研究生: |
彭彥淩 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
反校園霸凌之生活技能教學介入成效探討 |
指導教授: | 郭鐘隆 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
健康促進與衛生教育學系 Department of Health Promotion and Health Education |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 118 |
中文關鍵詞: | 校園霸凌 、生活技能 |
英文關鍵詞: | School bullying, Life skills |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:43 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
霸凌行為在校園中屢見不鮮,儘管教育部的「校園安全暨災害防救通報處理中心」致力推動校園治安,但件數並沒有明顯的下降,顯示學校的輔導管教成效有限。故本研究主要是針對國中生設計「反校園霸凌之生活技能教學介入」,並探討其成效。本研究採準實驗設計,立意取樣台北縣某國中七年級學生為研究對象,實驗組一班共35人,校內控制組一班共34人,且為避免實驗污染,另取桃園縣某國中之七級學生為校外控制組共33人,合計共102名學生。實驗組每週接受兩節教學介入,介入時間共計十五週;兩組控制組不予任何介入。
本研究發現教學介入後,與校內控制組比較,實驗組被霸凌的經驗皆有統計上的顯著下降;與校外控制組經詹森─內曼法比較後發現,教學介入對於被霸凌經驗較為嚴重的實驗組學生,效果較顯著。在霸凌他人之行為方面,實驗組學生較校內控制組顯著減少霸凌他人的行為,與校外控制組比較後因樣本數較少,以致P值不顯著,但比例已經有明顯降低,加大樣本即可顯著,故本研究仍值得推廣。
本研究發現,配合各種生活技巧設計之課程,較僅教導同理心或情緒調適的課程,更能讓學生有效處理校園霸凌的問題。因此未來可推廣以生活技能為主的相關研習,讓教師能針對學生需求,設計適合學生的生活技能課程,提升學生解決問題的能力。而未來研究者可在本研究之基礎下加大樣本數進行介入,以增加研究結果的外推性,探討反校園霸凌之生活技能教學介入之成效。
In Taiwan, Campus Security Report Center, Ministry of Education endeavors to prevent bullying at school. However, more and more school bullies still call people’s attention to campus security. For the limited effects of school discipline, this quasi-experimental study was conducted to
evaluate the effect of intervention for teaching life skills related to school bullying to junior high school students.
A total number of 102 seventh-grade students were recruited by purposive sampling. There were 35 students in the intervention group, and 34 in the control group from a junior high school in Taipei County. Additionally, 33 students from another junior high school in Taoyuan County served as another control group. Baseline and post-test Olweus Bullying Questionnaires were administered to the students of three groups. The intervention group received the teaching interventions twice a week for 15 weeks, and the control group only received regular courses. This study
found that school bullying decreased significantly in the intervention group after teaching intervention. Moreover, after Johnson-Neyman adjustment, teaching intervention revealed a more significant effect on students who
had been seriously bullied, and also reduced students’ bully behavior significantly.
In conclusion, learning life skills is more useful to help students to deal with school bullying than only taking courses of empathy or emotional control. Therefore, teachers need to learn how to design specific courses for
each student to enhance their problem-solving skills. For further research, large sample size will be necessary to increase external validity.
參考文獻
中文文獻
王鎮岳(2007)。臺北地區國中學生行為困擾與因應策略之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
邱珍琬(2001)。國小校園欺凌行為與教師應對策略。屏東師院學報,15,41-80。
李淑貞(譯)(2007)。Mona O’ Moore, Stephen James Minton著。無霸凌校園—給學校、教師和家長的指導手冊。臺北市:五南。
吳文琪(1999)。臺北市國中生暴力行為與溝通技巧關係。國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
吳京、李坤崇、尹玫君、胡淑貞(2000)。臺灣地區青少年校園暴力防治計畫。國科會計畫編號:NSC-89-2420-H-006-001-QBS。
吳芝儀(1999)。暴力犯罪與青少年的學校經驗回顧。載於中正大學主辦之「當前犯罪防治問題」研討會論文集,嘉義。
林孝慈(1986)。國中校園暴行之研究-臺北實證分析。中央警官學校警政研究所碩士論文。
林坤松(1999)。青少年校園暴力盛行率及危險因子研究:以臺南市國中為例。國立成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文。
林淑君(2007)。臺北縣市國中七年級學生生活技能現況初探及教育需求調查。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育系碩士論文。
周盛勳(2002)。班級輔導之情緒教育課程:對國小六年級兒童情緒智力、自我概念及生活適應之輔導效果。國立新竹師範學院輔導教學碩士論文。
兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2007)。兒童校園霸凌者現況調查報告。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會網站。
柯清心(譯)(1995)。Kim Zarzour著。校園暴力:別讓孩子成為沈默的受害者。臺北市:遠流。
高松景(2005)。「生活技能」為主的高中生性教育介入研究。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育系博士論文。
教育部(2005)。九十四年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報中心。
教育部軍訓處(2009)。93-97年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報中心。未出版。
張雅婷(2002)。桃園市國中生校園暴力行為及其相關因素研究。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育系碩士論文。
張富湖(2002)。情緒教育課程對提升國中學生情緒智力效果之研究。屏東師範學院教育心裡與輔導研究碩士論文。
郭鐘隆、李明憲、黃久美、鄭其嘉(2007)。95年度臺灣地區健康促進學校及生活技能人員訓練計畫—「全國教師生活技能說明及訓練研習會」北區研習手冊。臺北,未出版。
郭鐘隆、紀雪雲(2005)。生活技能在健康教學上的應用(國中版)。行政院衛生署/教育部。
黃久美、張鈞惠、郭鐘隆、張繻方、蕭雅娟、洪敏玲(2008)。評估生活技能為基礎之性教育課程對七年級學生之成效。臺灣性學學刊,14(1),49-68。
黃正鵠、楊瑞珠(1996)。建立青少年文化與心理態度指標之研究(一~十二)。教育部訓育委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。高雄:國立高雄師範大學。
黃秀媚(2005)。情緒管理教學對七年級學生壓力因應行為與情緒穩定性影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學習碩士論文。
楊瑞珠、連廷嘉(2004)。臺灣都會區高危險青少年流行率之調查研究。屏東師院學報,20,105-140。
楊翠娟(2005)。青少年暴力行為及其相關因素之探討—以臺中縣市為例。中國醫藥大學環境醫學研究所碩士論文。
臺灣健康促進學校網站(2008)。94年度Life Skill翻譯完整版。2008年7月9日。取自http://www.hps.pro.edu.tw/hps/lesson/default.aspx?E=QWN0aW9uPVZpZXdEZWFpbHMmQ2F0ZWdvcnlJRD0zJlRJRD00NCZQYWdlSW5kZXg9。
劉中夫(2005)。同理心訓練課程對高職學生同理心、情緒智力及人際關係影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
賴怡妏(2006)。情緒教育融入綜合活動課程對國中七年級學生情緒智慧、同儕人際關係之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
賴朝暉(1997)。國中生自我概念、行為困擾與校園暴力行為之相關研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
西文部分
American Medical Association. (1991). Healthy youth 2000:National health promotion and disease prevention objectives for adolescents. Chiago, IL:Author.
Botvin, G. J. (2001). Life Skills Training: Fact Sheet. October 12, 2008, from http://www.lifeskillstraining.com/facts.html.
Committee for Children. (2001). Creators of the acclaimed SECOND STEP program. October 12, 2008, from http://www.cfchildren.org/violence.htm
Etienne G. Krug, Linda. Dahlberg, James A. Mercy, Anthony B. Zwi and Rafael Lozano. (2002). World Report on Violence and Health (Chapter 2 Youth Violence). Geneva, World Health Organization. October 19, 2008, from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/chapters/en/index.html
Jemmott, J. B., Jemmott, L. S., & Fong, G. T. (1992). Reductions in HIV risk – associated sexual behaviors among back male adolescents: Effects of an AIDS prevention intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 82(3), 372 – 377.
Kirby, D. & Di Clemente, R. J. (1994). School-based interventions to prevent unprotected sex and HIV among adolescents. In R. J. Diclement & J. L. Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral intention, New York:Plenum Press。
Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-bullying in school: Nature and Extent of Canadian Adolescents’ Experience. Online Submission, Retrieved March 3, 2007, from the ERIC database.
Limber, S. P. (2004). Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: Lessons Learned from the Field. In D. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.) Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention (pp. 351-363). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maria Luisa Vazquez Navarrete. (1999). Regional Study on School Health and Nutrition in Latin America and the Caribbean. Life Skills Training in Columbia: A case study. Washington, DC: World Bank/PanAmerican Organization
Mona E. Solberg and Dan Olweus (2003). Prevalence Estimation of School Bullying With the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239-268.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do . Oxford : Blackwell.
Olweus,D. (1995). Bullying or Peer at School: Facts and intervenetion. American Psychological Society, 4(6), 196-200.
Olweus, D., Limber, S. P., & Mihalic, S. (1999). The Bullying Prevention Program: Blueprints for Violence Prevention, Vol. 10. Center for Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence: Boulder, CO.
Olweus, D. (2004). The Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme: Design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 13-36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Olweus, D. (2007). Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire CD-rom Pro. Hazelden Publishing.
O’Moore, A.M., Kirkjam, C. and Smith, M. (1997). Bullying behavior in Irish school: a nationwide study, Irish Fournal of Psychology, 18(2), 141-169.
Smith, P.K. (1997). Bullying in schools: the UK experience and Sheffield anti-bullying project, Irish Fournal of Psychology, 18(2), 191-201.
Wilson, D., Mparadzi, A., & Lavelle, E. (1992). An experimental comparison of two AIDS prevention interventions among young Zimbsbweans. Journal of Social Psychology, 132(3), 415-417.