本研究的主要目的在於瞭解臺灣地區高級中學體育教師之組織疏離現況與其影響因素，並比較不同背景變項高中體育教師組織疏離之差異及預測力之探討。研究對象為臺灣地區公、私立高級中學體育教師519位，並以自編之「臺灣地區高級中學體育教師組織疏離問卷」為研究工具，進行問卷調查。
根據實際調查所得資料，以平均數、標準差、單因子多變項變異數分析（One - way ANOVA）及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法處理，結果發現：
一、整體而言，臺灣地區高中體育教師在組織疏離方面，其內涵包括：無力感、無規範感、社會孤立感及自我疏離感四個構面，而在組織疏離影響因素方面，其內涵包括：領導風格、社會期望、組織關係、專業成長及工作滿足五個構面。
二、不同學歷、職務及學校地區的高中體育教師，其組織疏離程度有顯著差異存在，學歷較高、兼任行政及北區的高中體育教師，其組織疏離程度較輕；而在組織疏離影響因素方面，年齡愈高，對專業成長的需求愈高，一般大學體育系畢業者較重視工作上的滿足，專任體育教師期待有滿意的領導風格，而南區的高中體育教師則較重視社會對體育教師的角色期望。
三、高中體育教師之背景變項與組織疏離影響因素能有效預組織疏離，其中以社會期望、專業成長及組織關係之預測力較佳。

The purpose of this study was to clarify influential factors in the organizational alienation phenomenon of physical education teachers for senior high schools in Taiwan. The differences in the organizational alienation for senior high school physical education teachers, who were different in their backgrounds, were investigated and the tendencies to the organizational alienation were predicted according to these results. The subjects in this study were 519 physical education teachers from public as well as private senior high schools in Taiwan. The data were obtained by using the questionnaire entitled "The Scale of Organizational Alienation for Senior High School Physical Education Teachers in Taiwan".
The collected data were analyzed by means of statistical methods, including mean values, standardized scores, one - way MANOVA, and multiple - stepwise regression. According to the analyzed data, it was shown that:
1.As a whole, there were four aspects for the organizational alienation, including the sense of powerlessness, normlessness, social isolation and self - estrangement,which were affected by the leading style, social expectation, organizational relationship, expertise advancement, and job satisfaction.
2.Significant differences in organizational alienation were found for the senior high school physical education teachers. The differences resulted from their levels of education, positions, or areas. For instance, the tendencies to the organizational alienation were less significant for teachers who had higher degrees, take administrative work as part - time, or teach in the northern Taiwan. The influential factors to the organizational alienation varied. For elder teachers, they demanded much more about expertise advancement; while for teachers graduated from the physical education department of colleges, they regarded their job satisfaction as the most important. As to the professional teachers, they expected to have satisfying leading styles. For the physical education teachers in the southern Taiwan, they paid more attention to the social expectation of their roles.
3.The organizational alienation of senior high school physical education teachers could be predicted effectively by using its influential factors and background variants. The predictions worked better especially for social expectation, expertise progress, and organizational relationship.

一、中文部份

王文科(民88)：教育研究法。台北：五南。
王如哲(民77)：國中行政人員領導方式與教師疏離感關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳宗立(民86)：學校行政研究。高雄：復文。
吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、賴維堯(民85)：行政學(一)。台北：國立空中大學。
吳瓊恩(民85)：行政學。台北：三民。
呂運志（民85）。社會疏離感對工作態度與休閒態度影響之研究。大葉工學院碩士論文(未出版)。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬合譯，Stephen, P. Robbins原著 (民84) ：組織行為學。台北：華泰。
沙亦群（民75）：疏離感－個人問題？社會問題？。台北：巨流。
林清山 (民79)：多變項分析統計法。台北：東華。
林清山（民81）：心理與教育統計學。台北：東華。
林清江（民74）：重振學校倫理的途徑。師友月刊，212期，頁6。
林麗琴（民84）：國小教師領導型態與學生疏離感相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
洪光遠譯，G. A. Yukl原著 (民81) ：組織領導。台北：桂冠。
馬立秦(民73a)：社會學上疏離之研究(上)。中國論壇，第208期，頁60-64。
馬立秦(民73b)：社會學上疏離之研究(下)。中國論壇，第209期，頁60-64。
張來平（民74）：高中、高職學生內外制握與疏離感關係之比較研究。高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文〈未出版〉。
張紹勳（民83）：SPSS For Windows多變量統計分析。台北：松崗。
張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟（民89）：SPSS For Windows統計分析、初等統計與高等統計。台北：松崗。
張慶勳(民85)：學校組織行為。台北:五南。
張瓊玲(民88)：中央行政機關科層體制特徵與成員疏離感關係之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文(未出版)。
陳文瑜(民85)：國小校長領導型式、學校組織氣氛與教師疏離感之關係。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
陳秀容(民81)：佛洛姆(Erich Fromm)的政治思想。台北：三民。
陳麗容(民88)：高雄縣國中小學教育人員的職業疏離。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
黃文山(民77)。國民中學教師領導型態、班級氣氛與學生疏離感之關係。高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃金柱(民88)：我國青少年休閒運動現況、需求暨發展對策之研究，行政院體育委員會委託研究。
黃素惠(民86)：高級中等教育階段學校文化之研究，國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
黃發典(民83)：工業社會學。台北：遠流。
楊中芳等譯，Robinson J. P., Shaver P. R., & Wrightsman L. S.原著（民86）：性格與社會心理測量總覽(上)。台北：遠流。
楊超然（民85）：企業組織與管理(下)。台北：華視文化事業公司。
楊寶琴（民72）：國民中、小學校長領導型式與學校組織氣氛的關係。高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
趙自強(民82)：自動化與工作疏離感之相關研究─以大台北地區印刷業為例。中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
劉慧娥(民88)：官僚組織的異化問題：台北市政府所屬一級行政機關個案研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文(未出版)。
蔡勇美，蕭新煌主編（民75）：社會學中國化。台北：巨流。
蔡聯澄(民85)：高雄市高職教師工作疏離調查研究。中等教育第48卷第3期，頁78-84。
鄭志富(民88)。運動管理學論著輯錄。上課講義(未出版)。
顏若映(民78)：國民中學組織結構對教師疏離感之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文〈未出版〉。
蘇育任（民74）：國民中學組織結構對教師疏離感之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。

二、英文部份
Allinson, C. W. (1984). Breaucratic personality and organization structure. U. S. A.：Gower Publishing Company.
Benoit, S. S. (1977). Job satisfaction among faculty women in higher education in the state university of Louisiana. Dissertation Abstracts International, May, 6969-6970A.
Blazovsky, R.A. & Hoy, W. K. (1978). School bureaucracy and teacher alienation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 3820-3821A.
Cherniss, C. (1980). Professional burnout in human service organizations. New York. 62,79-80.
Cox, H., & Wood, J. R. (1980). Organization structure and professional alienation: The case of public school teachers. Journal of Education,58 (1). 1-6.
Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1987). Research method in the social science. New York：St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Dimitrova, D. (1994). Work, commitment and alienation. International Social Science Journal, (140), 201-211.
Geyer, R. F. (1980). Alienation theories－A general systems approach. Polytechnic Institute of New York.
Geyer, R. F. (1981). Alienation: problems of meaning, theory and method. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Goldsby, M. G. (1998). New organization forms：An examination of alienation and ideology in the postindustrial workplace. Dissertation Abstracts International, A60/03,803.
Gouldner, A. (1983). Some remarks on theoretical individualism, alienation, and work. Human Relations, 36 (8), 717-724.
Hoy, W. K., & Isherwood, G. B. (1973). Bureaucracy, powerlessness and teacher work values. The Journal of Educational Administration,11 (1), 124-138.
Hoy, W. K., Blazovsky, R., & Newland, W. (1983). Bureaucracy and alienation: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Educational Administration, XXI(2), 109-120.
James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1976). Organizational structure: a review of structure dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 16 (1), 80.
Kanungo, R. N. (1992). Alienation and empowerment imperatives in business. Journal of Business Ethics. (11), 413-422.
Kohn, M. C. (1982). Occupational structure and alienation. American Journal of Sociology, 82.342-351.
Maxwell, R. (1980). Alienation theories－A general systems approach. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
Miller, J. (1975). Isolation in organization: Alienation from authority and expressive relations. American Sociological Review, (20), 260-271.
Mottaz, C. J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. Sociological Quarterly, (22), 515-529.
Papamarcos, S. D. (1995). Individual differences and the job characteristics：Job involvement linkage (alienation). Dissertation Abstracts International, A56/10,4043.
Phenix, P. (1974). Student alienation: Causes and cures, in Leight, Robert L. (ed), Philosophers speak on alienation in education. The Interstate Printers and Publisher, Inc.
Santora, D., & Steiner, H. (1982). School nurses and powerlessness. The Journal of School Health, 428-431.
Schmitt, R., & Moody, T. E. (1994). Alienation and social criticism - key conception critical theory. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, (24), 783-791.
Shoho, A. R., & Katims, D. S. (1998). Perceptions of alienation among special and general education teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association..
Slaybaugh, J. E., (1975). Organization structure and teacher alienation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 7584-A.
Wu, C. E. (1988). An empirical study of the relationship between teachers' sense of alienation and their attitudes toward work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Zielinski, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1983). Isolation and alienation in elementary school. Educational Administration Quarterly,19 (2), 27-29.