研究生: |
陳卓航 Tan, Zhuo Hang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
市長異動對企業社會責任影響之探究 Exploring the Impacts of Mayors' Reshuffle on Corporate Social Responsibility |
指導教授: |
陳慧玲
Chen, Hueiling |
口試委員: |
林孝倫
Lin, Hsiao-Lun 林瑞青 Lin, Ruey-Ching 陳慧玲 Chen, Hueiling |
口試日期: | 2021/06/28 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 67 |
中文關鍵詞: | 市長異動 、企業社會責任 、企業狀態 、法治環境 |
英文關鍵詞: | Mayors' reshuffle, Corporate social responsibilities, Firms' types, Legal environment |
研究方法: | 行動研究法 、 現象分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200019 |
論文種類: | 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類) |
相關次數: | 點閱:93 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自中國開放後,經濟大幅成長。既有文獻研究結果顯示,地方政府官員的升遷 制度是影響中國經濟快速增長的主要因素。隨著經濟發展,中國管制者日益重視企 業社會責任,並將相關指標納入地方政府官員升遷指標。地方政府不僅重視經濟發 展,亦須重視企業社會責任。本研究係檢視市長的異動對公司從事企業社會責任之 影響。本文亦檢視市長的不同升遷方式對公司從事企業社會責任之影響。
本文樣本期間為 2010 至 2017。研究結果表示,無論新市長來自同一個城市或 是其他的城市,當地公司之企業社會責任都未受到影響,究其可能原因是大部分企 業不想引起新市長的注意,維持該公司的企業社會責任的表現。實證結果亦顯示, 企業型態並未顯著影響市長異動與企業社會責任關聯性。此外,實證結果顯示,位 於法制環境較佳地區之企業,當新市長來自其他城市時,其企業社會責任績效會下 降。
關鍵字:市長異動、企業社會責任、企業型態、法制環境
Since China was liberated, the economy has dramatically grown. Empirical results of prior studies demonstrate that promotion systems of local officials is one of reasons for rapid economic growth in China. With economic development, Chinese regulators have increasingly emphasized corporate social responsibilities (CSR) and have incorporated CSR into indicators of local governors’ promotion. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the mayors’ reshuffle affects firms’ CSR performance. This study also investigates whether business types and legal environment affect the relationship between mayors’ reshuffle and companies’ CSR performance.
The sample period of this study is from 2010 to 2017. The results indicate that firms’ CSR performance is not affected by mayors’ reshuffle no matter new mayors come from the same city or from another cities. The possible reason is that firms try not to get the new mayors’ attention; thus, they remain their CSR performance. The empirical results also indicate that the firms’ types do not affect the relationship between mayors’ reshuffle and CSR performance. Furthermore, the results show that firms locating at area with better legal environment may reduce the level of CSR performance when the new mayor is from another city.
Keywords: Mayors’ reshuffle, Corporate social responsibilities, Firms’ types, Legal environment
Albareda, L., J. M. Lozano., and T. Ysa. 2007. Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics 74: 391-407.
Cao, G., R. Tao., F. Su., and M. Liu. 2010. Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities. Urban Studies 47(10): 2217-2236.
Cao, X., G. G. Tian., M. Qian., M. Lemmon., and X. Qian. 2018. Political promotion, CEO incentives, and the relationship between pay and performance. Management Science 65(7): 2947-3448.
Chen, D., and Y. Chen. 2008. Policy uncertainty and earning management by listed companies. Economic Research Journal (6): 97-111. (In Chinese)
Chen, R. C. Y., and J. Wang., S. Hung. 2017. The impact of corporate governance on the corporate social responsibility and firm values. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review 25(1): 135-176. (In Chinese)
Chen, Y., L. Zhou., and H. Li. 2005. Relative performance evaluation: An empirical analysis of turnover of the Chinese local officials. China Journal of Economics 1:83-96. (In Chinese)
Chen, X., C. Song., L. Wu., Y. Xie., J. He., T. Wang., Y. Lin., T. Jin., A. Wang., Y. Liu., Q. Dai., B. Liu., Y. Wang., and H. Mao. 2017. Air pollution in China: Status and spatiotemporal variations. Elsevier Science 227: 334-347.
Chen, Z., and T. Hamilton. 2020. What is driving corporate social and environmental responsibility in China? An evaluation of legacy effects, organizational characteristics and transnational pressures. Geoforum 110: 116-124.
Eriksson, T., A. Poulsen., and M.C. Villeval. 2009. Feedback and incentives: experimental evidence. Labour Economics 16: 679-688.
Giannarakis, G. 2013. The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5): 393-416.
Hambrick, D. C., L. K. Trevino., and M. K. Chin. 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quaterly 58(2):197-232.
Jin, H., Y. Qian., and B. R. Weingast. 2005. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics 89(9-10): 1719-1742.
Li, H., and L. Zhou. 2005. Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics 89(9-10): 1743-1762.
Li, L., Y. Lei., D. Pan., C. and Yu. 2016. Economic evaluation of the air pollution effect on public health in China’s 74 cities. SpringerPlus 5.
Li, P., D. Zhao., and M. E. Kahn. 2015. Water pollution progress at borders: The role of changes in China’s political promotion incentives. American Economic Journal Economic 7(4): 223-242.
Li, W., and R. Zhang. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethic 96(4): 631-645.
Lim, A., and K. Tsutsui. 2012. Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy Effect. American Sociological Review 77(1): 69-98.
Liu, C., K. Qiao., and L. Zhou. 2014. Interim rank, promotion incentives and current performance: Evidence from the dynamic tournament among Chinese local officials. China Journal Electronic 1(3): 84-106. (In Chinese)
McKinnon, R. I. 1997. Market-preserving fiscal federalism in American monetary union. Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance: Essays in honour of Vito Tanzi, ed. by M. I. Blejer., and T. Ter-minassian, (New York: Routledge).
Piotroski, J. D., and T. Zhang. 2014. Politicians and the IPO decision: The impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China. Journal of Financial Economics 111(1): 111-136.
Qiao, K. 2013. A reexamination of the mechanism of official promotion tournament in China: Evidence from provincial and municipal governments. Journal of Finance and Economics 39(4): 124-134. (In Chinese)
Roberts, R. R. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting Organizations and Society 17(6): 595-612.
Su, K. 2019. Does religion benefit corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from China. Wiley Online Library 26(6): 1206-1221.
Wang, F., L. Xu., F. Guo., and J. Zhang. 2019. Loan guarantees, corporate social responsibility disclosure and audit fees: evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04135-6.
Yan, M. 2019. Government and regulation in promoting corporate social responsibility- the case of China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 32: 264-294.
Zamir, F., and A. Saeed. 2020. Location matters: Impact of geographical proximity to financial centers on corporate social responsibility disclosure in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 37: 263-295.
Zhou, L. 2007. Governing China’s local officials: An analysis of promotion tournament model. Economic Research Journal 7: 36-50. (In Chinese)