簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 余承澔
Yu, Cheng-hao
論文名稱: 自我調整學習理論應用於國小高年級安親班學生完成回家作業之行動研究
An Action Research of Applying Self-Regulated Learning Theory to Upper Elementary School Students at an After-School Care Center in Completing Homework
指導教授: 唐淑華
Tang, Shu-Hua
口試委員: 章勝傑
Chang, Sheng-jie
林君憶
Lin, Jun-yi
唐淑華
Tang, Shu-hua
口試日期: 2022/05/14
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 課程與教學研究所
Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 166
中文關鍵詞: 自我調整學習回家作業課後照顧安親班
英文關鍵詞: self-regulated learning, homework, after-school care
研究方法: 行動研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200546
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:40
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究源於研究者對於自身教學場域之觀察,以及對當今自主學習趨勢的響應。研究者發現,自身所服務之私立兒童課後照顧服務中心(下文以安親班代稱之)的學生,相當缺乏自主學習之能力,因此設計並實施本研究。目的在應用自我調整學習 (Self-Regulated Learning, SRL) 理論以發展一套教學方案,幫助學生在完成回家作業的歷程中習得SRL策略;並檢視學生在接受本方案後,在SRL策略運用與態度上的變化;最後探討研究者在此一歷程中的反思與成長。

    本研究採用行動研究法,研究場域為臺北市一所安親班的五、六年級混齡班,共13位學生。本研究共分為兩期:行動期與修正期,實施時長皆為六週。在研究過程中,研究者以參與式觀察、文件分析、訪談等方式蒐集資料,並就所蒐集資料進行整理、歸納與分析。
    本研究之結論如下:

    一、適用於安親班之自我調整學習教學方案的內容主要有二:首先,是透過差異化的計畫表,引導學生進行事前的目標設定、自我激勵與環境建構;在執行時自我記錄、時間管理與尋求幫助;並在事後自我反思。其次,是藉由故事討論與工作站學習法,引導學生在情境中練習SRL的三階段循環。

    二、發展教學方案的歷程中,主要遭遇學生難以看見自己的進步、學生缺乏學科學習策略、教師過度焦慮等困難。解決方式則是結構化的教學介入、搭建學習策略鷹架、教師自身善用自我激勵與反思策略等。

    三、接受本方案後,學生的SRL策略運用與態度都有所進步,並展現出正向調節的行為。

    四、進行本研究後,研究者的教師信念與自我效能感有所改善。
    研究者根據上述結論,提出對自我調整學習教學及研究之建議,以供實務工作者或研究者參考。

    This research was based on the researcher's observation of his own teaching environment and responding to the current trend of self-directed learning. This study was designed and implemented because the researcher found that the students at the after-school care center for children he worked at severely lacked the ability to learn independently. The purposes of the study were to apply the Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) theory in order to develop an instructional program to assist students in learning the SRL strategies during the process of completing their homework; additionally, to examine changes in students' use of SRL strategies and attitudes while participating in the program; and lastly, to explore and discuss the researcher's reflections and growth throughout the process.

    This research study utilized an action research approach with the research environment consisting of 13 students in a 5th and 6th grade mixed-age class at a private after-school care service center for children in Taipei City. The study was divided into two periods: an action period and a revision period, both of which lasted six weeks. During the study course, the researcher collected data by using methods such as participant observation, document analysis, and interviews, and then the data information collected were organized, summarized, and analyzed.
    The conclusions of this study were as follows:

    I.The content of the self-regulated learning instructional program for after-school care classes for children consists of two main components: First, students were guided to set goals, motivate themselves, and build the environment through different planning charts beforehand; to record themselves, manage their own time, and seek help when performing; and to self-reflect afterwards. Secondly, students were guided to practice the three-stage SRL cycle in the context through story discussion and learning stations.

    II.During the development of the teaching program, the main obstacles encountered were that students had difficulty seeing their own progression, students lacked subject learning strategies, and teachers were overly anxious. In order to resolve the issues, solutions such as structural teaching interventions, learning strategy scaffold establishment, and teachers' own self-motivation and reflection strategies were implemented.

    III.While participating in the program, students showed improvement in their use of SRL strategies and attitudes, and demonstrated positive regulated behaviors.

    IV.The researcher’s teacher beliefs and self-efficacy ability improved while progressing through the study.
    Based on the above conclusions, the researcher proposes recommendations for self-regulated learning teaching and research to provide reference to practitioners or researchers.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 6 第三節 名詞釋義 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 自我調整學習的理論內涵 9 第二節 自我調整學習的教學應用 21 第三節 回家作業與自我調整學習 34 第三章 研究方法與設計 41 第一節 研究場域與參與者 41 第二節 研究方法 45 第三節 研究流程 53 第四節 研究倫理 58 第四章 行動歷程與反思 61 第一節 行動期歷程與反思 61 第二節 修正期歷程與反思 72 第三節 研究者的反思與成長 83 第五章 研究結果與討論 91 第一節 全體學生運用自我調整學習策略的表現 91 第二節 全體學生運用自我調整學習策略的態度 107 第三節 個別學生運用SRL策略的表現 115 第六章 結論與建議 129 第一節 結論 129 第二節 建議 132 第三節 研究限制 134 後記 137 參考文獻 141 附錄一 每日計畫表的評分規準 147 附錄二 每日計畫表 149 附錄三 每週計畫表 150 附錄四 自我觀察記錄表 151 附錄五 未成年研究參與者家長知情同意書 152 附錄六 教學活動歷程表 153 附錄七 工作站學習法個人任務單(以第七週為例) 154 附錄八 工作站學習法各站任務(以第七週為例) 156 附錄九 工作站學習法學生作品 162

    Alfie Kohn(2010)。家庭作業的迷思[項慧齡譯]。親子天下。(原著出版年:2007)。
    Altrichter, Posch & Somekh(1997)。行動研究方法導論[夏林清等譯]。遠流。(原著出版年:1993)。
    B. J. Zimmerman, S. Bonner & R. Kovach(2000)。自律學習[林心茹譯]。遠流。(原著出版年:1996)。
    Carol Ann Tomlinson(2018)。差異化班級:回應所有學習者的需求[張碧珠、呂潔樺、林芯汝、劉慧平、陳雲釵、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻譯]。五南。(原著出版年:2016)。
    Charles Duhigg(2012)。為什麼我們這樣生活,那樣工作?[鍾玉玨、許恬寧譯]。大塊文化。(原著出版年:2012)。
    Marshall. C., & Rossman, G.B.(2006)。質性研究:設計與計畫撰寫[李政賢譯]。五南。(原著出版年:1999)。
    Maxwell, J.A.(2001)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法[高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵譯]。心理。(原著出版年:1996)。
    王金國(2002)。成功學習的關鍵—自我調整學習。課程與教學,5(1),145-163,178。
    何俊青(2011)。安親班教師實務知識與教學意象之個案研究。教育學刊,36,95-136。
    李宗達(2017)。自律學習融入摘要策略教學對國小六年級學童閱讀理解能力成效之探究—以社會學習領域為例(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學。
    李昱葳(2015)。國小五年級學生數學解題歷程的自我調整學習策略與動機信念之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
    林吟霞(2010)。自主學習取向之適性課程與教學研究:臺灣小學與德國小學「方案教學」個案比較。課程與教學,13(3),47-76。
    林吟霞(2018)。運用德國「工作站學習法」促進學生自主學習的教學策略。課程與教學,21(2),1-32。
    林育毅、王明泉、唐榮昌(2008)。運用自我管理及家長參與對數學低成就學生數學家庭作業的完成率及正確性增進之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報,10,47-69。
    林芳瑛(2013)。自我調整學習課程對國小中年級學童學習動機及學習自我效能之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
    林建平(2005)。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知,52(2),8-25。
    林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,39(2),173-194。
    洪詠善(2018)。素養導向教學的界定、轉化與實踐。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8336/60712/20a973ac-7ba5-4f3e-a29a-3220634613cd.pdf。
    張貴琳(2011)。談自主學習:三位國小學生的讀寫檔案省思記錄成長剖面。研習資訊,28(3),89-98。
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要・總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c1582-1.php。
    教育部(2019)。〈兒童課後照顧服務班與中心設立及管理辦法〉(民國108年12月05日修正)。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070041。
    梁雲霞、陳芸珊(2013)。國中小學生學習策略使用之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,9(2),33-64。
    梁雲霞(2006)。從自主學習理論到學校實務-概念架構與方案發展。當代教育研究季刊,14(4),171-206。
    梁雲霞(2008)。自主能力的發展與自主學習。國教新知,55(3),11-19。
    郭雅君(2020)。引導國小課後照顧服務班學生自律學習之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士班。
    陳志恆、林清文(2008)。國中學生自我調整學習策略量表之編製及效度研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),1-36。
    陳玟伶(2001)。國小高年級兒童自我調整歷程之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所。
    陳芸珊(2010)。國中小學生自主學習策略之使用及其影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。
    陳信宏、楊雅涵(2019)。差異化教學應用於混齡課後照顧班之實施、困境與因應策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(3),197-204。
    陳嬿如(2015)。自律學習融入國小社會學習領域專題報告教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
    鈕文英(2020)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(三版)。雙葉書廊。
    馮朝霖(2016)。乘風尋度—教育美學論輯。道禾書院。
    葉敏(2017)。自我調整學習對不同能力水準國小四年級學童計算流暢性與數學學習態度之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
    甄曉蘭(編)(2007)。課程經典導讀。學富。
    劉佩雲(2000)。自我調整學習模式之驗證。教育與心理研究,23,173-206。
    潘世尊(2005)。教育行動研究:理論、實踐與反省。心理。
    蔡清田(2007)。課程行動研究的實踐之道。課程與教學,10(3),75-89。
    親子天下編輯部(2017)。親子天下調查:超過四成國中生沒有學習動機,沒有成就感。親子天下。https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5075187。
    賴靜儀(2009)。學校外的教室—安親班對國小學童教育的影響。師友月刊,499,38-41。
    劉玉婷(2018)自主學習hen促咪—運用工作站學習法於國小四年級詞彙教學之實務分享。教育脈動(15),1-9。
    簡成熙(2020)。自主性作為教育目的之哲學省察:倫敦路線的相關論辯。教育研究集刊,66(1),1-33。
    Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
    Bembenutty, H. (2011). The last word: An interview with Harris Cooper-Research, policies, tips, and current perspectives on homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 340-350.
    Brooks, R. (1981). Creative characters: A technique in child therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 18(1), 131–139.
    Chin-Wen Chien (2017). Undergraduates’ implementations of learning stations as their service learning among elementary school students, Education 3-13, 45:2, 209-226.
    Cooper, H., Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Dent, A. L. (2012). Homework. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, A. G. Bus, S. Major, & H. L. Swanson (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (p. 475–495). American Psychological Association.
    Cosden, M., Morrison, G.M., Albanese, A.L., & Macías, S.C. (2001). When Homework is not Home Work: After-School Programs for Homework Assistance. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 211-221.
    Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and learning, 3(3), 231-264.
    Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-129.
    Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69-76.
    Heath, M. A., Sheen, D., Leavy, D., Young, E. L., & Money, K. (2005). Bibliotherapy: A resource to facilitate emotional healing and growth. School Psychology International, 26, 563-580.
    Nickerson, E. T. (1975). Bibliotherapy: A therapeutic medium for helping children. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 12(3), 258–261.
    Ocak, G. (2010). The effect of learning stations on the level of academic success and retention of elementary school students. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 146-157.
    OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
    Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 422.
    Peel, K. L. (2020). Everyday classroom teaching practices for self-regulated learning. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 260-282.
    Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (p. 3–31). American Psychological Association.
    Pomerantz, E. M., Kim, E. M., & Cheung, C. S.-S. (2012). Parents’involvement in children’s learning. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (p. 417–440). American Psychological Association.
    Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of advanced academics, 22(2), 194-218.
    Simons, C., Metzger, S. R., & Sonnenschein, S. (2020). Children’s metacognitive knowledge of five key learning processes. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(1), 32–42.
    Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2011). Self-regulatory training through elementary-school students' homework completion. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (p. 87-101). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
    Xu, J. (2013). Why Do Students Have Difficulties Completing Homework? The Need for Homework Management. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1), 98-105.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, Arthur C. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 311-328). Routledge.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-26). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE