簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 施美朱
Mei-Chu Shih
論文名稱: 國中生電腦學習成就相關因素之研究
A Study on Relevant Factors of Computer Learning Achievement of Junior High School Students
指導教授: 蔡錫濤
Tsai, Shir-Tau
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 141
中文關鍵詞: 電腦學習成就電腦態度電腦焦慮電腦信心電腦喜好電腦有用性認知技能、情意
英文關鍵詞: computer learning achievement, computer attitude, computer anxiety, computer confidence, computer interest, computer usefulness, cognitive domain, psychomotor domain、affective domain
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:211下載:25
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著資訊的蓬勃發展,國中電腦課程教育已然開展,資訊已是人們必備的生活素養。本研究即就影響電腦學習成就的相關因素加以探討,以分層隨機抽樣的方式,共抽取國中生樣本1,224人,進行電腦態度問卷調查,獲得有效樣本1,160人,並蒐集學生的電腦學習成就的成績及智力的百分位數來分析探討。分別以t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析來進行資料分析,得到以下的結論:
    一、國中生的性別、智力、喜愛科目、家長教育程度及家庭社經地位不同,其電腦態度及電腦學習成就也就有差異。
    二、學校班級規模、學校所在地及學校創校歷史不同,學生的電腦態度會有差異,電腦學習成就則沒有顯著的差異。
    三、國中生電腦學習經驗愈豐富的,其電腦學習態度愈佳,電腦學習成就也愈好。初學時期不同,電腦態度、電腦學習成就會有差異。
    四、國中生家中有電腦設備、有人討論、擁有電腦書籍、擁有電腦雜誌的,其電腦態度、電腦學習成就表現較佳。
    五、電腦態度與電腦學習成就及其三個構面認知、技能及情意均有顯著的正相關。
    六、對國中生電腦學習成就有顯著預測力的有六個變項:智力、電腦焦慮、性別、班級規模、有無電腦書籍以及每週使用電腦的時數,預測解釋力為78.1%。

    In this age of information, information has become an important part of our life. Due to this demand, computer education has been recognized its importance and added to our junior high school curriculum. The purpose of this study is to investigate factors that affect computer learning achievement of junior high school students. The method used here is by random survey. A sample size of one thousand two hundred and twenty four junior high school students were chosen. These samplers were asked about their attitude towards computer learning. Samplers’ grades of Computer course and intelligence quotient (IQ) were examined for relation. A total of 1,160 students out of 1,224 were valid samplers. T-test, One-way ANOVA, Person Product-moment Correlation and multiple regression were applied in the examination. The results are as follows:
    A.Student’s gender, IQ, subject preference, parent’s educational level and social status have correlation with their computer attitude and computer learning achievement.
    B.Class size, school location and school’s historical development have correlation with student’s computer attitude; however, computer learning achievement is not correlated with these variables.
    C.The more computer-learning experience a student has, the better computer attitude he/she has. So is his/her computer learning achievement. Starting learning computer at different age will result in the difference in computer attitude and learning achievement.
    D.Students with home computer facilities, with people to discuss with, and with computer books or magazines have better attitude as well as learning achievement in computer.
    E.There is significant correlation among computer attitude, learning achievement and the three aspects: cognitive, psychomotor and affective domain.
    F.There are six valid predictive factors: IQ, computer anxiety, gender, class size, access to computer books, and weekly computer usage hours. The predictive accuracy value was 78.1%.

    謝誌.....................................................I 中文摘要.................................................III 英文摘要 ................................................V 目錄.....................................................VII 表次.....................................................XI 圖次.....................................................XV 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究緣起......................................1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題............................4 第三節 研究範圍與限制................................7 第四節 名詞定義......................................8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 電腦學習成就..................................11 第二節 電腦態度......................................18 第三節 影響相關因素..................................27 第四節 文獻探討摘要..................................32 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究架構......................................35 第二節 研究方法......................................38 第三節 研究步驟......................................39 第四節 研究對象......................................41 第五節 研究工具......................................42 第六節 資料分析......................................49 第四章 研究發現與討論 第一節 學生人口變項與電腦態度及電腦學習成就的關係...53 第二節 學校環境變項與電腦態度及電腦學習成就的關係....74 第三節 電腦學習經驗與電腦態度及電腦學習成就的關係....83 第四節 家中電腦資源與電腦態度及電腦學習成就的關係....95 第五節 電腦態度與電腦學習成就的關係..................104 第六節 各變項對電腦學習成就的預測....................105 第七節 研究發現摘要..................................107 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論..........................................109 第二節 建議與後續研究................................111 參考書目 中文部分.............................................115 外文部分.............................................119 附錄 附錄一 職業分類.....................................125 附錄二 國中生電腦態度量表預試信度分析...............126 附錄三 國民中學之電腦課程標準.......................128 附錄四 調查樣本學校所在地區分配表...................130 附錄五 本研究樣本資料...............................131 附錄六 委託函.......................................132 附錄七 問卷調查協助函...............................133 附錄八 預試問卷.....................................134 附錄九 正式問卷.....................................138

    一、中文部分
    丁導民(民85),空中大學學生自我導向學習準備度、電腦態度與電腦成就關係之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    王以仁、吳清山(民75),國中學生電腦態度及其相關素之研究。國立大學教育與心理研究,9,177-190
    王以仁、吳清山、劉定霖(民76),國中學生學業成就對電腦成就、電腦態度之影響。台北市立師專學報,18,27-42。
    王春龍(民87),認知型態與多媒體電腦輔助教學策略對電機控制學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
    王基振(民84),研究生的電腦態度與電腦知能之分析探討。大葉工學院資訊管理研究所士論文。
    王裕方(民87),電腦態度與學習績效的影響因素之探討–中學生網頁製作教學的實地實驗研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    王智宏(民87),資優教育適用的智力理論。資優教育季刊,69,19-21。
    尹玫君(民81),台南地區大學生電腦學習素養內涵之研究,台南師院學報,25,65-82。
    吳正己、邱發貴(民85),資訊社會國民的電腦素養教育,社教雙月刊,73,13-18。
    吳明隆(民82),國民小學學生學習電腦的態度及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    吳明隆(民86),國小學生數學學習行為與其電腦焦慮、電腦態度關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    吳美惠(民81),在職成人的電腦態度電腦成就及其相關素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    何榮桂(民88),教育部「資訊教育基礎建設計畫」與北、高兩市「資訊教育白皮書」簡介。資訊與教育,70,2-8。
    林震城(民86),兩岸大學生電腦態度及電腦素養之比較研究。中央資訊管理研究碩士論文。
    林曉妮(民86),電腦態度與電腦素養的影響因素探討–小學生的實地實驗研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    唐文儀(民83),南部地區國小電腦素養相關因素之比較研究。台南師院學生學刊,15-82。
    翁百安(民87),環境因素與個人因素對國中生電腦態度與電腦素養之影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    莊雅茹(民82),台灣學生電腦焦慮之探討。教育研究資訊,1(5),115-127。
    黃常明(民87),我中小學教師遠距教學學習成就及相關因素研究──以資策會「居家學習模式」實驗設計「全球資訊網上的教材製作」課程學員為例。師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳婉如(民87),認知型態與空間能力對程式設計學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳姿秀(民85),母親就業與否及其相關因素對子女之學業成就、生活適應影響之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳立祥(民88),資訊教育推動現況與展望。師友,383,16-20。
    許瀚濃(民86),國中生多媒體電腦輔助學習影響因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
    國立編譯館(民88),國中電腦課程標準的內涵與教材編選要旨。國立編譯館通訊,12(1),19-26。
    湯惠誠(民83),高雄市高中學生電腦態度及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
    路君約(民81),國民中學智力測驗(第三種)編製報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,39,1-10。
    教育部(84),國民中學課程標準。台北:聯教。
    程溫嘉(民83):性別、學科別對大學生電腦態度之影響。私立淡江大學教育資料科學研究所碩士論文。
    駱月絹(民80),中小學電腦素養教學實驗研究報告,載於國立科學園區實驗高級中學,中小學電腦素養教學實驗第三年期成果報告,1-42,新竹:國立科學工業園區高級實驗中學。
    蔣姿儀(民85):國民小學學生電腦態度、電腦素養及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    蔡明富(民87),多元智力理論在資優教育的啟示。資優教育季刊,68,9-15。
    蔡淑娥(民74),高中生的電腦態度、電腦成就及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    蔡錫濤(民84):國中生活科技課程內涵及其教學策略探討。中學工藝教育,28(1),10-15。
    魏延超(民87),教育學程對電腦態度及電腦素養之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    蕭惠君、邱貴發(民87),歐亞地區中小學資訊教育之概況。臺灣教育,37-45。
    韓善民(民87),我國資訊教育基礎建設簡介。研習資訊,15(2),16-21。
    二、外文部分
    Anderson, R. E., Klassen, D. L., & Jonnson, D. C. (1981). In defense of a comprehensive view of computer literacy-a reply to luehrmann. Mathematics Teacher, 74(9), 687-690.
    Boos, M. (1986). The relationship of certain personality and cognitive variables to computer attitudes and anxiety in pre-service teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(7), 2547A
    Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147-158.
    Campbell, N. J. (1990). Self-perceived computer proficiency, computer attitudes, and computer attributions as predictors of enrollment in college computer courses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, 16-20.
    Dambrot, F. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, S. M., Marshall, R. S. and Garver, J. A. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71-86.
    Fetler, M. (1985). Sex differences on the california statewide assessment of computer literacy. Sex Roles, 13(3-4), 181-191.
    Francis, L. J., & Evan, T. E. (1995). The reliability and validity of the bath county computer attitude scale. Journal of educational Computing Research, 12(2), 135-146.
    Fritz, J. M. (1985). Rethinking computer literacy. in K. Duncan & D. Harris(EDS.), Computers in Education, NY: North-Holland-Amsterdam, 705-710.
    Gange, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston, Inc. 3rd edition.
    Hawkins, R., & Paris, A. E. (1997). Computer literacy and computer use among college students: Differences in black and white. The Journal of Negro Education. Journal of Negro Education, 66, 147-158.
    Hignite, M. A.(1991). The relationship between computer attitudes and computer literacy among prospective business education teachers at missouri’s public four-year college . Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(11), 3705A.
    Hignite, M. A., & Echternacht, L. J. (1992). Assessment of the relationships between the computer attitudes and computer literacy levels of prospective educators. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 381-391.
    Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. New York: yale.
    Houle, P. A. (1996). Toward understanding student differences in a computer skills course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(1), 25-48.
    Kay, R. H. (1989). Gender differences in computer attitudes, literacy, locus of control and commitment. Journal of Educational Computing in Education, 22(1), 307-316.
    Klassen, D.L., & Anderson, R. E. (1982). Computer literacy, in A. S. Kepner(ED.), Computer in the Classroom. Washington , DC: National Education.
    Kluever, R. C., Lam, T.C.M., Hoffman, E, Green, K. E., & Swearingen, D.L. (1992). The Computer Attitude Scale: Assessing Teachers’ Attitude toward Computer. (ED 348963).
    Koohang, A. A. (1989). A study of attitudes toward computers : Anxiety, confidence, linking, and perception of usefulness. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2), 214-228.
    Lawton, J., & Gerschner, V. T. (1982). A review of literature on attitudes towards computers and computerized instruction. Journal of Research and development in Education, 16(1), 50-55.
    Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Women, girl, and computers: A first look at the evidence. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 115-122.
    Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1984a). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 501-505.
    Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, c. (1984 b) . The effects of sex , age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. AEDS Journal, 18(2), 67-77.
    Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1985a). The reliability and validity of an instrument for the assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 903-908.
    Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1985b). The effect of sex , age and computer experience on computer attitude. Association for Educational Data System (AEDS) Journal, 18(4), 66-67
    Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1985c). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. (ED 264297).
    Mathews, W. M., & Wolf, A. W. (1983). Measurement attitude toward computers: The computer appreciator-critic attitude scales. (ED 231886).
    McGowan M. K., & Cornwell L. (1999). Measuring computer literacy through the use of proficiency exams. The Journal of Computer Information Systems,39(3),107-112.
    Moroz, p. a., & Nash, J. B. (1997). Bath county computer attitude scale: A reliability and validity scale . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, 24-28).
    Moursund, D. (1976). What is computer literacy? Creative Computing, 55(2).
    Reeves, T. C. (1998). "Future Schlock," "The Computer Delusion," and "The End of Education": Responding to Critics of Educational Technology. Educational Technology, 38,49-53。
    Roy, R. (1986). Technological literacy : clarifying the concept and its relation to STS. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 6(2ſ), 131-137. (ED 308099).
    Shashaani, L. (1993). Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers. Computer and Education, 18, 263-167.
    Simonson, M. R., Matt, A., & Maurer M. M. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literary and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 231-247.
    Smith, E. S. (1993). Myers-briggs type indicator and computer literacy: A study of adult learners in technological business environment. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania University.
    Snelbecker, G. E., Bhote-Eduljee, N., & Aiken, R. M. (1992). Demographic variables, experience, aptitudes and attitudes as predictors of teachers’ learning about computer. (ED 344877).
    Sowers,J., & Powers, L. (1989). Preparing students with cerebral palsy and mental retardation for the transition from school to community-based employment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 12, 25-35.
    Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Giftedness and successful intelligence. In T.L. Cross, J.J. Gallagher & A. Starko (Eds.), Research briefs,1-14.
    Subhi, T. (1999). Attitudes toward computers of gifted students and their teachers High Ability Studies. High Ability Studies, 10(1), 69-84.
    Watt, D. H. (1980). Computer literacy : What should schools be doing about it? Classroom Computer News, November/December, 1-26.
    Woodrow, J. E. (1991). A comparison of four computer attitudes scale . Journal of Educational computing Research, 7 , 165-187.
    Woodrow, J. E. (1994). The development of computer-related attitudes of secondary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(4), 307-338.

    QR CODE