本研究運用社會網路分析方法，分析台北縣國中資訊組長的知識獲得網路和他們之間的友誼網路，本研究分析了台北縣五十八位國中資訊組長，使用UCINET6進行資料分析，研究得到以下的結果：(1)資訊組長之硬體知識獲得網路都較其他知識獲得網路大密集高，顯示資訊組長工作上遇到硬體問題時，有較多資訊組長會給予協助。(2)資訊組長之友誼網路的大小、密度和相互性三者都大於知識獲得網路的大小、密度、相互性，顯示資訊組長在友誼網路中的互動較頻繁，也較緊密。(3)資訊組長在硬體、軟體、網路、採購和數位教材的知識獲得網路與友誼網路的相關性高，顯示資訊組長的友誼與知識獲得兩者有密切關係。(4)資訊組長的年資與知識獲得網路和友誼網路的大小、向內程度中心性、向內接近中心性等面向有顯著的相關。(5)研習次數與知識獲得網路和友誼網路的相關不顯著。未來研究可針對中介者、結構洞進行較細膩的分析。

This thesis analyzed the knowledge acquiring and friendship networks of technology coordinators at junior high schools in Taipei County using social network analysis. Data was collected from fivety-eight technology coordinators at junior high schools in Taipei County. Data were analyzed by UCINET6 software.The following findings were revealed from the social network data. (1) the size and density of hardware knowledge acquiring network are larger than other knowledge acquiring networks. These result indicated that school technology coordinators can get some help when they encounter hardware problems (2) the size, density, and reciprocity of friendship network are larger than those in knowledge acquiring networks. These results indicated that school technology coordinators interact more and tighter in friendship network. (3) the correlation between knowledge acquiring network and friendship network is significant. (4) the seniority (years as coordinators) of school technology coordinators has significant associations with the size, in-degree centrality and out-degree centrality of knowledge acquiring network and friendship network. (5) the frequency of inservice-training has not significant relationship with knowledge acquiring network and friendship network.
Future research might focus on brokages and structural holes to identify key actors and related factors.

中文部分

王上元（2004）。開放源碼團隊溝通結構與團隊績效。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

王儒彬（2005）。台北市高中職資訊業務人員資訊技術能力自我評估與課程需求之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。

李毓聖（2007）。台北市國民小學資訊組長與系統管理師電腦之能之調查研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。

林義凱（2005）。國民小學資訊組長角色壓力與工作滿意度關係之研究。國立台南大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。

林佳瑩、蔡毓智（2006）。臺北地區小學教育資源分佈結構地位之探討－社會網路結構地位分析之應用。教育與社會研究，11，71-106。

邱議德（2003）。以社會網路分析法評估工作團隊知識創造與分享。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

徐慧成 (2003)。利用網頁資訊建構多階層指導教授與研究生之網絡關係。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

徐振豐（2003）。國民中小學資訊組長資訊能力及相關因素探討以台中縣為例。彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。

高銓鴻（2005）。應用結構洞與小世界理論分析供應鍊資訊流通性之研究。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

陳俊宏 (2002)。建構專業虛擬社群內團隊之社會網絡分析系統。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

陳榮德（2004）。組織內部社會網絡的行程與影響：社會資本觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。

張火燦、劉淑寧 (2002)。從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報，101-113。

康瑜芳 (2007)。國中資訊組長之社會網路分析。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。

溫文正（2007）。高雄縣國小資訊教師工作滿意度與離職傾向之研究。國立台南大學科技發展與傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。

詹智傑（2001）。國中資訊組長工作現況調查。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。

劉曉約（2001）。台灣地區國民中小學校園網路管理現況之調查研究。長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。

劉守喬（2004）。國中小資訊負責人角色扮演、角色壓力與工作滿意之相關研究。國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。

鄭尹茹 (2004)。線上與線下世界的交錯：校園線上學習的社會網絡分析。資訊社會研究，8，155-192。

蕭淑珍（2006）。國中資訊組長工作壓力與組織承諾關係之研究－以桃竹苗地區為例。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北。

羅家德、葉冠伶 (2003)。從社會網絡的觀點看組織的知識管理-以組織團隊的角度分析。電子商務與數位生活研討。11-12，2005-2023。

羅家德 (2005)。清華社會學講義-社會網路分析講義。社會科學文獻出版社。

英文部分

Borgatti, S.P., “What Is Social Network Analysis?” 1998,
http://www.analytictech.com/networks/whatis.htm.

Burt R.(1992)Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 313 pages.

Carmichael, P., Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R. & Honour, L., “Teachers’networks in and out of school,” Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 2006, 217-234.

Constant, D. and Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice,” Organization Science,
7(2), March 1996, 119-135.

Ehrich, L. C. (1994) Mentoring and networking for women educators. Women in Management Review,9(3), 4–11.

Evans-Andris. M. (1995). Barrier to computer integration: Microinteraction among computer coordinators and classroom teachers in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (1), 29-45.

Freeman, L. C. (1979).”Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification” Social Networks 1, 215-239.

Garton, L., Haythornthwaite C., and Wellman, B. “Studying Online Social Networks”, Journal of Comupter-Mediated Communication, 3(1), June 1997.

Granovetter, M.S., “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78, 1973, 1360-1380.

Hancock, V. E. (1990, March). Promoting secondary computer use? A coordinator is the key. Paper presented at the International Conference on Technology and Education, Brussels, Belgium.

Hanneman, R., Introduction to Social Network, 1998, Available:http://wizard.ucr.edu/~rhannema/networks/nettext.pdf.

Hanneman & Mark (2005). From:http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/

Haythornthwaite, C., “Online Personal Network: Size, Composition and Media Use Among Distance Leaners,” New Media and Society, 1996.

Hite, J. M.,Willams, E. J. & Baugh, S.C.,”Multiple networks of Public School Administrators: An Analysis of Network Content and Structure,” Leadereship in Education, 8(2), 2005, 91-122.

Kautz, H. and Selman, B. and Shah, M., ”The Hidden Web,” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Summer 1997,27-35.

Lai, K. W., Trewern, A., & Pratt, K. (2002). Computer coordinators as change agents: Some New Zealand observations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 539-551.

Lynch, W., Hobbs, B. & Hollanders, H. (1999). Dancing on quicksand: the role of the ICT coordinator in the primary school. Research in Educatioon, 62, 32-40.

Marcovitz, D. M. (2000). The roles of computer coordinators in supporting technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 259-273.

Marsden, P. and Campbell, K.E., “Measuring Tie Strength,” Social Forces, 63, 1984,482-501.

Moallem, M., & Micallef, S. (1997). Instructional technologists at public schools: A study of the role and effectiveness of technology resource teachers. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations. Albuquerque, NM: National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 856)

Mullen, C. A. and Kochan, F. K. (2000) Creating a collaborative leadership network: An organic view of change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 183–200.

Nooy W. D., Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. (2004). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press.

Pattison, P., Algebraic Models for Social Networks, Cambridge University Press,1993.

Penuel, W. R., Sussex, W., Korbak, C. & Hoadley, C., “Investigating the Potential of Using Social Networrk Analysis in Educational Evaluation,” American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 2006, 437.

Ronnkvist, A., Dexter, S., & Anderson, R. (2000, June 22). Technology support: Its depth, breadth, and impact on America''''s schools: Teaching, learning, and computing 1998 survey, report # 5. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information, Technology, and Organizations at University of California, Irvine and the University of Minnesota. [On-line].Available:http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/technology-support/ (June 28, 2002)

Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.

Strudler, N.B. (1996). The role of school-based technology coordinators as change agents in elementary school program: A follow-up study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(2), 234-257.

Strudler, N., Falba, C., Hearrington, D. (2001). The evolving role of school-based technology coordinators in elementary programs. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, IL. [On-line]. Available:http://confreg.uoregon.edu/necc2001/program/research_pdf/Strudler.pdf (June 28, 2002)

Tuire, P. & Erno, L. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.
UCINET. http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/ucinet.htm

Wellman, B., “For a Social Network Analysis of Computer Networks: A Sociological Perspective on Collaborative Work and Virtual Community,” ACM, 1996.

Wellman, B., “Which Types of Ties and Networks Provide What Kinds of Social Support,” Advances in Group Processes, Volume 9, 1992, 207-235.

Wellman, B. and Wortley, S., “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support,” American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 1990, 558-588.

Wellman, B. and Carrington, P. and Hall, P., “Networks as Personal Communities,” In Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1988,
130-184.

Wiseman, J., “Friendship: Bonds and Binds in Voluntary Relationship,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1990, 191-212.

Wohlstetter, P. and Smith, A. K. (2000) A different approach to systemic reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 508–515.