研究生: |
劉家鴻 Chia-Hong Liu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
團隊運作對團隊工作態度影響之研究--以台北市政府為例 A study on the Influence of Team Process on Employee’s Teamwork Attitude--- A case of Taipei City Government |
指導教授: |
方崇雄
Fang, Chung-Hsiung |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 141 |
中文關鍵詞: | 團隊 、團隊運作 、工作態度 、工作滿足 、組織承諾 、工作投入 |
英文關鍵詞: | Teamwork, job attitude |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:192 下載:48 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究的主要目的,在於探討團隊運作對團隊工作態度的影響,並調查瞭解台北市政府內團隊運作的情形及員工對團隊所抱持的工作態度情形,據以提出結論與建議,以供台北市政府運用團隊時之參考。根據文獻探討的結果,自編問卷,並經多位市府同仁「試填」及專家修訂,以台北市政府人事處編印「中華民國八十九年四月台北市府暨所屬各機關學校職員錄」之市府一級單位之科長、股長、組長、課長、科員、組員、技士、工程員、課員為抽樣對象,進行問卷調查法之研究。所得資料經統計方法分析,綜合歸納為以下結論:
一、 台北市政府內團隊運作的情形,整體來看表現尚可,顯示大部分的員工對團隊運作已有一定程度的認知,也具備一定的技巧,但未達運作良好的程度。
二、 台北市政府內員工對團隊的工作滿足程度,在工具性滿足與社會性滿足上,滿意度尚可,顯示大部分員工在參與團隊工作時,對所達到的團隊目標及成員間的互動關係尚稱滿意。但在利己性滿足上,滿意度表現平平,顯示對參與團隊工作所能獲得的個人欲求的利益,不予置評。
三、 台北市政府內員工對團隊的組織承諾與工作投入情形,整體表現尚可,顯示大部分員工在參與團隊工作時,對團隊有相當的認同感且會積極的投入團隊工作。
四、 台北市政府內員工的基本特性對團隊的工作態度有顯著的差異性存在,顯示不同屬性的員工對團隊工作有著不同的認知與行為表現。
五、 團隊運作對團隊工作態度有一定之影響,且運作愈好,則成員的工作滿足感、組織承諾及工作投入程度愈高。就台北市政府內的團隊運作而言,以團隊領導、團隊決策、授與權能與團隊目標等五項因素,對員工的團隊工作態度具有顯著性的影響。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of team process on employee’s teamwork attitude and to understand the performance of team process and employee’s teamwork attitude in Taipei City Government. From 800 mailed questionnaire collected from employees of Taipei City Government, 309 were completed and used to draw the following conclusions:
1. In general, team process has been actively practiced in many projects in Taipei City Government indicating that most of staffs remain certain level knowledge and skill of team process. Nevertheless, most people feel that it still has a lot of room to improve the current situation.
2. Although most of people feel that instrumental and social satisfactions are acceptable, they have little comment on egocentric satisfaction.
3. The organizationl commitment and job involvement are satisfied. This suggests that not only are most of people able to identify themselves as part of team, but also willing to devote themselves to the teamwork.
4. In Taipei City Government, individual background including age, gender, education, seniority, experience, and job position can prominently affect team attitude. This represents that people who have different background would have distinct acknowledgment and behave differently in teamwork.
5. Team process influences teamwork attitude. The more effective team process, the better job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. In this study, it reveals that unified commitment, a strong leader, common consensus decision, empowered and clear team goal are the key factors, which would influence teamwork attitude.
一、 中文部分:
周文祥等譯(民87),巨變時代的管理,中天出版社。
施貞夙譯(民87),經營優質團隊,中國生產力中心。
李青芬等譯(民84),組織行為學,華泰書局。
思穎譯(民85),追求卓越的團隊趨勢,業強出版社。
羅耀宗譯(1997),一分鐘最佳團隊,聯經出版事業公司。
齊若蘭譯(1995),團隊出擊,天下遠見出版公司。
譚家瑜譯(民84),卓越領導,遠流出版公司。
葛中俊譯(民85),團隊工作的原理,業強出版社。
吳玫瑛等譯(民85),團隊EQ,美商麥格羅˙希爾公司台
灣分公司。
張沛元譯(民87),領導團隊,晨星出版社。
李根芳譯(民86),無上司企業,遠流出版公司。
楊美齡譯(1997),組織遊戲,天下文化出版公司。
紀晶晶譯(1998),優質團隊365,中國生產力中心。
郭生玉(民86),心理與教育研究法,精華書局。
陳靜怡譯(民86),組織行為,台灣西書出版社。
孫本初(民84),學習型組織的內涵與運用,空大行政學報
第三期,P4-5。
孫本初等(民85),從分析單元論團隊的意義及對公共管理
之影響,國立政治大學學報,第73集下卷,145-177。
李弘暉(1997),團隊領導第一章—認清團隊的本質,能力
雜誌。
李弘暉(1997),高績效團隊管理的理論基礎—團隊理論模
型綜述,中國行政評論,第六卷第四期,p87-104。
黃同圳(1997),組織承諾影響因素之跨層次分析—兼論人
力資源管理之意涵,Business Review,p19-38.
陳孟修等(民89),團隊特性與工作價值觀對員工的組織承
諾及工作投入的影響之研究,商學學報,第八期,201-239。
楊俊雄(民82),組織變革策略-團隊建立技術之研究,國
立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
張瑞春(1998),組織便格中組織氣候對工作投入、組織承
諾及工作滿足影響之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研
究所碩士論文。
宋清華(1992),女性員工離職意願之研究—以楠梓加工出
口區為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
廖華立(1998),創新團隊能力、工作滿足、組織承諾與創
新績效的關係,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
蕭煥鏘(民88),領導型態、工作特性與我國地方機關人事
人員工作滿足、組織承諾關係之研究,國立中山大學人力
資源管理研究所碩士論文。
紀炳煌(民88),企業印進外勞對本國員工工作滿足、組織
承諾之探討,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
二、西文部分:
Becker,H.S.(1960), Notes On The Concept of Commitment.
American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-43.
Birnbaum, M. H.(1992), Issues in Utility Measurement,
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
52,3, 319-330.
Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Lawler, E.E., & Weick, K.E.
(1970), Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness,
New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Cyert, R.M. and March, J. G.(1963), Behavioral Theory of the
Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Dubin, R.(1956), Industrial workers worlds: A study of the
"central life interests " of industrial workers, Social
Problems.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen,(1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention
and Behavior, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publisher.
Gladstein, D. L.(1984),Groups in Context:A Model of Task
Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 29:
499-517.
Granovetter, M.(1985), Economic Action and Social Structure:
The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology,
91, 481-510.
Hackman, J. R.(1983), A Normative Model of Work Team
Effectiveness, New Haven, CT:Yale University。
Hackman, J. R.(1990), Groups That Work(and Those That
Don't):Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. San
Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Heider, F.,(1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations,
New York:Wiley.
Kanter,R.M.(1968),Commitment and Social Organization: A
Study of Commintment Mechanisms In Utopian Communities.
American Sociological Review, 33, 499-517.
Kanungo,R.N. (1982), Measurement of Job and Work Involvement ,
Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.67. No.3,341-349.
Katzenbach, J. R. And Smith, D. K.(1991), The Discipline
of Team, Harvard Business Review March/April:111-120。
Katzenbach, J. R. And Smith, D. K.(1993), The Wisdom of
Teams:Creating the High-performance Organization, New York:
Harper Collins。
Keller,R.T.(1997), Job Involvement and Organizational
Commitment as Longitudinal Predictor of Job Performance, A
Study of Scientists and Engineers, Journal of Applied
Psychology, vol.82, No.4, 539-545.
Kerr, J. L.(1985), Diversification Strategies and Managerial
Rewards:An Empirical Study, Academy of Management Journal,
28, 1, 155-179.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W.(1970). Determing Sample Size
for Research activities. Edcational and Psycological
Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lawler, E.E. and D.T. Hall(1970), Relationship of Job
Characteristics to Job Involvement Statisfaction and
Intrinsic Motivation, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.54,
No.4,305-312.
Leonard-Barton, D.(1992), Core Capabilities and Core
Rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development,
Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
Lewis, J. P.(1993), How to Build and Manage a Winning
Project Team, New York, NY:American Management Association。
Lee G. Bolman & Terrence E. Deal(1995), What Makes a Team
Work?, Organization Dynamics, Summer, 34- 44。
Levitt, B., and March, J.G.(1988), Organizational Learning,
Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
Lodahl, T.M. and M. Kejner(1965), The Definition and
Measurement of Job Involvement, Journal of Applied
Psychology, vol49, 24-33.
March, J.G., and Simon, H. A.(1958), Organizations, New York:
Wiley.
Marsh, M.R., & Mannari, H.(1977), Organizational Commitment
and Turnover: A Prediction study, Administrative Science
Quarterly, 22, 57-75.
Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M.(1990), A Review and Meta-
Analysis of The Antecedent, Correlates, and Consequences of
Organizational Commitment, Journal of applies Psychology,
108,171-194.
McGregor, D.(1960), The Human Side of Enterprise, N. Y.:
McGraw-Hill, Co.。
McFletcher, D.(1996), Teaming by Design:Real Teams for
Real People, Chicago, IL:Irwin Professional Publishing。
McGrath, J. E.(1964), Social Psychology:A Brief
Introduction. New York, NY:Holt。
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J.(1991), A Three-Component
Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human
Resource Management Review, 1, 61-98.
Mowday, R.T., Poter, L.W. &Steer, R.M.(1982), Employee
Organization Linkages:The Psychology of Commitment,
Absenteeism, and Turnover, New York:Academic Press.
Nerkar, A.A., McGrath, R.G., and MacMillan, I.C.(1996), Three
Facets nof Satisfaction and their Influence on the Performance
of Innovation Teams, Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 167-
188.
Poter, L., Steers, R., & Boulian, P.(1974), Organizational
Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric
Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology,59, 603-609.
Robinowitz, S. and D.T. Hall(1977), Organizational Research
On Job Involvement, Psychological Bulletin, vol.84, No2,
265-288.
Salas, E. et al.(1992), Toward an Understanding of Team
Performance and Training, in R. W. Swezey and E. Salas eds.
Teams:Their Training and Performance. Norwood, NJ:Ablex
Publishing Corporation,.3-29。
Sheldon, M.E.(1971), Investment and Involvement As Mechanisms
Producing Commitment to The Organization. Administrative
Science Quarterly,16, 143-150.
Shonk, James H.(1982), Working in Teams:A Practical Manual
for Improving Work Groups. New York:AMACOM.
Simon, H.A.(1976), Administrament Behavior. N.Y.: Mcmillan
Publishing Co. Inc., 368-371.
Simth, P.C., Kendall, L.M.,& Hulin, C.L.(1969), The
Measurement of Satisfaction in Work & Retirement, Chicago:
Rand McNally.
Steer, R. M.(1977), Antecedents and Outcome of Organization
Commitment, Administrative science quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Stevens, J.M., Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M.(1978), Assessing
Personal, Role, and Organizational Predictors of Managerial
Commitment, Academy of Management Journal, 21, 380-396.
Vroom, V.H.(1964), Work and Motivation, New York: John
Wiley & Sons Inc.,99.
Wiener, Y.(1982), Relationships between Job,Organizational,and
Creer Commitment and Work Outcome:An Integrative Approach,
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,26, 81-96.
Yeager, James F.(1994), Shaping the Culture:Organizational
Development through Team Building.。