有鑒於電子資源發展迅速、資訊媒體形式多元、使用者資訊搜尋行為與態度快速改變，致使互通性議題自1990 年代開始受到重視，異質整合檢索系統亦如雨後春筍般崛起。圖書館面臨經費逐年下降情況，如何在眾多且複雜的異質整合檢索系統中挑選，成為圖書館關切議題之一。

本論文旨在探討異質整合檢索系統間運用之技術及功能，以為圖書館採購產品之參考依據；並進一步瞭解目前國內已使用異質整合檢索系統之單位現況及具體成效。為達前述目的，本論文以MetaFind、SmartWeaver、HySearch、MuseSearch及MetaLib/ SFX 為例，運用文獻分析法、訪談法及實証研究法，探討異質整合檢索系統相關議題文獻，擬定訪談大綱，並產出系統評估準則以實際於系統中驗證之。

是以綜合文獻分析、訪談及進行五家異質性資源整合檢索系統功能評估之結果，本研究的結論為：

1. 初階使用者為多數異質整合檢索系統鎖定之目標對象；
2. 整合檢索功能（Federated search）、支援多元化協定（Protocal）、知識庫服務（Knowledge Base）、OpenURL Linking Services、個人化及客製化（Customization and
personalization）、認證機制（authentication）及使用統計（Usage statistics）為異質整合檢索系統目前所應具備之系統基
本功能；
3. 資訊組織之標準，如MARC、Dublin Core 及AACR 等，以及資訊交換與溝通標準，如Z39.50、OAI-PMH 及OpenURL 等協定，成為目前統所應用之相關技術；
4. 異質整合檢索系統在圖書館資源管理效能上廠商和使用用戶看法有差異；
5. 廠商和使用用戶均認為異質整合檢索系統對圖書館資訊服務與資源利用指導帶來新契機；
6. 標準協定為達成異質整合檢索系統資源溝通之工具及基礎。

最後，依據透通的資源取用精神，針對建構完善之個人化資訊檢索服務、系統採行標準協定、加強檢索結果精確度及發展系統以為服務流程整合之第一提出建議，期使異質整合檢索系統之功能得以更臻完善。

Since 1990, the rapid growth of electronic resources, the diverse form of　information media and the quick change of users’ information searching behavior, the　issue of interoperability was initially taken into account and the Integrated Searching　Systems were also starting to grow. The importance of decision making on Integrated　Searching Systems was increasingly higher for library with budget decreased by year.

　　In this thesis, we focus on the technology of how Integrated Searching Systems　are operated. This research would help libraries to make the decision which system
will be chosen. This research would also help us to grasp the progress for the use of　Integrated Searching Systems in Taiwan. By taking five systems (MetaFind,　SmartWeaver, HySearch, MuseSearch and MetaLib/ SFX ) and using three methods　(literature review method, in-depth interview and empirical methodology), we analyze　the Integrated Searching System related topics and literatures. The guideline of the　estimated system is suitable for verifying in the real system.

　　The conclusions of literature review methods, in-depth interviews and estimated　results of five Integrated Searching Systems were summarized as follows:

1. The beginner is targeted by most of the Integrated Searching Systems.
2. Federated search, Protocol, Knowledge Base, OpenURL Linking Services,　Customization and personalization, authentication and Usage statistics should　be the basic functions of Integrated Searching Systems at the present.
3. The standards of Information Organization like MARC, Dublin Core and　AACR etc. and the standard of information exchange protocol like Z39.50,　OAI-PMH and OpenURL etc. are the present system technology.
4. There are some arguments between supplier and users against the management　efficiency of library resources by Integrated Searching Systems.
5. The suppliers and users agree with Integrated Searching Systems could bring　the new chance for the information service of library and the instruction of　resource usage.
6. The standard of the protocol is the tool and base for the communication among　Integrated Searching Systems.

　　Base on the spirit of transparent information access, the author suggests the　complete personal information index service build-up, the standard system protocol,
the increase of the precision index results and the development of the integrated　system services. These elements would comprise the complete Integrated Searching
System.

一、 西文
Arant, Wendi & Payne, Leila（2001）. The common user interface in academic libraries: myth or reality? Library Hi Tech, 19(1), 63-76.

Arms, William Y.（2000）. Thoughts about Interoperability in the NSDL. Retrieved Feb 15, 2005, from
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/wya/papers/NSDl-Interop.doc.

Arms, William Y., Hillmann, Diane., Lagoze, Carl., Krafft, Dean., Marisa, Richard., Saylor, John., Terrizzi, Carol., Sompel, Herbert Van de. (2002). A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 1.

Ashby, Ann-Marie. (2003). Metasearch section: ENCompass for Resource Access 3.0. The Charleston Advisor, 5(2). Retrieved May 1, 2005, from
http://www.charlestonco.com/toc.cfm?iss=v5n2

Association of Research Libraries. (2002). Collections and Access for the 21st-Center Scholar: Changing Roles of Research Libraries. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research library Issues and Actions from ARL, ANI, and SPARC. 225. Retrieved Nov 13, 2004, from
http://www.arl.org/newsltr/225/index.html

Association of Research Libraries. (2003). ARL Supplementary STATISTICS 2001-2002. Retrieved Nov 17, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/stats/pubpdf/sup02.pdf.

Borgman, Christine L.（2000）. Challenges in Building Digital Libraries for the 21st Century. Digital Libraries: People, Knowledge & Technology Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries（LCADL 2002）, Singapore, 12-14 December 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2555, Eds. Lim, E.-P., Foo, S., and Khoo, C.（Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2002）: 2.

Boss, Richard W. （2002a）. How to Plan and Implement a Library Portal. Library Technology Reports , 38（6）

Boss, Richard W. (2002b). Library Web Portals. Retrieved Aug 8, 2005, from
http://www.ala.org/ala/pla/plapubs/technotes/librarywebportals.htm

Boss, Richard W.（2004）。Automated Library System Vendors and Electronic Resources Management. Retrieved Apr 2, 2005, from http://www.ala.org/ala/pla/plapubs/technotes/technotes.htm

Boss, Richard W.（n.d.）. Automated library system vendors and electronic resources management. Retrieved Aug 8, 2005, from
http://www.ala.org/ala/pla/plapubs/technotes/ermgmt.htm

Breeding, Marshall（2004）. The Many Facets of Managing Electronic Resources. Computers in Libraries, 24( 1), p25-28。

Breeding, Marshall（2005）. Re-Integration the“Integrated”Library System. Computers in Libraries, 25(2), p27-29.

Changing Roles of Research Libraries. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research library Issues and Actions from ARL, ANI, and SPARC. 225. Retrieved Nov 13, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/225/index.html

Chvatal, Don . (2003). ALA 2003 Midwinter report. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.bibliotech.com//btr11/ALA_2003_MW_Complete.cfm

Cleveland, Gary. （1998）. Digital Libraries: Definitions, Issues and Challenges. UDT Occasional Paper # 8, 998, Retrieved Feb 15, 2005,from http://www.ifla.org/VI/5/op/udtop8/udtop8.htm.

Cornell University Libraries. (2000). Cornell University Library Digital Futures Plan : July 2000 to June 2002. Retrieved Nov 13, 2004, from
http://www.library.cornell.edu/staffweb/CULDigitalFuturesPlan.html

Davies, Ron.（2004）. Library portals – today and tomorrow. Retrieved Apr 14, 2005, from
http://www.online information.co.uk/2004proceedings/thurspm/
davies_r.pdf.

Digital Library Federation , (2004). Electronic Resources Management 148 Report of the DLF Initiative. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation. Retrieved Nov 11, 2004, from
http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlfermi0408/dlfermi0408.pdf.

Dorner, Daniel G & Curtis, AnneMarie (2003). A comparative review of common user interface software products for libraries. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.natlib.govt.nz/files/CUI_Report_Final.pdf

EU-NSF Digital Library Working Group.（2002）. Interoperability between Digital Libraries Position Paper. Retrieved Feb 15, 2005, from
http://pacinotti.isti.cnr.it/DELOS/NSF/interop.htm

Friedlander, Amy. (2002). Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment: Intreduction to a Data Set Assembled by the Digital Library Federation and Outsell, Inc. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved Dec 8, 2004, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub110/contents.html

Gerrity, Bob. (2003). Metasearch section: MuseSearch. The Charleston Advisor, 5(2). Retrieved May 1, 2005, from
http://www.charlestonco.com/toc.cfm?iss=v5n2

Hane, Paula J. (2003). The truth about federated searching, Information Today, 20(9), 24.

Johnston, Pete.（2001）. Interoperability: supporting effective access to information resources. Library & Information Briefings, 108. Retrieved Dec 30, 2003, from
http://rigel.soi.city.ac.uk/litc/publs/libs/2001/libs108

Joint Information Systems Committee（2002）. Portals 2002: An Institutional I mperative. Retrieved Apr 14, 2005, from
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=event_portals_0702

Kapidakis, Sarantos. （1998）. Unpublished notes prepared for the NSF-EU collaboration. Resource Indexing and Discovery in a Globally Distributed Digital Library.

Ketchell, Debra S. (2000). Too many channels: making sense out of portals 149 and personalization. Information technology and libraries, 19 (4). 175-179.

Lagoze, Carl and Van de Sompel, Herbert.（2001）. The Open Archives Initiative: Building a low-barrier interoperability framework . Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digtial Libraries, Roanoke VA, June 24-28, 2001, pp. 54-62. [draft at
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/lagoze/papers/oai-jcdl.pdf]

Levinsohn, Allan. (2003). Geospatial Interoperability: The Holy Grail of GIS. Retrieved Feb 15, 2005, from
http://www.geoplace.com/gw/2000/1000/1000data.asp

Library of Congress. (2003). List of Portal Application Functionalities for the Library of Congress. Retrieved Jan 5, 2004, from
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/lcpaig/portalfunctionalitieslist4public comment1st7-22-03revcomp.pdf

Luther, Judy. (2003). Trumping Google? Metasearching’s Promise. Retrieved Aug 8, 2005, from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA322627.html?display=searchResults&stt=001&text=trumping+google

Lynch, Clifford. (1993). Interoperability: The standards challenge for the 1990s. Wilson Library Bulletin, 67(7): 38-42.

Lynch, Clifford A. (1997). Building the Infrastructure of Resource Sharing: Union Catalogs, Distributed Search, and Cross-Database Linkage. Library Trends, 45(3).

Lynch, Clifford A. (2001). Metadata Harvesting and the Open Archives Initiative. ARL Bimonthly Report 217. Retrieved May 9, 2005, Retrieved Jan 25, 2005 from
http://www.arl.org/newsltr/217/mhp.html

Medeiros, Norm. (2003). A Pioneering Spirit: Using Administrative Metadata to Manage Electronic Resources. OCLC Systems & Services, 19(3).

Miller, Paul. （2000）. Interoperability: What is it and why should I want it? Retrieved Feb 15, 2005, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability/

Moen, William E. （2000）. Accessing Interoperability in the Networked Environment: Standards, Evaluation, and Testbeds in the Context of Z39.50. Retrieved Jan 24, 2003 from
http://www.unt.edu/wmoen/publications/InteropEvalPreprint.pdf

Morgan, Eric Lease. (1995). Adding Internet Resources to Our OPACs. Serials Review, 21, (4), p70-72.

Paepcke , A., Chang, C-C-K., Garcia-Molina, H., Winograd. T. （1998）. Interoperability for Digital Libraries WorldWide. Communications of the ACM, 41（4）, 33-43.

Pickett, Joseph P. et al.（2000）. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Preston, Cecilia M. and Lynch, Clifford A.（1994）. Interoperability and conformance issues in the development and implementation of the government information locator service (GILS). In William E. Moen and Charles R. McClure. The Government Information Locator Service (GILS):
Expanding Research and Development on the ANSI/NISO Z39.50
Information Retrieval Standard.

Ranger, Sara. (2003). Metasearch section: MetaLib. The Charleston Advisor, 5(2). Retrieved May 1, 2005, from
http://www.charlestonco.com/toc.cfm?iss=v5n2

Ron, Miller (n.d.). About MuseGlobe. Retrieved May 2, 2004. from http://www.museglobal.com/company

Sleeman, Allison Mook. (1994). Cataloging Remote Access Electronic Materials. Serials Review, 21, (4), p70.

Tennant , Roy . (2001). Digital Libraries- Cross-Database Search: One-Stop Shopping. Retrieved Aug 8, 2005, from
http://libraryjournal.com/article/CA170458.html

Tennant, Roy. (2003). The right solution federated search tools. Library Journal, 128(11). 28.

The WEB Research Resource. Search Strategies and Tips. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.clubi.ie/webserch//strategies/

Warner, Beth Forest. (2003). Metasearch section: Kartoo. The Charleston Advisor, 5(2). Retrieved May 1, 2005, from
http://www.charlestonco.com/toc.cfm?iss=v5n2

Webster, P. (2004). Meatasearch in an academic environment, Online, 28(2), 20-23.

二、 中文
Jul, Erik（民89）。知識管理的四個柱石。在中國圖書館學會、美國國際電腦研究中心（OCLC）主辦， 知識管理：方法與系統研討會，高雄市。

中華民國國家資訊基本建設產業發展協進會。(民92)。談數位內容於電子商務之應用座談會分析報告。上網日期：2005年8月19日。網址：
http://www.nii.org.tw/cnt/info/Report/200309_4.htm

王梅玲（民89）。電子資源對圖書館資訊組織工作的挑戰。書苑，45，54-67。

朱瀅潔（民91）。電子資源整合檢索之互通性架構--以OAI-PMH為探討主軸。書府，24，7-23。

江思嫻（民93）。從連結技術之應用層面談整合檢索。異質資源整合查詢系統研討會，崑山科技大學，台南縣。

何佳欣（民92）。從異質系統的資訊組織模式探討數位圖書館整合檢索之效能－以華文知識入口網站為例[全文]。碩士論文，台北市：國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。檢自全國碩士論文摘要系統。

余顯強（民91）。淺談開放式元資料獲取協定的應用與內涵。圖書與資訊學刊，43，頁34-45。

余顯強（民92）。淺談數位圖書館典藏資料互通之存取協定。書藝，39，頁15-25。

林信成（民88）。XML 相關技術與下一代Web 出版趨勢研究。教育資料與圖書館學，37，（1），184-210。

林銀英（民91）。跨資料庫檢索之利器－簡介Metalib & SFX 與Millennium Access Plus（MAP）。國立臺灣大學醫學院圖書分館館訊，60，14-16。

柯皓仁、黃夙賢、楊維邦（民90）。詮釋資料與數位圖書館系統互通性之探討。大學圖書館，5（1），頁49-78。

柯皓仁（民94）。圖書館電子資源整合檢索與利用。圖書館電子資源整合服務研討會，靜宜大學，台中市。

徐小琪（民93）。華文網路知識資源指南--國家圖書館華文知識入口網的建置。國家圖書館館刊，93（1），209-235。

徐代昕（民92）。數位典藏互通性架構之建置﹝電子檔﹞。碩士論文。國立臺灣大學資訊工程學研究所，臺北市。檢自全國博碩士論文摘要檢索系統國家圖書館（民90）。數位圖書館分散式協定（SOAP, OAI, OpenURL）。Retrived Feb 10, 2005 from
http://www.ndap.org.tw/2_techreport/files/226.pdf

張慧銖（民94）。圖書館電子資源之組織與整理。圖書館電子資源整合服務研討會，靜宜大學，台中市。

張懷文（民93）。數位圖書館互通性模式之研究－以OAI-PMH 互通性架構為例﹝全文﹞。碩士論文，台北市：國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。檢自全國博碩士論文摘要檢索系統。

張關評（民93）。動態連結於圖書館整合系統之探討--以開放式定址法(OpenURL)為例[全文]。碩士論文，台北縣：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。檢自全國博碩士論文檢索系統。

陳良駒（民83）。異質性分散式資料庫系統資料查詢及綱目整合方法之研究﹝全文﹞。碩士論文，台北縣：國防管理學院資源管理研究所。檢自全國博碩士論文摘要檢索系統。

陳昭珍（民84）。開放性互聯資訊檢索應用與協定(Z39.50)之過去、現在與未來（下）。全國圖書資訊網路通訊，15（4：3），1-4。

陳昭珍（民84）。開放性互聯資訊檢索應用與協定(Z39.50)之過去、現在與未來（上）。全國圖書資訊網路通訊，14（4：2），1-3。

陳昭珍（民87）。從使用者需求與文獻特性看圖書館界資訊組織模式發展趨勢。大學圖書館，2（3），105-115。

陳昭珍（民89）。電子圖書館整合檢索之理論與實作。臺北市：文華。

陳昭珍、何佳欣（民92）。數位化圖書館互通檢索機制之探討。中國圖書館學會會報，70，53-68。

陳雪華（民89）。數位時代資訊組織之發展趨勢。中國圖書館學會會報，64，49-60。

陳昭珍（民91）。數位典藏計畫異質系統互通機制：以OAI 建立聯合目錄的理論與實作。國家圖書館館刊，91(1)，1-17。

陳昭珍、陳雪華、陳亞寧（民91）。數位典藏國家型科技計畫OAI-based 聯合目錄建置規，第一屆數位典藏技術研討會，台北市：中央研究院資訊科學研究所。

陳昭珍（民93）。圖書資源整合模式與標準。異質性資源整合查詢系統研討會，崑山科技大學，台南縣。

陳雪華、項潔、陳昭珍、洪筱盈、徐代昕（民91）。數位典藏互通性架構之探討。中國圖書館學會會報，68，1-13。

黃華明（民89）。Z39.50 客戶端軟體評鑑研究[全文]。碩士論文，台北市：輔仁大學圖書資訊學系研究所。檢自全國柏碩士論文摘要檢索系統。

黃榕江（民93）。情境化圖書館異質資源整合管理方案。異質資源整合查詢系統研討會，崑山科技大學，台南縣。

黃榕江（民94）異質資料庫整合查詢檢索系統。中華民國圖書館學會會訊，13（136/ 137） ，113-1117。

詹麗萍（民92）。圖書館數位化館藏組織整理與OPAC 的新角色。國家圖書館館刊，92（1），95-109。

劉育君（民93）。圖書館入口網站建置及資源整合檢索技術。在崑山科技大學、教育部主辦，異質資源整合查詢系統研討會，台南縣。

劉昌龍（民93）。整合檢索解決方案。異質資源整合查詢系統研討會，崑山科技大學，台南縣。

劉淑德、邱柑震（民93）。全功能異質性電子資源整合檢索系統--SmartWeaver。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊，22，51-53。

歐陽崇榮、張關評（民91）。參考服務新挑戰--電子資源整合與管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊，20（2），56-66。

歐陽崇榮、歐陽慧（民92）。數位物件識別碼與圖書館相關議題之探討。國家圖書館館刊，92（2），29-59。

賴忠勤（民91）。電子商務技術與架構對圖書館之影響與應用。書苑，51，51-64。