簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳曉春
Chen Hsiao-Chun
論文名稱: 自我決策教學方案對國小智能障礙學生的教學成效
Teaching effects of Self-Determination Programs on Elementary School Students with Mental Retardation
指導教授: 杞昭安
Chi, Chao-An
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 172
中文關鍵詞: 自我決策教學方案國小學生智能障礙教學成效
英文關鍵詞: Self-determination programs,, elementary school students, Students with mental retardation, teaching effects
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:185下載:47
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討自我決策教學方案對國小智能障礙學生自我決策能力的立即表現、維持效果及類化程度。研究方法採單一受試實驗設計的跨受試多探試設計,參與研究對象為三名智能障礙學生,包括一年級中度智能障礙女生、二年級輕度智能障礙男生及三年級中度智能障礙男生。自變項為自我決策教學方案,依變項為學生自我決策能力在「自知與獨立」、「心理賦權」、「自我調整」與「自我實現」等四方面的表現。教學實驗分為三階段進行:基線期、教學介入期及保留期,四大單元的自我決策教學方案共有三十堂課,為期十週。
      研究工具為根據教學內容所編的課程本位評量單,以學生在「我的自我決策學習小小評量」的得分蒐集基線期、介入期及保留期的量化資料,所蒐集的量化分數應用視覺分析法及C統計加以分析;以家長與教師於教學前後在「國小學童自我決策能力評定量表」評分的平均進步分數,加上訪談家長及學生蒐集教學方案實施後的質性資料,綜合評估自我決策教學方案的教學成效。
      本研究之主要發現如下:
    一、自我決策教學逐一介入研究對象的結果皆能看出明顯進步,顯示三名國小智能障礙學生的自我決策能力可立即提升。
    二、撤除教學後對學生已習得的自我決策能力具維持的效果。
    三、自我決策教學方案對國小智能障礙學生具有良好的社會效度。
    整體上顯示自我決策教學方案具有良好學習成效及類化效果。

    The primary purpose of the study was to explore the immediate, sustained and generalized effects of self-determination programs on elementary school students with mental retardation (MR). It employed the multiple probe designs of the single subject research framework. Participants consisted of three MR students, of which one was a first-grade TMR girl whereas the other two were 2nd and 3rd graders of boys with EMR and TMR respectively. While the only independent variable was self-determination programs, there were four dependent variables, involving self-awareness and independence, psychological empowerment, self-regulation and self-fulfillment. Experimental instruction came in three phases: baseline, intervention and retention involving 4 units and 30 sessions.
    The main study tool was referred to as the curriculum-based inventory, i.e., “the self-determination assessment worksheet.” Obtained data were processed in terms of visual inspection and C statistics. Major findings were as follows:
    A. Self-determination programs were offered to participants and ended up in obvious improvement of all the three participants in their self-determination power.
    B. The teaching outcome was retained after the withdrawal of intervention.
    C. Self-determination programs demonstrated acceptable social validity. Both the rating scale and interview supported the intervention outcome.
    Further discussion was addressed on the basis of the above findings and suggestions were proposed for practitioner and future researchers.

    目次 第一章 緒論 ..................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究動機 ......................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 ..................................................................... 6 第三節 名詞釋義.......................................................................................... 7 第二章 文獻探討 ........................................................................................... 11 第一節 自我決策的發展歷史與重要性 ................................................... 11 第二節 自我決策的意涵及理論 ............................................................... 15 第三節 自我決策的課程與教學 ............................................................... 25 第四節 自我決策的相關研究 ................................................................... 40 第三章 研究方法與設計 .............................................................................. 49 第一節 研究設計與架構 ........................................................................... 49 第二節 研究對象........................................................................................ 56 第三節 研究工具........................................................................................ 59 第四節 自我決策教學方案設計 ............................................................... 64 第五節 實驗研究步驟 ............................................................................... 67 第六節 資料處理與分析 ........................................................................... 70 第四章 研究結果 ......................................................................................... 75 第一節 介入階段立即表現之資料分析 .................................................. 75 第二節 保留階段之資料分析 .................................................................. 85 第三節 社會效度分析 .............................................................................. 91 第四節 綜合討論 .................................................................................... 111 第五章 結論與建議..................................................................................... 117 第一節 結論 .............................................................................................. 117 第二節 建議 .............................................................................................. 119 II 參考文獻 ....................................................................................................... 123 ㄧ、中文部份 ........................................................................................... 123 二、英文部份 ........................................................................................... 125 附錄 ............................................................................................................... 131 【附錄一】家長同意書 ........................................................................... 131 【附錄二】自我決策教學方案的教學單元與學習重點 ....................... 132 【附錄三】教學範例 ............................................................................... 134 【附錄四】專家效度 ............................................................................... 135 【附錄五】國小學童自我決策能力評定量表(教師版) ....................... 136 【附錄六】國小學童自我決策能力評定量表(家長版) ....................... 140 【附錄七】我的自我決策學習小小評量(預試) ................................... 141 【附錄八】我的自我決策學習小小評量(正式) ................................... 146 【附錄九】自我決策教學後訪談家長大綱 ........................................... 151 【附錄十】訪談家長之內容整理 ........................................................... 152 【附錄十一】自我決策教學後訪談學生大綱 ....................................... 161 【附錄十二】訪談學生自陳內容整理 ................................................... 162

    ㄧ、中文部份
    王明泉(1999):障礙學生自我決策定義與評量方式。台東特教簡訊,10,1-9。
    王明泉(2000):高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力相關影響因素及教學方案成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    王明泉(2003):高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力教學方案成效之研究。臺東師院學報,14,139-168。
    王明泉(2003):高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力相關影響因素之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報,5,47-71。
    余禮娟 (2001):身心障礙社會福利機構智能障礙就業青年自我決策之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    杜正治 (2006):單一受試研究法。台北:心理。
    李宜倫 (2005):高中職特殊教育教師自我決策教學態度之研究。屏東師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    林宏熾(1999a):身心障礙者自我擁護與自我決策之探討。特殊教育季刊,73,1-13。
    林宏熾(1999b):身心障礙者自我決策與自我擁護-障礙者社會福利與特殊教育新議題與趨勢。社會福利,140,25- 41。
    林宏熾(2003a):美國身心障礙者自我決策與轉銜實務。特殊教育季刊,88,1-15。
    林宏熾(2003b):身心障礙者生涯規劃與轉銜教育。台北:五南。
    林宏熾、丘思平、江佩珊、吳季樺、林佩蓁(2003):高職輕度智能障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。東台灣特殊教育學報,5,25-46。
    林宏熾、丘思平、江佩珊、吳季樺、林佩蓁(2004):高中職中重度多重障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,27,161-182。
    林幸台(2007):身心障礙者生涯輔導與轉銜服務。台北:心理。
    林明玉 (2006):休閒教學對國小中高功能自閉症學生的自我決策之成效。國立台南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    林玫君(2003):兒童自己作決定。台北:心理。
    徐享良(2001):身心障礙者自我決策與就業訓練服務。就業與訓練,5,3-7。
    徐享良(2004):中華適應行為量表。台北:國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系。
    教育部(1997):國民教育階段啟智學校(班)課程綱要。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(2002):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(2003):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(2008):最新修訂國民教育階段特教課程綱要。台北市:教育部。
    許銘容(2004):高職特教班教師對學生學習自我決策態度與實施現況之調查。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    陳淑慧(2005):國小輕度智能障礙學生自我決策歷程之研究。國立台中教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
    曾惠敏(2008):國中階段輕度智能障礙學生自我決策教學方案成效之研究。私立中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
    黃光雄(1997):教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
    董冀輝(2004):特殊教育學校高職部教師對智能障礙學生自我決策素養之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    劉佩嘉(2003):高中職特教班智能障礙學生自我決策之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    劉佩嘉(2004):誰才是真正的作決定者:自我決策對重度障礙者之重要性。特殊教育季刊,92,32-36。
    謝怡如(2004):國中學習障礙學生自我決策能力及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    謝怡如、李毓貞(2004):學習障礙學生自我決策能力培養之迷思與正思。特教園丁。20(2),1-5。
    謝佳妙(2008):國小中年級資源班學生自我決策能力提升之教學方案成效研究。私立中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
    魏燕河(2008):國小特教教師對身心障礙學生自我決策教學態度之研究。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。

    二、英文部份
    Abery, B. H.(1994).A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination. In M. F. Hatden & B. H. Abery(Eds.), Challenge for a service system in transition: Ensuring quality of community experience for persons with develpopmental disabilities(pp. 345-380). Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes.
    Abery, B. H., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2002). An ecological theory of self- determination: Theoretical Foundations. In M. L. Wehymeyer, B. H. Abery, D. E. Mithaug, L. E. Powers, & R. J. Stancliffe (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp.25-42). Springfield. IL: Charles C. Thomas.
    Abery, B. H., & Stancliffe, R. J. (1996).The ecology of self-determination. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 111-145). ML, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2005). Introduction to special issue: Self-determination reexamined are people with severe disabilities any more self-determined Introduction to the special issue on self-determination: How far have we come? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 105-107.

    Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
    Deci, E. L., Connel, J. P.,& Ryan, M. R. (1989). Self-Determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology,74(4), 580-590.
    Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A, Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-70). Hillsdle, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), 159-169.
    Field, S., & Hoffman, A.(1995).Promoting self-determination through effective curriculum development. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(3), 134-141.
    Field, S., Hoffman, A., & Spezia, S. (1998). Self-determination strategies for adolescents in transition. Texas: PRO-ED.
    Field, S., Martin J., Miller R., Ward M., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on career development and transition.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113-128.
    Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (2002). Lessons learned from implementing the steps to self-determination curriculm. Remedial and Special Education, 23(2), 90-98.
    Hoffman, A., & Field, S. (1995). Promoting self-determination through effective curriculum development. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 134-141.
    Holverstott, J. (2005). Promote Self-Determination in Students. Intervention in School and Clinic,41(1),39-41.
    Leggett, N. M., & Bates, P. (1996).Recommendations for Enabling and Enhancing Self-Determination During the Transition Planning Process. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(4), 251-253.
    Martin, J. E., & Marshall, L. H. (1995). Choice Maker:A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 147-156.
    Martin, J. E., Marshall, L. H., & Pry, R. L. D. (2001). Participatory decision-making: innovative practices that increase student self-determination. In R. W. Flexer, T. J. Simmons, P. Luft & R. M. Baer (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 304-332). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Malian, I., & Nevin, A. (2002). A review of self-determination literature: Implications for practitioners. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 68-74.
    Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Soresi, S., & Wehmeyer, M., L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(2), 850-865.
    Serna, L. A., Nielsen, M. E., & Forness, S. R.(2006). Social Skills in Pictures, Stories, and songs. Retrieved 2009.3.15. from
    http://www.researchpress.com/product/item/5278/
    Ward, M. J. (1988). The many facets of self-determination. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Handicaps: Transition summary, 5, 2-3.
    Ward, M. J., & Kohler, P. D. (1996). Teaching self-determination: Content and process. In L. E. Powers, G. H. S. Singer & J. Sowers (Eds.), Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities: On the road to autonomy (pp.275-322). Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes.
    Ward, M.J. & Kohler, P.D. (1996). Promoting self-determination for individuals with disabilities: Content and process. In L.E. Powers, G.H.S. Singer, & J. Sowers (Eds.), Making our way: Building self-competence among children with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., & Kelchner, K. (1995). The Arc’s self-determination scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior in individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100 (6 ), 632-642.
    Wehmeyer, M. L. (1997). Self Determination as an educational outcome: a definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developemental and Phsyical Disabilities, 9, 175-209.
    Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(1), 5-16.
    Wehmeyer M. L., Agran, M., & Hunges, C. (1998). Teaching self-determination for students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination : Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53-64.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2003). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skill for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(5), 371-383.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., Field, S., Doren, B., Jones, B., & Mason, C. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 413-425.
    Wehmeyer, M. L. & Palmer, S. B. (2002).The Self-determined Learning Model of Instruction for Early Elementary-Age Stubents. Final Report.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., & Schwartz, M. (1998).The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 3-12.
    Wehmeyer, M. L., & Field, S.L. (2007). Teacher-Directed instructional strategies. Self-determination : instructional and assessment strategies. 22-24, 78 & 87. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
    Wolman, J. M., Campeau, P. L., Dubois, P. A., Mithaug, D. E., & Stolarski, V. S. (1994). AIR Self- determination Scales and User Guide.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE