研究生: |
陳映伶 Chen, Ying Ling |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
藝術融入海洋環境教育對海洋素養提昇之研究-以海科館「針織珊瑚陸上造礁」活動為例 Art-embedded Marine Environmental Education for Enhancing Marine Literacy: taking “Crochet Coral” of National Marine Museum of Science and Technology as an example |
指導教授: |
葉欣誠
Yeh, Shin-Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
環境教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Education |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 126 |
中文關鍵詞: | 海洋素養 、環境教育 、針織 、海洋教育 、珊瑚生態 、海洋環境教育 、環境藝術 |
英文關鍵詞: | Ocean literacy, Crochet, Art-based environment education, Environmental Education, Marine education, Marine environmental education, Coral ecosystem |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GEE.004.2019.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:258 下載:20 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
海洋是世界地表面積最大的生態環境,透過海洋所發揮的生產力與各種自然現象而影響了整個人類的生活與文化。隨著海洋環境問題的浮現與惡化,聯合國Rio+20將水下生態列入提出的17項聯合國永續發展目標之中,以確保海洋資源的永續發展及海洋素養的建立。海洋素養的形成,需從教育,生活,文化,藝術…等各層面建構而成。美國國家海洋暨大氣總署(NOAA)也發展「海洋素養」及相關綱要,成為各國及台灣海洋素養建立與海洋教育執行之參考。
本研究探討從教育層面建構台灣學童之海洋素養,研究對象為12年國教學童,透過海洋課程模組,將針織藝術融入海洋環境教育現場教學,以引起學童之學習興趣。設計問卷調查方式,從量化與質性分析,研究台灣1到12年級學生之海洋素養現況,以及透過針織藝術教學融入課程之後,是否達到海洋教育成效,提昇研究對象之海洋素養。
結果顯示本研究對象之海洋素養現況,經過海洋環境教育課程及針織教學介入之後,在海洋環境知識進步顯著,平均分數上升;在海洋環境態度則並無顯著差異;對於海洋環境採取行動也沒有顯著成長。針織藝術活動部分介入,研究對象接受課程知識意願較高,同時對學習針織技巧有極大興趣。從半結構式訪談,參與活動教師對於針織活動持肯定態度,並能列舉課程對於參與學童之行為影響。
本研究是台灣首度以針織藝術創造模仿海洋生物型態,融入海洋環境教育傳遞海洋珊瑚礁生態概念之案例,並期待提供未來更多跨領域課程融入海洋環境教育研究之參考。
As the largest ecological environment, marine connects the lives and culture of human being. Company with the problems and worse situation, sustainable development goal of under water has been listed in 17 goals of UN Rio20+ in 2015 to ensure the resources from the ocean can be sustainable used and to build up the ocean literacy. Ocean literacy was formed from education, life styles, art, culture…. The “Ocean Literacy” conducted by NOAA has become the important reference of many countries including Taiwan.
To investigate ocean literacy of Taiwan students, we design a set course of coral ecosystem for K2-K12 students by using crochet art as a embedded skill. We used questionnaire before and after the class to measure the effect this set class. Both quantitative and qualitative research, we try to find out ocean literacy of Taiwan student. And looking forward the effect of using crochet art as a teaching tool to enhance students interesting in marine environment.
According the result of the study, students’ knowledge were enhanced by this set of marine class. But the friendly attitude of ocean were not enhanced. And they didn’t want to take aggressive action for protecting ocean environment. Learning crochet is fun for both students and teachers. But sometimes they focus in learning the skill more than protecting ocean action. Interaction class arise the interesting of students to learning, but we need more connection to link knowledge, attitude, and action.
This is the first time for ocean environmental education to use crochet art as an interactive media to transform the image of corals and to introduce marine ecosystem in Taiwan. We hope to make this case as a reference material for crossing field study in marine environment education.
Athman, J., and M. Monroe (2001). “Elements of Effective Environmental Education Programs.” In Defining Best Practices in Boating and Fishing Education, 37–48. Washington, DC: Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation.
Barnard, M. (1998). Visual culture and the social process. In M.Barnard (Eds.). Art, design, and visual (166-196). London: Macmillan.
Butzow, J.W. (1980). Have you been to the shore before? A marine educationinfusion unit on seashore and aquarium life. Orono: University of Maine.
Butzow, J.W., & Kane, P. (1982). Do you know our marine fish? A marineeducation infusion unit. Orono: University of Maine.
Carleton-Hug. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Eval Program Plann. 2010 May;33(2):159-64.
Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 101-123.
Floriang Kaiser, Sybille Wolfing, Ursfuhrer (1999). Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:1-19
Flowers A. A., Carroll P. J., Green T. G. & Larson R. L. (2015), Using art to assess environmental education outcomes, Environmental Education Research, 21:(6), 846-864.
Guilfoil, Joanne K., Ed.; Sandler, Alan R., Ed.(1999),Built Environment Education in Art Education. National Art Education Association, Reston, VA.
Holmes, G. & Hooper, N. Higher Education (2000) 40: 247. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004003032197
Kathryn Vercillo (2012), Crochet Saved My Life: The Mental and Physical Health Benefits of Crochet. UK, Lightning Source UK Ltd.
M. Marks, L. Chandler & C. Baldwin (2016): Environmental art as an innovative medium for environmental education in Biosphere Reserves, Environmental Education Research, DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1214864
Meade, Micheal (2008), Creative Ecology: Art’s role in Addressing Environmental and Sustaintable Issue in Australia (Master's thesis, Connecticut Collage), Retrieved from http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1580&context=isp_collection
Wertheim M. and Wertheim C. (2015). “Crochet Coral Reef”, Institute For Figuring
NOAA (2013), Ocean Literacy The Essential Principles and Fundamental Concepts of Ocean Sciences for Learners of All Ages Version 2, Retrieved from www.oceanliteracy.net
Susana Tereso (2012), Environmental Education through Art, International Journal of Education through Art, Volume 8, Number 1, pp. 23-47(25).
UNESCO (2006), Understandings of literacy, Education for All Global Monitoring Report, ch6, 147-159.
WalkerJ., & Chaplin, S. (1997). Visual culture as a field of study, and the orgins of visual culture studies. Visual culture: An introduction, 31-50. New York: Manchester University Press.
Young Imm Kang Song (2008). Exploring Connections between Environmental Education and Ecological Public Art, Childhood Education, 85:(1), 13-19, DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2008.10523051
Young Imm Kang Song (2012). Crossroads of public art, nature and environmental education, Environmental Education Research, Volume 18, No. 6, 797–813
內政部(2006)。海洋政策白皮書。
吳靖國(2012)。中小學海洋教育課程綱要之檢討與重構。教育資料與研究雙月刊,92期,25-46。
吳靖國(2012)。當前臺灣海洋教育的關鍵問題。臺灣教育評論月刊,12期,68-69。
邱魏津;黃珮雯;蔡瀞瑤;許甄育(2016)。應用顯微鏡下所觀察到的生物形態於手鉤編織之創意設計。紡織綜合研究期刊,26(2),27-35。
周漢強(2015)。海洋素養與海洋教育內涵比較研究:以現行海洋教育課程綱要為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
周祝瑛(2011)。臺灣海洋教育之回顧與展望。海洋事務與政策評論,創刊號,43-64。
高燦榮(2012)。環境藝術論。台北市。國家出版社。
徐磊清(2004)。環境心理學:環境知覺和行為。台北市。五南出版社。
教育部(2002)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
張芬芬、張嘉育(2015)。十二年國教「議題融入課程」規劃芻議。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(3),26-33。
張正杰(2015)。影響國中學生海洋科學知識與海洋教育能力指標因素之研究。教育學報。第 43 卷第 2 期,173–196。
許世璋、徐家凡(2012)。池南自然教育中心一日型方案 「天空之翼」對於六年級生環境素養之成效分析。科學教育學刊,20(1),69-94。
許世璋(2003)。大學環境教育課程對於環境行動與 其它環境素養變項之成效分析。科學教育學刊,2003, 第十一卷第一期, 97-119。
許明欽、李坤崇、羅綸新(1986)。海洋教育基本知能融入中小學課程綱要計畫。教育部(教育研究委員會),未出版。
許籐繼(2011)。國民小學教師海洋教育能力指標及權重體系建構之研究。教育科學研究期刊,56(3),61-90。
陳美娟(2013)。Tim Gaudreau環境藝術計畫融入四年級學生環境教育之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
陳瓊花(2003)。視覺文化的品鑑。人文研究與語文教育研討會論文集。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
黃靖淵(2014)。我國國民中學學生能源素養調查研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
蔡錦玲(2008)。海洋科研與海洋教育發展之整合策略。教育資料與研究雙月刊,85期,1-18。
溫文正(2013)。臺灣海洋環境教育:海洋環境知識,保護海洋環境態度,及行為模式之探討。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
楊冠政(1997)。環境教育。臺北市:明文。
戴昌鳳、俞何興、喬凌雲、王冑、陳慶生、詹森、楊穎堅、邱銘達、郭家榆、郭天俠、溫良碩、陳守愚、蕭仁傑、謝志豪、張妮娜、林先詠、林佩諭(2014)。臺灣區域海洋學。台北市:臺大出版中心,412-413。
環保署(2011)。中華民國環境教育法。