本研究採行動研究的方式進行高中體育教師跨校專業學習社群的探討，研究目的在於了解社群運作的歷程，並分析社群運作時所遇的困難，討論社群採取的解決策略，最後則分析社群成員感知，提出建議以提供未來體育教育工作者建立跨校體育專業學習社群與研究的參考。本研究歷程可分為三個期程，運作前期為初步建構期，為社群成員共同擬定及修正專業成長活動的規則，並嘗試運作；運作中期則是磨合調整期，修正上期的運作方式，加入其他專業成長的活動，並以凝聚社群成員向心力為最大目標；運作後期則為穩定發展期，成員間已熟悉社群專業成長活動的進行，此期並加入了外部專家資源，提升社群協助教師專業成長的功用。本研究所得結論為：一、本研究歷程可分初步建構期、磨合調整期及穩定發展期等三大期程；二、社群遇到的困難及策略可分為運作方式及運作技術方面；三、社群成員感知分析可分為專業成長、社群運作、外部專家、跨校背景等四大部份。本研究建議如下：一、以同質性、異質性、互補性的成員背景考量成立社群；二、術科練習目標及方式應考量教師根本需求及教師地域性而進行；三、社群運作從教學問題解決導向討論開始；四、社群活動主題發展除了依據個人需求外，可考慮納入當前推動的教育政策；五、師培專家及實習輔導老師為社群良好的外部專家參考資源；六、與校內同事建立情感，以普遍推廣教師專業學習社群。

The research used the action research approach to investigate how high school physical education teachers worked through interdistrict professional learning community. The purpose was try to identify the operation of the community, community content, analyze the difficulties they met, the problem solving strategies they adopted, and to analyze the perception of the community members during the study. The process was divided into three phase including “The initial operation of pre-construction period” for members to formulate and revise the rules of professional development activities, and trying to operate the activities; “The intermediate operation of adjustment period“ prompt members to correct the operation method of the former period. The other professional development activities were added, and the members were trying to unite the centripetal force of all. During “the later operation of stable development period”, members were familiar with the professional development activities. In this period, the external expert and resources were joined to promote the function of teachers' professional growth in the community. The conclusions were as follows: 1. the developmental process was comprised to 3 periods: the initial construction, the intermediate adjustment, and stable development; 2. the difficulties that the community encountered with the problem solving strategies could be separated into operational methods and operational techniques; and 3. the analysis of community member perception were professional development, community functioning, external experts, interdistrict background. The suggestions were as follows: 1. to establish the community under homogeneity, heterogeneity, and complementary background considerations; 2.to considered the fundamental needs and the regional differences of the teachers correspond to the objectives and methods of technical subject exercises; 3. to start from the teaching problem-solving discussion in order to make the community in good operation; 4. to the current educational policies; 5. to invite teacher training experts and mentors to the community; and finally to establish the good relationship with school colleagues.

中文部分
丁一顧、張德銳 (2009)。校本教學輔導制度推動模式之建構研究－以臺北市教學輔導教師制度為例。載於李子建、張善培 (主編) ，優化課堂教學：教師發展、伙伴協作與專業學習共同體 (頁302-340) 。中國北京：人民教育出版社。
丁一顧 (2011) 。淺談中小學教師夥伴合作學習。教師天地，175，38-43。
王文科 (1995) 。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
王為國 (2007) 。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究，2 (2) ，41-63。
王為國 (2010) 。師資生參與實務社群之研究：以「幼稚園課程設計」科目為例。教育理論與實踐學刊，22，2-29。
行政院 (2012，10月11日) 。行政院院會通過「教師法」修正草案。2013年1月17日取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=F8BAEBE9491FC830&sms=99606AC2FCD53A3A&s=F1838CAD76CC1343。
朱巖清 (2010) 。國民中小學體育教師評鑑方式及政策的檢討。屏東教大體育，13，155-163。
李子建 (2006) 。前言：教師領導、專業學習社群和夥伴協作。基礎教育學報，15 (2)，1-38。
李俊湖 (2004) 。九年一貫課程與教師專業發展策略。教育部學習加油站─台北市教育入口網。臺北市，臺北市教育局。
李淑凌、馮麗花 (2004) 。體育教師專業成長之探討。大專體育，74，121-129。
李瑞光 (2012) 。從買方市場談教師專業學習社群的發展。師友月刊，539，44-47。
林劭仁 (2006) 。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究，5(2) ，79-111。
林明地 (2001) 。學校行政如何協助教師成長與發展。教師天地，115，14-19。
林思伶、蔡進雄 (2005) 。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究月刊，132，99-109。
林瑞昌 (2006) 。以專業社群概念內涵為核心的教師專業發展策略。載於歐用生(主編) ，熱情卓越新典範 (頁67-76) 。臺北市：國立臺北教育大學。
周麗華 (2010，11月) 。教師專業學習社群的發展與實踐—以臺北市民生國小為例。第九屆教育經營與管理學術研討會，臺南市。
孫志麟 (2010) 。專業學習社群：促進教師專業發展的平台。學校行政雙月刊，69，138-158。
高秋娟 (2012) 。Facebook與教師專業發展。師友月刊，541，48-50。
高博銓 (2009) 。學校教師學習社群發展的個案研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，2 (1)，61-74。
教育部 (2009) 。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊 (再版) 。台北市：教育部。
張素娟 (2012) 。由雁行理論談教師專業學習社群。臺灣教育評論月刊，1 (7)，55-56。
張淑宜、辛俊德 (2011) 。學習社群與教師專業表現關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報，25 (1)，83-103。
張景媛、鄭章華、范德鑫、林靜君 (2012) 。「教師學習社群」發展對話式形成性評量實務及其對學習成效之影響。教育心理學報，43 (3)，717- 734
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅 (2010) 。中小學教師專業學習社群—同路偕行、攜手合作、關注學習、師生雙贏。教師天地，169，20-26。
許義雄 (1998) 。體育教師專業發展。載於許義雄 (主編) ，運動教育與人文關懷 (下) (頁245-254) 。臺北市：師大書苑。
張德銳、王淑珍 (2010) 。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報，41 (1)，61-90。
張德銳、郭淑芳 (2011) 。我國中小學教師專業發展實務與研究的問題與展望。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，4 (2)，21-44。
黃永和 (2005) 。教學文化的概念探討。課程與教學季刊，8 (3)，27-40。
程瑞福 (2000) 。台灣地區中小學體育教師專業能力之研究。體育學報，28 ， 123-132。
歐用生 (1996) 。教師專業成長。臺北市：師大書苑。
歐用生 (2012) 。日本中小學「單元教學研究」分析。教育資料集刊，54，121-147。
楊振富 (譯) (2002) 。學習型學校：第五項修練教育篇：獻給教育工作者、父母以及關心教育的每個人 (上) (下)。臺北市：天下文化。 ( Senge et al., 2000)
葉憲清 (2000) 。二十一世紀理想的學校體育教師形象。國民體育季刊，29 (1)，4-11。
劉祐彰 (2008) 。國民中小學實施試辦教師專業發展評鑑計畫可能面臨的困境與可行途徑。教育學術彙刊，2 (1)，81-103。
劉惠玲 (2002) 。從教師彰權益能角度談教學研究會的發展。學校行政雙月刊，17，58-63。
蔡清田 (2000) 。教育行動研究。臺北市：五南。
簡紅珠 (2007) 。教師專業發展與教學改善：借鏡日本小學教師的學課研究。教育研究月刊，158，130-140。
顧瑜君 (2002) 。實踐取向之教師專業成長～在職教師進修模式之變革之解析。課程與教學，5 (4)，1 -17。
饒見維 (2003) 。教師專業發展：理論與實務。臺北市：五南。
甄曉蘭 (1995) 。合作行動研究─進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。
甄曉蘭 (2003) 。課程行動研究─實例與方法解析。臺北市：師大書苑。
英文部分
Anderson, W. G. (1989). Analysis of teaching physical education. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R., (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Haslam, M. B. (2008). Maryland teacher professional development evatuation guide. Retrieved from http://www.mdk12.org/share/pdf/MarylandTeacherProfessionalDevelopmentEvaluationGuide.pdf
Hill, J. R. (1997). Web-based learning environments: Guidelines for development and implementation. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 2(3), 36–43
Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., & Pankake, A. M. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9 (2), 173-195.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Katz, L. G. (1972). Developmental stages of preschool teachers. Elementary School Journal, 73 (1), 50-54.
Lave,J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2 (1), 34-36.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement？The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35 (3), 3-14.
Patton, K., Pagnagno, L., Griffin, L. L., Dodds, P., Sheehy, D., Arnold, R. Henninger, M. L., Gallo, A. M., & James, A. (2005). Chapter 2: Navigating the mentoring process in a research-based teacher development project: A situated learning perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 302-325.
Pink, W. T. (1992). A School-Within-A-School for at-risk youth: Staff development and program success. In W. T. Pin,, & A. A. Hyde (Eds.), Effective staff development for school change. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Corporation..
Roberts, M. S., & Pruitt Z. E. (2003). School as professional learning communities :Collaborative & activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press Inc.
Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday Cognition : Its Development in Social Context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community,and personal meaning in our schools. California, SFO: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2002). Leadership: What's in it for schools? New York: Routledge.
Stanford, R. L., Banaszak, R. A., McClelland, S. M., Rountree, B. S., & Wilson, E. K. (1994). Empowering cooperating teachers: The University of Alabama clinical master teacher (CMT) program. Paper present at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Atlanta, GA.
Stroot, SA., & Whipple, CE. (2003). Organizational socialization: Factors affecting beginning teachers. In S. J. Silverman, & C. D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 311-328). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated action : The problem of human-machine communication. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strenghening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32, 328-369.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing Knowledge. Massachusetts, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger , E., & Snyder, W. M. (2001). Cultivating communities of practice. Massachusetts, Boston: Haven Business School Press.