研究生: |
陳家禾 Jia-He Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以後設認知能力探討網路搜尋學習活動之研究 A Study of Web Searching Learning Activities with Meta-Cognition Ability |
指導教授: |
蕭顯勝
Hsiao, Hsien-Sheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 129 |
中文關鍵詞: | 後設認知 、序列分析 、網路搜尋 |
英文關鍵詞: | meta-cognition, sequential analysis, web searching |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:123 下載:29 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討學習者運用WebQuest及Yahoo搜尋引擎進行網路搜尋學習活動時,其本身所具備之後設認知能力對網路搜尋結果之影響,並討論學習者之網路搜尋行為表現。研究對象為兩班國小五年級的學生,在實驗開始前,對學習者施以後設認知問卷衡量出每位學習者之後設認知能力;在實驗進行中實驗組學習者以WebQuest網站,控制組學習者則以Yahoo搜尋引擎進行網路搜尋學習活動,兩者同時需完成研究者所設計之搜尋任務。最後以積差相關、獨立樣本二因子變異數分析、獨立樣本t檢定等統計方法以及序列分析法進行資料分析。研究結果發現當學習者具較高程度之評估策略,以WebQuest進行網路搜尋學習活動時,其搜尋結果之表現會優於低評估策略程度的學習者。而另一方面,當學習者在以Yahoo搜尋引擎進行網路搜尋學習活動時,若具備較高之後設認知能力者,其搜尋結果之表現會明顯優於後設認知能力較低之學習者。
This thesis aims to study the searching behaviors and results of different learner’s ability of meta-cognition on WebQuest and Yahoo search engine. Two classes’ students at 5th grade of elementary school were invited. All the learners have to pretest the questionnaire of meta-cognition before experiment. The experimental group carries on web searching activities using WebQuest and control group carries on web searching activities by the Yahoo search engine. Both learners of two groups have to utilize their websites to answer the searching task designed by the researcher. The statistics methods of product-moment correlation, two-way analysis of variance, independent-samples t test, and sequential analysis were conducted to analyze the data. The results showed that the learners with higher degree of evaluation have the better searching results than the learners with lower degree of evaluation when they used the WebQuest in web searching activities. As for the learners with high ability of meta-cognition have the better searching results than the learners with low ability of meta-cognition when they used the Yahoo searching engine in web searching activities.
卜小蝶(1996)。圖書資訊檢索技術。台北:文華。
于第、王秀惠(2002)。技術學院學生網路使用行為之調查研究–以景文技術學院為例。景文技術學院學報,13,1-17。
王仁宏(2004)。後設認知策略教學對國小補校成人學生閱讀理解成效影響之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
王佳如(2002)。探究活動在網路上實施之可行性研究。國立高雄師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
江美娟(2001)。後設認知策略教學對國小數學學習障礙學生解題成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
吳青宜(2004)。運用專題導向學習提昇國小五年級學生資訊素養之研究。私立東海大學教育研究所碩士論文。
杜義文(2005)。國二學生的網路搜尋策略與成果:檢視知識觀所扮演的角色。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文。
沈中偉(2004)。科技與學習–理論與實務。台北:心理。
幸曼寧(1989)。由後設認知談知識的結構。研習資訊,52,12-14。
林余思(2002)。國中學生在資訊科技融入生物科學習中後設認知的表現。國立台灣師範大學生物學系碩士論文。
邱上貞(1989)。後設認知研究在輕度障礙者教學上的應用。特殊教育季刊,30,12-16。
邱森德(2006)。後設認知與概念構圖對封閉與開放式任務搜尋成效的影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文。
施威銘(2003)。網路應用:Internet導論與實務。台北:旗標。
柳棟(2001)。什麼是Webquest?惟存教育網絡主題探究網。2006/10/22,取自http://www.being.org.cn/webquest/whatarewebquests.htm。
胡永崇(1995)。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。
秦衛東(2001)。WebQuests:因特網環境下的研究性學習。惟存教育網絡主題探究網。2006/10/22,取自http://www.being.org.cn/webquest/nr.htm。
張昇鵬(1995)。資賦優異學生後設認知能力與創造思考能力關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。台北:東華書局。
張景媛(1990)。後設認知能力與資優教育。資優教育,34,6-9。
張新仁(1992)。國中地理學習之後設認知研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
張瀚文(2000)。從小學生之資訊需求與資訊尋求行為探討學校資訊網路與系統設計。台北市立圖書館館訊,17(3),43-56。
教育部(2000)。教學創新:九年一貫課程說帖。國教專業社群網。2006/10/3,取自:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/brief/brief4.php。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。
莊雪芳(2003)。高三學生後設認知、生物科自我概念與生物能力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學生物研究所碩士論文。
郭諭陵(1992)。後設認知的探討。中等教育,43(4),92-100。
郭靜芳(1997)。國小資優生後設認裀與推理思考能力相關之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育學系碩士論文。
郭靜姿(1994)。不同閱讀能力學生成敗歸因方式、策略運用與後設認知能力之差異比較。師大學報,39,284-325。
陳李綢(1988)。學習策略的研究與教學。資優教育季刊,29,15-24。
陳李綢(1990)。近代後設認知理論的發展與研究趨勢。資優教育,37,9-12。
陳密桃(1990)。兒童和青少年後設認知的發展及其教學效果之分析。教育學刊,9,107-148。
曾望超(2004)。國小教師創意教學與學生後設認知能力、創造力及問題解決能力之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
黃明堅譯 (Alvin Toffler原著)(1981)。第三波。台北:聯經。
黃慕萱(2001)。成人讀者之資訊尋求行為。台北市立圖書館館訊,19(2),9-19。
黃慕萱(2002)。國小學生的資訊需求研究。中國圖書館學會會報,69,1-11。
楊宗仁(1991)。後設認知的源起及其理論。資優教育,38,16-25。
楊榮昌(2001)。相互教學法對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、後設認知及閱讀動機之影響。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
葉淑綾(2005)。高雄市國小學童所持後設認知與自然生活科技自我概念之研究。國立臺南大學自然科學教育研究所碩士論文。
詹文宏(1993)。Sternberg 智力三元論與後設認知之關係。資優教育季刊,48,21-23。
廖宜瑤(2000)。國小四年級學生運用電腦網路科技進行主題式學習之行動研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
趙涵捷、陳俊良(2001)。悠遊網際網路。台北:台灣書店。
劉照庭(2002)。目標導向對電腦學習技能的影響。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡天民(2002)。概念構圖對國小學童自然科學習成就、學習態度及概念改變之研究。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學。台北:桂冠。
謝寶媛(2000)。網站搜尋e網打盡。台北:華文網。
鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學。台北:心理。
魏麗敏(1995)。後設認之學習理論與策略。學生輔導,38,66-75。
蘇玉凰(2004)。高中生英文閱讀理解之後設認知策略使用量表之編製。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.353-394). N. Y.: Longman.
Barker, J. (2004). Recommended Search Strategy: Analyze your topic & Search with peripheral vision. The Regents of the University of California. Retrieved October 8th, 2006 form the World Wide Web: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Internet/strategies.html.
Beger, R. S., & Reid, D. K. (1989). Differences that make a difference: Comparisons of metacomponetial functioning and knowledge base among groups of high and low IQ learning disabled, mildly mentally retarded, and normally achieving adults. Jouranal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 422-429.
Belkin, N. (1980). Anomalous states of Kmwoledge as Basis for Information Retrieval. The Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
Beyer, B. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bilal, D. (2000). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine. I. Cognitive, Physical, and Affective Behaviors on Fact-based Tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646–665.
Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s Use of the Yahooligans! Web Search Engine: II. Cognitive and Physical Behaviors on Research Tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(2), 1-23.
Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Information Processing and Management , 38, 649-670.
Borkowski, J. G. (1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. In S. Yussen’s (Ed.), Development of reflection in children (pp.105-144). San Diego: Academic Press.
Brown, A. L. (1977). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Wwiner and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Burton, J.K. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An Overview. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3-4), 345-369.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Memory and metamemory development ineducable retarded childern. In R.V. Kail, Jr. ,& J.W. Hagen(Eds.), The development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1988). Mental retardation and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392-490). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dania, B. (1998). Children’s search processer in using world wide web search engines: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 35, 45-53.
Dawson, A. (1996). The World Wide Web: Spun in gold or just a cobweb? Information Management and Technology, 29, 112-115.
Dervin, B. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2, 3-33.
Dodge, B. (1995a). WebQuests: A Technique for Internet-Based Learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13.
Dodge, B. (1995b). Some thoughts about WebQuests. Retrieved October 22, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://WebQuest.sdsu.edu/about_WebQuests.html.
Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(8), 69, 58.
Ellis, D. (1989). A Behavioral Approach to information Retrieval Design. Journal of Documentation, 45, 3, 171-212.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reposts as data. Psychological Review, 83(3), 215-251.
Erkens, G. (2006). MEPA. Multiple Episode Protocol Analysis (version 4.10) [computer software]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comment: What is memory development of? Human Development, 14, 272-278.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. (pp.231-235) NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children oral communication skills (pp.35-60). N.Y.: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Franz E. WEINERT, and Rainer H. Kluwe, Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1993). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In K. Hogan, Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grover, R. (1993). A proposed model for diagnosing information needs. School Libyary Media Quarterly, 21, 2, 95-100.
Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178-199.
Hendry, D. G., & Harper, D. J. (1997). An informal information-seeking environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 1036-1048.
Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D.F. (2000). Metacognition in Adulthood and Old Age. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. (pp417-466). N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hill, J. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational technology , research and development, 47, 5-27.
Hölscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Network, 33, 337-346.
Hsieh-Yee, I. (2001). Research on Web search behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 167-185.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Kafai, Y., & Bates, M. J. (1997). Internet Web-Searching Instruction in the Elementary Classroom: Building a Foundation for Information literacy. School Library Media Quartely, 25(2), 103-111.
Kim, K. S., & Allen, B. (2002). Congnitive and Task Influences on Web Searching Begavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 2, 109-119.
Krikela, J. (1983). Information-seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. drexel Library Quarterly, 19, 2, 5-20.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1988). Developing a Model of Library Search Process: Cognitive and Affective Aspects. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 28, 232-242.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information-seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361–371.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (1999). Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature. 400, 107-109.
Lazonder, A. W., Harm Biemans, J.A., & Iwan Wopereis, G. J. H. (2000). Differences between Novice and Experienced Users in Searching Information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(6), 580.
Liang, T. P., Shaw, J. P., & Wei, C. P. (1999). A Framework for Managing Web Information: Current Research and Future Direction. Proceeding of the 32th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Maichionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in the electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University.
Matlin, M. W. (1998). Cognition (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognition approach. Boston Company.
Moran, G., Dumas, J. E., & Symons, D. K. (1992). Approaches to sequential analysis and the description of contingency in behavior interaction. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 65-92.
Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
Navarro-Prieto, R., Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Cognitive strategies in Web searching. Retrieved October 3rd, 2006 from Web site: http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/proceedings/navarro-prieto/index.html.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26). New York: Academic Press.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press.
Rouet, J. F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with computers, 15, 409-428.
Rouet, J. F., & Tricot, A. (1996). Task and Activity Models in Hypertext Usage. In van Oostendorp, H., de Mul, S. (Eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing. (pp. 239-264). Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Schacter, J., Gregory, K., Chung, W. K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children’s Internet searching on complex problem: performance and process analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840-849.
Shenton, A. K., & Dixon, P. (2004). Issues arising from youngsters’ information-seeking behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 26, 177-200.
Shimamura, A. P. (2000). What is metacognition? The brain knows. The American Journal of Psychology, 113(1), 142-146.
Simon, H, A. (1960). The New Science of Management Decision. Harper and Brothers.
Singer, J. B., & Flavell, J. H. (1981). Development of knowledge about communication: Children’s evaluations of explicitly ambiguous messages. Child Development, 52, 1211-1215.
Solomon, P. (1993). Children's Information Retrieval Behavior: A Case Analysis of an OPAC. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 245-264.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, C. -C. (2004). Information commitments in Web-based learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 105-112.
Tsai, M. -J., & Tsai, C. -C. (2003). Information Searching Strategies in Web-Based Science Learning: The Role of Internet Self-Efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 1, 43-50.
Wampold, B. E., & Margolin, G. (1982). Nonparametric strategies to test the independence of behavioral states in sequential data. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 3, 755-765.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walgerg, H. J. (1990).What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Education Research, 84(1), 30-34.
Wellman, H. (1985). The origins of metagnition. In D. L. Forest-Pressly, G. E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller(Eds.), Metacognition, Cognition, and Human Performance (Vol1. 1-31). N.Y.: Acackmic Press.
Wersig, G. (1975). Future main trends of information systems and their implications for specialization of information personnel. Frankfurt, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Dokumentation.
Weyer, S. K. (1982). The design of a dynamic book for information search. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 87-107.
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in Information Behavior Research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 251-263.
Yussen, S. R., & Santrock, J. W. (1982). Child Development: An introduction. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.
Yuwono, B., & Lee, D. L. (1996). A World Wide Web Resource Database System. IEEE Transaction On Knowledge And Data Engineering, 8, 4, 548-554.