 local students; 102 new immigrant students), were used as research subjects to understand the potential influence of cultural distance. The results showed that Southeast Asian students (with greater cultural distance) had a disadvantage in family background variables compared to native-born students, as well as a weaker academic performance than both the native-born students and students from China. Despite their weaker academic performance, Southeast Asian students exhibit an improved tendency in domain of creativity: Open-ended creativity, specifically in terms of adaptability and originality. In contrast, despite similar background disadvantages, students from China did not show any difference in their academic performance compared to native-born students and also demonstrated a stronger level of originality in open-ended creativity. A further mediational analysis also revealed that the superior performance of immigrant children in open-ended creativity (fluency) is mediated by cultural distance, meaning that cultural distance has a positive influence on the creativity of children of new immigrants. Study 3 examines the impact of “degree of acculturation” on new immigrant children by considering the level of identification with mainstream culture (e.g. Taiwanese culture) and their native culture (e.g. culture from their home country). Study 3 involved 728 middle school students (525 local students; 203 new immigrant students). The results showed that the degree of acculturation of new immigrant children is positively correlated with their psychological well-being (positive emotions, positive emotion complexity), and affective domain of creativity (creative self-efficacy). Additionally, the degree of acculturation also promotes the expression of affective domain of creativity through positive emotions. Importantly, through the comparison of high and low acculturated new immigrant children, it was found that students with high acculturation not only have similar psychological well-being as native-born students, but also perform significantly better in domain of creativity: Open-ended creativity. On the other hand, students with low acculturation have lower psychological well-being and similar creativity performance as native-born children. Likewise, new immigrants with higher degree of acculturation also perform better in terms of psychological well-being and both types of creativity measures compared to those with lower degree of acculturation. Additionally, further analysis revealed that the degree of acculturation and the complexity of positive emotions have an interactive effect on open-ended creativity. Specifically, only in the high acculturation group, does the complexity of positive emotions effectively enhance open-ended creativity, and it is superior to that of native-born students. Conversely, in the low acculturation group, the complexity of positive emotions has no effect on creativity, and is not significantly different from the performance of native-born students. This also means that high acculturation individuals can effectively receive the positive influence of emotional diversity, and demonstrate the advantages of multicultural experiences, whereas low-acculturation individuals are not affected by emotional diversity.Finally, the present research, through the examination of three studies, has highlighted the psychological mechanisms that influence the strengths in creativity of children from new immigrants’ family, as well as the cultural variables that potentially impact the refinement of multicultural experiences. The findings provide insight into the complexities of the immigrant experience and the role that cultural variables play in shaping it.

王世英、溫明麗、謝雅惠、黃乃熒、黃嘉莉、陳玉娟、陳烘玉、曾尹彥、廖翊君（2006）：〈我國新移民子女學習成就現況之研究〉。《教育資料與研究》，68，137–170。
內政部（2013）：《內政部101年度補助地方政府辦理外籍配偶生活適應輔導成果報告》。
王貞云、黃欣蕙、何淑菁（2012）：〈新移民家庭父母教養子女的問題與因應之探討〉。《家庭教育雙月刊》，37，28–40。https://doi.org/10.6422/JFEB.201205.0028
宋玉英、高振耀（2019）：〈探索五位理工科女性世界中的創造力：她們對創造力的詮釋以及理工背景對其創造力的影響〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，64（3），55–84。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0003
李美怡（2016）：《中文版「種族本質觀量表」之修訂及其信、效度分析》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。
吳毓瑩、蔡振州、蕭如芬（2010）：〈東南亞裔新移民母親之家長參與及與子女學校生活適應之關聯〉。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），157–186。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）：《新編創造思考測驗研究》。教育部。
洪素蘋、林珊如（2004，2月14日）：〈Whatever you say, I can do it ─「學生創意自我效能量表」之編製〉（口頭發表論文）。2004年第二屆創新與創造力研討會，臺北。
洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如（2010）：〈重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗？以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果〉。《教育心理學報》，40，303–321。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080508
張芳全（2006）：〈社經地位、文化資本與教育期望對學業成就影響之結構方程模式檢定〉。《測驗學刊》，53，261–295。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200612.0261
張芳全、王瀚（2014）：〈新移民與非新移民子女的家庭社經地位、家庭文化資本與家庭氣氛之縱貫性研究〉。《教育研究與發展期刊》，10（3），57–94。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042014091003003
張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君（2010）：〈教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響〉。《復興崗學報》，99，151–172。
教育部（2002）：《創造力教育白皮書》。
教育部（2021）：《109學年度各級學校新住民子女就學概況》。
陳姵臻、黃博聖、陳學志、林緯倫（2020）：〈青少年封閉式創造力潛能測量：「青少年版中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及信、效度研究〉。《測驗學刊》，67，167–190。
陳學志（計畫主持人）（2013）：《新移民族群學生科學與數學學習的教育長期追蹤資料庫之建置–教師創造性教學、個人目標導向對新移民及本地生之數學成就及數學創造力之影響》（計畫編號：NSC99-2511-S003-036-MY3）。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告，科技部。https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=2379901
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政（2008）：〈藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係〉。《教育心理學報》，39，127–149。
陶宏麟、銀慶貞、洪嘉瑜（2015）：〈臺灣新住民與本國籍子女隨年級的學習成果差異〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》，27（2），289–322。
黃淑芬（2013）：《從TIMSS 2007分析探討臺灣國小四年級新移民子女之數學成就表現》（未出版碩士論文），國立新竹教育大學。
黃凱祺（2013）：《新移民子女數學學習成就之相關因素分析》（未出版碩士論文），國立新竹教育大學。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏（2012）：〈「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告〉。《測驗學刊》，59，581–607。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201212.0581
黃詩媛（2022）：《幼兒與青少年新住民子女創造力優勢之歷程》（未出版博士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。
黃毅志（2008）：〈如何精確測量職業地位？「改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構〉。《臺東大學教育學報》，19（1），151–160。https://doi.org/10.6778/NTTUERJ.200806.0151
鄧閔鴻、張素凰（2006）：〈廣泛性焦慮疾患與憂鬱疾患共病現象的階層病理模式〉。《中華心理學刊》，48，203–218。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2006.4802.06
蕭佳純（2012）：〈國小學生內在動機, 學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究：教師創造力教學的調節效果〉。《特殊教育研究學刊》，37（3），89–113。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE201211.3703004
蕭佳純（2014）：〈延宕交叉相關與潛在成長模式在創造力傾向與科技創造力關係間之分析〉。《特殊教育研究學刊》，39（2），87–107。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201407.3902004
賴翠媛（2006）：〈新移民子女就讀國民中小學之學業表現及接受學校相關輔導措施之調查研究〉。《特教論壇》，1，12–24。https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.2006.1.12-24
謝名娟、謝進昌（2013）：〈本土與新移民子女學習表現差異之後設分析研究〉。《教育與心理研究》，36（3），119–149。https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852013093603005
謝佩蓉、曾建銘、王如哲、郭工賓（2015）：〈新移民子女國小國語文學習成就大型評量調查研究〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，60（4），93–127。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).04
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Amiot, C. E., De la Sablonniere, R., Terry, D. J., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive-developmental model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(4), 364–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304091
Aytug, Z. G., Rua, T., Brazeal, D. V., Almaraz, J. A., & González, C. B. (2018). A socio-cultural approach to multicultural experience: Why interactions matter for creative thinking but exposures don’t. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.004
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Intellectual hide-and-seek: Prospective Teachers’ Prior Experiences with Creativity Suppression. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 20(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9014-2
Benet-Martínez, V., Lee, F., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2021). Bicultural identity integration:Components, psychosocial antecedents, and outcomes. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-y.Chiu, & Y.-y. Hong (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (pp. 244–284). Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190079741.003.0006
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/026999497378467
Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. M. Chun, P. Balls Organista, & G. Marín (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17–37). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10472-004
Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigration youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., and Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
Bonam, C. M., & Shih, M. (2009). Exploring multiracial individuals’ comfort with intimate interracial relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01589.x
Buriel, R., Perez, W., De Ment, T. L., Chavez, D. V., & Moran, V. R. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism, and self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863980203001
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship of state and trait anxiety to performance on figural and verbal creative tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392788
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Forthmann, B. (2016). A new perspective on the link between multiculturalism and creativity: The relationship between core value diversity and divergent thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.002
Chang, J.-H., Hsu, C.-C., Shih, N.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2014). Multicultural families and creative children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8), 1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114537556
Chang, J. H., Su, J., & Chen, H. C. (2015). Cultural distance between parents and children’s creativity: A within country approach in Taiwan. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(3), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037539
Chang, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wu, I.-C., Chang, J.-H., & Wu, C.-L. (2016). Developmental trends of divergent thinking and feeling across different grades for Taiwanese adolescence between 1990’s and 2010’s. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.002
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
Cheng, C.-Y., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2013). Revisiting the multicultural experience-creativity link: The effects of perceived cultural distance and comparison mind-set. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4(4), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612462413
Cheng, C.-Y., Leung, A. K., & Wu, T.-Y. (2011). Going beyond the multicultural experience-creativity link: The mediating role of emotions. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01729.x
Cheng, C.-Y., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x
Chirumbolo, A., Livi, S., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.518
Chiu, C., Gries, P., Torelli, C. J., & Cheng, S. Y. Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01721.x
Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 189–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214563595
Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1704_4
Connolly, P. (2001). Qualitative methods in the study of children’s racial attitudes and identities. Infant and Child Development, 10(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.280
Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021840
Dai, D. Y., Tan, X., Marathe, D., Valtcheva, A., Pruzek, R. M., & Shen, J. (2012). Influences of social and educational environments on creativity during adolescence: Does SES matter? Creativity Research Journal, 24 (2-3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677338
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
Demes, K. A., & Geeraert, N. (2014). Measures matter: Scales for adaptation, cultural distance, and acculturation orientation revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113487590
Der-Karabetian, A., & Balian, N. (1991). Ingroup, outgroup, and global human identities of Turkish-Armenians. Journal of Social Psychology, 132(4), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924729
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67(8), 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029783
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychologica Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Edwin, C. S., Emily, J. S., & John, C. H. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900404
Fee, A., & Gray, S. J. (2012). The expatriate-creativity hypothesis: A longitudinal field test. Human Relations, 65(12), 1515–1538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712454900
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Forster, J., Friedman, R. S., Butterbach, E. B., & Sassenberg, K. (2005). Automatic effects of deviancy cues on creative cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.253
Gabora, L. (2018). The neural basis and evolution of divergent and convergent thought. In O. Vartanian & R. Jung (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 58–70). Cambridge University Press.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., & Raver, J. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’amato, A., Ferrer, M., Kashma, Y., ... & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001
Gilhooly, K. J., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(3), 279–302. https://doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.1080/13546780442000187
Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/258770
Gocłowska, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). How dual-identity processes foster creativity. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000008
Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Labuschangne, K. (2013). Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212445076
Godart, F. C., Maddux, W. W., Shipilov, A. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0575
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2010.08124bad.003
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 142–161). Harper.
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Promoting the middle east peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333, 1767–1769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925
Hanus, A. E. (2014). Understanding Whites’ colorblind racial attitudes: The role of intergroup anxiety and psychological flexibility. State university of New York at Albany. Hills: Sage.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200218401500400
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hong, Y. Y., Chao, M. M., & No, S. (2009). Dynamic interracial/intercultural processes: The role of lay theories of race. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1283–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00582.x
Horenczyk, G., & Tatar, M. (2012). Conceptualizing the school acculturative context: School, classroom, and the immigrant student. In A. Masten, K. Liebkind & D. J. Hernandez (Eds.), Realizing the potential of immigrant youth (pp. 359–375). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094696.018
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1941
Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., & Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward Blacks, gay men, and lesbians. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059863
Johansson, F. (2005). Masters of the multicultural. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 18–19.
Joshua, J. M. (2014). The influence of students’ experience in the past academic success on convergent thinking. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 22(1), 159–169. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC150780
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment (Vol. 53). John Wiley & Sons.
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical” mood effects on creative problem solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999397379971
Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
Khalil, R., Godde, B., & Karim, A. A. (2019). The link between creativity, cognition, and creative drives and underlying neural mechanisms. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 13, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2019.00018
Kung, F., & Chao, M. (2019). The impact of mixed emotions on creativity in negotiation: An interpersonal perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02660
Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (6), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846
Larsen, J. T., & Stastny, B. J. (2011). It’s a bittersweet symphony: Simultaneously mixed emotional responses to music with conflicting cues. Emotion, 11(6), 1469–1473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024081
Lee, C. S., Therriault, D. J., & Linderholm, T. T. (2012). On the cognitive benefits of cultural experience: Exploring the relationship between studying abroad and creative thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2857
Lemons, G. (2010). Bar drinks, rugas, and gay pride parades: Is creative behavior a function of creative self-efficacy? Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481502
Leung, A. K., & Chiu, C. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5-6), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110361707
Leung, A. K.-Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169
Lin, W.-L., Hsu, K.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, J.-W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026241
Lin, W. -L., & Lien, Y. -W. (2013). The different role of working memory in open-ended versus closed-ended creative problem solving: A dual-process theory account. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752249
Lin, W.-L., & Shih, Y.-L. (2016). The developmental trends of different creative potentials in relation to children’s reasoning abilities: From a cognitive theoretical perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 36–47.
Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Emotional complexity. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 513–530). Guilford Press.
Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 265–278). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.017
Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome... Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210367786
Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1047–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014861
Maddux, W., Leung, A. K.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Toward a more complete understanding of the link between multicultural experience and creativity. American Psychologist, 64(2), 156–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014941
Maddux, W. W., Lu, J. G., Affinito, S. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). Multicultural experiences: A systematic review and new theoretical framework. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0138
Martin, L., & Shao, B. (2016). Early immersive culture mixing: The key to understanding cognitive and identity differences among multiculturals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116639391
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2(3),213–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x
Mok, A., Morris, M., Benet-Martínez, V., & Karakitapoglu-Aygun, Z. (2007). Embracing American culture: Structures of social identity and social networks among first-generation biculturals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(5), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107305
Nguyen, A.-M. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111435097
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323
No, S., Hong, Y. Y., Liao, H. Y., Lee, K., Wood, D., & Chao, M. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012978
Olteţeanu, A. M., & Falomir, Z. (2015). comRAT-C: A computational compound Remote Associates Test solver based on language data and its comparison to human performance. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.05.015
Ozdemir, S. B. & Stattin, H. (2013). Why and when is ethnic harassment a risk for immigrant adolescents’ school adjustment? Understanding the processes and conditions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(8), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0038-y
Pauker, K. & Ambady, N. (2009). Multiracial faces: How categorization affects memory at the boundaries of race. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01588.x
Pauker, K., Meyers, C., Sanchez, D. T., Gaither, S. E., & Young, D. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: Identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), 1–15.
Phinney, J. S. (1989). Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 9(1-2), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431689091004
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). Cambridge University Press.
Quoidbach, J., Gruber, J., Mikolajczak, M., Kogan, A., Kotsou, I., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Emodiversity and the emotional ecosystem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2057–2066. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038025
Rangel, U., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1056–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022401
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Elsevier Academy Press.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Saad, C., Damian, K., Benet-Martínez, V., Moons, W.G., & Robins, R. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and cognitive fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779374.018
Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2003, August 1–5). The long-term predictive validity of a performancebased assessment used to identify gifted CLD Students. Proceedings of the 15th Biennial World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Students, Adelaide, Australia.
Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling, age, and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_5
Sanchez, D. T., & Garcia, J. A. (2009). When race matters: Racially stigmatized others and perceiving race as a biological construction affect biracial people’s daily well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1154–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209337628
Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
Scherman, R. M. (2010). A theoretical look at biculturalism in intercountry adoption. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 19(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313201003771742.
Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). MIT Press.
Sharif, R. (2019). The relations between acculturation and creativity and innovation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 28(1), Article 100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100287
Shih, M., Bonam, C., Sanchez, D., & Peck, C. (2007). The social construction of race: Biracial identity and vulnerability to stereotypes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01584.x
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
Tadmor, C. T., Chao, M. M., Hong, Y. Y., & Polzer, J. T. (2013). Not just for stereotyping anymore: Racial essentialism reduces domain-general creativity. Psychological Science, 24(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452570
Tadmor, C. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Maddux, W. W. (2012). Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029360
Tadmor, C. T., Hong, Y. Y., Chao, M. M., Wiruchnipawan, F., & Wang, W. (2012). Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029719
Tadmor, C. T., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326279
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: norms-technical manual. Personnel Press, Inc.
Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322438215
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem solving skills and the arts orientation. Ablex Pub.
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1994). Acculturation strategies, psychological sdjustment, and sococultural competence during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(3), 329–343.https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90036-1
Ward, C., & Rana-Deuba, A. (1999). Acculturation and adaptation revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(4), 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030004003
Ward, C., Stuart, J., & Kus, L. (2011). The construction and validation of a measure of ethno-cultural identity conflict. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.558872
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (2008). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge University Press.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Waugh, C. E., Thompson, R. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2011). Flexible emotional responsiveness in trait resilience. Emotion, 11(5), 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0021786
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: Definition of terms and a taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 157–196). MIT Press.
Williams, F. E. (1969). Models for encouraging creativity in the classroom by integrating cognitive-affective behaviors. Educational Technology, 9(12), 7–13.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410006
Zagefka, H., Nigbur, D., Gonzalez, R., & Tip, L. (2013). Why does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority members? International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.729841
Zhang, W., Sjoerds, Z., & Hommel, B. (2020). Metacontrol of human creativity: The neurocognitive mechanisms of convergent and divergent thinking. NeuroImage, 210, Article 116572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116572